Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   30M : Finally had enough of VM BS........... (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33689080)

Mick Fisher 03-08-2012 17:58

Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I got STM'ed during Happy Hour again. :mad:

I downloaded 4gig between 1.00pm and 3.30pm. As my tier gets allowed 7gig between 10am till 3pm and 3pm till 4pm is supposedly un-metered, to be STM'ed is taking the proverbial IMO.

Although I had no need to download anything else today, the fact that VM make up all their stupid traffic throttling schemes and then don't even bother sticking to them got right up my nose.

That, the abysmal Indian support, the abysmal superhub and having to wait for about another year for speed doubling has pushed me over the edge and I have ordered Sky Fibre 80/20 and Sky Talk.

I got Free Installation, the Sky Fibre is the same price as my 30meg VM and Sky Talk is way cheaper than my BT phone so overall I will save a little cash and hopefully get a better BB experience.

Fingers crossed anyway. I've been told to expect at least 67meg down with absolutely no throttling of any kind whatsoever. Install date is 20th August.

vmfriend 03-08-2012 18:21

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Doesn't the traffic management depend on the type of download, P2P is treated differently to 'other' traffic, that's been discussed ad nauseum on here anyway, good luck with Sky.

Chrysalis 04-08-2012 06:41

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
STM doesnt care what type of traffic it is.

Although I just ignore STM now as its a 50% theottle now instead of 75%. I can download at 15mbit/sec even when STM'd.

vmfriend 04-08-2012 07:31

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Ah ok thanks for clarifying. Yes when I downloaded mountain lion and all the associated updates I was throttled to 15mb but it doesn't really bother me that much to be honest.

babis3g 04-08-2012 14:41

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
when your speeds lower due to stm, the ping did got higher ????thanks

Mick Fisher 04-08-2012 19:20

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by babis3g (Post 35459745)
when your speeds lower due to stm, the ping did got higher ????thanks

I don't think so. Speed just went from 34/3 to 17/3 at just past 3.00 pm.

It's happened before a couple of times.

I just got tired of clock watching just to make a few small downloads.

Hugh 04-08-2012 19:24

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
More than 7GB - new definition of 'small' I hadn't come across before.....;)

Peter_ 04-08-2012 19:57

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35459803)
More than 7GB - new definition of 'small' I hadn't come across before.....;)

Probably wants to download the https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...012/08/124.jpg or believes should be allowed to.https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/12/10.gif

muppetman11 04-08-2012 20:39

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35459510)
I got STM'ed during Happy Hour again. :mad:

I downloaded 4gig between 1.00pm and 3.30pm. As my tier gets allowed 7gig between 10am till 3pm and 3pm till 4pm is supposedly un-metered, to be STM'ed is taking the proverbial IMO.

Although I had no need to download anything else today, the fact that VM make up all their stupid traffic throttling schemes and then don't even bother sticking to them got right up my nose.

That, the abysmal Indian support, the abysmal superhub and having to wait for about another year for speed doubling has pushed me over the edge and I have ordered Sky Fibre 80/20 and Sky Talk.

I got Free Installation, the Sky Fibre is the same price as my 30meg VM and Sky Talk is way cheaper than my BT phone so overall I will save a little cash and hopefully get a better BB experience.

Fingers crossed anyway. I've been told to expect at least 67meg down with absolutely no throttling of any kind whatsoever. Install date is 20th August.

Keep us posted how you get on Mick , this will probably be my next move when we finally get fibre.:(

Mick Fisher 05-08-2012 12:59

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35459803)
More than 7GB - new definition of 'small' I hadn't come across before.....;)

Please get the facts right.

Nowhere have I said I downloaded "More than 7GB".

Anyway I have no need to as I downloaded the Internet years ago and these days just need the occasional update. ;)

Anyway this is not about how much I downloaded it's about VM not honouring the Traffic Managing rules they themselves set.

---------- Post added at 12:58 ---------- Previous post was at 12:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35459816)

Done that and got the T-Shirt. :)

---------- Post added at 12:59 ---------- Previous post was at 12:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35459825)
Keep us posted how you get on Mick , this will probably be my next move when we finally get fibre.:(

Will do.

yorkshireborn 05-08-2012 14:54

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35459816)

well with sky fibre he will be allowed to without being throttled.

gj4009 05-08-2012 14:59

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Not being funny but its really not that hard these days to hit the traffic management limit. So the sarcy comments about him wanting to download the earth are a bit stupid. 2 HD films at about 2.5 - 3 gigs each and a game demo and your done ... i've done it myself a few times, Download a film from Sky anytime watch it, download another while im watching the first downloaded, once films are watched pop onto xbox live and download a demo or a new game if im feeling a bit flush with money that weekend and boom. Cannot wait for my Sky Fibre install to be honest so i can get rid of this jittered, congested overly managed mess that is virgins network...

Sirius 05-08-2012 15:05

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35459972)
Please get the facts right.

Nowhere have I said I downloaded "More than 7GB".

Anyway I have no need to as I downloaded the Internet years ago and these days just need the occasional update. ;)

Anyway this is not about how much I downloaded it's about VM not honouring the Traffic Managing rules they themselves set.

---------- Post added at 12:58 ---------- Previous post was at 12:57 ----------


Done that and got the T-Shirt. :)

.

Me to :tu:

---------- Post added at 15:05 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by gj4009 (Post 35460017)
Not being funny but its really not that hard these days to hit the traffic management limit. So the snarky comments about him wanting to download the earth are a bit stupid. 2 HD films at about 2.5 - 3 gigs each and a game demo and your done ... i've done it myself a few times, Download a film from Sky anytime watch it, download another while i'm watching the first downloaded, once films are watched pop onto xbox live and download a demo or a new game if i'm feeling a bit flush with money that weekend and boom. Cannot wait for my Sky Fibre install to be honest so i can get rid of this jittered, congested overly managed mess that is virgins network...

End of the day i don't give a fig about STM, my connection goes from 100 meg down to 50 meg which is still a decent speed and far better than any of my friends on ADSL :LOL:

I download what i want, when i want, how i want,. ;)

muppetman11 05-08-2012 16:53

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
heres my parents upto 20mb speed :(

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/36.png

gj4009 05-08-2012 16:57

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35460018)
Me to :tu:

---------- Post added at 15:05 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------



End of the day i don't give a fig about STM, my connection goes from 100 meg down to 50 meg which is still a decent speed and far better than any of my friends on ADSL :LOL:

I download what i want, when i want, how i want,. ;)


Ok then, really happy for you ...:clap: not everyone wants, needs or can afford 100mb the point i was making is the usage caps before you hit traffic management are low by todays internet usage standards. Netflix streams in HD, Lovefilm streams in HD, game demos, patches or a full game, Sky Anytime+, HD youtube streaming, bbc iplayer, 4od etc etc take your pick from the plethora of bandwidth hungry services the internet is used for. End of the day virgin are forcing peoples hands into either living with permanent traffic management or taking the higher end (more expensive) internet packages. Funny on this forum i read all about Sky forcing peoples hands into taking up services because of thier greed, seems like virgin are doing the same thing here.

Hugh 05-08-2012 17:03

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
But that's like complaining that when you bought a Mini, it was fine for just you and your partner, but now you have four kids, it's not big enough.

More services require more bandwidth, VM and other suppliers now offer bigger packages to allow customers to use more services - it's like being peeved your six year old PC won't play black Ops, and Blaming Activision.

ymmv.

alwaysabear 05-08-2012 17:37

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35460058)
heres my parents upto 20mb speed :(

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/36.png

That is awful, a contended area I am guessing.

gj4009 05-08-2012 17:55

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35460064)
But that's like complaining that when you bought a Mini, it was fine for just you and your partner, but now you have four kids, it's not big enough.

More services require more bandwidth, VM and other suppliers now offer bigger packages to allow customers to use more services - it's like being peeved your six year old PC won't play black Ops, and Blaming Activision.

ymmv.

Its nothing like that at all, personally i think that is a really poor analagy. 60 meg package for example between peak hours you are allowed 5gb of bandwidth before you are traffic managed. So your telling me that someone who pays for 60 mbps of download speed should have 5gb of bandwidth to play with in the evening? Sorry mate but come on that is rediculous i dont know of any other ISP providing a fibre connection that has this in place. Ok with Infinity 1 you get a 40gb monthly usage allowance which is another cheap tactic to get people to take up the more expensive infinity 2 option. But none of them to my knowledge have a daily download limit before your connection is halved for 5 hours.

Also are you suggesting that a family lets say 2 parents and 2 teenagers should all take up the most expensive option on virgin to get 10gb of usage per night, so that even if they were under STM they would still have 50mbps to play with? That is pure nonsense at the end of the day you and i and everyone reading this knows that downloading 5gb online between 4-9 pm if you have 3 or 4 people using the internet all at once is done in no time.

As i said i fail to see what you were saying as far as the mini goes, 60mb should be PLENTY for the average family but with rediculous restrictions on how much you can download before you're speed is halved. It is like i said forcing people to take up the most expensive packages that they do not need.

Hugh 05-08-2012 18:01

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
But they would be halved to 30Mb/s, which surely is more than sufficient for their needs, as HD streaming is 5Mb/s, which would allow 6 people to stream a HD movie each.

What would being STM'ed to 30Mb/s stop them doing?

Sirius 05-08-2012 18:23

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35460079)
But they would be halved to 30Mb/s, which surely is more than sufficient for their needs, as HD streaming is 5Mb/s, which would allow 6 people to stream a HD movie each.

What would being STM'ed to 30Mb/s stop them doing
?

30 meg just means the Linux iso's take longer ;)

carlwaring 05-08-2012 19:04

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35460018)
End of the day i don't give a fig about STM, my connection goes from 100 meg down to 50 meg which is still a decent speed and far better than any of my friends on ADSL :LOL:

I download what i want, when i want, how i want,. ;)

And this is exactly the point. What can you download at 100mb that you can't at 50?

---------- Post added at 18:59 ---------- Previous post was at 18:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35460058)
heres my parents upto 20mb speed :(

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/36.png

Here's my "up to 30mb" speed :)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/37.png

---------- Post added at 19:00 ---------- Previous post was at 18:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by gj4009 (Post 35460060)
Ok then, really happy for you ...:clap: not everyone wants, needs or can afford 100mb...

I can do the same on 30mb though :)

---------- Post added at 19:02 ---------- Previous post was at 19:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by gj4009 (Post 35460074)
60 meg package for example between peak hours you are allowed 5gb of bandwidth before you are traffic managed. So your telling me that someone who pays for 60 mbps of download speed should have 5gb of bandwidth to play with in the evening?

But it doesn't STOP after that 5GB has been downloaded. It does slow down by 50%, but that's still 30gb and only for 5 hours.

---------- Post added at 19:04 ---------- Previous post was at 19:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35460086)
30 meg just means the Linux iso's take longer ;)

Exactly. So things take a little longer. Big deal :(

gj4009 05-08-2012 19:25

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
But we all know that from reading on here and other forums that ones people are under STM it seems to have an adverse effect on the qaulity of connection, i know for me it certainly does. Anyways im gonna make this my last words on the matter because this forum is known for its bias towards VM which is fine considering its a cable forum. :)

carlwaring 05-08-2012 19:29

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gj4009 (Post 35460107)
... this forum is known for its bias towards VM which is fine considering its a cable forum. :)

Really? Anyone else spotted this bias lying around? I keep losing stuff so it was probably me :p: :D

boroboi 05-08-2012 22:52

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I can spot a bias right now, it goes under the name of Carl Waring posting a speed test with an invisible caption that says "My internet is fine, theres nothing wrong with Virgin Media".

Peter_ 05-08-2012 23:15

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boroboi (Post 35460194)
I can spot a bias right now, it goes under the name of Carl Waring posting a speed test with an invisible caption that says "My internet is fine, theres nothing wrong with Virgin Media".

Well here is my 30Mb connection which appears to go past the up to 30Mb download and the 3Mb upload and this is normal for me at any time of day.

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/35.png

carlwaring 05-08-2012 23:38

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boroboi (Post 35460194)
I can spot a bias right now, it goes under the name of Carl Waring posting a speed test with an invisible caption that says "My internet is fine, theres nothing wrong with Virgin Media".

That's not bias, of course. That's just confirming that not everyone has such a bad connection. It's called balance and is actually the exact opposite of bias.

The OP obviously does have a problem with their connection. Nothing I can say will help with that, but they should certainly get it sorted out.

Not that there was an 'invisible caption' but if there were it would have actually said "My internet is fine. There is obviously something wrong with yours."

MalteseFalcon 05-08-2012 23:50

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
This is me on an up to 30MB package for BB.

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/34.png

I would like a better upload speed, but it serves me adequately so I have no real complaints.

Stuart 05-08-2012 23:51

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boroboi (Post 35460194)
I can spot a bias right now, it goes under the name of Carl Waring posting a speed test with an invisible caption that says "My internet is fine, theres nothing wrong with Virgin Media".

No need for that. VM operate a large network (actually several large interconnected networks). Just because you (or anyone else) get a bad connection it doesn't follow that everyone does. Similarly, because Carl, Peter and I (or anyone else) get a good connection, it does not follow that everyone does.

Bias goes both ways. There appear to be large group of people on here who think that VM never provide a good service. That opinion is just as biased.

carlwaring 06-08-2012 09:25

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35460220)
I would like a better upload speed, but it serves me adequately so I have no real complaints.

Did you get 30mb as an upgrade from 10 when you asked for it?

If so then that explains the slightly lower upload speed; which will increase to 3mb (inkeeping with VM's 10:1 speed ratio) when your area gets the free speed upgrade.

kwikbreaks 06-08-2012 09:49

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35460206)
Well here is my 30Mb connection which appears to go past the up to 30Mb download and the 3Mb upload and this is normal for me at any time of day.

That's interesting - I'm on 60/3 and although the downstream will normally exceed 60 the upstream resolutely remains below 3.

My upstream config is

Primary Upstream Service Flow
SFID 58061
Max Traffic Rate 3072000 bps
Max Traffic Burst 8160 bytes
Min Traffic Rate 0 bps
Max Concatenated Burst 8160 bps
Scheduling Type BestEffort

Now I'm assuming that 3Mbps max rate will always give me less than 3Mbps up because of overheads. Is your 30/3 config different or is something else coming into play? Be interesting to see your config.

MalteseFalcon 06-08-2012 09:59

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35460242)
Did you get 30mb as an upgrade from 10 when you asked for it?

If so then that explains the slightly lower upload speed; which will increase to 3mb (inkeeping with VM's 10:1 speed ratio) when your area gets the free speed upgrade.

Yes, I called to upgrade the phone package and they offered me a free upgrade to 30MB as part of the phone upgrade. Pleased to know it will go up when my area gets the speed upgrade.

Peter_ 06-08-2012 10:33

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35460250)
That's interesting - I'm on 60/3 and although the downstream will normally exceed 60 the upstream resolutely remains below 3.

My upstream config is

Primary Upstream Service Flow
SFID 58061
Max Traffic Rate 3072000 bps
Max Traffic Burst 8160 bytes
Min Traffic Rate 0 bps
Max Concatenated Burst 8160 bps
Scheduling Type BestEffort

Now I'm assuming that 3Mbps max rate will always give me less than 3Mbps up because of overheads. Is your 30/3 config different or is something else coming into play? Be interesting to see your config.

It has always been this since day one.

Primary Downstream Service Flow Max Traffic Rate 33330000 bps Primary Upstream Service Flow Max Traffic Rate 3333000 bps

kwikbreaks 06-08-2012 10:40

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35460261)
It has always been this since day one. Primary Upstream Service Flow Max Traffic Rate 3333000 bps

Interesting - I wonder if you'll get a reduction in upload to match mine when you get your doubling - or is that a doubled + 1 10Mbps?

Peter_ 06-08-2012 10:50

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35460264)
Interesting - I wonder if you'll get a reduction in upload to match mine when you get your doubling - or is that a doubled + 1 10Mbps?

As mine is in the New Year sometime I will have to wait and see, possibly by that time it should be sorted but then again we have very few issues in my area so you never know.

kwikbreaks 06-08-2012 11:51

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I reckon it will be the same for everybody so if anybody else has a doubled 30 your upload config would be appreciated.

Mick Fisher 20-08-2012 16:12

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35459825)
Keep us posted how you get on Mick , this will probably be my next move when we finally get fibre.:(

Install went like clockwork. The BTO chap was on time, 10 minutes to install the filter on the master socket, 15 minutes to sort the Cab, 10 minutes to connect up and run a test.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/15.png
And he was on his way.

However all is not good. I wanted to use my own router and had researched how to hack my rt n-16 running tomato to let it connect to the Sky system. For this I needed my sky router username/password which they obfuscate. Relatively easy to obtain from the Sagem router which I expected to receive however they have sent me their very latest Hub.:shocked: for which I have no idea how to obtain my username/password. So I am stuck with it for the moment. :(

No specs for the Hub although I believe it to be a 300 N device with 100meg ports :( It is a dual DSL/Sky fibre device. There is a dedicated DSL connector but the sky fibre is connect direct to the switch only leaving 3 ports for other wired devices. Providing the device proves to serviceable the easiest thing is to connect a gigabit switch to it.

I'm going to use it as is for a bit and see how it performs.

ShadowTD 20-08-2012 17:24

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Never understood Sky's stance on this. By all means provide the router, even only provide support to people using it if you must, but don't actively prevent people from using something else. This was always my problem with the SH when it lacked modem mode - how arrogant to suggest that your router will be sufficient for everyone's needs.
I used the HH3 with my Infinity connection up until about 2 weeks ago as I was struggling to get the port forwarding to play ball. Now I'm using a WNR3300 with DD-WRT and a gigabit switch. I've got the flexibility to use what I want after the OR modem, as it should be!

Mick Fisher 20-08-2012 19:51

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ShadowTD (Post 35465491)
Never understood Sky's stance on this. By all means provide the router, even only provide support to people using it if you must, but don't actively prevent people from using something else. This was always my problem with the SH when it lacked modem mode - how arrogant to suggest that your router will be sufficient for everyone's needs.
I used the HH3 with my Infinity connection up until about 2 weeks ago as I was struggling to get the port forwarding to play ball. Now I'm using a WNR3300 with DD-WRT and a gigabit switch. I've got the flexibility to use what I want after the OR modem, as it should be!

I couldn't agree more.

I knew Sky were inflexable as regards routers but I really wanted to dump BT.

I didn't expect any problems with a Sagem. Getting this new Hub has flummoxed me for the moment but I am confident someone will figure out how to extract the relevent data from it soon.

ethan103 22-08-2012 00:45

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35465458)
Install went like clockwork. The BTO chap was on time, 10 minutes to install the filter on the master socket, 15 minutes to sort the Cab, 10 minutes to connect up and run a test.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/15.png
And he was on his way.

However all is not good. I wanted to use my own router and had researched how to hack my rt n-16 running tomato to let it connect to the Sky system. For this I needed my sky router username/password which they obfuscate. Relatively easy to obtain from the Sagem router which I expected to receive however they have sent me their very latest Hub.:shocked: for which I have no idea how to obtain my username/password. So I am stuck with it for the moment. :(

No specs for the Hub although I believe it to be a 300 N device with 100meg ports :( It is a dual DSL/Sky fibre device. There is a dedicated DSL connector but the sky fibre is connect direct to the switch only leaving 3 ports for other wired devices. Providing the device proves to serviceable the easiest thing is to connect a gigabit switch to it.

I'm going to use it as is for a bit and see how it performs.


That's not a bad connection,

Can you do a speedtest to Paris, France?


And am I right in saying 120 Mb will not have STM ?

Mick Fisher 22-08-2012 15:01

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by internetuser (Post 35466091)
That's not a bad connection,

Can you do a speedtest to Paris, France?

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/14.png



Quote:

Originally Posted by internetuser (Post 35466091)
And am I right in saying 120 Mb will not have STM ?

Well 120meg is VM's "speed doubled" 100meg. As 100meg is micromanaged I would expect 120meg to be the same.

ethan103 22-08-2012 15:26

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35466273)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/14.png




Well 120meg is VM's "speed doubled" 100meg. As 100meg is micromanaged I would expect 120meg to be the same.


Well when 100 Mb launched as it was the top package it didn't have any STM.

I also heard rumours that when 120 Mb comes into force, as it would be the top package it also wouldn't have STM and I can't find any STM info on it.

Also could you please do one final speedtest to Wellington, New Zealand?

A pingtest to Maidenhead would be nice too, to see the jitter and ping.

The sky speeds + ping look impressive and I may have to consider switching if they match Virgins 120 Mb speeds or higher. I imagine they are using BTs fibre ?

Chrysalis 22-08-2012 19:00

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
fiber cant come soon enough here.

last 2 to 3 days I noticed severe issues, by severe I mean web pages not loading, emails not arriving ssh barely responding on an idle line.

here is a tracert.

Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms home.gateway2 [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms cpc14-leic14-2-0-gw.8-1.cable.virginmedia.com [8
2.30.112.1]
3 * 1672 ms * leic-core-2a-ae7-775.network.virginmedia.net [82
.3.35.73]
4 1693 ms 1638 ms 1632 ms leed-bb-1c-ae5-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.174.113]
5 1883 ms 1808 ms 1814 ms leed-bb-1a-ae10-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.25
3.174.21]
6 1775 ms * 1744 ms nrth-bb-1b-as2-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.185.101]
7 1768 ms * 1843 ms tele-ic-4-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.
174.18]
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 1621 ms 1660 ms * ae1.er01.rbsov.bbc.co.uk [132.185.254.46]
11 1800 ms * 1725 ms 132.185.255.60
12 1672 ms 1659 ms 1661 ms 212.58.241.131

The first external hop looks normal, so this indicates an issue between my UBR and the rest of VM's network. I personally noticed this issue 2 out of the 3 past days at around 5pm. When I checked the TBB graph which I havent checked for a while I see a huge spike with much of it red, but not only at 5pm but also again around 10pm, checking historical data shows it almost daily at random points between 5pm and 11pm for the past 3 weeks. In addition my general jitter has been poor since mid may with noticeble congestion showing after 9 in the morning and I cannot remember the last time I had max download speed as thats also been affected.

BT put FTTC back to dec 2012 but work has been ongoing since june so I really hope its ahead of schedule because I will be off in a flash when its available. VM are acting like they want to lose customers.

Normally I contact the CEO office and start a 6-12 month process of waiting for the fix, not this time, the decision is made I will be parting ways with VM as soon as FTTC is here.

Mick Fisher 22-08-2012 19:30

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by internetuser (Post 35466289)
Also could you please do one final speedtest to Wellington, New Zealand?

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/12.png

Ouch, it didn't like that server much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by internetuser (Post 35466289)
A pingtest to Maidenhead would be nice too, to see the jitter and ping.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Quote:

Originally Posted by internetuser (Post 35466289)
The sky speeds + ping look impressive and I may have to consider switching if they match Virgins 120 Mb speeds or higher. I imagine they are using BTs fibre ?

Yes it is BT's fibre.

---------- Post added at 19:30 ---------- Previous post was at 19:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35466386)
fiber cant come soon enough here.

last 2 to 3 days I noticed severe issues, by severe I mean web pages not loading, emails not arriving ssh barely responding on an idle line.

here is a tracert.

Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms home.gateway2 [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms cpc14-leic14-2-0-gw.8-1.cable.virginmedia.com [8
2.30.112.1]
3 * 1672 ms * leic-core-2a-ae7-775.network.virginmedia.net [82
.3.35.73]
4 1693 ms 1638 ms 1632 ms leed-bb-1c-ae5-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.174.113]
5 1883 ms 1808 ms 1814 ms leed-bb-1a-ae10-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.25
3.174.21]
6 1775 ms * 1744 ms nrth-bb-1b-as2-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.185.101]
7 1768 ms * 1843 ms tele-ic-4-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.
174.18]
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 1621 ms 1660 ms * ae1.er01.rbsov.bbc.co.uk [132.185.254.46]
11 1800 ms * 1725 ms 132.185.255.60
12 1672 ms 1659 ms 1661 ms 212.58.241.131

The first external hop looks normal, so this indicates an issue between my UBR and the rest of VM's network. I personally noticed this issue 2 out of the 3 past days at around 5pm. When I checked the TBB graph which I havent checked for a while I see a huge spike with much of it red, but not only at 5pm but also again around 10pm, checking historical data shows it almost daily at random points between 5pm and 11pm for the past 3 weeks. In addition my general jitter has been poor since mid may with noticeble congestion showing after 9 in the morning and I cannot remember the last time I had max download speed as thats also been affected.

BT put FTTC back to dec 2012 but work has been ongoing since june so I really hope its ahead of schedule because I will be off in a flash when its available. VM are acting like they want to lose customers.

Normally I contact the CEO office and start a 6-12 month process of waiting for the fix, not this time, the decision is made I will be parting ways with VM as soon as FTTC is here.

Seems like it.

ethan103 22-08-2012 20:37

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35466402)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/12.png

Ouch, it didn't like that server much.


http://www.pingtest.net/result/68370997.png


Yes it is BT's fibre.

---------- Post added at 19:30 ---------- Previous post was at 19:28 ----------


Seems like it.


Thanks for that!

They are impressive results!

I shall probably move to BT when the 100 Mb is available in my area.

gazzae 22-08-2012 21:25

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Its not all rosey in the BT world...

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2012/08/11.png

http://www.pingtest.net/result/68376288.png

TMLeafs 22-08-2012 21:30

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I'm sure one day sky will also have STM once they are also over subscribed. Im on 100Mbps (Just been double) Had virgin since 0.5Mbps I have never noticed STM I average around 450GB per month on 50Mbps that's an average of 15GB a day. Sunday evening I downloaded a 21.2GB file never went slower than 8MBps

Chrysalis 23-08-2012 01:24

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMLeafs (Post 35466453)
I'm sure one day sky will also have STM once they are also over subscribed. Im on 100Mbps (Just been double) Had virgin since 0.5Mbps I have never noticed STM I average around 450GB per month on 50Mbps that's an average of 15GB a day. Sunday evening I downloaded a 21.2GB file never went slower than 8MBps

people were saying this 2 years ago, now sky are a major uk isp with subscribers in the millions. Still no STM or FUP, just investment in their backbones, FTTC is a test for them as its a huge jump from adsl speeds. I dont think any non cable isp has STM, thats something unique to VM due to them oversubbing a heavy use fast service on narrow shared pipes.

ethan103 23-08-2012 09:07

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35466488)
people were saying this 2 years ago, now sky are a major uk isp with subscribers in the millions. Still no STM or FUP, just investment in their backbones, FTTC is a test for them as its a huge jump from adsl speeds. I dont think any non cable isp has STM, thats something unique to VM due to them oversubbing a heavy use fast service on narrow shared pipes.



I agree and I hardly see the point in "doubling speeds" if when you use your connection they throttle you back down 50% :/

Seems pointless.

The top tier or top two tiers should not have any restrictions.

kwikbreaks 23-08-2012 09:21

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Actually it's a big improvement. A non-doubled 50Mbps user was throttled to 12.5Mbps after exceeding the threshold now a doubled 50Mbps user will still get 50Mbps under the STM plus the thresholds have been raised too.

What you should be complaining about is paying the same as new customers but having to wait anything up to a year to get the same speeds and thresholds.

Mick Fisher 23-08-2012 10:42

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35466519)
Actually it's a big improvement. A non-doubled 50Mbps user was throttled to 12.5Mbps after exceeding the threshold now a doubled 50Mbps user will still get 50Mbps under the STM plus the thresholds have been raised too.

What you should be complaining about is paying the same as new customers but having to wait anything up to a year to get the same speeds and thresholds.

Absolutely!

kwikbreaks 23-08-2012 11:01

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35466539)
Absolutely!

Which of course you don't have to do as they will upgrade on request at the price of extending the contract. If everybody actually did that of course and actually made use of their increased download capability then VM would be up that well known brown coloured creek with no paddle. This is what happens when marketing lead a company by the nose.

I upgraded from 10Mbps to 60Mbps for £2.50 a month. Others have done even better it seems.

ethan103 23-08-2012 11:32

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35466519)
Actually it's a big improvement. A non-doubled 50Mbps user was throttled to 12.5Mbps after exceeding the threshold now a doubled 50Mbps user will still get 50Mbps under the STM plus the thresholds have been raised too.

What you should be complaining about is paying the same as new customers but having to wait anything up to a year to get the same speeds and thresholds.



The point is you should get what you pay for.

You wouldn't buy a race car and then get told after 20 miles the car will limit itself :/

So if you pay for 100 that's what you should get unless you are going crazy and running it 24/7.

Chrysalis 23-08-2012 11:35

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35466519)
Actually it's a big improvement. A non-doubled 50Mbps user was throttled to 12.5Mbps after exceeding the threshold now a doubled 50Mbps user will still get 50Mbps under the STM plus the thresholds have been raised too.

What you should be complaining about is paying the same as new customers but having to wait anything up to a year to get the same speeds and thresholds.

you forgot 'if' adequate capacity is in place. On paper its a good improvement yes.

Seems a big coincidence my latest woes coincide with the latest speed bump from VM. This is with still with upload speeds on restricted configs as well, so its going to get even worse for me when those get unlocked.

kwikbreaks 23-08-2012 12:01

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Yes I didn't mention that. My area is back to very acceptable right now which is why I abandonned my switch to Infinity when they messed me about - I simply didn't trust BT to sort out problems in a timely fashion if my line was dodgy which it could well still be as that was why I left BT in the first place. If VM performance drops to the sort of levels I saw late last year and early this then they won't be getting a second chance and I will take a gamble on BT who may by then have got their act together.

I disgree that you don't get what you pay for with VM when it is actually working properly as the STM is well documented and it's unrealistic to expect 1:1 leased line performance from a consumer product that is the price VM charge for it.

Chrysalis 23-08-2012 12:07

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
yes STM itself isnt a huge hinderence when active, and I actually dont care about it much, I just want a service that performs well when I need it.

keepitretro 31-08-2012 21:57

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Well after going from an unlimited 100mb connection, to a half arsed 100mb connection, and not getting my 120mb upgrade on time, put back till unknown!!!

Sky fibre pro is now available YAY.......:):):):):)

says i will get 51mb down and 11mb up with NO shaping,

2 calls made,

one to sky to order,

install on the 12th September

next to virgin to buy out remaining 3 months / reduce to lowest possible package,

good riddance!!!

No more waiting till 9pm till i can start using my connection,

No more throttling anything and everything...

No more lies

No more forever moving goalposts.....

(Throttling is only gonna get worse as speeds increase!!!)

ethan103 31-08-2012 23:33

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keepitretro (Post 35469379)
Well after going from an unlimited 100mb connection, to a half arsed 100mb connection, and not getting my 120mb upgrade on time, put back till unknown!!!

Sky fibre pro is now available YAY.......:):):):):)

says i will get 51mb down and 11mb up with NO shaping,

2 calls made,

one to sky to order,

install on the 12th September

next to virgin to buy out remaining 3 months / reduce to lowest possible package,

good riddance!!!

No more waiting till 9pm till i can start using my connection,

No more throttling anything and everything...

No more lies

No more forever moving goalposts.....

(Throttling is only gonna get worse as speeds increase!!!)


Let's us know how it goes on the 12th !

qasdfdsaq 01-09-2012 13:03

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
FYI I was estimated 53 down and 13 up, got a full 80 down 20 up (line capable of about 88 down)

Mick Fisher 01-09-2012 14:56

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35469504)
FYI I was estimated 53 down and 13 up, got a full 80 down 20 up (line capable of about 88 down)

I was estimated at 64 down and get 75/16

kwikbreaks 01-09-2012 15:41

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I don't recall exactly what my estimate was just that Openreach CBA to turn up and do the install so I stuck with cable.

keepitretro 01-09-2012 17:20

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Cab's quite a distance to be honest,

looks at least 300mts,

at this point i could not care less if i only get 25mb,

as l just want rid of VM!!!

qasdfdsaq 03-09-2012 17:42

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keepitretro (Post 35469629)
Cab's quite a distance to be honest,

looks at least 300mts,

With vectoring on 30a you should be easily able to get about 150Mbps at 300M.

kwikbreaks 03-09-2012 21:15

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35470403)
With vectoring on 30a you should be easily able to get about 150Mbps at 300M.

Except that isn't what's currently being used. From memory my estimate was 60Mbps and by chance I'm pretty much exactly 300m from the cab.

qasdfdsaq 04-09-2012 15:53

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
My line behaves like a 300m line and I get a theoretical max of 88-94, but an estimate of 53 as previously stated. Just sayin, when it eventually gets doubled upgraded his line will probably be able to keep up.

kwikbreaks 04-09-2012 17:39

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35470700)
...when it eventually gets doubled upgraded...

VM will announce some more jam tomorrow which might just might start getting delivered a year or so after the announcement. My VM area doubling date is currently set for March-August 2013 - any bets on which end of that timescale it will be if they actually meet it at all.

keepitretro 05-09-2012 00:12

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Measured with wheel 340 meters exactly!!!

Would 51mb be a bit optimistic?

Peter_ 05-09-2012 07:09

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keepitretro (Post 35470900)
Measured with wheel 340 meters exactly!!!

Would 51mb be a bit optimistic?

My cabinet is more than 400 metres away out of line of site and I never have any speed issues because unlike BT copper cabling distance does not matter.

kwikbreaks 05-09-2012 10:09

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keepitretro (Post 35470900)
Measured with wheel 340 meters exactly!

The actual cable may not follow a direct line path. For instance I'm on the same side of the road as my cab but the drop cable comes in from a pole the other side of the road. From what I've seen most people get better than their estimates - probably BT deliberately give estimates that are low so they don't get complaints.

---------- Post added at 10:09 ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35470918)
My cabinet is more than 400 metres away out of line of site and I never have any speed issues because unlike BT copper cabling distance does not matter.

I think most people who move from VM to FTTC do so to reduce jitter and packet loss and increase upstream rather than worry about the top end Mbps which VM STM will crop off anyway after half an hour or less of full speed usage at most times people want to use their connections.

FTTC may still be cable length dependent but a lot less so than ADSL as the lengths are so much less. The rest of the technology seems to knock spots off VM cable at the moment as BT and Sky, unlike VM, don't seem to be running their network at insane utilisation rates at peak times.

qasdfdsaq 05-09-2012 11:14

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35470750)
VM will announce some more jam tomorrow which might just might start getting delivered a year or so after the announcement. My VM area doubling date is currently set for March-August 2013 - any bets on which end of that timescale it will be if they actually meet it at all.

Incidentally BT have been completely bang on time with their speed upgrades on FTTC so far.

Chrysalis 05-09-2012 14:45

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35470951)
The actual cable may not follow a direct line path. For instance I'm on the same side of the road as my cab but the drop cable comes in from a pole the other side of the road. From what I've seen most people get better than their estimates - probably BT deliberately give estimates that are low so they don't get complaints.

---------- Post added at 10:09 ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 ----------


I think most people who move from VM to FTTC do so to reduce jitter and packet loss and increase upstream rather than worry about the top end Mbps which VM STM will crop off anyway after half an hour or less of full speed usage at most times people want to use their connections.

FTTC may still be cable length dependent but a lot less so than ADSL as the lengths are so much less. The rest of the technology seems to knock spots off VM cable at the moment as BT and Sky, unlike VM, don't seem to be running their network at insane utilisation rates at peak times.

even off peak utilisation can be high on VM, a 100mbit customer on VMs forums is seeing congestion at 9.20am which VM staff have told him they see nothing wrong and I also see jitter at early hours of the day indicating utilisation is still high enough to cause jitter. My speeds are only now consistently fast after about 2-3am and before about midday. Other hours it varies too much and at weekends its more like 9am before speeds drop off.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35470969)
Incidentally BT have been completely bang on time with their speed upgrades on FTTC so far.

you sure? lots of situations where estimated live data is pushed back 3 months at a time multiple times. My own area has missed its original sept 2012 date and new estimated date is now dec 2012.

ethan103 05-09-2012 16:10

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35471033)
even off peak utilisation can be high on VM, a 100mbit customer on VMs forums is seeing congestion at 9.20am which VM staff have told him they see nothing wrong and I also see jitter at early hours of the day indicating utilisation is still high enough to cause jitter. My speeds are only now consistently fast after about 2-3am and before about midday. Other hours it varies too much and at weekends its more like 9am before speeds drop off.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------



you sure? lots of situations where estimated live data is pushed back 3 months at a time multiple times. My own area has missed its original sept 2012 date and new estimated date is now dec 2012.



I pretty much get full speeds all day everyday.

Ping is rick solid online too with 9-15ms ping on games like Cod and tf2.

The only issue is jitter which is normally 1-5ms.

kwikbreaks 05-09-2012 18:29

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Yes cable can deliver but for many it simply doesn't. Mines fine right now but it has been poor in the past.

My main gripe with VM is the huge delay between announcing speed doubling and actually delivering it. For me it's no big deal as I bypassed the wait by upgrading to a speed doubled product but probably millions of existing customers are getting a worse deal than new customers as they are paying the same price but getting half the speed - or sometimes more if they've neglected to visit the car boot sale known as retentions internally recently.

I was going to leave VM for BT Infinity but Openreach CBA to actually turn up and do the install so I cancelled and upgraded with VM instead. If the poor performance I've seen before returns I'll give them another chance.

ethan103 05-09-2012 18:43

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35471109)
Yes cable can deliver but for many it simply doesn't. Mines fine right now but it has been poor in the past.

My main gripe with VM is the huge delay between announcing speed doubling and actually delivering it. For me it's no big deal as I bypassed the wait by upgrading to a speed doubled product but probably millions of existing customers are getting a worse deal than new customers as they are paying the same price but getting half the speed - or sometimes more if they've neglected to visit the car boot sale known as retentions internally recently.

I was going to leave VM for BT Infinity but Openreach CBA to actually turn up and do the install so I cancelled and upgraded with VM instead. If the poor performance I've seen before returns I'll give them another chance.


For the many I'm sure it works, hence they millions of customers.

carlwaring 05-09-2012 19:45

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ethan103 (Post 35471068)
I pretty much get full speeds all day everyday.

Ping is rick solid online too with 9-15ms ping ...

Same here.

Quote:

The only issue is jitter which is normally 1-5ms.
Probably the same here too, but I never measure that :)

---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35471109)
Yes cable can deliver but for many it simply doesn't.

Care to put a figure on that? Last time I checked, official figures were that 66% of their customers were getting the headline speed.

Quote:

My main gripe with VM is the huge delay between announcing speed doubling and actually delivering it.
A fair point.

ethan103 05-09-2012 21:24

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471135)
Same here.


Probably the same here too, but I never measure that :)

---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:43 ----------


Care to put a figure on that? Last time I checked, official figures were that 66% of their customers were getting the headline speed.


A fair point.



Pingtest.net is speedtests website for checking jitter which I'm sure you know.

Worth checking ad too pack jitter can degrade online gaming if that's what you do.

A good ping with higher jitter is no good.

carlwaring 05-09-2012 22:01

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Here's mine; done just now.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Ping's a little higher than normal :(

kwikbreaks 05-09-2012 22:14

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471135)
Care to put a figure on that?

No I can't. My statement is based on the number of complaints I've seen here and elsewhere and the high level of vitriol exhibited by ex-customers whenever VM gets discussed on various boards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471135)
Last time I checked, official figures were that 66% of their customers were getting the headline speed.

Care to post a link to those official figures you are quoting? 66% seems rather low to me - I would have expected more.

carlwaring 05-09-2012 22:33

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35471210)
No I can't. My statement is based on the number of complaints I've seen here and elsewhere and the high level of vitriol exhibited by ex-customers whenever VM gets discussed on various boards.

Well yes. And we all know about 'negativity bias', right? :)

Quote:

Care to post a link to those official figures you are quoting?
http://store.virginmedia.com/broadba...al-speeds.html
Quote:

What does 'typical speed' mean?
This is the speed that at least 66% of our customers get on average in a particular month on a particular product. Our typical speed tests run over 24 hours and speeds may vary at peak times.
Quote:

66% seems rather low to me - I would have expected more.
Well at least you found some negative spin to put on it. Well done! ;)

ethan103 05-09-2012 22:44

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471206)
Here's mine; done just now.

http://www.pingtest.net/result/68999211.png

Ping's a little higher than normal :(


That's quite a bit of jitter.

Try pinging bbc.co.uk and see if the ping is stable.


On the same server I get 13ms ping and 1ms jitter.

MalteseFalcon 05-09-2012 23:05

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
http://www.pingtest.net/result/69001512.png

qasdfdsaq 05-09-2012 23:09

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35471109)
Yes cable can deliver but for many it simply doesn't. Mines fine right now but it has been poor in the past.

Indeed, pinging some Austrian guy's 15/1 cable connection today (from my BT line mind you, so it has the jitter of both our connections added together):

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 56.109 / 56.982 / 60.922 / 1.511

Spoiler: 
Pinging 90.146.212.178 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 90.146.212.178:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 56ms


Meanwhile in VM land (this is VM 100Mb EH9 on my ping page, so reasonably good for VM):

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 38.945 / 44.493 / 58.957 / 4.376

Spoiler: 
Pinging d1.qasdfdsaq.com [92.235.190.31] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 92.235.190.31:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 43ms


Meanwhile in BT land...

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 21.395 / 21.635 / 21.756 / 0.103

Spoiler: 
Pinging bbc.qasdfdsaq.com [212.58.246.94] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 212.58.246.94:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 21ms

carlwaring 05-09-2012 23:35

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I just tried from here:

C:\Users\Carl>ping 92.235.190.31

Pinging 92.235.190.31 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=56
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=56
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 92.235.190.31:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 33ms

qasdfdsaq 06-09-2012 00:26

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35471033)
you sure? lots of situations where estimated live data is pushed back 3 months at a time multiple times. My own area has missed its original sept 2012 date and new estimated date is now dec 2012.

They only did two speed upgrades and neither of them were done by area. There was no estimated date, a precise date was given both times and the whole country was switched on that day.

You're talking new area rollout, not existing area speed upgrades.

ethan103 06-09-2012 00:47

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35471231)
Indeed, pinging some Austrian guy's 15/1 cable connection today (from my BT line mind you, so it has the jitter of both our connections added together):

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 56.109 / 56.982 / 60.922 / 1.511

Spoiler: 
Pinging 90.146.212.178 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=47
Reply from 90.146.212.178: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 90.146.212.178:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 56ms


Meanwhile in VM land (this is VM 100Mb EH9 on my ping page, so reasonably good for VM):

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 38.945 / 44.493 / 58.957 / 4.376

Spoiler: 
Pinging d1.qasdfdsaq.com [92.235.190.31] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=47
Reply from 92.235.190.31: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 92.235.190.31:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 43ms


Meanwhile in BT land...

RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 21.395 / 21.635 / 21.756 / 0.103

Spoiler: 
Pinging bbc.qasdfdsaq.com [212.58.246.94] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 212.58.246.94:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 21ms


The BT line is impressive however it could just be down to your own Virgin connection.

What is bbc.co.uk like for you on both?

craigj2k12 06-09-2012 01:40

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ethan103 (Post 35471258)
The BT line is impressive however it could just be down to your own Virgin connection.

What is bbc.co.uk like for you on both?

I think youre mis understanding, he is on BT, those tests are from his infinity connection to those stated

kwikbreaks 06-09-2012 09:16

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471215)

Ah by "official" you mean VM's figures - I thought you meant some independent testing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471215)
Well at least you found some negative spin to put on it. Well done! ;)

Actually it wasn't negative - I'd assumed that more than 66% would be getting somewhere close to their headline speeds. In fact 66% was a number chosen by VM to calculate their averages so is an arbitrary number. Measuring over 24hours makes the speeds pretty meaningless too though as it's what you can get at peak times that counts because by definition that's when most people want to use the service. Most really wouldn't care if they could get a Gbps at 3:00am if their peak time speeds were poor.

The devil is in the detail of course - how close is close? I'd accept that within 10% is close and I suspect more than 66% get that close even at peak. Where the problem lies imo is that the skinny pipes mean that when it unravels it unravels big time and VM seem to take an age to fix it.

carlwaring 06-09-2012 09:27

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35471301)
Ah by "official" you mean VM's figures - I thought you meant some independent testing.

I do indeed. Independent testing for VM by Samknows. They are also officially the fastest according to OFCOM; though I'm sure you'll now come up with a reason why that's not actually true either.

Quote:

Actually it wasn't negative - I'd assumed that more than 66% would be getting somewhere close to their headline speeds.
I wasn't being serious; hence the smiley. And I actually agree with you :)

Quote:

Measuring over 24hours makes the numbers pretty meaningless though as it's what you can get at peak times that counts because by definition that's when most people want to use the service. Most really wouldn't care if they could get a Gbps at 3:00am.
Actually I would have thought that measuring over a longer period would give more accurate results.

The tests are conducted at random times throughout the day; mainly when your connection is otherwise idle.

Quote:

BTW - with jitter like you've got I'm not surprised your VOIP wasn't any too hot.
Indeed. I was going to ask about that. It was the only thing left that could be the problem! Any way to reduce it from here?

kwikbreaks 06-09-2012 09:38

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I've edited my reply a bit as it didn't put across my meaning well and in doing that I also took out the VOIP comment.

Your 7ms speedtest is higher than I normally see - my JDA testing which runs 24x7 normally shows 1-4 unless I'm actively downloading or uploading something sizeable. VOIP should still work well with 7ms. It was the big variations of 20ms in your command box ping that I meant but as that was a one off it's not enough to base my comment on.

Where jitter affects VOIP is when it is bad enough for packets to arrive out of sequence because that will obviously screw up the speach to some degree. If lots are oos it will be awful - I make sure I'm not hammering the downloads if the phone is being used.

qasdfdsaq 06-09-2012 10:22

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ethan103 (Post 35471258)
The BT line is impressive however it could just be down to your own Virgin connection.

What is bbc.co.uk like for you on both?

The BT line *is* pinging the BBC.

Chrysalis 06-09-2012 19:19

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35471257)
They only did two speed upgrades and neither of them were done by area. There was no estimated date, a precise date was given both times and the whole country was switched on that day.

You're talking new area rollout, not existing area speed upgrades.

ok fair enough, if you still have my ip by the way you can test jitter on that also ;)

qasdfdsaq 07-09-2012 11:09

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
I've modified the test slightly to simulate a typical high-quality VOIP connection - 100pps, 80B payload size. On your connection:

Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.029377 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 20.327 / 32.502 / 53.147 / 5.985
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.768, rcvd=10.768
Out of sequence packets: 21

VM in my area:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.020790 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 25.218 / 30.334 / 54.009 / 3.774
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.777, rcvd=10.777
Out of sequence packets: 2

BT Infinity:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.021413 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 31.378 / 31.789 / 32.796 / 0.170
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.776, rcvd=10.776
Out of sequence packets: 0

Statistics for pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.001254 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 11.144 / 11.257 / 12.889 / 0.085
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.798, rcvd=10.798
Out of sequence packets: 0

Note the Std. Dev figures don't tell the whole story, as packet to packet jitter on VM in my area is quite low, with occasional "gaps" of 20ms+ e.g.:
Spoiler: 
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0386 time=29.341ms TTL=50 ID=3500
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0387 time=27.262ms TTL=50 ID=3501
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0388 time=29.315ms TTL=50 ID=3502
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0389 time=27.361ms TTL=50 ID=3503
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038a time=45.572ms TTL=50 ID=3504
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038c time=29.594ms TTL=50 ID=3506
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038b time=39.729ms TTL=50 ID=3505
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038d time=27.296ms TTL=50 ID=3509
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038e time=29.279ms TTL=50 ID=350a
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038f time=27.285ms TTL=50 ID=350b
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0390 time=29.370ms TTL=50 ID=350c

Yet on yours it's constantly variable but most jumps are <10ms:
Spoiler: 
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03dd time=36.349ms TTL=51 ID=dc08
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03de time=34.260ms TTL=51 ID=dc09
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03df time=37.076ms TTL=51 ID=dc0a
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e0 time=40.866ms TTL=51 ID=dc0b
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e1 time=35.427ms TTL=51 ID=dc0c
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e2 time=25.542ms TTL=51 ID=dc0d
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e3 time=26.181ms TTL=51 ID=dc0e
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e4 time=31.852ms TTL=51 ID=dc0f
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e5 time=43.401ms TTL=51 ID=dc10
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e7 time=37.374ms TTL=51 ID=dc12
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e6 time=47.570ms TTL=51 ID=dc11
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e8 time=38.876ms TTL=51 ID=dc13

And despite st.dev. being less than 2x as high in your area, out of sequence packets are over 10x higher, the latter being, as mentioned, quite disruptive to VOIP communications

horseman 07-09-2012 13:36

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35471135)
…..
Care to put a figure on that? Last time I checked, official figures were that 66% of their customers were getting the headline speed.

Before you rewrite history you might want to re-visit where you thought you last checked your official figures and place them in the correct context?
I think you might find it was more like 66% of users got within a specific percentage of the headline speed? ;)

For example from Ofcom/SK/VM in mid 2010:
Quote:

" Virgin Media cable customers typically received speeds which were much closer to advertised speeds, with almost 90% of those on 'up to'10Mbit/s receiving average speeds of over 8Mbit/s, and 80% of those on 'up to' 20Mbit/s services receiving average speeds of over 14Mbit/s."
Of course I daren't even suggest or hint about the lack of information concerning the actual statistical sampling by node/cmts/area.
Nor anything regarding the way the actual data is "normalised"! :(

Not that 2+ yrs worth of data myself and 1600 other SK/VM trialists could ever be released publically anyway without VM&SK express consent.
Just to balance my implied critique - my own d/s from my latest calculations easily exceeds >90% of Max Configured thruput rate for >90% of time in one Brighton hotspot across 2 CMTS chassis.

Remembering that D/S is only 1 of a total of 10 metrics that we currently collate and probably (in my case until very recently) both the d/s & u/s were the only two more consistent measurements!

carlwaring 07-09-2012 14:57

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by horseman (Post 35471732)
Before you rewrite history you might want to re-visit where you thought you last checked your official figures and place them in the correct context? I think you might find it was more like 66% of users got within a specific percentage of the headline speed? ;)

Fair enough. But the point is still valid :)

Chrysalis 07-09-2012 15:39

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35471698)
I've modified the test slightly to simulate a typical high-quality VOIP connection - 100pps, 80B payload size. On your connection:

Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.029377 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 20.327 / 32.502 / 53.147 / 5.985
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.768, rcvd=10.768
Out of sequence packets: 21

VM in my area:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.020790 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 25.218 / 30.334 / 54.009 / 3.774
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.777, rcvd=10.777
Out of sequence packets: 2

BT Infinity:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.021413 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 31.378 / 31.789 / 32.796 / 0.170
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.776, rcvd=10.776
Out of sequence packets: 0

Statistics for pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com:
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 10.001254 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 11.144 / 11.257 / 12.889 / 0.085
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=10.798, rcvd=10.798
Out of sequence packets: 0

Note the Std. Dev figures don't tell the whole story, as packet to packet jitter on VM in my area is quite low, with occasional "gaps" of 20ms+ e.g.:
Spoiler: 
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0386 time=29.341ms TTL=50 ID=3500
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0387 time=27.262ms TTL=50 ID=3501
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0388 time=29.315ms TTL=50 ID=3502
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0389 time=27.361ms TTL=50 ID=3503
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038a time=45.572ms TTL=50 ID=3504
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038c time=29.594ms TTL=50 ID=3506
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038b time=39.729ms TTL=50 ID=3505
Reply from 92.235.190.31: SEQ=038d time=27.296ms TTL=50 ID=3509
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038e time=29.279ms TTL=50 ID=350a
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=038f time=27.285ms TTL=50 ID=350b
Reply from 92.235.190.31: seq=0390 time=29.370ms TTL=50 ID=350c

Yet on yours it's constantly variable but most jumps are <10ms:
Spoiler: 
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03dd time=36.349ms TTL=51 ID=dc08
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03de time=34.260ms TTL=51 ID=dc09
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03df time=37.076ms TTL=51 ID=dc0a
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e0 time=40.866ms TTL=51 ID=dc0b
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e1 time=35.427ms TTL=51 ID=dc0c
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e2 time=25.542ms TTL=51 ID=dc0d
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e3 time=26.181ms TTL=51 ID=dc0e
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e4 time=31.852ms TTL=51 ID=dc0f
Reply from [your ip]: seq=03e5 time=43.401ms TTL=51 ID=dc10
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e7 time=37.374ms TTL=51 ID=dc12
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e6 time=47.570ms TTL=51 ID=dc11
Reply from [your ip]: SEQ=03e8 time=38.876ms TTL=51 ID=dc13

And despite st.dev. being less than 2x as high in your area, out of sequence packets are over 10x higher, the latter being, as mentioned, quite disruptive to VOIP communications

you think thats ok constantly variable during the morning?

Sephiroth 07-09-2012 18:16

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
To honour Mick Fisher's point about BS, VM is full of BS in other areas.

Here's what they currently say on their web site in relation to the Super Hub:

Welcome to wonderful wireless broadband
With a wireless network in your home, no-one needs to plug in with wires. That means everyone can connect to the internet at the same time using one fast, secure broadband connection – in different rooms and on all sorts of devices (like laptops, smartphones or games consoles).
The best bit? All you need is a Virgin Media Super Hub, which is included with all our broadband packages.

The Virgin Media Super Hub - our fastest ever wireless- Packed with the latest wireless ā€˜N’ technology for a really fast, secure - connection
- Built to handle speeds of over 120Mb
- 5GHz compatible

How fast is wireless broadband?
Don't worry - going wireless won't cramp your style. You can still do everything that you'd expect to do with a wired connection, only now you're not tied to your desk:
- Go online anywhere in the house
- Print stuff from anywhere in the house
- Get fast broadband on your mobile instead of using 3G
- Send photos from your mobile to your laptop
- Play music from your computer around the house
- Download a film onto your laptop to watch on your TV


I don't need to point out the blatant pieces of BS - surely even to die-hard VM geeks.

carlwaring 07-09-2012 18:29

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Go on... humour me :)

Sephiroth 07-09-2012 18:37

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Why?

craigj2k12 08-09-2012 01:06

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
It gives his limited amount of brain cells something to do

carlwaring 08-09-2012 08:54

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Well if you can't then it doesn't matter. You said there was "BS" in there. I simply asked where.

Tazz 08-09-2012 08:58

Re: Finally had enough of VM BS...........
 
Well all of it is BS as far as I am concerned.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum