Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Networking (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   Router Antennas (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33690802)

robson689 23-11-2012 22:17

Router Antennas
 
Does anyone know what advantage I would get from using large antennas on my router? I have ordered 2x 16dBi antennas and was wondering what difference it will make in terms of wireless range. They're 38cm in length and omni-directional.

Thanks!

thenry 23-11-2012 22:29

Re: Router Antennas
 
you should notice better coverage.

which product have you brought? and which router are you fitting them to? whats the struture in which its going to be used like? what are you trying to achieve?

robson689 23-11-2012 22:35

Re: Router Antennas
 
I've bought 2 of these: http://bit.ly/UPIng9

I will be fitting them to a DLINK DIR-615 and want to eliminate the dead / weak spots in my house. Currently when you go to a corner of the house the signal drops quite bad and becomes slow.

thenry 23-11-2012 22:48

Re: Router Antennas
 
have you checked whether the 615 you have or rev. has the ability for the owner to simply unscrew the antennas off? don't pull or the hard wire will come out with it.

robson689 23-11-2012 22:53

Re: Router Antennas
 
I will have to check on Monday, but if not will it be as simple as to de-solder the old antennas or a little more complicated?

thenry 23-11-2012 23:04

Re: Router Antennas
 
more complex and also could prove a problem for the router itself (over heating)

qasdfdsaq 23-11-2012 23:06

Re: Router Antennas
 
Revision D2 as U.FL connectors for replacement antennas/pigtails, revision D4 has the antenna cable soldered directly to the mainboard.

Large antennas focus the signal in one direction. Indoors, it's pretty pointless as most of the signal is reflected, and even if it weren't it'd only work well if you had a wide, flat residence.

You'd also be breaking ETSI regulations, but who cares about those, right?

robson689 23-11-2012 23:07

Re: Router Antennas
 
Is it the antennas that could cause overheating or using the soldering iron on it?

qasdfdsaq 23-11-2012 23:08

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35501299)
more complex and also could prove a problem for the router itself (over heating)

Bollocks.

thenry 23-11-2012 23:13

Re: Router Antennas
 
wont it overheat when setting are tweaked to max out the antennas?

---------- Post added at 23:13 ---------- Previous post was at 23:11 ----------

anyway never fear qas is here. ask him, he knows everything there is to know about the 615.

robson689 23-11-2012 23:25

Re: Router Antennas
 
Ok qas, if the antennas are maxed out will the router overheat and will my health be at risk from such large antennas?

qasdfdsaq 24-11-2012 02:01

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35501307)
wont it overheat when setting are tweaked to max out the antennas?

Max out antennas? What are you on about?

Router outputs fixed power. Antenna points it in a certain direction. Different antenna points it more precisely in a certain direction.

Nothing to overheat.

Though if you short the antenna connectors it probably won't like that, but all you'll get then is crappy performance until you connect them properly.

Quote:

anyway never fear qas is here. ask him, he knows everything there is to know about the 615.
Only revisions D2 and D4 (the Virgin Media ones)

That said I still haven't managed to get the ethernet, wireless, hardware NAT and mesh networking to work on it at the same time. I kinda gave up and I moved onto more expensive kit.

robson689 24-11-2012 02:24

Re: Router Antennas
 
The antennas I got say they're omni-directional and I have the D2 version.

qasdfdsaq 24-11-2012 04:22

Re: Router Antennas
 
Omnidirectional in the horizontal plane. Probably as omnidirectional as a pancake in the vertical plane...

Kymmy 24-11-2012 08:47

Re: Router Antennas
 
Moved to Networking forum as nothing to do with VM internet

robson689 25-11-2012 01:25

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35501337)
Omnidirectional in the horizontal plane. Probably as omnidirectional as a pancake in the vertical plane...

Thank you

idi banashapan 25-11-2012 01:28

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35501302)
Bollocks.

i lol'd. then lol'd again when I noticed no one noticing!!!
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/meyer769/psy_1001/giggle.jpg

robson689 28-11-2012 21:28

Re: Router Antennas
 
I am just wondering, will I need "tails" to hook the new antennas up since the ports are on the PCB?

If so, could you please advise which tails will be needed? Thank you in advance :)

Wicked_and_Crazy 28-11-2012 23:48

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35501332)

Router outputs fixed power. Antenna points it in a certain direction. Different antenna points it more precisely in a certain

Is that right? I thought with dd-wrt you could increase to power output to the antenna?

qasdfdsaq 29-11-2012 17:44

Re: Router Antennas
 
Not any further than it is designed to go.

The relevant point is the antenna has no effect on the transmit power of the router.

Waldo Pepper 29-11-2012 17:59

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35501279)
you should notice better coverage.

which product have you brought? and which router are you fitting them to? whats the struture in which its going to be used like? what are you trying to achieve?

And more interference from surrounding users as you will now be able to pick up more distant WiFi routers.

A smaller aerial will keep them below the noise floor and work fine as long as you're above it by a margin.

qasdfdsaq 29-11-2012 18:56

Re: Router Antennas
 
That depends what way they're pointing.

A higher gain antenna will pick up more interference from one direction and less from another. This is why directional antennas (omnidirectional antennas are really directional antennas in one axis) are used to reduce interference.

The same applies to legitimate signal from your own devices.

Wicked_and_Crazy 29-11-2012 21:45

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35504100)
Not any further than it is designed to go.

The relevant point is the antenna has no effect on the transmit power of the router.

So the router doesn't output fixed power. Agree the router has a power limit but it can be adjuster beyond the design parameters.

I thought antennas only affect the gain and therefore impact the signal

Waldo Pepper 30-11-2012 19:23

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35504100)
Not any further than it is designed to go.

The relevant point is the antenna has no effect on the transmit power of the router.

Correct, but it can increase the ERP or effective radiated power which is more relevant in path loss calculations.

---------- Post added at 19:23 ---------- Previous post was at 19:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35504152)
That depends what way they're pointing.

A higher gain antenna will pick up more interference from one direction and less from another. This is why directional antennas (omnidirectional antennas are really directional antennas in one axis) are used to reduce interference.

The same applies to legitimate signal from your own devices.

An omnidirectional aerial in an ideal world has a circular radiation pattern when viewed from directly above.
When viewed from the side, it's a circular lobe shape.

robson689 02-12-2012 14:07

Re: Router Antennas
 
Can anyone advise me on which tails to get? The connectors are tiny

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/35.jpg

Peter_ 02-12-2012 17:15

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35505685)
Can anyone advise me on which tails to get? The connectors are tiny

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/35.jpg

You are aware that tinkering with your Superhub in any way is in breach of the terms and conditions of your contract as one with holes in it is not acceptable if you have to call out an engineer for any reason.

Buy a N router and use modem mode much simpler.

thenry 02-12-2012 17:17

Re: Router Antennas
 
you are aware the OP is tinkering with a D-Link 615 and not the SH ?

Peter_ 02-12-2012 17:19

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35505808)
you are aware the OP is tinkering with a D-Link 615 and not the SH ?

Then why not just fit some screw on 9db antennas instead, much easier as it gives extra range and speed in many cases.

thenry 02-12-2012 17:23

Re: Router Antennas
 
because the OP has the rev. that hasnt got the ability to screw off and on antennas.

Peter_ 02-12-2012 17:29

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35505812)
because the OP has the rev. that hasnt got the ability to screw off and on antennas.

Not a nice router in that respect but I fitted 3 on my Edimax and it works fine, pity it is not that easy.

robson689 02-12-2012 18:38

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35505816)
Not a nice router in that respect but I fitted 3 on my Edimax and it works fine, pity it is not that easy.

Agree'd, it was literally as simple as you describe with my old DIR-301, but unfortunately not with the DIR-615 D2

qasdfdsaq 03-12-2012 21:17

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wicked_and_Crazy (Post 35504274)
So the router doesn't output fixed power. Agree the router has a power limit but it can be adjuster beyond the design parameters.

No, they cannot be adjusted beyond design parameters.

The interface may allow you to enter arbitrary numbers beyond design parameters but the chip will not obey it. In the case of the DIR-615 the default transmit power is 18dBm and the maximum it will ever go to nomatter what you try to set is 20dBm.

Quote:

I thought antennas only affect the gain and therefore impact the signal
Signal != amplifier output power

Hom3r 03-12-2012 21:23

Re: Router Antennas
 
There are some DIY option to direct the signal.

qasdfdsaq 03-12-2012 21:24

Re: Router Antennas
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Waldo Pepper (Post 35504710)
Correct, but it can increase the ERP or effective radiated power which is more relevant in path loss calculations.

Yes, ERP (or EiRP) is relevant for path loss calculations but irrelevant for determining if you are going to overheat the router. That's what they were suggesting would happen from fitting bigger antennas...

Quote:

An omnidirectional aerial in an ideal world has a circular radiation pattern when viewed from directly above.
When viewed from the side, it's a circular lobe shape.
A 2dBi 1/4 wave dipole may be circular lobe shaped from the side but not a 16dBi.

A 12dBi looks like the attachment below.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/20.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/21.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/20.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/21.gif
A 16dBi like the OP is talking about (if it really is, because that is a ludicrous claim) would be even more flattened.

Hom3r 03-12-2012 21:26

Re: Router Antennas
 
http://www.wikihow.com/Boost-a-Router-Signal

http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/boos...with-pr-140195

http://www.wikihow.com/Increase-the-Range-of-Your-Wifi

qasdfdsaq 03-12-2012 21:31

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35505807)
Buy a N router and use modem mode much simpler.

Learn to read. That's what he's already doing.

---------- Post added at 21:31 ---------- Previous post was at 21:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35505812)
because the OP has the rev. that hasnt got the ability to screw off and on antennas.

None of the DIR-615's have the ability to screw off and on antennas.

Peter_ 03-12-2012 21:39

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35506314)
Learn to read. That's what he's already doing.

---------- Post added at 21:31 ---------- Previous post was at 21:30 ----------


None of the DIR-615's have the ability to screw off and on antennas.

Who really cares as it is obvious you cannot read or you would not have missed my answer to Thenry and as for the D Link again who cares buy another that can be altered, try getting your own life.

qasdfdsaq 03-12-2012 22:53

Re: Router Antennas
 
I can read perfectly fine, that's why I did post moronic nonsense to begin with.

We were having a perfectly decent conversation in this thread that had nothing to do with you until you came along and derailed it with irrelevant horseshit like you always do. And you tell me to get my own life? As always, you first.

thenry 03-12-2012 23:29

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35506314)
None of the DIR-615's have the ability to screw off and on antennas.

the manual says they are. obviously this is wrong for some versions but all of them?

Peter_ 04-12-2012 06:14

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35506349)
I can read perfectly fine, that's why I did post moronic nonsense to begin with.

No need to post anything moronic as you are one oddly enough, the proof is in the way you have to cyberstalk other posters truly a sad person.

Do also check out the rather helpful manual which is a fault on D Link's side maybe you could also stalk them.

You just like to try Yan king my chain but always fail.

You could also post here about it as well D Link Forum or even to D Link as it clearly states HERE removable but a stalker dislikes facts as it gets in the way of their perception of reality.


https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/66.png

Waldo Pepper 04-12-2012 17:47

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35506308)
Yes, ERP (or EiRP) is relevant for path loss calculations but irrelevant for determining if you are going to overheat the router. That's what they were suggesting would happen from fitting bigger antennas...

A 2dBi 1/4 wave dipole may be circular lobe shaped from the side but not a 16dBi.

A 12dBi looks like the attachment below.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/20.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/21.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/20.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/21.gif
A 16dBi like the OP is talking about (if it really is, because that is a ludicrous claim) would be even more flattened.

Which are range tested results and all turn to pants once inside someone's house.

robson689 04-12-2012 20:21

Re: Router Antennas
 
I guess we'll just see how it turns out. Worst case is that it doesn't work and I won't be any worse off since the router only cost be £5.30 and best case is that I'll have better performance! =)

Btw has anyone heard of the router company called H3C?

thenry 04-12-2012 20:32

Re: Router Antennas
 
which product of theirs are you looking at?

robson689 04-12-2012 20:43

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35506873)
which product of theirs are you looking at?

None in particular, I just saw one of their routers today and it looked pretty impressive, it had 6 antennas, 3 for 2.4GHz and 3 for 5GHz. I've tried to find information about it but can't find anything (don't have the model number as it was mounted on a wall).

thenry 04-12-2012 20:58

Re: Router Antennas
 
alright questions.. wheres this router going? whats its purpose? whats the area size you want wifi to cover? whats the building struture like?

qasdfdsaq 05-12-2012 13:54

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35506363)
the manual says they are. obviously this is wrong for some versions but all of them?

Which manual?

---------- Post added at 13:49 ---------- Previous post was at 13:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waldo Pepper (Post 35506702)
Which are range tested results and all turn to pants once inside someone's house.

Heh, that much we can agree on...

---------- Post added at 13:52 ---------- Previous post was at 13:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35506881)
None in particular, I just saw one of their routers today and it looked pretty impressive, it had 6 antennas, 3 for 2.4GHz and 3 for 5GHz. I've tried to find information about it but can't find anything (don't have the model number as it was mounted on a wall).

Pfft, Netgear WNDR3700 has 8 antennas.

Cisco 2602i's have only 4, but all 4 are simultaneous dual-band and with some Cisco vector beamforming, makes for some fun results. Probably outperforms those 6 by a mile (though I haven't actually played around with ours yet, the 1142's were disappointing...)

---------- Post added at 13:54 ---------- Previous post was at 13:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by robson689 (Post 35506861)
Btw has anyone heard of the router company called H3C?

Never. Personally I'd go for Meru or Extricom myself.

thenry 05-12-2012 14:15

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35507173)
Which manual?

UK Revision B has it stated > http://www.dlink.com/uk/en/support/p...nual_EN_UK.pdf

UK Revision D hasn't > http://www.dlink.com/uk/en/support/p...4_01_EN_UK.pdf

UK Revision H hasn't > http://www.dlink.com/uk/en/support/p...4_01_EN_UK.pdf

Peter_ 05-12-2012 20:33

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35507178)

A little bit of homework goes a long way when others are questioning an answer does it not.http://www.addemoticons.com/emoticon...icons04259.gif

thenry 05-12-2012 20:36

Re: Router Antennas
 
Peter you call Qas a stalker all the while picking off mine and his conversation. stop causing trouble hypocrite!

Peter_ 05-12-2012 20:40

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35507428)
Peter you call Qas a stalker all the while picking off mine and his conversation. stop causing trouble hypocrite!

Are you a complete fool, I think the above proves it, go back to your tinfoil hat or the noise might reappear, your post proved that I was quite correct.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Mick 05-12-2012 20:57

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quit it - the pair of you. I am sick to death of seeing you two arguing all the time.

Put yourselves on each others ignore list because if I see the pair of you argue again, I shall suspend your accounts. I have had enough! :afire:

thenry 05-12-2012 21:11

Re: Router Antennas
 
ok Mick. this is a proper reply. electrical fraud plus cloning. i happily admitted i was wrong after having to dig deep for a pro electrician. clones were knocked off. you said there were no clones. anyway i did think 'the thieves' were messing with something more serious on the network with what was going on in other peoples homes as well, even those with no VM but ready for VM services. same old cable point ticking over. like i said i happily admitted i was wrong.

qasdfdsaq 06-12-2012 00:20

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35507178)

The Virgin Media issued ones (and practically every one in the UK) are revision D.

VM were too cheap to go for the standard build, and made D-Link cut cut out every optional component and then some, including the rubber feet, the metal shield on the ethernet ports, the external antenna connectors, and eventually even the internal antenna connectors were removed to save money (hence why D4 has them soldered straight on).

The B revision was a short run Ubicom unit that isn't supported by dd-wrt or openwrt. You'll never see one in real life. Incidentally, it's also a pile of crap.

Sephiroth 07-12-2012 22:12

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35507573)
The Virgin Media issued ones (and practically every one in the UK) are revision D.

VM were too cheap to go for the standard build, and made D-Link cut cut out every optional component and then some, including the rubber feet, the metal shield on the ethernet ports, the external antenna connectors, and eventually even the internal antenna connectors were removed to save money (hence why D4 has them soldered straight on).

The B revision was a short run Ubicom unit that isn't supported by dd-wrt or openwrt. You'll never see one in real life. Incidentally, it's also a pile of crap.

Qasi will know from his forays into the SH. Aren't the antennae in the SH glued on or something as cheapskate? Didn't they reduce the number of antennae from the standard CG3101D? Isn't it just the sotry of the SH? Cut out good stuff to get the cost down?

qasdfdsaq 09-12-2012 05:17

Re: Router Antennas
 
The Superhub has two antenna, but removable antenna connectors. That'd be hard to cut down, as they are connected to an add-in PCIe card and those practically never come with soldered on antennae.

I don't know how many antennae the CG3101D has but in order to have reduced the number VM would also had to have downgraded the wireless card itself, because it only has two connectors.

Sephiroth 09-12-2012 09:29

Re: Router Antennas
 
There's your answer then. Customised even down to the PCIe card.

Peter_ 09-12-2012 09:43

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35508926)
There's your answer then. Customised even down to the PCIe card.

I think the word you really want is illegitimised, or words to that effect.;)

Sephiroth 09-12-2012 10:13

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35508930)
I think the word you really want is illegitimised, or words to that effect.;)

OOps. How could I have let that slip?!!

robson689 13-12-2012 21:59

Re: Router Antennas
 
VM seem to have an obsession with shiny finger print magnets :P I looked online at pictures of the normal DIR-615 and it has a matte black top like my DIR-301 does.

Does anyone know why VM like shiny things so much?? Haha :P

I'm just waiting on the "pig tails" now anyway since I got the antennas this morning.

qasdfdsaq 15-12-2012 14:53

Re: Router Antennas
 
There's a matte version of the Superhub floating around somewhere...

robson689 15-12-2012 16:03

Re: Router Antennas
 
Done it! Not tested it yet though..

https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.n...10968625_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...94602205_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.n...22634748_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.n...34782111_n.jpg

qasdfdsaq 15-12-2012 16:05

Re: Router Antennas
 
Oh god, not those cheap pieces of EBay crap...

thenry 15-12-2012 16:19

Re: Router Antennas
 
:LOL: qas

robson689 15-12-2012 18:44

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35512382)
Oh god, not those cheap pieces of EBay crap...

Yeah they were maybe 2 quid each. I posted them on like the first page.

I think I did an alright job with the tails though. I had to use a hacksaw to cut some of the sticking out plastic off.

qasdfdsaq 15-12-2012 21:51

Re: Router Antennas
 
I'd be surprised if they managed 6dB let alone the 16dB they're claiming.

craigj2k12 29-01-2013 21:29

Re: Router Antennas
 
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/38.jpg

MJPS 30-01-2013 09:30

Re: Router Antennas
 
Hi guys

This site Marty Bugs is a great place for antenna designs and links to others.

The co linear there looks good too.

qasdfdsaq 31-01-2013 05:05

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35529194)

I see your "I have so many antennas bleurx" and raise you:
http://www.schippermt.nl/assets/images/Node-mast3.jpg

craigj2k12 31-01-2013 13:05

Re: Router Antennas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35529665)
I see your "I have so many antennas bleurx" and raise you:

Its not mine, its a kit I saw on ebay :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum