Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33688958)

Chris 27-07-2012 18:53

The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
A new thread to discuss sporting matters only. There will be a separate thread to discuss gaffes, traffic jams, opening/closing ceremonies, inept American politicians and Boris.

Current affairs comments in this thread please: http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/20...l#post35457042

Kymmy 28-07-2012 11:25

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
First gold of the games to China in the Women's 10m Air Rifle :clap:

mertle 28-07-2012 11:30

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Looking not good for cavendish or bradley in road race.

Half asleep was great britain to allow good number to break with number nations in it.

now gap 4 mins with only great britian chasing looks like even this early stage it wont come back.

Great britain needs help why should those with one in the break help why should those who aint got chance against the manx misile.

Only one team possible might help is germany for griple even he might struggle to take cav on.

Edit just got final info only Great britain, france and germany missed the break of 12 riders.

With this gap little help from peleton great britian will struggle to bridge this one

Kymmy 28-07-2012 11:31

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Still lots of distance left and the gaps that large have been seen before and have been pulled back

danielf 28-07-2012 12:11

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
It's a flat course, apart from Box Hillock. It'll be a sprint finish. My money's on Cav.

mertle 28-07-2012 12:29

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy (Post 35457221)
First gold of the games to China in the Women's 10m Air Rifle :clap:

Well done to Yi Siling

was Suryani Mohammed Taibi of malaysia 8 months pregnant competing. Hope she survived:D

---------- Post added at 12:29 ---------- Previous post was at 12:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy (Post 35457226)
Still lots of distance left and the gaps that large have been seen before and have been pulled back

aye but if GB dont get help in big way it will be tough call. saying that germany now started to do bit with one man.

We need 3 to 4 riders to help.

Depends on how strong brakers are but with menchov russia he is definate danger powerful rider and stuart o'Grady too.

They probably out the lot 4 or 5 strong so it is doable but how much has tour de france took out of bradley wiggins, chris froome and david miller. Ian Stannard was in tour poland.

Some like menchov had poor tour de france was likely saving himself.

now michael rodgers australia fired off from peleton.

danielf I agree too flat so its likely why dont see it coming back myself.

Hope it does give us chance but nobody helping.

danielf 28-07-2012 12:37

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mertle (Post 35457240)

Hope it does give us chance but nobody helping.

I agree that it's slightly worrying that there's so many nationalities in the break away group, but there's lots of time left. No need to panic yet.

mertle 28-07-2012 12:50

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457247)
I agree that it's slightly worrying that there's so many nationalities in the break away group, but there's lots of time left. No need to panic yet.

nearly 7 mins last time check mins now very panicky now:(

Anoying the commentating keeps dropping out:mad:

commentators say GB being careful on boxhill due to not wanting to lose cav.

Personally not sure why they think this he got up some bigger than this in tour de france this year. If he puts his mind in it he can do it.

edit latest now down 5 mins but its cracked open by nibali Italy gilbert belgium as they go attack in group put more pressure on GB.

danielf 28-07-2012 14:07

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Down to 1.5 mins now. Are you still panicking Mertle?

mertle 28-07-2012 14:35

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457262)
Down to 1.5 mins now. Are you still panicking Mertle?

lol always panick.

this team like sky team only miller is alien lol.

I noticed bosson hagen just infront cav someone should tell him he not riding for sky being leadout for cav:D

denphone 28-07-2012 15:41

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457247)
I agree that it's slightly worrying that there's so many nationalities in the break away group, but there's lots of time left. No need to panic yet.

Its not looking good now dan.

Derek 28-07-2012 15:44

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Can't believe how far ahead the first 2 riders have managed to get in the last 10k

danielf 28-07-2012 15:44

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35457281)
Its not looking good now dan.

No. It's not going to happen.

mertle 28-07-2012 15:54

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35457281)
Its not looking good now dan.

nope not good at all inquest will be why let dangerious threats that much lead.

I think it was not suprising rival nations would let gb control it not help due to cav.

Feel for cav he sacrificed his green jersey for bradley the team screw up big time for olympic gold.

Cancellara looked in bad way after that horror crash.

nice for Vinokourov. gold

He works hard in tour de france

uran silver

Sadly for team GB one almighty disaster of team tactics. Why oh why did they let this one slip there grip.

Maybe tour de france took more out them but they had the main threats from second group break within 24 secs but that last climb they let it complete go out control.

Seems the damage was when Cancellara attacked they let it go like previous breaks but at that stage was suicide.

Certainly this was mega mega tactical messup.

Kymmy 28-07-2012 15:57

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mertle (Post 35457288)
nice for Vinokourov. gold

He works hard in tour de france

uran silver

.........and a bronze for Norway's Alexander Kristoff.

mertle 28-07-2012 16:07

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy (Post 35457289)
.........and a bronze for Norway's Alexander Kristoff.

thanks there was not sure who got bronze

kazackstan gold

columbia silver

norway bronze

lets hope women tomorrow show men how to control the race;)

Wonder if Cook will repeat bejing.

danielf 28-07-2012 16:38

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mertle (Post 35457288)

Certainly this was mega mega tactical messup.

I'm not sure about that. Things looked good after the last climb, but team GB just didn't have enough left in the tank. Normally you'd expect them to be able to bridge one min. in an hours' racing, but the problem was they didn't receive any help. It is a big ask for one team to control the whole race.

alwaysabear 28-07-2012 16:43

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mertle (Post 35457288)
nope not good at all inquest will be why let dangerious threats that much lead.

I think it was not suprising rival nations would let gb control it not help due to cav.

Feel for cav he sacrificed his green jersey for bradley the team screw up big time for olympic gold.

Cancellara looked in bad way after that horror crash.

nice for Vinokourov. gold

He works hard in tour de france

uran silver

Sadly for team GB one almighty disaster of team tactics. Why oh why did they let this one slip there grip.

Maybe tour de france took more out them but they had the main threats from second group break within 24 secs but that last climb they let it complete go out control.

Seems the damage was when Cancellara attacked they let it go like previous breaks but at that stage was suicide.

Certainly this was mega mega tactical messup.

I agree the writing was on the wall when they let Cancellara and whole lot of other riders like Boonan ride of the front at the top Box Hill.

Kymmy 29-07-2012 15:37

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
An amazing finish in the Womens Cycling road race...

Vos (NL) Gold, Armistead (GB) Silver, Zabelinskaya (RUS) Bronze

Maggy 29-07-2012 15:44

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Yep..We are finally on the medal board.:)

denphone 29-07-2012 15:49

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35457613)
Yep..We are finally on the medal board.:)

Yes absolutely brilliant and hopefully the start of many more to come.

Ramrod 29-07-2012 15:52

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
The 66kg mens judo was exciting, especially Jap V Georgia :)

mertle 29-07-2012 16:04

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
fantastic news

well done lizie Armistead got our first medal a silver behind Vos of dutch.

Just pipped to sprint from the 3 women break.

Foul horrid weather absolute chucked it down.

Think someone up there dont like women road race they had torrential rain in bejing too.

Russian ws third sorry cant prononce her name.

danielf 29-07-2012 17:12

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
And a cracking race it was. Well done Marianne Vos for taking the first Gold for The Netherlands and Lizzie Armistead for taking the silver.

Timing info was better than yesterday, but still a bit hit and miss. Luckily, the BBC were prepared and provided their own. :tu:

Damien 29-07-2012 17:14

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
I've managed to get tickets for the Velodrome next Sunday. My first track cycling event ever.

danielf 29-07-2012 17:24

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35457644)
I've managed to get tickets for the Velodrome next Sunday. My first track cycling event ever.

Cool! We tried to get tickets, but weren't successful. We are going to see the Women's waterpolo final and bronze medal match though.

Damien 29-07-2012 17:53

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457645)
Cool! We tried to get tickets, but weren't successful. We are going to see the Women's waterpolo final and bronze medal match though.

Keep trying! I only got them last night. I am hoping they keep doing track events at the Velodrome after the Olympics.

danielf 29-07-2012 17:57

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35457653)
Keep trying! I only got them last night. I am hoping they keep doing track events at the Velodrome after the Olympics.

Where did you get them?

(Mind you, finding a hotel might turn out to be a bit of a challenge)

Damien 29-07-2012 17:59

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457654)
Where did you get them?

(Mind you, finding a hotel might turn out to be a bit of a challenge)

The official London 2012 Website. If you get them then you collect them prior to the event.

http://www.tickets.london2012.com/br...lable_events=1

danielf 29-07-2012 19:03

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Wow. Tickets still available for the swimming. At £300 a pop and the same for a hotel presumably, we'd be looking at £1000 for an evening out. Just a little steep...

denphone 29-07-2012 19:25

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35457671)
Wow. Tickets still available for the swimming. At £300 a pop and the same for a hotel presumably, we'd be looking at £1000 for an evening out. Just a little steep...

You can say that again.:shocked:

danielf 29-07-2012 19:34

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35457682)
You can say that again.:shocked:

Wow. Tickets still available for the swimming. At £300 a pop and the same for a hotel presumably, we'd be looking at £1000 for an evening out. Just a little steep...

:shrug:

Hom3r 29-07-2012 19:35

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Watching Beach Volleyball, waiting for the Brazilians ;) :D

martyh 29-07-2012 20:40

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
rebecca addlington managed a bronze in the 400mtr freestyle

---------- Post added at 20:40 ---------- Previous post was at 20:37 ----------

liam tancock qualifies for the 100m backstroke final

Russ 29-07-2012 20:45

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Can't believe they allowed British Players into this Welsh side. Giggs and Bellamy tearing it up :D

denphone 29-07-2012 20:58

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35457719)
rebecca addlington managed a bronze in the 400mtr freestyle

---------- Post added at 20:40 ---------- Previous post was at 20:37 ----------

liam tancock qualifies for the 100m backstroke final

:clap:

richard1960 29-07-2012 22:14

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35457719)
rebecca addlington managed a bronze in the 400mtr freestyle

---------- Post added at 20:40 ---------- Previous post was at 20:37 ----------

liam tancock qualifies for the 100m backstroke final

Rebecca Addlington done brilliantly well to get a bronze after qualifying in 8th place,she looked as though she put everything into it well done Rebecca.:):clap::clap::clap:

Arthurgray50@blu 30-07-2012 17:52

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
What is really annoying me about these games is that the BBC has so many channels on this, and yet there MAIN channel has - the games as well, what about the people who don't to watch the games.

Russ 30-07-2012 18:05

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Arthur that's for discussion in the other thread. This is for sports results only.

Osem 30-07-2012 19:22

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
An excellent Bronze for the mens gymnastics team - GB's first gymnastics team medal since 1912 FGS!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18906623

Men's hockey team currently beating the Argies 2-0 too! :D

Cobbydaler 30-07-2012 21:30

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
What are people's thoughts on the Ye Shiwen Gold/World Record?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18910504

Maggy 30-07-2012 21:40

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35458030)
An excellent Bronze for the mens gymnastics team - GB's first gymnastics team medal since 1912 FGS!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18906623

Men's hockey team currently beating the Argies 2-0 too! :D

GB 4 Arg 1

:D

Henkesghost 30-07-2012 22:39

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35457996)
What is really annoying me about these games is that the BBC has so many channels on this, and yet there MAIN channel has - the games as well, what about the people who don't to watch the games.


People who don't like sport should be imprisoned.

danielf 30-07-2012 23:27

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Brilliant result for the Gymnasts, but that Lithuanian girl from Plymouth really stole the day :)

---------- Post added at 23:27 ---------- Previous post was at 23:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobbydaler (Post 35458078)
What are people's thoughts on the Ye Shiwen Gold/World Record?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18910504

Dubious, to say the least.

Quote:

It was not even supposed to be her strongest event: it is over 200m that she is world champion. What made her swim even more remarkable is that her final split time, of 28.93, was 0.17 quicker than that of Ryan Lochte in the men’s 400m medley earlier that evening.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oly...ng-expert.html

carlwaring 30-07-2012 23:45

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35457996)
What is really annoying me about these games is that the BBC has so many channels on this, and yet there MAIN channel has - the games as well, what about the people who don't to watch the games.

BBC2, BBC4 or any of the other 100s of channels that the TVL allows you to watch live. Or VM's massive On Demand library.

In fact, overall, there are more channels not showing the Olympics than those that are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35458092)
People who don't like sport should be imprisoned.

Steady on there! :)

Cobbydaler 30-07-2012 23:45

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458097)

Exactly, as well... Guardian

carlwaring 30-07-2012 23:47

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
And we weren't supposed to get a medal in the Mens Artistic Gymnastics (I had to look that up!) but we ended-up with the Bronze! Was that "dubious"too? :confused:

danielf 31-07-2012 00:20

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458102)
And we weren't supposed to get a medal in the Mens Artistic Gymnastics (I had to look that up!) but we ended-up with the Bronze! Was that "dubious"too? :confused:

No. Surprising as that result may be, they didn't have a 16 year old woman whose performance would have been exceptional in the men's event.

denphone 31-07-2012 06:18

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35458079)
GB 4 Arg 1

:D

:cleader:

martyh 31-07-2012 07:14

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458107)
No. Surprising as that result may be, they didn't have a 16 year old woman whose performance would have been exceptional in the men's event.

and given the Chinese reputation for doping their athletes my eyebrows are not only raised they have put a hole in the roof .Taking 5 seconds of your personal best and a whole second of the world record is astounding .She may well be innocent but ,as i said with the chinese record of past doping incidents i would be surprised if she was innocent.

Osem 31-07-2012 08:45

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458099)
BBC2, BBC4 or any of the other 100s of channels that the TVL allows you to watch live. Or VM's massive On Demand library.

In fact, overall, there are more channels not showing the Olympics than those that are.

:rofl:

Once again Arthur won't let facts in the way of one of his puerile rants.

---------- Post added at 08:45 ---------- Previous post was at 08:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35458079)
GB 4 Arg 1

:D

I dare say that offensive Argie advert was all the pre match team talk they needed.

:)

carlwaring 31-07-2012 09:31

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
I actually stopped up to watch that game. (Usually in bed by Midnight.) I was cheering lilke a mad thing as each point was one :)

denphone 31-07-2012 13:53

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Britain win team silver behind Germany in the Olympics eventing team event.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18901761

gazzae 31-07-2012 20:06

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458097)

I'm saddened by this story. Yes she smashed the world record but to immediately assume drugs cheat, rather than enjoy the achievement, is a sorry affair. Unfortunately we have the cheaters of the past to blame for this attitude.
So what if she swam a section faster than Ryan Lochte, Rebecca Adlington did the same in one of her races.

martyh 31-07-2012 20:27

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Michael Jameson gets a new British record in the 200m breaststroke
:clap::clap::clap:

Damien 31-07-2012 20:31

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458306)
I'm saddened by this story. Yes she smashed the world record but to immediately assume drugs cheat, rather than enjoy the achievement, is a sorry affair. Unfortunately we have the cheaters of the past to blame for this attitude.
So what if she swam a section faster than Ryan Lochte, Rebecca Adlington did the same in one of her races.

I think it's also because of the massive upgrade in her own performance.

martyh 31-07-2012 20:36

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458306)
I'm saddened by this story. Yes she smashed the world record but to immediately assume drugs cheat, rather than enjoy the achievement, is a sorry affair. Unfortunately we have the cheaters of the past to blame for this attitude.
So what if she swam a section faster than Ryan Lochte, Rebecca Adlington did the same in one of her races.

I think it's more the way she did it winning a race so convincingly and breaking records by so much is bound to raise a few eyebrows especially when she has been no where near before .I do hope that she turns out to be a outstanding swimmer rather than a cheat though

---------- Post added at 20:36 ---------- Previous post was at 20:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35458317)
Michael Jameson gets a new British record in the 200m breaststroke
:clap::clap::clap:

and now Andrew Willis has just broken that ,2 swimmers in the final tomorrow :D:D

denphone 31-07-2012 20:46

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35458317)
Michael Jameson gets a new British record in the 200m breaststroke
:clap::clap::clap:

Brilliant and now lets hold our breath for tomorrow and hopefully our first gold medal shall arrive.:)

carlwaring 31-07-2012 21:34

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458306)
I'm saddened by this story. Yes she smashed the world record but to immediately assume drugs cheat, rather than enjoy the achievement, is a sorry affair.

Which was kinda my point. And isn't it always the US looking making these sort of complaints. You know... like anyone that beats them has to be on drugs :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 21:34 ---------- Previous post was at 21:20 ----------

And we just won the Women's Football preliminary round!

danielf 31-07-2012 21:43

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458335)
Which was kinda my point. And isn't it always the US looking making these sort of complaints. You know... like anyone that beats them has to be on drugs :rolleyes:

No it isn't. Have you followed the case surrounding Lance Armstrong? US officials are still hounding him and are actually putting him on trial, and he's never tested positive. The reality is that the Americans are very serious about catching their own cheats.

About this particular case: yes, we'd all like it if the girl is the real thing, but sadly there will always be cheats, and despite what people are saying, it's not easy to test for doping. People will always be looking for and finding ways to beat the tests. Unfortunately, passing a test does not necessarily mean there was no cheating.

gazzae 31-07-2012 21:48

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35458320)
I think it's more the way she did it winning a race so convincingly and breaking records by so much is bound to raise a few eyebrows especially when she has been no where near before .I do hope that she turns out to be a outstanding swimmer rather than a cheat though

True, but she did set her PB when she was 14.

Plus in the race where she set her PB, the second placed woman finished 4 seconds behind her, so you could assume she didn't go all out at the end.

danielf 31-07-2012 22:01

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458345)
True, but she did set her PB when she was 14.

Plus in the race where she set her PB, the second placed woman finished 4 seconds behind her, so you could assume she didn't go all out at the end.

Is it not a little surprising then that (for such a young girl) she's not improved her PB over what's likely to be around 1.5 years, and then smashes it with a world record on the biggest stage of all?

Surely, you'd expect her to at least show some gradual improvement?

---------- Post added at 22:01 ---------- Previous post was at 21:53 ----------

Meanwhile, in other news: Bradley Wiggins has his knickers stolen.

gazzae 31-07-2012 22:03

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458349)
Is it not a little surprising then that (for such a young girl) she's not improved her PB over what's likely to be around 1.5 years, and then smashes it with a world record on the biggest stage of all?

Surely, you'd expect her to at least show some gradual improvement?

It happens. I'm not a swimming expert by any means but it's not unknown for swimmers to smash their personal bests. Stepanie Rice took something like 5 seconds off her PB in the same event at the last olympics.
Phelps has taken over 7 seconds off the world record in this event over 6 years.

People talk about how she was faster than Lochte, yes but only for one length - he was 20 odd seconds faster overal.

Damien 31-07-2012 22:12

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458354)
It happens. I'm not a swimming expert by any means but it's not unknown for swimmers to smash their personal bests. Stepanie Rice took something like 5 seconds off her PB in the same event at the last olympics.
Phelps has taken over 7 seconds off the world record in this event over 6 years.

People talk about how she was faster than Lochte, yes but only for one length - he was 20 odd seconds faster overal.

But those examples are over many years. We're talking about a massive improvement in one race all of a sudden. It's going to raise questions, it would in any sport when an athlete posts such a sudden and unexpected improvement in performance.

Shadow Demon UK 31-07-2012 22:15

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
How great was Chad Le Clos. It really was what the olympics is all about. The interview with his Dad was great as well, you could see how very proud he was of his son.

gazzae 31-07-2012 22:19

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35458358)
But those examples are over many years. We're talking about a massive improvement in one race all of a sudden. It's going to raise questions, it would in any sport when an athlete posts such a sudden and unexpected improvement in performance.

Rice's was in one race. She was labelled a wonderkid rather than a cheat.

danielf 31-07-2012 22:20

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Yes, I'm no swimming expert either. I've also just seen Ian Thorpe saying it is possible at that young an age. Sadly, following the cycling a bit has made me into a cynic. They will try all sorts to mask doping. Riders are taken out of competition not because of traces of banned substances, but because of deviations around values in their biological passport. Presumably, that's because the masking of banned substances is so successful. Then there's the can of worms of blood doping. It all becomes a matter of probabilities, which makes you wonder if a passed test means a clean athlete.

As you say, it's a sad state of affairs, but I'm afraid it's reality.

martyh 31-07-2012 22:26

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35458359)
How great was Chad Le Clos. It really was what the olympics is all about. The interview with his Dad was great as well, you could see how very proud he was of his son.


Yep i saw that ,a wonderful Olympic moment .Couldn't have been closer though 0.05 secs faster than phelps

danielf 31-07-2012 23:20

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Le Clos senior was great (as was junior) :D

---------- Post added at 23:20 ---------- Previous post was at 22:27 ----------

Hats off to John McEnroe for mentioning the best Olympian ever...

Eric Heiden


Heiden took 5 individual Golds in the 1980 Winter Olympics at Lake Placid, winning all distances in the Speed Skating: 500m, 1000m, 1500m, 5000m and 10000m. A bit like winning all running events in track athletics.

carlwaring 31-07-2012 23:32

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458340)
No it isn't.

I know. I forgot the "only kidding" smiley :blush:

danielf 31-07-2012 23:41

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458388)
I know. I forgot the "only kidding" smiley :blush:

Yeah, and yesterday you got your figures wrong claiming that CDs have an effective bitrate of 110Kbps. A word of advice: Engage brain before posting :p: :angel: ;)

denphone 01-08-2012 07:55

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Olympics badminton: Four pairs charged with not trying.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/19072677

Lets hope they all get thrown out.:td::(

Damien 01-08-2012 08:52

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Is Phelps the greatest ever? I dislike measuring it in terms of medals since swimming has a absurd amount of different events which differ from each other only slightly (in comparison in Athletics where people have sprinting, hurdles, high jump and so on). Even having the chance to win 8 gold medal during a single Olympics is crazy.

carlwaring 01-08-2012 09:13

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458391)
Yeah, and yesterday you got your figures wrong claiming that CDs have an effective bitrate of 110Kbps.

I was not entirely wrong; though :p: I knew that :) Like I said. Not sure how the 128k fitted in though.

Damien 01-08-2012 09:15

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
No more discussion about the bitrate of CDs before I lose my mind. The topic is Olympic Sports.

danielf 01-08-2012 10:24

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35458424)
Is Phelps the greatest ever? I dislike measuring it in terms of medals since swimming has a absurd amount of different events which differ from each other only slightly (in comparison in Athletics where people have sprinting, hurdles, high jump and so on). Even having the chance to win 8 gold medal during a single Olympics is crazy.

Despite what I said earlier about Eric Heiden, I think Phelps probably is the greatest ever. Just look at Bejing. Even disregarding the relays, Phelps took Gold in 100 and 200 m Butterfly, 200m Freestyle, and the 200 and 400 m Individual medley. That's 3 distances, two strokes plus the medleys. You'd be hard pressed to find a track athlete that excels in the 100-400m range, and it's not that common for swimmers to compete over that range either. It's still tough to compare him to Heiden who won everything from 500m to 10,000m, but Heiden did that 30 years ago when people didn't specialise as much as they do these days. Then consider Phelps's haul in Athens, as well as London. So yes, I do think he is the greatest ever.

Itshim 01-08-2012 11:08

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35458411)
Olympics badminton: Four pairs charged with not trying.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/19072677

Lets hope they all get thrown out.:td::(

Rule saying you have too? that`s a question there may well be one :erm:

Did not the same thing happen in that rowing "show" Bert and someone on The BBC the other night. Nothing is new. :dozey:

danielf 01-08-2012 11:37

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35458411)
Olympics badminton: Four pairs charged with not trying.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/19072677

Lets hope they all get thrown out.:td::(

Personally, I blame the format. What do you expect if teams can get an easier draw if they lose a match? It's not that different to a football team resting players for a game when they've already qualified. Or a relay team that fields lesser athletes for the heats. I think the organisers should come up with a format that doesn't incentivise a loss. This is four pairs out of the last eight, i.e. half the qualifying pairs. That should tell you something's wrong with the format.

mertle 01-08-2012 11:58

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
first to congrats amy oliver archery she ranked 37 just beat this morning world number 1 indian Deepika Kumari 6-2.

great result for GB. In the last 32

carlwaring 01-08-2012 12:00

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
And we just got our first GOLD for Women's Pair in Rowing :D

martyh 01-08-2012 12:10

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458461)
Personally, I blame the format. What do you expect if teams can get an easier draw if they lose a match? It's not that different to a football team resting players for a game when they've already qualified. Or a relay team that fields lesser athletes for the heats. I think the organisers should come up with a format that doesn't incentivise a loss. This is four pairs out of the last eight, i.e. half the qualifying pairs. That should tell you something's wrong with the format.


apparently this is the first year that we have had group stage format for badminton......... and i suspect the last

Maggy 01-08-2012 12:28

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458474)
And we just got our first GOLD for Women's Pair in Rowing :D

Terrific effort!:clap:

denphone 01-08-2012 12:42

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carlwaring (Post 35458474)
And we just got our first GOLD for Women's Pair in Rowing :D

Wonderful news.:clap:

danielf 01-08-2012 13:33

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35458479)
apparently this is the first year that we have had group stage format for badminton......... and i suspect the last

I'm not so sure now: All eight have been disqualified:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012...ified-olympics

denphone 01-08-2012 13:36

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458514)
I'm not so sure now: All eight have been disqualified:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012...ified-olympics

The right decision.:clap:

danielf 01-08-2012 13:46

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35458516)
The right decision.:clap:

I'm not so sure. We've lost 4 of the 8 quarter finalists, due to a format that incentivises losing. I think they need to look at the format, not the players.

denphone 01-08-2012 13:59

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458518)
I'm not so sure. We've lost 4 of the 8 quarter finalists, due to a format that incentivises losing. I think they need to look at the format, not the players.

Perhaps we do need to change the format dan but at the end of the day cheating is cheating and in a lot of peoples mind that what they did.

danielf 01-08-2012 14:28

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35458524)
Perhaps we do need to change the format dan but at the end of the day cheating is cheating and in a lot of peoples mind that what they did.

I don't consider it cheating, although what they did was rather blatant. There's plenty examples of athletes who don't perform at their best in races that don't matter too much in order to avoid showing the opposition how strong they really are. Are they cheats as well?

Is a football team that rests players for less important matches cheating?

I think you're better off thinking of a format where losing doesn't help.

Maggy 01-08-2012 14:37

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458530)
I don't consider it cheating, although what they did was rather blatant. There's plenty examples of athletes who don't perform at their best in races that don't matter too much in order to avoid showing the opposition how strong they really are. Are they cheats as well?

Is a football team that rests players for less important matches cheating?

I think you're better off thinking of a format where losing doesn't help.

It hardly epitomises the Olympic ideal though does it? So I think it's the right result..Format or not they had a duty to do their best and they patently didn't.

After all the Athletes oath is
Quote:

"In the name of all competitors, I promise that we shall take part in these
Olympic Games, respecting and abiding by the rules that govern them, in the
true spirit of sportsmanship, for the glory of sport and the honour of our teams."

danielf 01-08-2012 14:41

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35458533)
It hardly epitomises the Olympic ideal though does it? So I think it's the right result..Format or not they had a duty to do their best and they patently didn't.

After all the Athletes oath is

True, but the question also is if we're now seeing the best Athletes competing for the medals. Not having the best Athletes isn't exactly in the Olympic spirit either is it?

denphone 01-08-2012 14:50

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458530)
I don't consider it cheating, although what they did was rather blatant. There's plenty examples of athletes who don't perform at their best in races that don't matter too much in order to avoid showing the opposition how strong they really are. Are they cheats as well?

Is a football team that rests players for less important matches cheating?

I think you're better off thinking of a format where losing doesn't help.

But dan they cheated themselves and they cheated the crowd who paid all that money only for them to do that and perhaps cheating is a strong word but l can't think of any other word to describe it.

danielf 01-08-2012 15:15

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35458540)
But dan they cheated themselves and they cheated the crowd who paid all that money only for them to do that and perhaps cheating is a strong word but l can't think of any other word to describe it.

I agree that it must have been a shambles for the crowd that paid good money to watch some quality sports, but I don't think the outcome makes for the best spectacle either. Presumably, 4 other couples that were beaten will now be reinstated. So the crowds will be looking at poorer couples in the quarters now.The alternative is to scrap two quarter finals. Hardly a crowd pleaser either.

I do think it was a blatant attempt to affect the results, but I don't think it's that different from a football team that rests key players, or decides that coming second in the group gives you a more favourable opponent, so they don't give it their all. It's not pretty, but it does happen. Perhaps not as blatantly as in this case, but it does happen. Personaly, I think a stern warning would have been the better option here.

---------- Post added at 15:15 ---------- Previous post was at 15:07 ----------

Amazing to see these crowds on a British road for the time trial :)

gazzae 01-08-2012 15:18

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458530)
I don't consider it cheating, although what they did was rather blatant. There's plenty examples of athletes who don't perform at their best in races that don't matter too much in order to avoid showing the opposition how strong they really are. Are they cheats as well?

Is a football team that rests players for less important matches cheating?

I think you're better off thinking of a format where losing doesn't help.

There is a difference between resting or taking your foot off the gas to absolutely blatant attempts to lose.

I’d would say it was more like a football team deliberately and repeatedly scoring own goals.

Yes it was an error to have the format of the competition to put players in a position where losing was beneficial for them but I do think they deserved to be disqualified.

danielf 01-08-2012 15:26

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35458553)
There is a difference between resting or taking your foot off the gas to absolutely blatant attempts to lose.

I’d would say it was more like a football team deliberately and repeatedly scoring own goals.

Yes it was an error to have the format of the competition to put players in a position where losing was beneficial for them but I do think they deserved to be disqualified.

Nice analogy :)

I can see your side of the argument, but I don't think that taking potential champions out is the right solution either. I'd be looking at a different format for the tournament.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Ge...A_World_Cup%29

Damien 01-08-2012 15:46

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Come on Wiggins!

Maggy 01-08-2012 15:46

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458536)
True, but the question also is if we're now seeing the best Athletes competing for the medals. Not having the best Athletes isn't exactly in the Olympic spirit either is it?

Well sorry that's not the point..It's about competing and if the result is that the best are disqualified for cheating too damned bad..they have broken the oath.

danielf 01-08-2012 15:52

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35458559)
Well sorry that's not the point..It's about competing and if the result is that the best are disqualified for cheating too damned bad..they have broken the oath.

Look, they didn't cheat. They'd already qualified. No-one (except the crowd) lost out because of what they did. And don't give me that rubbish about the oath. Nobody cares about that. They tried to get the best result they could, and the format encouraged them to lose.

Maggy 01-08-2012 15:58

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35458561)
Look, they didn't cheat. They'd already qualified. No-one (except the crowd) lost out because of what they did. And don't give me that rubbish about the oath. Nobody cares about that. They tried to get the best result they could, and the format encouraged them to lose.

I think you will find that they do.Which is why the disqualification.

Damien 01-08-2012 15:59

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
GOLD!!!!

Arise Sir Bradley Wiggins!

denphone 01-08-2012 16:01

Re: The London 2012 Olympics: Sports discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35458564)
GOLD!!!!

Arise Sir Bradley Wiggins!

Brilliant.:clap::clap:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum