Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Superhub 2 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33693243)

jb66 01-05-2013 14:21

Superhub 2
 
testers are now free to talk about the SH2.

For me its been rock solid for the 3 weeks ive had it!

Dash: CF noob 01-05-2013 14:22

Re: superhub 2
 
Pics?

Sirius 01-05-2013 14:48

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35567002)
testers are now free to talk about the SH2.

For me its been rock solid for the 3 weeks ive had it!

Indeed my wireless connections have been faultless and i am amazed at the range. I had major issues with my wireless connections dropping all the time on the shub but i have not had a single drop on the NGSH. It gets a :tu: from me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dash: CF noob (Post 35567005)
Pics?


As long as we are allowed to i will post some later.

thenry 01-05-2013 14:51

Re: superhub 2
 
8 Attachment(s)
SH2 pics

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-1.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-2.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-3.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-4.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-5.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-6.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-7.png?stc=1

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...50-8.png?stc=1

Kushan 01-05-2013 14:55

Re: superhub 2
 
That...actually looks all right. Bit of a silly design in that you can't lay it flat, but still.

So what's different about it compared to the original SHUB? Is it just better wireless or is there more to it?

Sirius 01-05-2013 14:56

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567022)
SH2 pics

I had just sent a pm on the trial forum and was waiting for an answer.

thenry 01-05-2013 14:59

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567025)
That...actually looks all right. Bit of a silly design in that you can't lay it flat, but still.

So what's different about it compared to the original SHUB? Is it just better wireless or is there more to it?

wireless is better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35567026)
I had just sent a pm on the trial forum and was waiting for an answer.

keep waiting mate.

Sirius 01-05-2013 15:10

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567025)
That...actually looks all right. Bit of a silly design in that you can't lay it flat, but still.

So what's different about it compared to the original SHUB? Is it just better wireless or is there more to it?

All new internals and chip set, new power supply, both wireless frequency's at the same time, 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz. It still has modem mode for those that want that side of it. Mine has been rock solid since the trial started and has performed better than my Tp Link 1043nd router

---------- Post added at 14:06 ---------- Previous post was at 14:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567025)
That...actually looks all right. Bit of a silly design in that you can't lay it flat, but still.

So what's different about it compared to the original SHUB? Is it just better wireless or is there more to it?

I would have preferred the ability to stand it up or lay it down.

---------- Post added at 14:10 ---------- Previous post was at 14:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567028)


keep waiting mate.

Its been confirmed

paultrademark 01-05-2013 15:33

Re: superhub 2
 
Had one reboot since I got mine, putting it down to just settling in.

Wireless range in my household has increased dramatically with the new SH2.

truthspeaker 01-05-2013 15:37

Re: superhub 2
 
Sirius delete your post. am gonna get in trouble by virgin media.

That about sums it up.. please.
thankz

Sirius 01-05-2013 15:39

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by umbrokhan786 (Post 35567048)
Sirius delete your post. am gonna get in trouble by virgin media.

That about sums it up.. please.
thankz

Done

Stephen 01-05-2013 15:43

Re: superhub 2
 
Mines been solid since I first got it and wireless range and stability is also fantastic.

My fav thing are the LEDs can now have the brightness changed.

GazCBG 01-05-2013 15:47

Re: superhub 2
 
It is 8 channel like the current Superhub, or can it do more?

I noticed it has a USB port will that work?

Sirius 01-05-2013 15:54

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35567050)
Mines been solid since I first got it and wireless range and stability is also fantastic.

My fav thing are the LEDs can now have the brightness changed.

My wife noticed that straight away as i have mine turned right down because the hub is in the living room. :)

---------- Post added at 14:54 ---------- Previous post was at 14:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big-Gaz (Post 35567051)
It is 8 channel like the current Superhub, or can it do more?

I noticed it has a USB port will that work?

Mine shows 8 in the network stats page and i am presently locked to 6, i don't know if it will do more than 8.

robson689 01-05-2013 16:03

Re: superhub 2
 
The wireless is much better! I can get a full 60Mbit now from most parts of the house (even the furthest point where with the SH1 I would get a mere 5Mbit).

Big big improvement over the SH1.

justasking92 01-05-2013 16:04

Re: superhub 2
 
Just heard about the SH2.. what is new in it and what improvements...?

also when it finnnaly realses how do you go about getting one.. you have to payŁ or just ring them up and ask for an upgrade

craigj2k12 01-05-2013 16:10

Re: superhub 2
 
Does it run the same firmware as the current superhub?

---------- Post added at 15:10 ---------- Previous post was at 15:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35567052)
Mine shows 8 in the network stats page and i am presently locked to 6, i don't know if it will do more than 8.

Spec says no

AMWSmith 01-05-2013 16:19

Re: superhub 2
 
The GUI are much the same.
For me the wireless is vary good and stable. Not had any issues with speed or drops. Range covers my flat fine.

GrimUpNorth 01-05-2013 16:24

Re: superhub 2
 
Compared to my RT-N56U the 5GHz is slightly stronger and the 2.4GHz slightly weaker but overall pretty similar coverage around the house and garden. I'm using it in modem mode and everything looks good:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

compared to my old VMNG300:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]


Cheers

Grim

MutleyF 01-05-2013 16:28

Re: superhub 2
 
Yup - I have to agree with the others here... for the past few weeks, I have thrashed mine to death, and it comes bouncing back each time.

The ability to use both frequencies at the same time is a nice bonus

Sirius 01-05-2013 16:35

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MutleyF (Post 35567070)
Yup - I have to agree with the others here... for the past few weeks, I have thrashed mine to death, and it comes bouncing back each time.

The ability to use both frequencies at the same time is a nice bonus

At the moment 5ghz is very under used in my area and i find it to be excellent, that might change as we see more NGSH's being deployed.

whizzbang 01-05-2013 16:37

Re: superhub 2
 
When is the SH2 due for general release then guys??

GrimUpNorth 01-05-2013 16:37

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35567075)
At the moment 5ghz is very under used in my area and i find it to be excellent, that might change as we see more NGSH's being deployed.

I'm the only person round here, but all good thing have to come to an end.

Cheers

Grim

Sirius 01-05-2013 16:39

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35567076)
I'm the only person round here, but all good thing have to come to an end.

Cheers

Grim

:LOL:

MutleyF 01-05-2013 16:41

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35567076)
I'm the only person round here, but all good thing have to come to an end.

Cheers

Grim

That is a very good point made by Sirius - Hardly anyone uses 5ghz around here - I bet as folks replace equipment due to age etc, my excellent wireless will drop!

AMWSmith 01-05-2013 16:43

Re: superhub 2
 
Yea I seem to be the only one around my street with a 5ghz wifi.

karma mechanic 01-05-2013 16:48

Re: superhub 2
 
Generally the 5.2GHz wifi tends to be stopped by walls more than 2.4GHz, so there can be more users in a locality before it starts conflicting.

I'm more worried about the 2.4GHz users getting the SH2, their signals will reach further...

robson689 01-05-2013 16:58

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by karma mechanic (Post 35567083)
Generally the 5.2GHz wifi tends to be stopped by walls more than 2.4GHz, so there can be more users in a locality before it starts conflicting.

I'm more worried about the 2.4GHz users getting the SH2, their signals will reach further...

Just line your house walls with thick lead haha (external walls)

dave.m 01-05-2013 17:02

Re: superhub 2
 
Any idea on power usuage? - the same in standard and modem mode ?

Does it have a WOL feature ?

Dash: CF noob 01-05-2013 17:04

Re: superhub 2
 
Qas will be here after school to disect it for us.

babis3g 01-05-2013 17:10

Re: superhub 2
 
Wanna see it in REAL working??

http://youtu.be/Dn_ZQ7gqnb8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn_ZQ...=youtube_gdata

Kushan 01-05-2013 18:09

Re: superhub 2
 
Interesting. So has nobody got anything bad to say about it? Nice development, I'm still on an Ambit 300, if I hold out long enough, I might upgrade to this thing.

adduxi 01-05-2013 18:13

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35567068)
I'm using it in modem mode and everything looks good:

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...01-05-2013.png

compared to my old VMNG300:

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...01-03-2013.png


Cheers

Grim

That's pretty much the same as my graphs, Grim. I think it's a keeper in Modem Mode. Don't think I'll be using Router Mode as I like my Tomato firmware too much :)

crazyronnie 01-05-2013 18:43

Re: superhub 2
 
If i had it i'd keep it in modem mode as well. I forked out some dosh for the RT-N66U and have Merlins firmware on it for some DNSMasq sorcery going on for netflix and other US only services.

General Maximus 01-05-2013 18:46

Re: superhub 2
 
I don't know whether to be a pesimist or not. Have they listened to customer feedback and enabled modem mode from the get go to maje everyone happy or are they just covering their asses in case this one is a flop as well? :)

Either way I am not fussed, I am just glad to see because I was seriously worried they would turn around and say we didn't need a modem only mode because it has gone "through rigourous and thorough testing" and works fine.

Sirius 01-05-2013 18:52

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35567125)
Glad to see modem mode still supported for those of us who have established networks.

Could they have got it right this time?

I honestly feel they have got it right, i remember what it was like at the start of the issuing of the Shub and this feels far better.

Sephiroth 01-05-2013 18:53

Re: superhub 2
 
Router mode; wireless on; Airport Extreme router attached in bridge mode.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

data0002 01-05-2013 19:06

Re: superhub 2
 
Deleted found the info i needed

Qtx 01-05-2013 19:25

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by babis3g (Post 35567093)

Ironically virgin customers might have trouble buffering the video :LOL:

If its powerful enough, has better wireless range and has working firmware, it can only be a positive thing for VM customers.

Sirius 01-05-2013 19:27

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 35567159)
Ironically virgin customers might have trouble buffering the video :LOL:

If its powerful enough, has better wireless range and has working firmware, it can only be a positive thing for VM customers.

Buffered fine for me even at 1080p :LOL:

roughbeast 01-05-2013 19:56

Re: superhub 2
 
I did have some trouble with streaming and loading office files across my LAN, but it turns out that my SH2 in full mode was struggling with the SamKnows white box (gigabit version). Now I have disconnected the box and, consequently, ended my arrangement with SamKnows, my SH2 ethernet is running sweetly. Indeed, it seems snappier than my WNDR3700 when the SH2 is in modem-only mode.

I'm not sure about the wireless yet. The SH2 reaches all the places in my property that the WNDR3700 does, but I have had more incidents of my wireless devices logging on to my neighbour's BT FON and my own attic-based FON HOT spot. Currently I have 5MHz disabled. None of my devices require it or can use it. My Xperia U android managed a download speed of 28Mb in the same room as the SH2, something never achieved with the WNDR3700. My previous best was 19Mb.

AMWSmith 01-05-2013 19:59

Re: superhub 2
 
I have the latest SamKnows whitebox(black) and its not caused any problems on my Superhub2.

eljay 01-05-2013 21:02

Re: superhub 2
 
Except for a couple of "incidents" I never had that many problems with the SH.

However, the SH2 has far better wireless speeds and stability for me both at 2.4 & 5ghz frequencies. For the first time I can even take my laptop into the garden and get a stable and good download speed and that is on 5ghz.

A definite improvement.:)

roughbeast 01-05-2013 21:31

Re: superhub 2
 
This is SHS in full router mode, not as neat and tidy as in modem-only mode but when performance is not affected, why should I worry?

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...01-05-2013.png

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/05/49.png

http://www.pingtest.net/result/80638632.png

Slightly higher latency than in modem-only mode, but no ill effects.

---------- Post added at 20:31 ---------- Previous post was at 20:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by AMWSmith (Post 35567182)
I have the latest SamKnows whitebox(black) and its not caused any problems on my Superhub2.

I had a smaller problem in modem-only mode, but not as debilitating as in full mode.

Perhaps my set up had some bearing on this.

My SH2 is connected to three switches.
Switch 1 serves 2 games systems one of which is used as a media player; Switch 2 serves my main PC, a games system and a smart TV; Switch 3 serves 3 network hard disks, a FON hot spot router and another PC. The white box being right at the hub of my network has been connected to all three switches to give SamKnows a full picture of internet - intranet traffic within my household. All three switches serve equipment that use the internet as well as my intranet.

All this running through the white box may have been too much.

eljay 01-05-2013 21:57

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35567136)
I don't know whether to be a pesimist or not. Have they listened to customer feedback and enabled modem mode from the get go to maje everyone happy or are they just covering their asses in case this one is a flop as well? :)

Either way I am not fussed, I am just glad to see because I was seriously worried they would turn around and say we didn't need a modem only mode because it has gone "through rigourous and thorough testing" and works fine.

Do not think they had any intention of trying too convince the established modem fraternity to move fully away from "modem mode". Just to provide a modem/router that will satisfy Joe bloggs and reduce the level of support costs the superhub must have incurred with its many failings.

My experience with the sh2 is that it is a significant improvement with regard to wireless performance and stability. Hardware life and failure rates are still to be determined of course.

Skie 01-05-2013 22:04

Re: superhub 2
 
I've been happy with my experience of it. Wireless range and speed is on par with my existing router.

Router mode seems to have the ability to cause havoc with TBB monitors but it has no detriment on actual service and it looks like it's something they are planning to fix.

My only real criticism would be that the UI is pretty poorly laid out. But as it's identical to the superhub 1's UI this is more for consistency than ease of use I guess. Would just have been nice to see something along the lines of a tomato style interface.

Qtx 01-05-2013 22:15

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eljay (Post 35567249)
Do not think they had any intention of trying too convince the established modem fraternity to move fully away from "modem mode". Just to provide a modem/router that will satisfy Joe bloggs and reduce the level of support costs the superhub must have incurred with its many failings.

My experience with the sh2 is that it is a significant improvement with regard to wireless performance and stability. Hardware life and failure rates are still to be determined of course.

Reduced support costs would have been part of the spec and probably helped get some better hardware than would have been considered otherwise. VM would have learnt this lesson from the original hub.

An isp supplied router is never going to be as good as a decent router at this moment in time, it just has to be good enough to do the job, easy to support and use, reliable and give less reasons for support calls.

Lets hope the sh2 doesnt have wireless dropout issues.

Foo Fighter 01-05-2013 22:37

Re: superhub 2
 
I think its very buggy and voip still doesnt work with sipgate. It requires rebooting way more than the old hub and gives a dodgy tbb graph.

Never had a issue with the wireless on the old hub and was great till r37 broke some voip.

Only possitive is you can change the LED brightness.

eljay 01-05-2013 22:42

Re: superhub 2
 
dropouts were never a recurring or frequent problem for me with the sh so difficult to comment other than for me the lack of a problem continues.

on a lighter note a major boon is no flashing blue lights frightening the local criminal fraternity.

Sephiroth 01-05-2013 22:56

Re: superhub 2
 
The VOIP issue does need sorting if you're not prepared to go to modem mode.

VM have shown serious commitment to fix other issues reported on the trial so I have no doubt that this one is receiving serious attention.

Sirius 01-05-2013 23:06

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 35567273)
Reduced support costs would have been part of the spec and probably helped get some better hardware than would have been considered otherwise. VM would have learnt this lesson from the original hub.

An isp supplied router is never going to be as good as a decent router at this moment in time, it just has to be good enough to do the job, easy to support and use, reliable and give less reasons for support calls.

Lets hope the sh2 doesn't have wireless dropout issues.

I had dropout issues on the SHUB, my wife's laptop would never stay connected for longer than 5 mins, my daughters iphone would have trouble connecting and then staying connected. Both of those items connect first time and stay connected when connected to the NGSH. I was also at my neighbours house tonight and had a look at my signal strength on my S3 and it was still nice and strong, it let me stream a YouTube video no problem.

I was there because he has major issues with wireless on his shub and as the NDA has been lifted i could show him the difference. He even said he saw a new wifi signal appear a couple of weeks ago that seemed stronger than his shub. He now knows what it is and wants one asap :)

Coffeeguy 01-05-2013 23:28

Re: superhub 2
 
I've not had any issues with it in modem mode

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

thenry 01-05-2013 23:29

Re: superhub 2
 
:shocked:

Bogof 01-05-2013 23:41

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coffeeguy (Post 35567304)
I've not had any issues with it in modem mode

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

No way is that a Virginmedia graph..

SnoopZ 01-05-2013 23:54

Re: superhub 2
 
Most peoples graphs look like this in router mode, although i am not sure if it is affecting the connection.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

craigj2k12 01-05-2013 23:55

Re: superhub 2
 
As has been mentioned above, that is no doubt pinging your CMTS and not your superhub

Chrysalis 02-05-2013 00:06

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567025)
That...actually looks all right. Bit of a silly design in that you can't lay it flat, but still.

So what's different about it compared to the original SHUB? Is it just better wireless or is there more to it?

I was going to say its a vast improvement over the first superhub, the connectors are on the thin side which is good, but the stand they have should have been top and bottom so it could be laid flat. ISP's I feel still fail in that they think standing up is superior to flat.

Its good that modem has advanced to the the point its labeled on the device and it was from my first post on the head of VMs CS blog that was the birth of modem mode.

---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35567075)
At the moment 5ghz is very under used in my area and i find it to be excellent, that might change as we see more NGSH's being deployed.

What I find interesting is that previously 5ghz is a premium because its hardly used. Now VM a major uk isp is going to have it on their new CPE suddenly 5ghz may get crowded?

Bogof 02-05-2013 00:13

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35567322)

What I find interesting is that previously 5ghz is a premium because its hardly used. Now VM a major uk isp is going to have it on their new CPE suddenly 5ghz may get crowded?

The current Superhub has 5ghz mode and has been around for a longgggggg timeeeeeeeeeeeeee :confused: An lets face it, it can't get any more crowded than 2.4ghz and that works fine for 99% of everyone.

Chrysalis 02-05-2013 00:23

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogof (Post 35567334)
The current Superhub has 5ghz mode and has been around for a longgggggg timeeeeeeeeeeeeee :confused: An lets face it, it can't get any more crowded than 2.4ghz and that works fine for 99% of everyone.

ahh didnt know ok.

Since I pretty much never used it in router mode except when I had to at start.

2.4ghz does it job yes but it is damn crowded where I live, over 15 networks on it and I only have houses one side of me.

robson689 02-05-2013 00:40

Re: superhub 2
 
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

My graph isn't pretty. It doesn't affect my connection though.

craigj2k12 02-05-2013 01:14

Re: superhub 2
 
Here you go....

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...4ff9516aaf.png

Edit: seems like your link has started working above :erm:

data0002 02-05-2013 02:23

Re: superhub 2
 
And here is mine as well

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...02-05-2013.png

Coffeeguy 02-05-2013 02:33

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35567342)
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...01-05-2013.png

My graph isn't pretty. It doesn't affect my connection though.

Yes, mine was pretty much identical in router mode & the connection was perfect.

Sirius 02-05-2013 08:04

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogof (Post 35567334)
The current Superhub has 5ghz mode and has been around for a longgggggg timeeeeeeeeeeeeee :confused: An lets face it, it can't get any more crowded than 2.4ghz and that works fine for 99% of everyone.

Indeed it did but 5ghz was not selected as standard as 2.4ghz was standard and you could have one or the other, most users i feel would not even have known that it had 5ghz as an option. Now you get both at the same time and you can connect to both if you have the right adapter. Thats why i say it will increase the use of the 5ghz band.

MJPS 02-05-2013 10:25

Re: superhub 2
 
Hi guys

Is there any move at all towards ipv6?

I'm not expecting VM to switch over anytime soon but Six In Tunnel (SIT) would be nice.

I'm happy that the wireless has been sorted out.:D

Kushan 02-05-2013 11:05

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35567382)
Indeed it did but 5ghz was not selected as standard as 2.4ghz was standard and you could have one or the other, most users i feel would not even have known that it had 5ghz as an option. Now you get both at the same time and you can connect to both if you have the right adapter. Thats why i say it will increase the use of the 5ghz band.

Not all wireless equipment is 5Ghz compatible, which is probably why 2.4 was left as the default (And why nobody would dare suggest switching to 5Ghz during a support call).

Still, if everyone in the country switched over to 5Ghz tomorrow, there'd still be a significant improvement just thanks to the nature of 5Ghz alone - it has less penetration than 2.4Ghz, which sounds bad but it also means that your neighbours connections will interfere a lot less. Also things like baby monitors and microwaves, which have been known to cause interference on 2.4Ghz, should have much less of an impact.

A weird side-effect (for me, anyway) of running both at once is that you get a sort of cross-over point whereby your 2.4Ghz network and 5Ghz network's signal strength overlaps.

Although it is nice browsing nearby networks and only seeing one 5Ghz one - mine!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJPS (Post 35567406)
Hi guys

Is there any move at all towards ipv6?

I'm not expecting VM to switch over anytime soon but Six In Tunnel (SIT) would be nice.

I'm happy that the wireless has been sorted out.:D

The last I heard, VM were investigating it but nothing solid had been released yet. I wouldn't expect anything any time soon as VM aren't running out of IP addresses for a while. If and when it does happen, I'd imagine there'll be a lot of trials first before it's rolled out nationally.

Still, it would be nice to have native IPv6.

robson689 02-05-2013 12:00

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MJPS (Post 35567406)
Hi guys

Is there any move at all towards ipv6?

I'm not expecting VM to switch over anytime soon but Six In Tunnel (SIT) would be nice.

I'm happy that the wireless has been sorted out.:D

There is something in the router settings hidden in regards to IPv6.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

I don't know if that was in the SH1 though (didn't check).

MJPS 02-05-2013 12:35

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35567430)
There is something in the router settings hidden in regards to IPv6.

http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/7...8ba9f3e896.png

I don't know if that was in the SH1 though (didn't check).

Well, what do you know? A link to an ipv6 config page:D:D

Good to see

SnoopZ 02-05-2013 13:32

Re: superhub 2
 
My Youtube seems to buffer fine now with the SH2.

Chrysalis 02-05-2013 15:39

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567417)

The last I heard, VM were investigating it but nothing solid had been released yet. I wouldn't expect anything any time soon as VM aren't running out of IP addresses for a while. If and when it does happen, I'd imagine there'll be a lot of trials first before it's rolled out nationally.

Still, it would be nice to have native IPv6.

We had this conversation before but waiting until you start to run out of ip address is too late, I wish UK companies actually could forward think once in a while but there is good news.

The government is planning to enforce isp's to rollout ipv6 in their desire to give every connected device its own ip address. The bad news of course planning and action could be many years apart so that may not be happening any time soon either.

richard s 02-05-2013 15:47

Re: superhub 2
 
How do I get a superhub 2 are they going to be sent me to replace superhub 1.

RobboEdin 02-05-2013 15:58

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35567489)
How do I get a superhub 2 are they going to be sent me to replace superhub 1.

Two out of the following three are probably correct:

1. They will provide a Superhub 2 at a charge for existing Superhub users:
2. They will supply a Superhub 2 to those wishing to re-contract for a new minimum period;
3. They will send all existing Superhub users a free Superhub 2.

thenry 02-05-2013 16:07

Re: superhub 2
 
#3 is unlikely.

Dash: CF noob 02-05-2013 16:09

Re: superhub 2
 
3 never

thenry 02-05-2013 16:15

Re: superhub 2
 
ever!

Dash: CF noob 02-05-2013 16:18

Re: superhub 2
 
Ever ever ever

Perfect Choice 02-05-2013 16:35

Re: superhub 2
 
Expect you get SH2 if your SH goes faulty or you pay. Expect SH1 fault calls to to increase!

thenry 02-05-2013 16:37

Re: superhub 2
 
doubt it. theres still SH1 stock.

Dash: CF noob 02-05-2013 16:37

Re: superhub 2
 
When sh2 becomes standard kit i expect mine to die

thenry 02-05-2013 16:45

Re: superhub 2
 
:LOL:

Kushan 02-05-2013 16:51

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35567485)
We had this conversation before but waiting until you start to run out of ip address is too late, I wish UK companies actually could forward think once in a while but there is good news.

The government is planning to enforce isp's to rollout ipv6 in their desire to give every connected device its own ip address. The bad news of course planning and action could be many years apart so that may not be happening any time soon either.

I'm certainly not disagreeing with that at all, but we all know what Virgin's like - if it saves them money in the short term, they'll probably ignore it. And it's not like they're getting a lot of new customers these days to be worried about running out, either.

MovedGoalPosts 02-05-2013 16:52

Re: superhub 2
 
It may be designed to stand upright rather than flat, but is there any provision for it to be wall mounted?

The current SH can be supplied with a wall bracket, although these are apparently rarer than a golden goose, but wall mounting doesn't really work so well given the connectivity for leads from the side. SH2 seems to have connections only on the end so it could be fixed neatly to a wall and yet offer easy access to plug / unplug.

thenry 02-05-2013 16:59

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35567519)
It may be designed to stand upright rather than flat, but is there any provision for it to be wall mounted?

The current SH can be supplied with a wall bracket, although these are apparently rarer than a golden goose, but wall mounting doesn't really work so well given the connectivity for leads from the side. SH2 seems to have connections only on the end so it could be fixed neatly to a wall and yet offer easy access to plug / unplug.

theres a tiny hole under the sticker on the bottom :confused: (sticker has the wifi network name, password etc.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567022)


robson689 02-05-2013 17:23

Re: superhub 2
 
I don't think it would be practical for the SH2 to be wall mounted. The way the connectors are it wouldn't look good. With the SH1 it was good because the connectors are on the back so they would be hidden if it was wall mounted.

BenMcr 02-05-2013 17:31

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35567525)
I don't think it would be practical for the SH2 to be wall mounted. The way the connectors are it wouldn't look good. With the SH1 it was good because the connectors are on the back so they would be hidden if it was wall mounted.

Also I believe the SH2 broadcasts it's signal out of both sides and the top - wall mounting it would risk blocking one of the signal directions

babis3g 02-05-2013 17:49

Re: superhub 2
 
The SH 2 broadcast its signal best where the front lights are ... so where facing the leds lights is the best signal ;) perhaps with about 45 -60 degree better range ... than sides or backwards

... at least that what i am getting from my tests and if you move it slightly left or right can make difference (where facing the leds) in signal

robson689 02-05-2013 18:08

Re: superhub 2
 
When you look into the top, you can see the antennas. There is 3 on the top left and 1 on the top right so as Ben said, depending on which way you would wall mount it you would either block 1 antenna or 3.

craigj2k12 02-05-2013 18:16

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35567537)
When you look into the top, you can see the antennas. There is 3 on the top left and 1 on the top right so as Ben said, depending on which way you would wall mount it you would either block 1 antenna or 3.

Look into the top?

Take it apart! :D

---------- Post added at 17:16 ---------- Previous post was at 17:16 ----------

Were there any rules in the trial not permitting you to open the device?

BenMcr 02-05-2013 18:18

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35567540)
Were there any rules in the trial not permitting you to open the device?

That would be covered by your general terms and conditions which prohibit you tampering with VM devices
Quote:

E2. You are responsible for making sure that our equipment is safe and used properly at all times. To do this, you agree to do the following:
d. Not tamper with disassemble, misuse, neglect or damage our equipment;
e. Not remove, tamper with or cross out any words or labels on our equipment.

thenry 02-05-2013 18:19

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35567540)
Were there any rules in the trial not permitting you to open the device?

I don't think anyone will be able to answer that although its a dead cert that 'someone' opened it up :angel:

robson689 02-05-2013 18:20

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35567540)
Look into the top?

Take it apart! :D

---------- Post added at 17:16 ---------- Previous post was at 17:16 ----------

Were there any rules in the trial not permitting you to open the device?

We can't damage it. I don't know if taking it apart would count as damaging it but I won't be the one to take the chance...

thenry 02-05-2013 18:20

Re: superhub 2
 
the antennas are on the sides so whats the big deal in fixing the device to a wall mounting the bottom (where the network password etc. sticker is) ?

BenMcr 02-05-2013 18:22

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567548)
the antennas are on the sides so whats the big deal in fixing the device to a wall mounting the bottom (where the network password etc. sticker is) ?

It would stick out from the wall then - I think people want to wall mount it so it's parallel with the wall

Sephiroth 02-05-2013 18:23

Re: superhub 2
 
Damn!

thenry 02-05-2013 18:28

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35567550)
It would stick out from the wall then - I think people want to wall mount it so it's parallel with the wall

then most people should carry on taking the advice of buying separate kit.

SH2 can be mounted to the wall end of.

BenMcr 02-05-2013 18:29

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567554)
SH2 can be mounted to the wall end of.

Not as designed by VM it can't.

thenry 02-05-2013 18:31

Re: superhub 2
 
ok. the SH2 can be mounted to the wall but you'll have to do it yourself or ask third party as VM wont do it :) please remember the kit belongs to VM and that it wasn't designed to be wall mounted so if it gets damaged you, the customer wanting it wall mounted will be left with a problem, possibly paying a charge for damaging the kit. terms and cons apply. i dont work for VM.

Dash: CF noob 02-05-2013 18:32

Re: superhub 2
 
Gaffer tape?

MovedGoalPosts 02-05-2013 18:33

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35567550)
It would stick out from the wall then - I think people want to wall mount it so it's parallel with the wall

Yep I want to be able to reclaim some of my desk space, so mounting on a wall is easy. Previous VM modems, current Superhub, and many standalone routers all allow wall mounting. At least by allowing the connections from the rear rather than a side it would now sit nicely on a shelf.

I accept what everyone says that wireless may suffer if the aerials aren't aligning nicely to the other kit if it is on a wall (or even a shelf), but the option to compromise oneself would be useful. It's a similar problem with things like TiVo, that are now nicely curved, and so you can't stack your hi-fi kit, blu-ray and related stuff nicely.

thenry 02-05-2013 18:38

Re: superhub 2
 
1 Attachment(s)
wifi wont suffer Rob

^
wall|http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...1&d=1367512465
V

just be careful you dont kill anything when poking it, be gentle :)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum