Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33689749)

Maggy 17-09-2012 11:01

Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19620075

Quote:

Changes to the exam system for 16-year-olds in England will "give parents confidence" in the exams taken by their children, says Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg.
Mr Clegg and Education Secretary Michael Gove are due to unveil the new GCSE exam regime.
From 2015, the current GCSEs are set to be replaced with what ministers claim will be a more rigorous system.
Assessment will be based on an O-level style single end-of-year exam.
Quote:

A leak during the exam season had claimed that GCSEs would be abolished and replaced with an O-level for the more able and a separate exam for pupils of a lower ability.
But this prompted a dispute within the coalition over introducing such a two-tier system - which seems to have been resolved so that there is a single exam for all ability levels.

Can't see how that will work unless they stick to a foundation and an advanced level..and guess what, not many employees will even consider foundation level passes.

Quote:

Addressing the education select committee last week, Mr Gove suggested that an exam could be taken at different points between 16 and 18 years of age - allowing weaker pupils to catch up.
Ah well that will keep the sixth form colleges going and keep the 16-18 year olds off the unemployment stats.

What happens if weaker students don't manage it by 18?
Where are the jobs that the lower third of each examination year during the GCE O-level pre CSE used to take up when they left school with no qualifications?

Gone abroad.Where are the industries that replaced them? Gone abroad.

nomadking 17-09-2012 11:30

Re: Nick Clegg hails coalition GCSE exam education changes
 
Spreading out the taking/retaking of 'O' levels is nothing new.

The are still jobs for those with no qualifications, but the exam system has given people delusions of grandeur that they are better than they actually are. Whatever system is used, there will be people at the bottom end of it. If not, that will only be because the exams have no true value.

Maggy 17-09-2012 12:37

Re: Nick Clegg hails coalition GCSE exam education changes
 
The problem is it would seem that this change means that yet again the emphasis is on academic achievement.Vocational training will yet again be at the bottom of the to do list..

The one person currently making sense is Lord Kenneth Baker who was actually instrumental in introducing in GCSEs.And no he doesn't want to keep them.He's got more radical ideas about introducing vocational training and wants to stop testing at 16.He wants to test at 14 to see in which direction our children should go in the training they receive between 14 and 18..He also points out that there is more than one way to learn and to achieve one's goals.

Chris 17-09-2012 12:58

Re: Nick Clegg hails coalition GCSE exam education changes
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35475013)
Spreading out the taking/retaking of 'O' levels is nothing new.

The are still jobs for those with no qualifications, but the exam system has given people delusions of grandeur that they are better than they actually are. Whatever system is used, there will be people at the bottom end of it. If not, that will only be because the exams have no true value.

Unfortunately that flies in the face of 50 years of educational dogma - we have a one-size-fits-all comprehensive education system and a one-size-fits-all exam system because the establishment wanted to ensure that everyone turns out the same.

It's no accident that GCSEs and A levels have reached the stage where it's impossible to tell the bright students apart by their exam results. That's simply the inevitable consequence of making the work incrementally easier and easier with the aim of ensuring that as few people at the bottom of the ability range can be said to have 'failed' anything.

The whole system has been skewed in pursuit of this crazy ideology that can't bear the simple truth that some kids are bright and some kids are thick. They shut down the Grammar schools, which really were an engine of social mobility, and look where we are now - vast numbers of public school toffs on both sides of the House of Commons, because in most of the country, parents who want to ensure their kids get the very best education now have no option but to pay for it.

The same thing is now happening in the Universities. These institutions, now groaning under the weight of their own witless Meedja Studies courses and the endless ranks of school leavers who populate them, are charging vast fees for a level of education that once upon a time was free of charge to those who actually stood to benefit from it. Thus a policy that on the face of it was socially liberating - higher education for everyone that could possibly do it - is now turning out, just as the assault on the Grammar schools was, to be simply another means of ensuring that the vast majority get stuck with mediocrity while those from moneyed backgrounds continue to pick and choose the best.

Stupid, stupid, shortsighted lefties. Sadly, Gove is unlikely to be allowed to go nearly as far as he needs to, to turn this ship around.

Maggy 17-09-2012 13:14

Re: Nick Clegg hails coalition GCSE exam education changes
 
Media studies should never have been allowed onto any syllabus as an examination subject..That we can agree on.

Chris 17-09-2012 16:00

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19626663

Quote:

The GCSE exam in England is going to be replaced by a qualification called the English Baccalaureate Certificate.
A shake-up of the exam system set to be unveiled will mean a single end-of-course exam and one exam board for each subject.
Pupils who have begun secondary school this year will be the first to take the revised exams in 2017.

jempalmer 17-09-2012 16:06

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
The crux of this whole education "debate" is very simple. It does not matter how you grade the examinations, irrespective of which body is responsible for them. Teach those subjects properly. There is no point in altering the marks awarded if those responsible are also ill educated. I could cite innumerable examples with regard to how teachers are illiterate, innumerate and incompetent. Off my high horse now.

Chris 17-09-2012 16:12

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jempalmer (Post 35475123)
The crux of this whole education "debate" is very simple. It does not matter how you grade the examinations, irrespective of which body is responsible for them. Teach those subjects properly. There is no point in altering the marks awarded if those responsible are also ill educated. I could cite innumerable examples with regard to how teachers are illiterate, innumerate and incompetent. Off my high horse now.

A qualification that is based entirely on final exam performance should achieve precisely that. There are no opportunities to endlessly reproduce coursework until you get the right result if everything hangs on the final assessment. For the first time in decades, it's just possible that exam results in England might prove that school pupils have actually learned stuff ...

Damien 17-09-2012 16:18

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35475120)

So this is the one single exam for leaving school? Brilliant if that is the case....

BenMcr 17-09-2012 16:21

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I'm feeling a little bit odd now. I'm not a fan of Michael Gove in any way, but I think this could be a good thing.

Might have to go have a shower shortly :D

Taf 17-09-2012 16:30

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I'd like to see pupils about to leave primary schools examined on at least the 3 R's, as in my experience that it's primary schools that are churning out more and more illiterate and innumerate pupils. And once they have failed at primary level, they are never allowed to catch up.

Damien 17-09-2012 16:39

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Turns out it's not a single qualification like the normal Baccalaureate is. Confusing....

Itshim 17-09-2012 16:41

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35475136)
I'd like to see pupils about to leave primary schools examined on at least the 3 R's, as in my experience that it's primary schools that are churning out more and more illiterate and innumerate pupils. And once they have failed at primary level, they are never allowed to catch up.


To much time wasted teaching Welsh. Get off hobby horse now:D

Maggy 17-09-2012 17:13

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35475125)
A qualification that is based entirely on final exam performance should achieve precisely that. There are no opportunities to endlessly reproduce coursework until you get the right result if everything hangs on the final assessment. For the first time in decades, it's just possible that exam results in England might prove that school pupils have actually learned stuff ...

Actually the only single thing that's going to be the most effective is...

Quote:

There will be one exam board for some key subjects - English, mathematics, sciences, history, geography and languages - rather than having different exam boards competing with their own versions.
That was what really needed.

Damien 17-09-2012 17:31

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I really don't like the lack of coursework. Can be a good chance for students who otherwise lack ability to exams to do well. I always did poorly at exams but very good at coursework....

martyh 17-09-2012 18:16

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35475165)
I really don't like the lack of coursework. Can be a good chance for students who otherwise lack ability to exams to do well. I always did poorly at exams but very good at coursework....

The problem with course work is that it offers too many opportunities for the pupil to show how adept they are at copy and paste or for mumsy to do it because the poor little darling is properly thick and mumsy doesn't want anyone to know

Damien 17-09-2012 19:07

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35475181)
The problem with course work is that it offers too many opportunities for the pupil to show how adept they are at copy and paste or for mumsy to do it because the poor little darling is properly thick and mumsy doesn't want anyone to know

True but then coursework is far more akin to actual work as well. For those that don't cheat it's a chance to craft a real bit of work, a researched and well-argued essay, a practical computer program, a work of art (they are keeping coursework for art) and so on. My essays for history were far better when I had the ability to type them out, research and use citations. I tend to get a bit messy when writing essays as my brain jumps between several points and a computer allows me to restructure it in a way a two-hour time limit with a written page doesn't.

watzizname 17-09-2012 19:17

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
"Baccalaureate"

Glad I'm not 16, I can't even pronounce it :dunce:

Damien 17-09-2012 19:19

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I have heard of it before. It's used in France and there is a European one that I think some schools in the UK offer. However although the modules are separate you get passed on it as a whole. So I am not sure if this is like that or they will continue to offer separate qualifications.

devilincarnate 17-09-2012 19:27

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35475136)
I'd like to see pupils about to leave primary schools examined on at least the 3 R's, as in my experience that it's primary schools that are churning out more and more illiterate and innumerate pupils. And once they have failed at primary level, they are never allowed to catch up.

Very true. I have taught my children the correct sayings/ spellings for words also the Maths.

---------- Post added at 19:27 ---------- Previous post was at 19:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 35475143)
To much time wasted teaching Welsh.

My mate is from Maesteg and he cannot speak Welsh:erm:

martyh 17-09-2012 19:38

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35475207)
True but then coursework is far more akin to actual work as well. For those that don't cheat it's a chance to craft a real bit of work, a researched and well-argued essay, a practical computer program, a work of art (they are keeping coursework for art) and so on. My essays for history were far better when I had the ability to type them out, research and use citations. I tend to get a bit messy when writing essays as my brain jumps between several points and a computer allows me to restructure it in a way a two-hour time limit with a written page doesn't.

That's true ,and why it is used in universities and colleges maybe the way forward is to make sure the kids know the 3rs first before doing course work after all Britain didn't do too bad when we where taught parrot fashion with one exam in each subject ,we still turned out world class academics .My school was one of the first to experiment with GCSE'S 1980-81 i did CSE levels which had a equivalent gcse grade attached to them and i remember one of the teachers saying that the government where trying to fix something that wasn't broken

RizzyKing 17-09-2012 19:51

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I really hoped this government might get something right in this regard a shift in emphasis to a more balanced system between academic and vocational but it is not meant to be. What i have noticed locally is that many of the truants and non academic kids have been taken into the vocational sector and are doing very well one who lives down the road from me i don't think attended a day of school for two years. He got a placement through some local scheme at a local garage and is now one of their best mechanics even catching up with is reading and writing and maths as he can now see how it benefits him to have those skills in his job.

We are so stuck in this country on the idea that academic excellence is the benchmark to judge people by and seem completely unable or unwilling to accept it is not for everyone such a shame a better approach to vocational training could have done so much that academic study never will.

Maggy 17-09-2012 19:59

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35475229)
I really hoped this government might get something right in this regard a shift in emphasis to a more balanced system between academic and vocational but it is not meant to be. What i have noticed locally is that many of the truants and non academic kids have been taken into the vocational sector and are doing very well one who lives down the road from me i don't think attended a day of school for two years. He got a placement through some local scheme at a local garage and is now one of their best mechanics even catching up with is reading and writing and maths as he can now see how it benefits him to have those skills in his job.

We are so stuck in this country on the idea that academic excellence is the benchmark to judge people by and seem completely unable or unwilling to accept it is not for everyone such a shame a better approach to vocational training could have done so much that academic study never will.

:clap:

Hom3r 17-09-2012 22:01

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Typical govenment using a word thats not english

http://oxforddictionaries.com/defini.../baccalaureate

Quote:

Origin:

mid 17th century (in baccalaureate (sense 2)): from French baccalauréat or medieval Latin baccalaureatus, from baccalaureus 'bachelor'. The earlier form baccalarius was altered by wordplay to conform with bacca lauri 'laurel berry', because of the laurels awarded to scholars. baccalaureate (sense 1) dates from 1970

THIS COUNTRY IS ENGLISH NOT FLAMING FRENCH:mad::mad:

BenMcr 17-09-2012 22:17

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35475285)
Typical govenment using a word thats not english

http://oxforddictionaries.com/defini.../baccalaureate



THIS COUNTRY IS ENGLISH NOT FLAMING FRENCH:mad::mad:

If we ruled out words that started out as French or Latin, think our language would be quite limited

Maggy 17-09-2012 22:37

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35475291)
If we ruled out words that started out as French or Latin, think our language would be quite limited

Plus the fact that Latin rules are applied to English grammar.Also there are the influences from the Vikings and Danes and Norsemen.

devilincarnate 17-09-2012 22:42

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35475299)
Plus the fact that Latin rules are applied to English grammar.Also there are the influences from the Vikings and Danes and Norsemen.

We would all speak Gaelic:)

danielf 17-09-2012 23:09

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Is this a good time to mention that English is a Germanic Language? :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_languages

jempalmer 18-09-2012 00:58

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Perhaps not daniel, although you are quite correct. Just teach the children to read, write and spell correctly. A grounding in mathematics would be useful. I despair (anagram = aspired) :D

Damien 18-09-2012 08:16

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35475285)
THIS COUNTRY IS ENGLISH NOT FLAMING FRENCH:mad::mad:

:erm:

Fawkes 18-09-2012 12:25

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
For future generations I hope Michael Gove knows what he is doing. I hope he has looked at all the evidence and chosen the best solution. Education needs to do two things. It needs to teach and then measure a persons ability.
Is the move from coursework to more lecture based study a better teaching method, I’m not sure?
Is a single exam at the end of a course the best way to measure ability, I’m sure of that either?
It’s possible that multiple approaches are needed.
Employers with tell you that change is needed, and I don’t disagree I just hope there is a strong evidential basis for this change and not just political ideology.

Angua 18-09-2012 14:04

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35475165)
I really don't like the lack of coursework. Can be a good chance for students who otherwise lack ability to exams to do well. I always did poorly at exams but very good at coursework....

It also gives those who can cram at the last minute a relatively free ride for 2 years. :dozey:

The obsession with churning out results rather than offering a complete education according to ability, is the continuing problem of government interference.

Maggy 18-09-2012 14:19

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35475487)
It also gives those who can cram at the last minute a relatively free ride for 2 years. :dozey:

The obsession with churning out results rather than offering a complete education according to ability, is the continuing problem of government interference.

:clap:

Teaching is not about churning out ready made workers for industry.A job is not the whole of a person's life.It is merely the means by which we pay to survive and live as an individual.
Education should be about teaching the person for the whole of their life not just the bit they spend working.

Damien 18-09-2012 14:45

Re: [Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35475487)
It also gives those who can cram at the last minute a relatively free ride for 2 years. :dozey:

Yup. Although it's hard to cram to such a degree. It also rewards the ability to retain facts for the purpose of an exam. Coursework teaches deadlines, research, and presentation.

Maggy 07-02-2013 10:28

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21363396

Quote:

Plans to scrap GCSEs in key subjects in England and replace them with English Baccalaureate Certificates are set to be abandoned by the government.
The reversal is set to be announced by the education secretary in the Commons later, alongside curriculum changes.
Michael Gove had planned to bring in what he said were more rigorous exams in some core subjects from 2015, but faced criticism from MPs and teachers.
Labour said it was a "humiliating climbdown".
The change means plans for the new qualification, announced in September, will be shelved, while GCSEs are retained, despite having been condemned by the education secretary.
I wonder what he's got planned next?

denphone 07-02-2013 10:37

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Tell me Maggy what are your thoughts on it as were you not a teacher as l know my thoughts are why do we need to tamper with our Education system every time a new government comes in and wants to change the policies of the previous incumbents.

Maggy 07-02-2013 10:42

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35533385)
Tell me Maggy what are your thoughts on it as were you not a teacher as l know my thoughts are why do we need to tamper with our Education system every time a new government comes in and wants to change the policies of the previous incumbents.

My thoughts are that education should be taken from government control and given to a cross party committee so that the constant short termism that emerges at every General Election would become a thing of the past.Then knee jerk reactions could be replaced by long term decisions that benefit
State Education rather than are based on a party getting elected.

denphone 07-02-2013 10:47

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35533389)
My thoughts are that education should be taken from government control and given to a cross party committee so that the constant short termism that emerges at every General Election would become a thing of the past.Then knee jerk reactions could be replaced by long term decisions that benefit
State Education rather than are based on a party getting elected.

Yes indeed l think thats what most of us would like to happen but whether that will ever happen is another matter l am afraid.

Damien 07-02-2013 10:56

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35533389)
My thoughts are that education should be taken from government control and given to a cross party committee so that the constant short termism that emerges at every General Election would become a thing of the past.Then knee jerk reactions could be replaced by long term decisions that benefit
State Education rather than are based on a party getting elected.

I sort of agree but doesn't this might government become more of a Technocracy? It seems like a balance needs to be struck but informed people can advocate to the Government, it's just problematic when politicians dismiss the concerns of these people in favour of popular opinion. Is it good or bad if popular opinion overrules minority, but perhaps more education, opinion?

One thing that's certain if experts decided more then we wouldn't be paying for idiotic homeopathy...

Chris 07-02-2013 11:08

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
I'm not a fan of government via unelected committee. That's how the Soviet Union was run. In fact that's how China is run. Love them or loathe them, our politicians are our elected representatives and frankly I think we get the government we deserve.

Use your vote wisely, folks ...

Maggy 07-02-2013 11:28

Re: Update to the[Update] "English Baccalaureate" replaces GCSE in England
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35533406)
I'm not a fan of government via unelected committee. That's how the Soviet Union was run. In fact that's how China is run. Love them or loathe them, our politicians are our elected representatives and frankly I think we get the government we deserve.

Use your vote wisely, folks ...

And I'm sick of education being a political football every 4/5 years.I wasn't suggesting an unelected committee either.I did think that it would be made up of equal numbers of MPs from the present house of Commons as well as a few cross party candidates from the House of Lords.
But of course as I'm supposedly a Labourite my opinions don't count despite I've been on the sharp end of kneejerk reactions from successive governments of both major parties during my working life.

Now we have Gove suggesting that teachers needn't be trained turning back time to the Victorian era..:rolleyes:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum