![]() |
UHD tv and poor picture
Hi all, I'm new at this.
I've bought a new UHDTv and the picture is poor in HD mode and really poor in standard. I'm informed that virgin media cannot output in adequate format.(1080). Any advise? So many different opinions but no conclusive answers. Can anybody help |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
You could build a time machine and watch TV from the future. Broadcast TV is only 1080i.
Congrats on being an early adopter of 4K TV :p: |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
As long as he has it set to 1080 in the set top box he isn't going to get any better. TV doesn't broadcast in resolutions higher than 1080i for now on any provider. I would have thought that most 4K TV's would do a decent job of upscaling content to it's resolution although it will never be a substitute for proper 4K content.
SD looks awful on normal 1080p 50" TV's IMO so it's no wonder that looks bad on his super duper ultra hd tv. Also bear in mind that i think the smallest 4K TV is 55" with most of them being 65". |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
You should be OK when Netflix release the second season of House of Cards in just over two weeks time ---- providing your TV has a 4K Netflix app --- as that will be UHD.
Broadcast TV has to be upscaled, which effectively means (intelligently) guessing the value of the missing pixels. With SD at 720X576 pixels and UHD at 3840X2160, that's a heck of a lot of pixels to 'guess'. Even with HD at 1920X1080, there are still a lot of actual pixels missing. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Damn... I was wondering why I could not get through on my subspace communicator..... I have to wait for the rest of the world's technology to catch up I suppose... :dunce:
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Be a while before ultra hd is commonplace , hopefully it will fair better than 3d tech.
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
3D is something that people either love or hate and many see as a novelty, 4K is just a straight up much better quality image. It's more of a natural progression. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
If you look at the difference between a HD and UHD tv of the same screen size the difference is the pixels are 1/2 the width and height, so to "upscale" HD to UHD you simply use a block of 2x2 UHD pixels for each HD pixel and your picture should be no worse than watching a HD panel of the same size. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
I'd rather VM get the missing HD channels first, before we start on UHD!.
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
You will get the same amount of jaggies using pixel doubling from HD to UHD as you would viewing the HD content on a native panel of the same size. Whilst you can use more advanced techniques to attempt to improve the picture my point still stands, the absolute worst case on viewing HD content on a UHD panel is that you get the exact same picture as you would have on a HD panel of the same size. This is entirely different than viewing SD content on HD (or SD on UHD) as there is always the need to interpolate pixels when upscaling there. There are no "missing frames" with upscaling. You 100HZ tv interpolates missing frames because of the difference between the refresh rate of the panel and the frame rate of the signal. It has nothing to do with upscaling at all, they're both entirely different concepts. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
Anyway wtching HD on a UHD screen is never going to look great. Was the same when SD on HD first came about and people moaned that it looked rubbish. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
SD on HD is an entirely different kettle of fish to HD on SD, SD on HD you have to guess pixels, they don't fit nicely. The problem most people looking at HD content on UHD panels have is they're going from a 40 to 60 inch panel, and it's that increase that kills the picture, not having 4x the pixels. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
How much did this TV cost you? Did you do any research on it at all and what material you were going to watch on it?
|
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
I guess the burning question is..
Is there any point getting a 4k TV now? Judging by these replies it is a No but there must be some benefit otherwise it's just a case of people having more money than sense (no offence to anyone that owns a 4K TV btw) |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
The cynic would say that 3D failed to drive new sales of TVs that the industry was hoping for, so now they are pushing 4K. 4K will be great when there is plenty of content and a TV of 60" plus is appropriate for the room in which you want to view it. Also, the quality of the TVs upscaler will be important, which means 4K TVs that produce a decent picture from SD (and HD?) will be expensive. Personally, I think 4K TV is a niche product at the moment for people with loads of spare money and big living rooms. And even then, they could have problems with current content. Just my POV. |
Re: UHD tv and poor picture
Quote:
I strongly agree with your point about screen size compared to room size. I hear so many people saying how big their TV's are and then you find out the room is 10 x 10 foot or something ridiculous and I just think why? Perhaps size matters to some people??? ;):p: |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum