Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33679809)

muppetman11 22-07-2011 20:03

VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.

Virgin Media

Plus Points , Excellent BB , Good Range of STB , HD On Demand , Advanced TV features with TIVO (Wishlists , Advanced Search , Season passes) , free ESPN with XL , Catchup TV , Remote Record Apps starting to appear , free repair or replacement of equipment.

Negatives , Key HD channels missing , phone packages expensive , OD content not updated regular enough , lack of online content or content on the go.

Sky

Plus Points Great Content range on SD and HD , Sky Go free for watching online or out and about , vast range of mobile apps including Sky+ , Sky news , Sky Go , Sky Sports score centre , cheap Phone packages , mpeg4 compression allowing for more recording hours , decent OD content range , nice clean and intuitive HD epg , dynamic epg , good online services via My Sky , Sky 3D.

Negatives ESPN costs 12.00 or 9.00 for Sky Sports subscribers , BB speeds are dependent on proximity to exchange , Sky's OD service Anytime+ only available to Sky BB subscribers , Sky+HD box only has two tuners , no catchup TV from terrestrial.

BT Vision

Plus Points Great selection of OD Content , some decent phone prices and packages , Sky Sports 1 and 2 cheap , Catchup TV , some HBO content , Good selection of PPV movies now including HD and 3D , some can get BT Infinity fibre BB.

Negatives Basically the linear offering is freeview , a lot of areas BB is still dependent on distance from the exchange , you must use BTs Homehub , no extras like remote record apps , very little HD.

Never say never 22-07-2011 20:05

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
I would object to free ESPN, its included in the £35 fee for tv xl.

Skys top entertainment package is £24 with a lot more channels.

muppetman11 22-07-2011 20:07

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Never say never (Post 35276932)
I would object to free ESPN, its included in the £35 fee for tv xl.

Skys top entertainment package is £24 with a lot more channels.

ESPN is free with XL costing 24.50 if took with a phone line

http://shop.virginmedia.com/digital-tv/tv-size-xl.html

Never say never 22-07-2011 20:08

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
I would object to free ESPN, its included in the £35 fee for tv xl.

Skys top entertainment package is £24 with a lot more channels.

ITS THIS SIMPLE..

FOR TV-Sky win
FOR BB VM and BTInfinity win
For phone Sky win.

---------- Post added at 19:08 ---------- Previous post was at 19:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276933)
ESPN is free with XL costing 24.50

Or without a Virgin phone line

£30.50 a month your kind of right lol.

Its £24 a month if you add a £13.90 phoneline.

denphone 22-07-2011 20:08

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276931)
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.

Virgin Media

Plus Points , Excellent BB , Good Range of STB , HD On Demand , Advanced TV features with TIVO (Wishlists , Advanced Search , Season passes) , free ESPN with XL , Catchup TV , Remote Record Apps starting to appear , free repair or replacement of equipment.

Negatives , Key HD channels missing , phone packages expensive , OD content not updated regular enough , lack of online content or content on the go.

Sky

Plus Points Great Content range on SD and HD , Sky Go free for watching online or out and about , vast range of mobile apps including Sky+ , Sky news , Sky Go , Sky Sports score centre , cheap Phone packages , mpeg4 compression allowing for more recording hours , decent OD content range , nice clean and intuitive HD epg , dynamic epg , good online services via My Sky , Sky 3D.

Negatives ESPN costs 12.00 or 9.00 for Sky Sports subscribers , BB speeds are dependent on proximity to exchange , Sky's OD service Anytime+ only available to Sky BB subscribers , Sky+HD box only has two tuners , no catchup TV from terrestrial.

BT Vision

Plus Points Great selection of OD Content , some decent phone prices and packages , Sky Sports 1 and 2 cheap , Catchup TV , some HBO content , Good selection of PPV movies now including HD and 3D , some can get BT Infinity fibre BB.

Negatives Basically the linear offering is freeview , a lot of areas BB is still dependent on distance from the exchange , you must use BTs Homehub , no extras like remote record apps , very little HD.

Very interesting to read but wheres the poll.;)

Gavin-D 22-07-2011 20:09

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276933)
ESPN is free with XL costing 24.50

Only with a VM phone line £13.90 a month, other wise it's £30.50 if you don't have a phone line.

richard1960 22-07-2011 20:33

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276931)
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.

Virgin Media

Plus Points , Excellent BB , Good Range of STB , HD On Demand , Advanced TV features with TIVO (Wishlists , Advanced Search , Season passes) , free ESPN with XL , Catchup TV , Remote Record Apps starting to appear , free repair or replacement of equipment.

Negatives , Key HD channels missing , phone packages expensive , OD content not updated regular enough , lack of online content or content on the go.

Sky

Plus Points Great Content range on SD and HD , Sky Go free for watching online or out and about , vast range of mobile apps including Sky+ , Sky news , Sky Go , Sky Sports score centre , cheap Phone packages , mpeg4 compression allowing for more recording hours , decent OD content range , nice clean and intuitive HD epg , dynamic epg , good online services via My Sky , Sky 3D.

Negatives ESPN costs 12.00 or 9.00 for Sky Sports subscribers , BB speeds are dependent on proximity to exchange , Sky's OD service Anytime+ only available to Sky BB subscribers , Sky+HD box only has two tuners , no catchup TV from terrestrial.

BT Vision

Plus Points Great selection of OD Content , some decent phone prices and packages , Sky Sports 1 and 2 cheap , Catchup TV , some HBO content , Good selection of PPV movies now including HD and 3D , some can get BT Infinity fibre BB.

Negatives Basically the linear offering is freeview , a lot of areas BB is still dependent on distance from the exchange , you must use BTs Homehub , no extras like remote record apps , very little HD.

I agree pretty much with the comparisons above but for me there is no comparison as.................

I live in a flat so no -sky and even if there was i can only get 1.5mb for broadband that leads me onto bt and..............

No BT either as 1.5 mb will not run their vision box or indeed provide me with very much ommph in the broadband department.

So although i agree with muppetman11 in his analysis its kind of hobsons choice as far as any comparisons go for me. Until when BT infinity arrives at least.:( And/or sky can fix a dish to my flat without the bodge up that happened with them at the first attempt that turned into four a few years back.:(

ekwk 22-07-2011 20:43

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
no dynamic epg is a huge negative for virgin.

martyh 22-07-2011 20:54

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276931)
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.

you must use BTs Homehub , no extras like remote record apps , very little HD.

Are there issues with the Homehub ? i have just had BT Total BB installed and up to now have had a rock solid connection of about 4.5 mb

muppetman11 22-07-2011 20:57

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35276965)
Are there issues with the Homehub ? i have just had BT Total BB installed and up to now have had a rock solid connection of about 4.5 mb

If I'm 100% honest I'm not sure on the new Homehub , there were issues with the first white one but to be fair it was rectified with a firmware update.

Theres a review here http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/wifi-.../bt-home-hub-3

Never say never 22-07-2011 21:03

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276968)
If I'm 100% honest I'm not sure on the new Homehub , there were issues with the first white one but to be fair it was rectified with a firmware update.

Muppetman you are seen as one of VERY few impartial posters on this site. Keep that in mind when posting, as its easy to lose...................

denphone 22-07-2011 21:05

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Never say never (Post 35276973)
Muppetman you are seen as one of VERY few impartial posters on this site. Keep that in mind when posting, as its easy to lose...................

Well you are certainly not impartial are you.:rolleyes:

martyh 22-07-2011 21:17

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276968)
If I'm 100% honest I'm not sure on the new Homehub , there were issues with the first white one but to be fair it was rectified with a firmware update.

well i can confirm that up to now ;) i am getting good wireless signal to 1 pc and 2 laptops with no drop outs

Hugh 22-07-2011 21:39

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35276974)
Well you are certainly not impartial are you.:rolleyes:

Ahem......

Noun - pot
Verb - calling
Noun - kettle
Adjective - black

:D

denphone 22-07-2011 21:43

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35276989)
Ahem......

Noun - pot
Verb - calling
Noun - kettle
Adjective - black

:D

Well l see you are in your usual mischievous form again well it must be the drinks you are having.:)

toady 22-07-2011 23:02

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
For me there is no comparision

VM can receive it :)
Sky can't receive it unless the tress are cut down
BT too far from the exchange

Chad 23-07-2011 00:25

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Happy Virgin customers will say Virgin is the best, happy SKY customers will say SKY is the best and happy BT customers will say they are the best.

I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)

alwaysabear 23-07-2011 00:34

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad (Post 35277074)
Happy Virgin customers will say Virgin is the best, happy SKY customers will say SKY is the best and happy BT customers will say they are the best.

I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)

Well said M8:D

clummy_ 23-07-2011 01:57

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
you didnt include virgin player (which is available on mobile) but you included Sky Go

Horizon 23-07-2011 17:43

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35276931)
Many threads on here result in a comparison to a competitors service so here's my views as I've used all three.

So have I, except VM's tivo, although I once had the original version.

You seem to ommit the most major negative for Sky though, that it's a satellite service. Fine when its dry, but when it rains...especially heavy rain, a satellite service is useless.

When BT can actually offer me a BT Infinity/decent fibre service, I'll be buried six feet under, so I won't hold out hope on that one. For those that are lucky enough to live near a BT exchange, perhaps it's possible to get a decent triple service from one supplier only. I don't, so I can't tell.

And despite the recent improvements to vm cable, faster speeds and tivo, there are glowing ommisions that does not make it the "all you can eat" service that cable was first touted as when it launched 20 years ago.

I am still waiting for a company to offer me a half decent tv service, a half decent telephone service and a half decent internet service all under the same roof for a reasonable price.

muppetman11 23-07-2011 17:53

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Horizon (Post 35277343)
So have I, except VM's tivo, although I once had the original version.

You seem to ommit the most major negative for Sky though, that it's a satellite service. Fine when its dry, but when it rains...especially heavy rain, a satellite service is useless.

When BT can actually offer me a BT Infinity/decent fibre service, I'll be buried six feet under, so I won't hold out hope on that one. For those that are lucky enough to live near a BT exchange, perhaps it's possible to get a decent triple service from one supplier only. I don't, so I can't tell.

And despite the recent improvements to vm cable, faster speeds and tivo, there are glowing ommisions that does not make it the "all you can eat" service that cable was first touted as when it launched 20 years ago.

I am still waiting for a company to offer me a half decent tv service, a half decent telephone service and a half decent internet service all under the same roof for a reasonable price.

To be honest my satellite signal has been lost once in six months with rain and that was only for around a minute or so , I find it has to be torrential rain to knock it off , I take your point though.

Jameseh 23-07-2011 18:07

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by clummy_ (Post 35277113)
you didnt include virgin player (which is available on mobile) but you included Sky Go

As much of a VM fanboy as I am, the two services aren't even comparable.

Horizon 23-07-2011 18:14

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35277345)
To be honest my satellite signal has been lost once in six months with rain and that was only for around a minute or so , I find it has to be torrential rain to knock it off , I take your point though.

For years, where I live we've had next to no rain, so yes satellite has been great. But in the London area there has been several major downpours over the last few months and it does take the signal away, or at least mine. But not on my 90cm dish though.:cool:

muppetman11 23-07-2011 18:17

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Horizon (Post 35277357)
For years, where I live we've had next to no rain, so yes satellite has been great. But in the London area there has been several major downpours over the last few months and it does take the signal away, or at least mine. But not on my 90cm dish though.:cool:

You are correct it is a disadvantage to satellite, I must just be lucky weather wise :D , it was knocked off a few weeks ago the one and only time since going back to Sky but to be fair it was a thunderstorm :)

richard1960 23-07-2011 19:29

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad (Post 35277074)
Happy Virgin customers will say Virgin is the best, happy SKY customers will say SKY is the best and happy BT customers will say they are the best.

I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)

With me i am not really a fan of one or the other,its just VM is the only game in town for me unless i just go to freeview for tv and am prepared to put up with 1.5mb ADSL broadband,just wish i had a choice with pay tv.

Never say never 23-07-2011 19:39

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jameseh (Post 35277352)
As much of a VM fanboy as I am, the two services aren't even comparable.

Thankyou for that, I can quote it whenever you're offering someone advice.;) YOU MAKE IT TOO EASY.

Jameseh 23-07-2011 19:48

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Never say never (Post 35277412)
Thankyou for that, I can quote it whenever you're offering someone advice.;) YOU MAKE IT TOO EASY.

Admitting a preference for Virgin Media on a Virgin Media forum by gosh. Its as if I'm a happy VM customer :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taken from your own profile message
Sky is just better.

You must be looking for http://www.satellites.co.uk/forums/

New to cable 23-07-2011 20:33

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jameseh (Post 35277417)


You must be looking for http://www.satellites.co.uk/forums/

Hey I used to use that forum a lot its a great community and definitely a site all sky user should go to.

Jameseh 24-07-2011 04:32

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by New to cable (Post 35277448)
Hey I used to use that forum a lot its a great community and definitely a site all sky user should go to.

And yet you decided to try cable. Why would that be?

adzii_nufc 24-07-2011 05:18

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jameseh (Post 35277645)
And yet you decided to try cable. Why would that be?

LOL.

It seems there are a lot of Sky customers about now unhappy that cable subscribers are happy.. So there must be a war between the two.

Has Murdoch been tapping your phone lines?

colin25 24-07-2011 09:45

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad (Post 35277074)
Happy Virgin customers will say Virgin is the best, happy SKY customers will say SKY is the best and happy BT customers will say they are the best.

I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)

Agree that brand loyalty seems to be strong, I've never understood why. I hop between both, depending on who gives me best deal. I never view them as friends, they are companies who will screw me if they can get away with it.

On the comparisons, if you relinquish sky sports at summer (even for a day) and add online, they offer ESPN free for first 3 months when taken with sky sports (and £5 off)

And to the rain and satellite point, I lost signal for about 5 minutes once, due to heavy rain (monsoon version). Doesn't happen that often.

My preference at moment is with sky, sky atlantic is my favourite channel. But overall, give me sports and I'm happy bunny, so probably will float between both unless I can't get better deal or one annoys me more than other.

OLD BOY 24-07-2011 20:30

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35277668)
Agree that brand loyalty seems to be strong, I've never understood why. I hop between both, depending on who gives me best deal. I never view them as friends, they are companies who will screw me if they can get away with it.

On the comparisons, if you relinquish sky sports at summer (even for a day) and add online, they offer ESPN free for first 3 months when taken with sky sports (and £5 off)

And to the rain and satellite point, I lost signal for about 5 minutes once, due to heavy rain (monsoon version). Doesn't happen that often.

My preference at moment is with sky, sky atlantic is my favourite channel. But overall, give me sports and I'm happy bunny, so probably will float between both unless I can't get better deal or one annoys me more than other.

I support Virgin Media simply because it provides me with the best options for me as a customer. I also think that they are closer to their customers than Sky are to theirs.

However, if Sky were to come up with a killer initiative that I wanted and VM appeared not to have a solution, I know which way I would leap!

LexDiamond 26-07-2011 13:58

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
One advantage VM have with the arrival of Tivo is being to offer a basic pay tv package + Tivo for under £10 to existing customers of other services.

Tivo is significant as now the PVR charge has reduced to just £3 as it is already included in the Tivo service. Excellent value IMO as even people who don't want pay tv could just get M+ and Tivo and pay not considerably more than they would have for a far superior STB than most the Freeview+HD junk out there.

G4v1n 26-07-2011 14:19

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35276979)
well i can confirm that up to now ;) i am getting good wireless signal to 1 pc and 2 laptops with no drop outs

My parents' place has BT broadband with the old white hub and it has pretty shocking WiFi range/signal strength. That's on a variety of devices like a desktop, netbook, laptop, Internet Radio and a couple of WiFi enabled smartphones that I've tried. You only really get reliable reception in the same room as the hub.

It's not like it's some sort of huge mansion with solid stone walls either - just a 3 bed ex-council house.

I think their later models improved considerably on the WiFi though dropped features like the VoIP phone socket, which I thought was useful as it effectively gave you an extra voice line for 'free'.

gcampbell 26-07-2011 14:25

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
The fact I had to watch all of Game of Thrones at my girlfriend's parent's house because it wasn't available on Virgin tells me which is best.

I'm in rented property at the moment so am stuck with Virgin for now, but would change to Sky in a heartbeat - I'd pay a little more each month but it's worth it for the vastly superior TV on offer.

The girlfriend's dad is quite a techy guy and hasn't had any issues regarding broadband from Sky, so VM don't even have that going for them.

G4v1n 26-07-2011 14:26

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Horizon (Post 35277343)
I am still waiting for a company to offer me a half decent tv service, a half decent telephone service and a half decent internet service all under the same roof for a reasonable price.

I'm not sure that it's desirable to want to tie yourself into a single provider for phone, internet and TV.

I have no interest in telephone land lines (happy with a mobile from any given provider) and would ideally choose VM for cable BB and Sky for telly.

Unfortunately, all those companies try to structure their offerings in such a way as to tie you in on all their services instead of just offering the most competitive packages they can on a service by service basis. They make even some of the more convoluted mobile phone contracts look simple by comparison.

Jameseh 26-07-2011 17:18

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gcampbell (Post 35278691)
The girlfriend's dad is quite a techy guy and hasn't had any issues regarding broadband from Sky, so VM don't even have that going for them.

You don't have to have issues, its just significantly slower for (what seems) the majority of people.

muppetman11 26-07-2011 17:28

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jameseh (Post 35278744)
You don't have to have issues, its just significantly slower for (what seems) the majority of people.

James I have an XL 30mb connection which for a few weeks was like dialup with F ratings on pingtest.com when I rang I was openly told it was contention and VM were aware of it , to be fair they gave me a fix time and it was ok from then on so I can't fault there openess and honesty, they even gave me a credit which I never asked for. My point is no service is perfect , just look at the 4pm -9pm 10mb traffic management , hit 1.5gb which is easy if say streaming a HD movie and your connection gets throttled. Sky BB Unlimited is 7.50 with no throttling and there are people who can achieve speeds perfectly acceptable , I agree with your point though that there are many who can only receive poor speeds and this is the real Achilles heel with ADSL.

Itshim 26-07-2011 17:39

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)[/QUOTE]
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::c lap::clap:
What else could I possibly add this is so true

denphone 26-07-2011 17:46

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 35278755)
I'm seeing some really strong brand loyalty coming through on this thread, and many others at the moment. I think both SKY and Virgin have us brain washed. I don't ever remember being so passionate about who I paid my hard earned money to in able to receive "premium subscription TV". I think we all need our heads examined :)

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::c lap::clap:
What else could I possibly add this is so true[/QUOTE]

With all those claps your hands must be hurting. and l am not brainwashed by any company either.:);):)

colin25 26-07-2011 19:19

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by G4v1n (Post 35278692)
I'm not sure that it's desirable to want to tie yourself into a single provider for phone, internet and TV.

I have no interest in telephone land lines (happy with a mobile from any given provider) and would ideally choose VM for cable BB and Sky for telly.

Unfortunately, all those companies try to structure their offerings in such a way as to tie you in on all their services instead of just offering the most competitive packages they can on a service by service basis. They make even some of the more convoluted mobile phone contracts look simple by comparison.

I'm not overly concerned about having one provider, been there with Virgin and sky. As long as I have a choice to change after 1 year. But i do feel sorry for those who don't have a choice, if I ever moved, and didn't have a choice, I'd be disappointed.

My criteria, as long as I have a reasonable connection to browse and chat on internet, can get sports and occassionally add movies, and at a reasonable price..I'm happy. Note, I'm not bothered about a phone, only take it because I have too (or offer makes it pointless not to add)

HDFootyMan 26-07-2011 19:21

Re: VM , Sky , BT Vision Comparison
 
Been working on a update for my PVR Document (points at sig), now includes partial details for BT Vision. Should be full details later tonight.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum