![]() |
VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.
Virgin Media Plus Points , Excellent BB , Good Range of STB , HD On Demand , Advanced TV features with TIVO (Wishlists , Advanced Search , Season passes) , free ESPN with XL , Catchup TV , Remote Record Apps starting to appear , free repair or replacement of equipment. Negatives , Key HD channels missing , phone packages expensive , OD content not updated regular enough , lack of online content or content on the go. Sky Plus Points Great Content range on SD and HD , Sky Go free for watching online or out and about , vast range of mobile apps including Sky+ , Sky news , Sky Go , Sky Sports score centre , cheap Phone packages , mpeg4 compression allowing for more recording hours , decent OD content range , nice clean and intuitive HD epg , dynamic epg , good online services via My Sky , Sky 3D. Negatives ESPN costs 12.00 or 9.00 for Sky Sports subscribers , BB speeds are dependent on proximity to exchange , Sky's OD service Anytime+ only available to Sky BB subscribers , Sky+HD box only has two tuners , no catchup TV from terrestrial. BT Vision Plus Points Great selection of OD Content , some decent phone prices and packages , Sky Sports 1 and 2 cheap , Catchup TV , some HBO content , Good selection of PPV movies now including HD and 3D , some can get BT Infinity fibre BB. Negatives Basically the linear offering is freeview , a lot of areas BB is still dependent on distance from the exchange , you must use BTs Homehub , no extras like remote record apps , very little HD. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
I would object to free ESPN, its included in the £35 fee for tv xl.
Skys top entertainment package is £24 with a lot more channels. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
http://shop.virginmedia.com/digital-tv/tv-size-xl.html |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
I would object to free ESPN, its included in the £35 fee for tv xl.
Skys top entertainment package is £24 with a lot more channels. ITS THIS SIMPLE.. FOR TV-Sky win FOR BB VM and BTInfinity win For phone Sky win. ---------- Post added at 19:08 ---------- Previous post was at 19:07 ---------- Quote:
£30.50 a month your kind of right lol. Its £24 a month if you add a £13.90 phoneline. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
I live in a flat so no -sky and even if there was i can only get 1.5mb for broadband that leads me onto bt and.............. No BT either as 1.5 mb will not run their vision box or indeed provide me with very much ommph in the broadband department. So although i agree with muppetman11 in his analysis its kind of hobsons choice as far as any comparisons go for me. Until when BT infinity arrives at least.:( And/or sky can fix a dish to my flat without the bodge up that happened with them at the first attempt that turned into four a few years back.:( |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
no dynamic epg is a huge negative for virgin.
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
Theres a review here http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/wifi-.../bt-home-hub-3 |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
Noun - pot Verb - calling Noun - kettle Adjective - black :D |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
For me there is no comparision
VM can receive it :) Sky can't receive it unless the tress are cut down BT too far from the exchange |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Happy Virgin customers will say Virgin is the best, happy SKY customers will say SKY is the best and happy BT customers will say they are the best.
I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :) |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
you didnt include virgin player (which is available on mobile) but you included Sky Go
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
You seem to ommit the most major negative for Sky though, that it's a satellite service. Fine when its dry, but when it rains...especially heavy rain, a satellite service is useless. When BT can actually offer me a BT Infinity/decent fibre service, I'll be buried six feet under, so I won't hold out hope on that one. For those that are lucky enough to live near a BT exchange, perhaps it's possible to get a decent triple service from one supplier only. I don't, so I can't tell. And despite the recent improvements to vm cable, faster speeds and tivo, there are glowing ommisions that does not make it the "all you can eat" service that cable was first touted as when it launched 20 years ago. I am still waiting for a company to offer me a half decent tv service, a half decent telephone service and a half decent internet service all under the same roof for a reasonable price. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
It seems there are a lot of Sky customers about now unhappy that cable subscribers are happy.. So there must be a war between the two. Has Murdoch been tapping your phone lines? |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
On the comparisons, if you relinquish sky sports at summer (even for a day) and add online, they offer ESPN free for first 3 months when taken with sky sports (and £5 off) And to the rain and satellite point, I lost signal for about 5 minutes once, due to heavy rain (monsoon version). Doesn't happen that often. My preference at moment is with sky, sky atlantic is my favourite channel. But overall, give me sports and I'm happy bunny, so probably will float between both unless I can't get better deal or one annoys me more than other. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
However, if Sky were to come up with a killer initiative that I wanted and VM appeared not to have a solution, I know which way I would leap! |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
One advantage VM have with the arrival of Tivo is being to offer a basic pay tv package + Tivo for under £10 to existing customers of other services.
Tivo is significant as now the PVR charge has reduced to just £3 as it is already included in the Tivo service. Excellent value IMO as even people who don't want pay tv could just get M+ and Tivo and pay not considerably more than they would have for a far superior STB than most the Freeview+HD junk out there. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
It's not like it's some sort of huge mansion with solid stone walls either - just a 3 bed ex-council house. I think their later models improved considerably on the WiFi though dropped features like the VoIP phone socket, which I thought was useful as it effectively gave you an extra voice line for 'free'. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
The fact I had to watch all of Game of Thrones at my girlfriend's parent's house because it wasn't available on Virgin tells me which is best.
I'm in rented property at the moment so am stuck with Virgin for now, but would change to Sky in a heartbeat - I'd pay a little more each month but it's worth it for the vastly superior TV on offer. The girlfriend's dad is quite a techy guy and hasn't had any issues regarding broadband from Sky, so VM don't even have that going for them. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
I have no interest in telephone land lines (happy with a mobile from any given provider) and would ideally choose VM for cable BB and Sky for telly. Unfortunately, all those companies try to structure their offerings in such a way as to tie you in on all their services instead of just offering the most competitive packages they can on a service by service basis. They make even some of the more convoluted mobile phone contracts look simple by comparison. |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
|
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)[/QUOTE]
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::c lap::clap: What else could I possibly add this is so true |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
What else could I possibly add this is so true[/QUOTE] With all those claps your hands must be hurting. and l am not brainwashed by any company either.:);):) |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Quote:
My criteria, as long as I have a reasonable connection to browse and chat on internet, can get sports and occassionally add movies, and at a reasonable price..I'm happy. Note, I'm not bothered about a phone, only take it because I have too (or offer makes it pointless not to add) |
Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
Been working on a update for my PVR Document (points at sig), now includes partial details for BT Vision. Should be full details later tonight.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum