Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK unemployment increases to 2.64m (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33683802)

denphone 14-12-2011 10:51

UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16175309

Quote:

UK unemployment rose by 128,000 in the three months to October to 2.64 million, the highest level since 1994.
Quote:

Youth unemployment rose to 1.027 million, the highest since records began in 1992, beating the previous record set only last month.
Quote:

However, the rate of increase in the claimant count showed signs of slowing down.

Gary L 14-12-2011 11:08

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
They need to put a lot on compulsory courses. they don't get counted in the unemployment figures that way. and it would look a lot less to everybody.

maybe they already are, and that's what they mean by the claimant count showing signs of slowing down.

denphone 14-12-2011 11:24

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
No matter what way we look at the employment figures for the people and families involved the economic situation will have a major impact on their families and loved ones and several years before my medical condition took over l was unemployed for a while and it can have a depressing morale sapping effect on you and your family and l do not wish it on anybody.

Gary L 14-12-2011 11:30

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
I think that in a few years from now this country is going to be one where poverty is as common as what having a job once was.

there are going to be thousands more job losses, and I don't think it will ever pick up.

in the meantime we'll be looking at how we can cut cuts that have already been cut 3 times over.

it will be very depressing.

Arthurgray50@blu 14-12-2011 11:31

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
The unemployment situation is a total disgrace for the coalition, and l blame them totally, for what they are doing with the severe cuts.

People that are made redundant, or laid off due to these cuts add to that figure, its no good members saying 'blame the previous government', its not there fault that the coalition are cutting everything going, its not the labour government making cutbacks in the armed services, the police, etc so that they can save money.

The coalition are blaming everyone else, except for themself, The course's that are being forced onto claimants are a waste of time, as l have been on them, all you do is sit in an office and learn how to write a CV or go cold calling on building sites, hoping that the company that will be there, will take you on in 12 months time.

The only way this country can get back on its feet, is stop giving contracts to oversea's companies, I was reading sad article by Paul O'Grady about the north east, who like the rest of Britain are proud people who just want work, sadly the coward of Clegg to stand up to Thatcher 2 and say enough is enough.

This country needs a government that will stop this mess.

Pierre 14-12-2011 12:25

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Of course when Labour were in power, they did such a great job in saving manufacturing jobs in the UK. Especially the North East

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...ndelson-rescue

Pog66 14-12-2011 12:59

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
...okay Arthur - so wholesale nationalisation to enable the "country" to choose who they give contracts too then? How does that get paid for then?

Paul O'Grady? Lily Savage's view on unemployment in teh North East? Please provide a link I'm intrigued.

I agree on one thing - we do need a government who can sort out this mess and I'll go for the lesser of the two evils and stick with the current one.

Arthurgray50@blu 14-12-2011 14:31

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Pog66, It was a centre fold in The Daily Mirror the other day, This country needs works, it needs a government that will ease stupid taxes ie vat, that is crippling some businesses.

Deb Meadon said this recently, this country needs to reduce vat, bring growth into the country, when she was on Tv recently, she stated with that Muppet Ken Clark sitting on the panel, the problem is that we need a government that will bring industry back to this country, and not have companies leave this shores due to high taxes.

At the moment, Puppet Cameron and Clegg are more concerned with other countries, then there own.

The North East is a major employer for factories and major industries, but now it is just a blip on the unemployment register - if l am wrong tell me.

Hugh 14-12-2011 14:55

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
You're wrong, in so many ways....

How would the job-creation be paid for if we reduce VAT?

To "create" jobs, we would either need to seed fund businesses (which would cost money) or attract overseas investors with tax-breaks or rate-relief (which would cost money).

We need more infrastructure projects, but these have to be paid for, which would be difficult if we reduce the tax revenue coming in.

Dai 14-12-2011 18:28

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
What Hugh said. Governments cannot create jobs, at least not the sort of jobs that actually make wealth for a country. All they can do is create an environment which assists start-up private businesses.

Unfortunately at the present time the obsession with EU regulations and environmental control makes it harder and harder to run a successful new venture.

I'd be happy to employ anyone who wants to work for the chinese or indian rates..

martyh 14-12-2011 19:51

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35345187)
The unemployment situation is a total disgrace for the coalition, and l blame them totally, for what they are doing with the severe cuts.

Arthur ,youth unemployment went up by around 40% under the last labour government so you need to blame the last government as well

denphone 14-12-2011 19:52

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35345475)
Arthur ,youth unemployment went up by around 40% under the last labour government so you need to blame the last government as well

Yes both governments are to blame and of that there is no doubt.

martyh 14-12-2011 20:09

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35345477)
Yes both governments are to blame and of that there is no doubt.

The difference is though Den ,the current government are reacting to Labours cock ups

denphone 14-12-2011 20:11

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35345496)
The difference is though Den ,the current government are reacting to Labours cock ups

l think we will have to agree to disagree on that Martyh.:)

Dai 14-12-2011 20:30

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35345477)
Yes both governments are to blame and of that there is no doubt.

It's really out of the control of Governments, no matter how they like to posture. Globalisation has enabled corporations to move their manufacturing to the cheapest provider and other types of business are following that lead. We've all experienced off-shore call centres for example. And clearly many companies consider that an acceptable level of support.

Basically we're never going to have full employment for the forseeable future.

Ignitionnet 14-12-2011 23:20

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35345270)
Pog66, It was a centre fold in The Daily Mirror the other day.....
..... if l am wrong tell me.

A good start would be to stop reading that toilet paper and read something approaching a real newspaper. You'll then get a viewpoint somewhat closer to the real world and not need to ask people on a forum if you're wrong.

Alan Fry 15-12-2011 13:57

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
To reduce unemployment, the government could start a development bank, and spend more

Hugh 15-12-2011 14:57

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
And how would they fund the Development Bank, please?

Gary L 15-12-2011 15:36

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Cut something.

if it's already been cut, then cut it some more.

denphone 15-12-2011 15:38

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35345907)
Cut something.

if it's already been cut, then cut it some more.

Not sure you can do that when its already been cut to the bone Gary.

Ignitionnet 15-12-2011 15:41

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35345907)
Cut something.

if it's already been cut, then cut it some more.

Sounds good, time for the NHS to feel some pain.

denphone 15-12-2011 15:43

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35345912)
Sounds good, time for the NHS to feel some pain.

And in what areas are you proposing for these cuts to happen in the NHS.

Ignitionnet 15-12-2011 15:45

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35345818)
To reduce unemployment, the government could start a development bank, and spend more

Or they could just hire a million extra public sector workers given how superbly it worked during the Labour government.

I'm sure our kids won't mind picking up the bill, failing that I'm sure people won't mind seeing their taxes shoot up even further punishing people yet more for being rude enough to be productive.

Halting all cuts and spending more should only require about a 25% increase on total tax burden.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35345913)
And in what areas are you proposing for these cuts to happen in the NHS.

The areas that Labour threw money at which caused the value the NHS delivers for the money spent on it to actually drop.

Bringing in a nice 3rd party private sector management consultancy with the ability to hire and fire pretty much as they see fit rather than leaving self-serving middle-management cutting front line services to keep their own jobs should work.

Alan Fry 15-12-2011 15:49

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35345867)
And how would they fund the Development Bank, please?

with money gained after a massive crackdown on tax evation, which is worth tens of billions each year

---------- Post added at 14:49 ---------- Previous post was at 14:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35345915)
Or they could just hire a million extra public sector workers given how superbly it worked during the Labour government.

I'm sure our kids won't mind picking up the bill, failing that I'm sure people won't mind seeing their taxes shoot up even further punishing people yet more for being rude enough to be productive.

Halting all cuts and spending more should only require about a 25% increase on total tax burden.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------



The areas that Labour threw money at which caused the value the NHS delivers for the money spent on it to actually drop.

Bringing in a nice 3rd party private sector management consultancy with the ability to hire and fire pretty much as they see fit rather than leaving self-serving middle-management cutting front line services to keep their own jobs should work.

I was think about speding more of transport porjects, like more new trains, more high speed lines, better airports etc

denphone 15-12-2011 15:50

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35345915)
Or they could just hire a million extra public sector workers given how superbly it worked during the Labour government.

I'm sure our kids won't mind picking up the bill, failing that I'm sure people won't mind seeing their taxes shoot up even further punishing people yet more for being rude enough to be productive.

Halting all cuts and spending more should only require about a 25% increase on total tax burden.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------



The areas that Labour threw money at which caused the value the NHS delivers for the money spent on it to actually drop.

Bringing in a nice 3rd party private sector management consultancy with the ability to hire and fire pretty much as they see fit rather than leaving self-serving middle-management cutting front line services to keep their own jobs should work.

l am all for cutting middle-management to protect front line services but there is only so much you can cut in the end.

Ignitionnet 15-12-2011 15:58

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35345925)
l am all for cutting middle-management to protect front line services but there is only so much you can cut in the end.

Indeed, doesn't change that there is something to cut and ring fencing it for political reasons, to the detriment of other less politically sensitive services, is very wrong.

---------- Post added at 14:56 ---------- Previous post was at 14:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35345922)
I was think about speding more of transport porjects, like more new trains, more high speed lines, better airports etc

It's happening?

I take it you missed where George Osborne mentioned £6bn of public money for just this such a thing, along with a purported £20bn from the National Association of Pension Funds and the Pension Protection Fund.

In addition to this there's some interest from China in investing in UK infrastructure.

I appreciate it may be a weird concept getting private investment in but it works pretty well elsewhere. Maybe they have a point?

---------- Post added at 14:58 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35345922)
with money gained after a massive crackdown on tax evation, which is worth tens of billions each year

Keep dreaming. Companies don't pay tax their customers do. Yes that's us.

Alan Fry 15-12-2011 16:39

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35345928)
Indeed, doesn't change that there is something to cut and ring fencing it for political reasons, to the detriment of other less politically sensitive services, is very wrong.

---------- Post added at 14:56 ---------- Previous post was at 14:54 ----------



It's happening?

I take it you missed where George Osborne mentioned £6bn of public money for just this such a thing, along with a purported £20bn from the National Association of Pension Funds and the Pension Protection Fund.

In addition to this there's some interest from China in investing in UK infrastructure.

I appreciate it may be a weird concept getting private investment in but it works pretty well elsewhere. Maybe they have a point?

---------- Post added at 14:58 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------



Keep dreaming. Companies don't pay tax their customers do. Yes that's us.

What the government spends on Transport is nowere near enough, we need far more new and extra trains for example

And we need to crack down on busineeses like Topshop from evading tax and claw back evaded taxes!

nomadking 15-12-2011 16:52

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35345961)
What the government spends on Transport is nowere near enough, we need far more new and extra trains for example

And we need to crack down on busineeses like Topshop from evading tax and claw back evaded taxes!

Topshop doesn't evade tax.:rolleyes:

richard1960 15-12-2011 18:26

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35345912)
Sounds good, time for the NHS to feel some pain.

It is the trust i work for is shedding quite a few jobs now and a neighbouring trust is doing the same with heavy job losses.:(

Would you like it to shed lots more?

One things for sure the private sector is not recruiting and those that lose their jobs from the NHS will still be on the government payroll collecting dole money,that in turn means they will not be spending in the shops or paying tax ,which in turn means less jobs in the private sector in itself.

denphone 15-12-2011 18:28

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard1960 (Post 35346035)
It is the trust i work for is shedding quite a few jobs now and a neighbouring trust is doing the same with heavy job losses.:(

Would you like it to shed lots more?

Yes things are already being cut to the bone Richard.

richard1960 15-12-2011 18:33

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35346036)
Yes things are already being cut to the bone Richard.

Yes indeed denphone quite a few people i know well over the years are gone,and more are to follow just before christmas,the NHS is certainly not immune from heavy jobs losses despite what the daily mail may tell us.;)

Ignitionnet 15-12-2011 23:37

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35345961)
What the government spends on Transport is nowere near enough, we need far more new and extra trains for example

The government doesn't buy/lease the rolling stock the train service operating companies do.

Gary L 16-12-2011 00:10

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
I think I know how we can fix all this. we should all give up our wages for a week. or maybe even two. in this time banks will give us a week or even the two weeks free mortgage and councils the same with rent.

supermarkets should give us free food to keep us fed for that week or two. and fuel suppliers the same with free petrol.

how much would that clear the mess we're in?

would certifying Cameron insane even help?

Hugh 16-12-2011 07:58

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Bless....

Anonymouse 16-12-2011 15:35

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Possibly slightly O/T, but I'm so pleased with myself at the moment I just don't care!

Hopefully soon I'll be able to do the coalition a little favour by reducing the unemployment figures by one (every little helps! :p:), because today I've just completed - and passed! - an RTITB-accredited FLT course (counterbalance), and I was so chuffed that I'd managed it, I went home without a care in the world, in the middle of a snow blizzard, and was singing "Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow" on my way! :D

I should mention in passing that I hate most Christmas songs, except that one about the spaceman calling (was it Chris de Burgh who did that one?). :p:

Word of advice to anyone doing FLT: it helps enormously if you have driving experience, as two of the blokes doing the same course discovered. I don't, and that kept bringing me up short on steering in reverse - those controls are so sensitive, and I kept oversteering. But after a couple of practice runs, I cracked it! :D


Kingofthedead4 16-12-2011 15:40

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 35346495)
Possibly slightly O/T, but I'm so pleased with myself at the moment I just don't care!

Hopefully soon I'll be able to do the coalition a little favour by reducing the unemployment figures by one (every little helps! :p:), because today I've just completed - and passed! - an RTITB-accredited FLT course (counterbalance), and I was so chuffed that I'd managed it, I went home without a care in the world, in the middle of a snow blizzard, and was singing "Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow" on my way! :D

I should mention in passing that I hate most Christmas songs, except that one about the spaceman calling (was it Chris de Burgh who did that one?). :p:

Word of advice to anyone doing FLT: it helps enormously if you have driving experience, as two of the blokes doing the same course discovered. I don't, and that kept bringing me up short on steering in reverse - those controls are so sensitive, and I kept oversteering. But after a couple of practice runs, I cracked it! :D


Very well done!!!!

denphone 16-12-2011 15:43

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 35346495)
Possibly slightly O/T, but I'm so pleased with myself at the moment I just don't care!

Hopefully soon I'll be able to do the coalition a little favour by reducing the unemployment figures by one (every little helps! :p:), because today I've just completed - and passed! - an RTITB-accredited FLT course (counterbalance), and I was so chuffed that I'd managed it, I went home without a care in the world, in the middle of a snow blizzard, and was singing "Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow" on my way! :D

I should mention in passing that I hate most Christmas songs, except that one about the spaceman calling (was it Chris de Burgh who did that one?). :p:

Word of advice to anyone doing FLT: it helps enormously if you have driving experience, as two of the blokes doing the same course discovered. I don't, and that kept bringing me up short on steering in reverse - those controls are so sensitive, and I kept oversteering. But after a couple of practice runs, I cracked it! :D


Congratulations on passing with flying colours.:clap:

Arthurgray50@blu 16-12-2011 15:59

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
In realistic terms Cameron and his puppets don't give a monkeys for the actual working class people of this country.

They are tearing the country to pieces, and at this time of year, people cannot spend money, hight street shops are closing, one shop today that my wife was in, she said the shop was empty of stock as the head office cannot bring in new stock as suppliers have run out.

This is what is happening, people can not longer afford to buy goods, it shocking and yet the puppets bring out these crazy ideas of giving money to daft idea like ' desperate families' plus in todays The Sun (Tory) states that Ken Clarke has scrapped £1.5 BILLION in fines. This is how mad the Puppets are.

Hugh 16-12-2011 19:05

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Once again - bless......

martyh 16-12-2011 19:26

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346514)
In realistic terms Cameron and his puppets don't give a monkeys for the actual working class people of this country.

.

Utter nonsense

Quote:

They are tearing the country to pieces, and at this time of year, people cannot spend money, hight street shops are closing, one shop today that my wife was in, she said the shop was empty of stock as the head office cannot bring in new stock as suppliers have run out.
How in the name of all that is holy is it the governments fault that the shop in question has sold out of stock ,that has to be seen as a good thing

Ignitionnet 16-12-2011 20:47

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35346625)
How in the name of all that is holy is it the governments fault that the shop in question has sold out of stock ,that has to be seen as a good thing

Arthur thinks the government should do everything for everyone, while not paying too much tax, so he sees their influence in everything I guess.

martyh 16-12-2011 20:53

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35346680)
Arthur thinks the government should do everything for everyone, while not paying too much tax, so he sees their influence in everything I guess.

of course ,how silly of me :dunce:

Arthurgray50@blu 16-12-2011 21:34

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Since the puppets have got in, how many cuts has ther been, how many businesses have gone down the plug hole, how many people have been made redundant - this is down to government cut backs,

Employment has gone up to the highest in 17 years.

Whose fault is that, or l do l live in cuckoo land.

martyh 16-12-2011 21:38

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346713)

or l do l live in cuckoo land.


erm.....

Hugh 16-12-2011 21:46

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346713)
Since the puppets have got in, how many cuts has ther been, how many businesses have gone down the plug hole, how many people have been made redundant - this is down to government cut backs,

Employment has gone up to the highest in 17 years.

Whose fault is that, or l do l live in cuckoo land.

Not sure if you do, but you probably have a holiday home there....;)

Gary L 16-12-2011 21:49

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346713)
Since the puppets have got in, how many cuts has ther been, how many businesses have gone down the plug hole, how many people have been made redundant - this is down to government cut backs,

Employment has gone up to the highest in 17 years.

Whose fault is that, or l do l live in cuckoo land.

I agree with you Arthur. even if nobody else does.

I can't see Dave lasting long to be honest. whether that will be him stepping down of his own accord or what.

Hugh 16-12-2011 21:52

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Two minds thinking as none.

martyh 16-12-2011 21:55

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35346730)
I agree with you Arthur. even if nobody else does.

I can't see Dave lasting long to be honest. whether that will be him stepping down of his own accord or what.

and the alternative to dave would be .......

Gary L 16-12-2011 21:57

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35346734)
and the alternative to dave would be .......

I was thinking of Hugh?

martyh 16-12-2011 22:01

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35346735)
I was thinking of Hugh?

there's an idea ,that would realy upset Arthur :D

Ignitionnet 16-12-2011 22:05

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346713)
Since the puppets have got in, how many cuts has ther been, how many businesses have gone down the plug hole, how many people have been made redundant - this is down to government cut backs,

Employment has gone up to the highest in 17 years.

Whose fault is that, or l do l live in cuckoo land.

This is how the economy would have looked over the last decade if it weren't for a debt bubble and Labour employing a million people on the public purse. This is how the UK economy looks when the government is not borrowing relentlessly from the next generation to buy votes.

The cuts are, actually, going to take the state back to where it was in the mid 2000's, though of course this has been explained to you more than once.

The only conclusion is that you don't have the wit to think for yourself and are quite happy to believe what the red tops, specifically The Mirror, preaches at you.

This government is doing a lot of things wrong, it doesn't change that thanks to the utter joke the previous Labour government were with the economy, which I'm sure a man of your age knows is par for the course for Labour, whomever was in power would have been cutting. Labour's plan had almost identical cuts to the current government's, a minimal difference.

Incidentally while you're ranting away merrily government expenditure actually increased in both nominal and real terms compared to last year, but carry on, it's not like facts or reality have bothered you in the past so they're not likely to start now.

Alan Fry 16-12-2011 22:49

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35345977)
Topshop doesn't evade tax.:rolleyes:

It's owner Phillip Green does

---------- Post added at 21:37 ---------- Previous post was at 21:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35346259)
The government doesn't buy/lease the rolling stock the train service operating companies do.

It is increasingly interfering in the process of buying rolling stock, plus it effectly provides the money

---------- Post added at 21:49 ---------- Previous post was at 21:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346514)
In realistic terms Cameron and his puppets don't give a monkeys for the actual working class people of this country.

They are tearing the country to pieces, and at this time of year, people cannot spend money, hight street shops are closing, one shop today that my wife was in, she said the shop was empty of stock as the head office cannot bring in new stock as suppliers have run out.

This is what is happening, people can not longer afford to buy goods, it shocking and yet the puppets bring out these crazy ideas of giving money to daft idea like ' desperate families' plus in todays The Sun (Tory) states that Ken Clarke has scrapped £1.5 BILLION in fines. This is how mad the Puppets are.

The sooner they call a general election the better

Ignitionnet 16-12-2011 23:03

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35346751)
The sooner they call a general election the better

That would be great on condition that Labour are required to actually give policies during the campaign rather than do what has characterised their time in opposition so far and oppose everything the government do without proposing any viable alternatives.

Lib Dems should get wiped out, which is good as they were never fit to play a roll in government as they promised a raft of things they could never deliver, Miliband get shown up as the charmless, vacuous, champagne socialist Primrose Hill boy that he is, and Cameron and Co look like the least worst of the 3 options by quite some distance.

Of course this may not matter. If Labour give enough BS people, some of whom post here, will merrily suck it up, then be demanding younger generations both pay off the ton of debt Labour chalked up bribing them for their votes while also paying them massive prices for housing and paying tons of tax for debt interest and their pensions.

You do know how small the difference between the Darling plan and the Osborne one would have been so far in terms of public spending cuts? Not much. The Balls plan is, well, balls plucked out of fantasy land by the man who, along with Calamity Brown, destroyed the UK economy.

Hugh 16-12-2011 23:10

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35346735)
I was thinking of Hugh?

I feel dirty now....

(and not in a good way ;))

---------- Post added at 22:10 ---------- Previous post was at 22:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35346751)
It's owner Phillip Green does

It is increasingly interfering in the process of buying rolling stock, plus it effectly provides the money

The sooner they call a general election the better

They can't, due to the Fixed Term Parliament Act
Quote:

How often are general elections held?

The date of the next general election is set at 7 May 2015 after the Fixed Term Parliament Act was passed on 15 September 2011.

The act provides for general elections to be held on the first Thursday in May every five years. There are two provisions that trigger an election other than at five year intervals.

A motion of no confidence is passed in Her Majesty's Government by a simple majority and 14 days elapses without the House passing a confidence motion in any new Government formed
A motion for a general election is agreed by two thirds of the total number of seats in the Commons including vacant seats (currently 434 out of 650)
Previous to this act, the duration of a Parliament was set at five years, although many were dissolved before that, at the*request of the Prime Minister to the Queen.

Gary L 16-12-2011 23:26

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35346772)
I feel dirty now....

I've already got a boyfriend, thanks ;)

Alan Fry 17-12-2011 10:33

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35346772)
I feel dirty now....

(and not in a good way ;))

---------- Post added at 22:10 ---------- Previous post was at 22:05 ----------



They can't, due to the Fixed Term Parliament Act

So even if let say 14 Lib Dems leave the their party (enough for this government to lose its majority) and either join another party or set up their own party, will this government still not call a general election

---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35346771)
That would be great on condition that Labour are required to actually give policies during the campaign rather than do what has characterised their time in opposition so far and oppose everything the government do without proposing any viable alternatives.

Lib Dems should get wiped out, which is good as they were never fit to play a roll in government as they promised a raft of things they could never deliver, Miliband get shown up as the charmless, vacuous, champagne socialist Primrose Hill boy that he is, and Cameron and Co look like the least worst of the 3 options by quite some distance.

Of course this may not matter. If Labour give enough BS people, some of whom post here, will merrily suck it up, then be demanding younger generations both pay off the ton of debt Labour chalked up bribing them for their votes while also paying them massive prices for housing and paying tons of tax for debt interest and their pensions.

You do know how small the difference between the Darling plan and the Osborne one would have been so far in terms of public spending cuts? Not much. The Balls plan is, well, balls plucked out of fantasy land by the man who, along with Calamity Brown, destroyed the UK economy.

Acually, I feel that we should vote for none of those three main parties and teach them a lesson by voting for other parties

denphone 17-12-2011 10:47

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35346878)
So even if let say 14 Lib Dems leave the their party (enough for this government to lose its majority) and either join another party or set up their own party, will this government still not call a general election

---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------



Acually, I feel that we should vote for none of those three main parties and teach them a lesson by voting for other parties

And what party would you suggest as here is a link for you to discover and ponder your next political vote.

---------- Post added at 09:47 ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 ----------

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...itical_Parties

richard1960 17-12-2011 10:52

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35346878)
So even if let say 14 Lib Dems leave the their party (enough for this government to lose its majority) and either join another party or set up their own party, will this government still not call a general election

---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------



Acually, I feel that we should vote for none of those three main parties and teach them a lesson by voting for other parties

Thats a very good idea the main political parties all offer more of the same the arguments they have in the westminster village are largely synthetic,they all believe in globalisation for instance,they all beileved also in light touch regulation for banks ,i remember George Osbourne calling for even lighter regulation in opposition around 2007 before the banks went belly up.

When it comes to smaller parties its always amazed me if we are such a Euro-Sceptic country that UKIP cannot get a single MP elected you would think the uk would be very open to a few UKIP MPs in parliament but no.

Whilst the uk continues to vote for more of the same thats exactly what it will get.

.

Arthurgray50@blu 17-12-2011 11:57

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
To all those knockers of me, answer the biggest question of all - how are you going to solve the problem, or do we have a lot of Tory lovers on this forum, who only care about themself.

I don't give a monkey's who runs this country, but l get sick to death each day reading on the tv or in the papers, that unemployment is rising, companies are closing down, contracts being sold to foreign companies at the expense of the British workforce.

While the Muppet's can find billions to fund crazy schemes that won't work, There might be members out there that have great jobs and great pay packets and enjoy living under the current situation, but all those billions could be spent on something that will bring back the dignity that this country has lost.

I spoke with a builder the other day and he says that the British builders are losing there jobs everyday due to cutbacks.

denphone 17-12-2011 12:07

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346926)
To all those knockers of me, answer the biggest question of all - how are you going to solve the problem, or do we have a lot of Tory lovers on this forum, who only care about themself.

I don't give a monkey's who runs this country, but l get sick to death each day reading on the tv or in the papers, that unemployment is rising, companies are closing down, contracts being sold to foreign companies at the expense of the British workforce.

While the Muppet's can find billions to fund crazy schemes that won't work, There might be members out there that have great jobs and great pay packets and enjoy living under the current situation, but all those billions could be spent on something that will bring back the dignity that this country has lost.

I spoke with a builder the other day and he says that the British builders are losing there jobs everyday due to cutbacks.

Thats a staggering claim you have just made about most forum members being Tory voters who only care about themselves as first of all most forum members are polite and very helpful and l suspect also that a considerable amount cannot stand the Tories but whoever they vote for is their own personal business and nobody elses at the end of the day.

Hugh 17-12-2011 12:09

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35346878)
So even if let say 14 Lib Dems leave the their party (enough for this government to lose its majority) and either join another party or set up their own party, will this government still not call a general election

---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------



Acually, I feel that we should vote for none of those three main parties and teach them a lesson by voting for other parties

You must have missed the bit in the post 2 posts above yours.....
Quote:

The act provides for general elections to be held on the first Thursday in May every five years. There are two provisions that trigger an election other than at five year intervals.

A motion of no confidence is passed in Her Majesty's Government by a simple majority and 14 days elapses without the House passing a confidence motion in any new Government formed

A motion for a general election is agreed by two thirds of the total number of seats in the Commons including vacant seats (currently 434 out of 650)

Kingofthedead4 17-12-2011 12:09

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
I personally vote for the Monster Raving Loony Party :D

Gary L 17-12-2011 12:34

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingofthedead4 (Post 35346931)
I personally vote for the Monster Raving Loony Party :D

That's alright. as long as the BNP don't get the votes from everyone :)

Hugh 17-12-2011 12:58

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Not even supporters of the MRLP have such bad taste as to vote for the BNP.

They're (the BNP) bankrupt and falling apart, anyway... (shame).
Quote:

BNP leader Nick Griffin faces being axed as a Euro MP as he fights to avoid bankruptcy over his party's soaring cash crisis.

He is among top officials thought to be personally liable for the racist group's £700,000 debts - which it admits it cannot pay.

Anyone made bankrupt is legally barred from being an MP or Euro MP...

....The BNP's debt meltdown comes amid a spate of defections and expulsions.

Mr Dowson and media officer Paul Golding have left while campaigns chief Eddy Butler and London Assembly member Richard Barnbrook were recently expelled.

Alan Fry 19-12-2011 16:38

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35346887)
And what party would you suggest as here is a link for you to discover and ponder your next political vote.

---------- Post added at 09:47 ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 ----------

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...itical_Parties

To be honest, not one of those poltical parties have polcies 100% agree with, However the Jury Team and Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition are not too bad

denphone 19-12-2011 16:40

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35347967)
To be honest, not one of those poltical parties have polcies 100% agree with, However the Jury Team and Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition are not too bad

Well people have the right to vote for whoever they want to but l for one would never vote for any of these two.

Hugh 19-12-2011 16:40

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Love the banner headline on the TUSC webpage.
Quote:

“No to Cuts and Privatisation!
Make the Bosses pay!”
btw, an interesting piece of info below the banner
Quote:

BOB CROW General Secretary, RMT and TUSC National Steering Ctte
No wonder you like it so much....

denphone 19-12-2011 16:48

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35347972)
Love the banner headline on the TUSC webpage.

Well they will always blame someone but as we all know is not exactly like that in real life as there are plenty of good bosses around and a few poor ones but it can be like that in any profession from my experience but some will always moan about things no matter what.

Alan Fry 19-12-2011 16:52

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35347972)
Love the banner headline on the TUSC webpage.

btw, an interesting piece of info below the banner No wonder you like it so much....[/COLOR]

I don't like it that much, they are not keen on the EU!

TheDaddy 20-12-2011 23:06

Re: UK unemployment increases to 2.64m
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35346713)
Since the puppets have got in, how many cuts has ther been, how many businesses have gone down the plug hole, how many people have been made redundant - this is down to government cut backs,

Employment has gone up to the highest in 17 years.

Whose fault is that, or l do l live in cuckoo land.

Not enough cuts to make any difference, where the government has gone wrong is failing to give business any confidence or help, that's why they aren't picking up the slack, still has better than those other puppets accross the floor whose bright idea of getting us out of debt is by borrowing more.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum