Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Second Runway At Gatwick Airport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33697124)

thenry 20-03-2014 12:49

Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
I just got a letter or leaflet...

Gatwick runway Consultation...

http://www.gatwickairport.com/consultation/

Quote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-26613812

Gatwick runway options

All runways would be 3.4km (2.1 miles) long:
  • Option 1 - New runway 585m south of the existing runway, with one runway used for landings and the other used for take-offs
  • Option 2 - New runway 1,045m south of the existing runway, with one runway used for landings and the other used for take-offs, and a new terminal between the runways
  • Option 3 - Same as Option 2 but with both runways used for landings and take-offs

this was on the news ealrier this month or late last month. those closest to the airport having to hear the noise will get a reduction in council tax or something.

Damien 20-03-2014 14:04

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Needs a new runaway. I believe it's the most used single runway in the world or something like that. Gatwick is probably London's second biggest airport and it actually surprised me to find out there is one runway yet two terminals.

richard s 20-03-2014 14:27

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Might well need the second runway as there is a bit of bad news coming to a Kent airport Manston again!!!

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...lans-jobs-risk

Manston has the 4th longest runway in the UK.

Hom3r 20-03-2014 21:01

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35681854)
Needs a new runaway. I believe it's the most used single runway in the world or something like that. Gatwick is probably London's second biggest airport and it actually surprised me to find out there is one runway yet two terminals.

Not really one could be local and short haul, while the other could be for long haul

Hom3r 20-03-2014 23:31

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
What annoys me about extra runways is the NIMBYs who've only been there a few years, personally anybody who has lived nearby for less than 30 years should be told sorry you moved near the airport, tough no say.

The company I worked for near Stansted moved away when they shelved plans for a 2nd runway making 91 Brits unemployed.

Damien 20-03-2014 23:36

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
One good thing about Gatwick: No charge for dropping people off or picking them up!

---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:36 ----------

Even the short stay parking is reasonable if you're only gone for under a week.

thenry 26-03-2014 13:46

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
This is something that clearly needs to be done so I'd like to see a new terminal etc. they might as well do it properly if it does go ahead. I am though a bit confused on option 2 & 3.

Option 2 - one runway used for landings and the other for take-offs.

Option 3 - both runways used for landings and take-offs.

which would be better?

Damien 26-03-2014 15:33

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35683418)
This is something that clearly needs to be done so I'd like to see a new terminal etc. they might as well do it properly if it does go ahead. I am though a bit confused on option 2 & 3.

Option 2 - one runway used for landings and the other for take-offs.

Option 3 - both runways used for landings and take-offs.

which would be better?

No idea. That sounds like a technical question for those well-versed in air traffic control and airport management.

thenry 26-07-2014 01:57

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Gatwick Airport has announced £256m of funding for local jobs, housing and apprenticeships if a second runway is given the go-ahead.

m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-28450567
more will no doubt be squeezed out. the runway has to happen though.

beeman 26-07-2014 18:43

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35683418)
This is something that clearly needs to be done so I'd like to see a new terminal etc. they might as well do it properly if it does go ahead. I am though a bit confused on option 2 & 3.

Option 2 - one runway used for landings and the other for take-offs.

Option 3 - both runways used for landings and take-offs.

which would be better?

If i remember rightly from the row over Heathrow about mixed mod ops (what option 3 is talking about). Using 1 runway for landing and 1 for take off means less local noise pollution BUT reduces the capacity of the runways.

Damien 26-07-2014 20:06

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Since it's not my money we'll be spending I am in favour of a new airport to the East. Boris Island basically. It makes sense to me to build a state of the art airport designed to handle multiple runways and terminals rather than stick them onto airports which were never designed to handle the load they have to handle.

Uncle Peter 26-07-2014 20:09

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Can the London TMA and Eurocontrol handle any more traffic though? That's the question. Surely that would have a bearing on how much more capacity an additional runway can add.

Qtx 26-07-2014 20:49

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35681836)
this was on the news ealrier this month or late last month. those closest to the airport having to hear the noise will get a reduction in council tax or something.

The noise can still be bad for people at least 15 miles from Heathrow or Gatwick due to the altitude. They often have to stack and circle the places before landing too so maybe those in that path should be considered for council tax reductions too.

thenry 26-07-2014 21:01

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Thats the only thing we know for sure.. more money will have to be put on the table.

jb66 27-07-2014 00:51

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Why are residents getting a vote? Surely there are people trained to make the best decision

thenry 27-07-2014 01:38

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Democracy. Incompetence.

beeman 27-07-2014 09:48

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 35717647)
The noise can still be bad for people at least 15 miles from Heathrow or Gatwick due to the altitude. They often have to stack and circle the places before landing too so maybe those in that path should be considered for council tax reductions too.

Extra runways at both these airports would almost totally remove the need to stack the aircraft and so would reduce the noise for people in the stack path. Infact at the moment its not unusual for arriving aircraft to have to hold for 30-60 minuites in the heathrow stack waiting for a slot to land (gatwick's not quite as bad yet but its getting there).

Quote:

Can the London TMA and Eurocontrol handle any more traffic though? That's the question. Surely that would have a bearing on how much more capacity an additional runway can add.
Extra capacity could actually reduce the amount of traffic in the air due to the reduced hold que

Uncle Peter 27-07-2014 16:51

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by beeman (Post 35717750)
Extra runways at both these airports would almost totally remove the need to stack the aircraft and so would reduce the noise for people in the stack path. Infact at the moment its not unusual for arriving aircraft to have to hold for 30-60 minuites in the heathrow stack waiting for a slot to land (gatwick's not quite as bad yet but its getting there).



Extra capacity could actually reduce the amount of traffic in the air due to the reduced hold que

Good point :tu:

Hom3r 27-07-2014 18:16

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
The biggest problem is NIMBYs, sorry but you move near an airport you have very little to say about expansion.

Only those born near an airport should have any say.

Stuart 27-07-2014 23:00

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35717827)
The biggest problem is NIMBYs, sorry but you move near an airport you have very little to say about expansion.

Only those born near an airport should have any say.


Or those who have an airport built near where they live.
Having said that, Heathrow was built in 1946, Gatwick in 1958. I shouldn't think many people living in those areas then are living in them now.

Qtx 27-07-2014 23:31

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35717827)
The biggest problem is NIMBYs, sorry but you move near an airport you have very little to say about expansion.

It's possible to move from one part of London or Surrey to another without thinking about or even noticing air traffic when you look at the place. Some don't notice until after the first night in their new place when the first big plane coming in wakes them up at around 6am in the morning once the altitude restrictions change.

There can be a huge difference in noise around the edge of a 20 mile radius, depending on where you are on the edge.

---------- Post added at 22:31 ---------- Previous post was at 22:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by beeman (Post 35717750)
Extra runways at both these airports would almost totally remove the need to stack the aircraft and so would reduce the noise for people in the stack path. Infact at the moment its not unusual for arriving aircraft to have to hold for 30-60 minuites in the heathrow stack waiting for a slot to land (gatwick's not quite as bad yet but its getting there).

In theory but over time they will probably add so many more flights that the gains are nullified. I wonder if the airlines would stop buying the biggest planes and use more smaller ones for example.

Is there a higher chance of accidents occurring if they use the same runways for landing and taking off or does it make no difference?

Also I would expect that using the same runway for everything would mean if one thing goes wrong more services would be affected and thus more longer delays. So in that respect a second runway would be better than a dual use single I would have thought.

GrimUpNorth 27-07-2014 23:43

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
If a second runway goes ahead then that would be classed as a public works under Part 1 of The Land Compensation Act 1973. Part 1 says that if there are any changes in any of the 5 physical factors (noise, vibration, artificial lighting, dust/fumes, run-off) that result in the devaluation of a property by £50 or more, then anyone who has an interest in that property can make a claim for compensation from the responsible authority.

In the event of a succesful claim (reasonable) fees are payable in addition to any compensation, but in most cases claim will not be considered until 12 months after the official opening date of the public works. The responsible authority has no statutory obligation to inform you that you may be eligible to make a claim (unlike Part 2 or the act), but there will be plenty of companies who will leaflet drop offering no win no fee services.

Hope this helps!

Cheers


Grim

Rexz 28-07-2014 00:29

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35717636)
Since it's not my money we'll be spending I am in favour of a new airport to the East. Boris Island basically. It makes sense to me to build a state of the art airport designed to handle multiple runways and terminals rather than stick them onto airports which were never designed to handle the load they have to handle.

They still have the problem of the SS Richard Montgomery which still has 1,400 tonnes of explosives and all the native birds which migrate or live in that area of Kent. Plus like someone else said, the infrastructure of London barely copes as it is. It would have been nice to see the amount of money going into HS2 to be used for upgrading our railways, then the support would be there. Unfortunately our government seems to have an attitude of dealing with a problem when it happens/gets too much media coverage, rather than taking a preventative approach.

thenry 10-12-2014 19:17

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Five separate YouGov polls show support for building new runway at Gatwick Airport over Heathrow

http://www.crawleynews.co.uk/separat...ail/story.html
start building already!

richard s 10-12-2014 21:00

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Another stupid bit of political decision making is that Lydd Airport, Kent has been granted permission to lengthen its runway.

http://www.lydd-airport.co.uk/

Yet just a few miles up the road at Manston Airport which has the fourth longest runway in the UK is to be turned into industrial units, houses!!!!!

Damien 11-12-2014 00:18

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
So tired of how long it takes to build anything other than luxury flats in this country. HS2? Still not started. Runway? Still discussing it. Nuclear power plants? 10 years away. Just bloody get on with it.

thenry 11-12-2014 09:05

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
So many millions will be wasted just 'talking'.

thenry 12-05-2015 19:55

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Boris Johnson has told LBC that the Tory government may not give the green light to Heathrow expansion - even if it's recommended by the Davies Commission.

http://www.lbc.co.uk/boris-chances-o...lly-nil-109545
Gatwick and the area surrounding has scope for expansion without much of a fuss. Heathrow should focus being more efficient running 2 runways once Gatwick takes on more of a load.

Ignitionnet 12-05-2015 21:26

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35777506)
Gatwick and the area surrounding has scope for expansion without much of a fuss. Heathrow should focus being more efficient running 2 runways once Gatwick takes on more of a load.

There is no room for Heathrow to be more efficient running 2 runways. It runs about as heavily loaded as it is possible to with 2 runways.

thenry 12-05-2015 21:57

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Could Gatwick take some of the load allowing Heathrow to rethink its heavily loaded airport or would Gatwick take on totally different flights?

beeman 13-05-2015 08:18

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35777536)
Could Gatwick take some of the load allowing Heathrow to rethink its heavily loaded airport or would Gatwick take on totally different flights?

Totally different flights. Gatwick (for the most part) handles point to point holiday flights. Heathrow however deals with interlineing "hub and spoke" type flights (when people fly in from 1 part of the world just to fly out again to another destination with the airline).

The ability to interline is VERY important to an airline and that requires most of the airlines hardwere to fly from one place (as well as their partner airlines).

For example to make gatwick as valuable to BA as heathrow is you would need to move the entire BA opperation to gatwick along with the opperations of ALL one world partners. which even with a second runway would simply transfer the capacity issue from heathrow to gatwick.

Landing slots (something that many airports give away) are sooo valuable at heathrow that BA brought an entire alirline (BMI) JUST to get hold of its landing rights.

Kymmy 13-05-2015 14:17

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by beeman (Post 35777574)
Totally different flights. Gatwick (for the most part) handles point to point holiday flights. Heathrow however deals with interlineing "hub and spoke" type flights (when people fly in from 1 part of the world just to fly out again to another destination with the airline).

The ability to interline is VERY important to an airline and that requires most of the airlines hardwere to fly from one place (as well as their partner airlines).

For example to make gatwick as valuable to BA as heathrow is you would need to move the entire BA opperation to gatwick along with the opperations of ALL one world partners. which even with a second runway would simply transfer the capacity issue from heathrow to gatwick.

Landing slots (something that many airports give away) are sooo valuable at heathrow that BA brought an entire alirline (BMI) JUST to get hold of its landing rights.

Surprised BA never bought out Gatwick and did move all operations and world partners there for their own exclusive use and leave Heathrow to everyone else.

Osem 13-05-2015 15:00

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Not sure the competition watchdog would allow that. :shrug:

thenry 13-05-2015 15:07

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by beeman (Post 35777574)
Totally different flights. Gatwick (for the most part) handles point to point holiday flights. Heathrow however deals with interlineing "hub and spoke" type flights (when people fly in from 1 part of the world just to fly out again to another destination with the airline).

The ability to interline is VERY important to an airline and that requires most of the airlines hardwere to fly from one place (as well as their partner airlines).

For example to make gatwick as valuable to BA as heathrow is you would need to move the entire BA opperation to gatwick along with the opperations of ALL one world partners. which even with a second runway would simply transfer the capacity issue from heathrow to gatwick.

Landing slots (something that many airports give away) are sooo valuable at heathrow that BA brought an entire alirline (BMI) JUST to get hold of its landing rights.

Thank you for the explanation. Would Gatwick expansion positively effect Heathrow at all?

beeman 14-05-2015 08:20

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35777643)
Thank you for the explanation. Would Gatwick expansion positively effect Heathrow at all?

Its debatable, there still a few point to point airlines left at Heathrow who might move over to Gatwick (though why they havent already as theres is still copacity?) but not enought to make any real difference at Heathrow. IMO Gatwick expansion will make no real difference to issues at Heathrow,

The best solution is as i said earlier. Give BOTH airports there new runway which will get rid of the dreadded heathrow hold stack (where planes circle over London for 30-60 minuites waiting for landing clearence) which would reduce aircraft, noise AND pollution over london (even with increased flight numbers). and as a gesture of goodwill to the anti's give Heathrow a hard cap of 90% capacity (so they can not sell more then 90% of there slots) making emergency recovery easier.

Kymmy 14-05-2015 09:11

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35777642)
Not sure the competition watchdog would allow that. :shrug:


I know but if all governments did it for one national/flag carrier it would probably not only solve a lot of issues but even reduce the costs of flights.

Osem 14-05-2015 09:22

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy (Post 35777764)
I know but if all governments did it for one national/flag carrier it would probably not only solve a lot of issues but even reduce the costs of flights.

Yep it could well do but I dare say that it would result in all sorts of legal challenges from other airlines.

thenry 27-02-2025 11:24

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

The government has delayed a decision on whether to bring a second runway at Gatwick into regular use.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the government was "minded to approve" plans but the deadline for a decision had now been pushed back until the end of October.

It is understood that the main stumbling blocks facing Gatwick's plans are related to the environment, specifically over noise prevention and public transport provision, after concerns were raised by the Planning Inspectorate.

https://news.sky.com/story/gatwick-s...nment-13317354
Those closest to the airport was expected to get some reductions in council tax :confused:

papa smurf 27-02-2025 12:53

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Obviously we will need the permission of prime minister Trump ,so as we are not seen as harming American interests by building this:nworthy:

thenry 27-02-2025 13:15

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
I'm not sure Trump would get involved because the extravagance of a new lavish terminal seem to have been kicked back and instead...

Quote:

The northern runway already exists at the airport parallel to the main one, but cannot be used at the same time as it is too close.

It is currently limited to being a taxiway and only used for take-offs and landings if the main one has to shut.

Gatwick wants to move it 12 metres further away to solve this problem.

https://news.sky.com/story/gatwick-s...nment-13317354
It's hardly eye catching but productive. However...

Quote:

It says being able to run both at the same time would allow around 100,000 more flights per year and create 14,000 jobs.

Gatwick says the £2.2bn project would not need government money, would be 100% privately funded, and could be complete by the end of the decade.

https://news.sky.com/story/gatwick-s...nment-13317354
2.2 billion :shocked: clearly something hasn't been disclosed in the report from SkyNews, what else are Gatwick planning :confused:

Quote:

The airport is already the second busiest in the UK, and the busiest single runway airport in Europe.

https://news.sky.com/story/gatwick-s...nment-13317354
:D

GrimUpNorth 27-02-2025 13:44

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36191899)
Those closest to the airport was expected to get some reductions in council tax :confused:

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35717882)
If a second runway goes ahead then that would be classed as a public works under Part 1 of The Land Compensation Act 1973. Part 1 says that if there are any changes in any of the 5 physical factors (noise, vibration, artificial lighting, dust/fumes, run-off) that result in the devaluation of a property by £50 or more, then anyone who has an interest in that property can make a claim for compensation from the responsible authority.

In the event of a succesful claim (reasonable) fees are payable in addition to any compensation, but in most cases claim will not be considered until 12 months after the official opening date of the public works. The responsible authority has no statutory obligation to inform you that you may be eligible to make a claim (unlike Part 2 or the act), but there will be plenty of companies who will leaflet drop offering no win no fee services.

Same rules still apply, I'd also add you don't need to use a claim management company as they'll also take a chunk of compensation and the forms are pretty easy to complete yourself. Just make sure you don't settle too cheaply!!

thenry 27-02-2025 14:22

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36191903)
2.2 billion :shocked: clearly something hasn't been disclosed in the report from SkyNews, what else are Gatwick planning :confused:

It's more than just a runway build

https://www.gatwickairport.com/compa...rn-runway.html

I like this proposal of planes crossing over runways. Gatwick will need the best of operators to run it :D

Julian 27-02-2025 15:51

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36191907)
It's more than just a runway build

https://www.gatwickairport.com/compa...rn-runway.html

I like this proposal of planes crossing over runways. Gatwick will need the best of operators to run it :D

<Cough> Manchester<Cough> ;)

thenry 21-09-2025 21:01

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Gatwick's second runway has been given the go-ahead by the government.

https://news.sky.com/story/gatwick-s...nment-13435863
:woot:

Paul 21-09-2025 22:32

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Not exactly the surprise of the century.

Damien 21-09-2025 22:51

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36203140)
Not exactly the surprise of the century.

A decision actually being made is!

But let's wait and see. Court challenges and politicians fighting to stop it will kick into hyperdrive now.

1andrew1 22-09-2025 00:21

Re: Second Runway At Gatwick Airport
 
Sounds a lot simpler piece of work than the expansion of Heathrow over the M25, so this must increase its chances of going ahead.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum