Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33671438)

mersey70 31-10-2010 06:14

TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
I see from the VM forums that VM are withdrawing TV Choice from non XL customers, the only way to get it will be with XL and no longer as an option on M, M+ & L packs.

http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/.../163235/page/2

Henkesghost 31-10-2010 06:43

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Cue pitchforks :)

mersey70 31-10-2010 06:55

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35115824)
Cue pitchforks :)

Given the way most HD channels are tiered and now this the VM pricing structure is looking very inflexible, not everyone can afford XL. I think XL is good value but it seems crazy to price people out of services who may well just stay with the pack they are on, afterall customers know what they can and cant afford.

Henkesghost 31-10-2010 07:26

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35115825)
Given the way most HD channels are tiered and now this the VM pricing structure is looking very inflexible, not everyone can afford XL. I think XL is good value but it seems crazy to price people out of services who may well stay with the pack they are on.



Agree, am on XL and pay roughly £90 per month for all services. Too much IMO but that is the going rate. Very rarely use on demand would rather they got rid of it if it meant addition of HD channels etc

Hugh 31-10-2010 07:28

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Wow, that's a lot - I am on XL for BB, TV, and Phone, and pay less than £60 (I don't have films or sports, though...)

mersey70 31-10-2010 07:45

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
I have previously said I have concerns about the way XL is packaged as there are whole genres of channels I have little or no interest in (music and kids spring to mind), nor do I particularly require ESPN but in order to get the other channels I want I subscribe to XL. I would prefer a pack system similar to Sky but it's unlikely to happen. I do feel sorry for the non XL customers affected by this move, until VM give a proper official explaination I can only interpret it as a move to get more customers onto XL, which sadly is not going to be an option for everyone.

Henkesghost 31-10-2010 07:57

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35115835)
Wow, that's a lot - I am on XL for BB, TV, and Phone, and pay less than £60 (I don't have films or sports, though...)

Have films and sport, HD subs and extra box, think that's what bumps it up.

ahardie 31-10-2010 08:20

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35115840)
I have previously said I have concerns about the way XL is packaged as there are whole genres of channels I have little or no interest in (music and kids spring to mind), nor do I particularly require ESPN but in order to get the other channels I want I subscribe to XL. I would prefer a pack system similar to Sky but it's unlikely to happen. I do feel sorry for the non XL customers affected by this move, until VM give a proper official explaination I can only interpret it as a move to get more customers onto XL, which sadly is not going to be an option for everyone.

A pack system would be an advantage but not the way Sky do it. The minimum price you pay is £19 and you lose a lot of channels if you take that option. You get a whole lot more for the £5.50 extra that the xl package costs.

mersey70 31-10-2010 08:30

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35115856)
A pack system would be an advantage but not the way Sky do it. The minimum price you pay is £19 and you lose a lot of channels if you take that option. You get a whole lot more for the £5.50 extra that the xl package costs.

The XL price you are comparing it to is with a phone line though, around £35 in total, if I recall XL alone is around £29 which is quite a bit more than having all the Sky packs although you do get HD channels and ESPN.

I guess there is no perfect solution but I hate the idea of customers being priced out, especially in these tough times.

ahardie 31-10-2010 08:49

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35115863)
The XL price you are comparing it to is with a phone line though, around £35 in total, if I recall XL alone is around £29.

I guess there is no perfect solution but I hate the idea of customers being priced out, especially in these tough times.

Sorry, yes you are right, although not a problem if you don't mind taking VM's phone line. In my opinion £19 is too much for one pack and as this is their minimum. VM's minimum is something like £11 if you take a phone line.

mersey70 31-10-2010 08:51

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35115873)
Sorry, yes you are right, although not a problem if you don't mind taking VM's phone line. In my opinion £19 is too much for one pack and as this is their minimum. VM's minimum is something like £11 if you take a phone line.

I broadly agree.

BenMcr 31-10-2010 09:12

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35115873)
VM's minimum is something like £11 if you take a phone line.

Actually it's £6.50 ;)

And it's £12.50 without a phoneline

ahardie 31-10-2010 09:27

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35115879)
Actually it's £6.50 ;)

And it's £12.50 without a phoneline

Sorry yes. I was looking at the L package which includes some more channels like Sky 1.

BenMcr 31-10-2010 09:48

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35115883)
Sorry yes. I was looking at the L package which includes some more channels like Sky 1.

M+ has Sky 1

devilincarnate 31-10-2010 13:45

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
From what i think it could be is due to all the content been shown on the VIRGIN PLAYER, TV CHOICE ON DEMAND AND MOBILE ( THREE SCREENS ), from what i have been reading this is all for XL customers as this quote is from the VIRGIN PLAYER FAQS:

I don't have Virgin TV XL. Can I add Virgin Media Player as a separate service?
Sorry, Player is only available to Virgin TV XL subscribers with Virgin Broadband.

To upgrade your Virgin TV to the XL package or check out our other offers, click here.

ahardie 31-10-2010 14:18

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35115894)
M+ has Sky 1

Oh dear. I'm not well up on VM packages. It's a long time since I had anything other than xl tv. Seems like VM have a better selection of packages for the not so well off than sky. Providing of course you are willing to take out their phone line.

Maggy 31-10-2010 15:07

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkesghost (Post 35115833)
Agree, am on XL and pay roughly £90 per month for all services. Too much IMO but that is the going rate. Very rarely use on demand would rather they got rid of it if it meant addition of HD channels etc

Oh that's OK then..the rest of us on XL TV who do use it regularly can just do without so you get your HD channels. ;)

Rivva 31-10-2010 18:15

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
It states on the VM website that TV XL is £23. Is that the price everyone pays who takes it. Or does the price vary depending what package/bundle you have. The reason I ask is because I'm paying £24.50.

mersey70 31-10-2010 18:18

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rivva (Post 35116118)
It states on the VM website that TV XL is £23. Is that the price everyone pays who takes it. Or does the price vary depending what package/bundle you have. The reason I ask is because I'm paying £24.50.

£23 (with a phone line at £11.99) as far as I am aware. Do you have a bundle of services.

Edit:- Actually I have just checked my bill and mine also says £24.50 for XL, I called CS who says 'that is just the way it is shown on your bill but we apply a discount'.

The bills are quite complicated, but BT's were just as bad.

Rivva 31-10-2010 18:47

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35116119)
£23 (with a phone line at £11.99) as far as I am aware. Do you have a bundle of services.

Actually I have just checked my bill and mine also says £24.50 for XL?

Yes I do have a bundle and it's very similar to yours, and if you're paying £24.50 it looks like the XL TV price does vary depending on what bundle's taken...

Thanks for clearing that one up..

Also, thanks for the swift reply.

Edit:- Just noticed your edit, cheers for the extra info!

mersey70 31-10-2010 18:53

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rivva (Post 35116127)
Yes I do have a bundle and it's very similar to yours, and if you're paying £24.50 it looks like the XL TV price does vary depending on what bundle's taken...

Thanks for clearing that one up..

Also, thanks for the swift reply.

You don't actually pay more than £23, it's just the billing and the way discounts are applied, at least that's what I think they mean.

ahardie 31-10-2010 20:21

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35116155)
£20 (2 packs) would cover all of Sky's entertainment and lifestyle channels but more importantly the attached on demand content plus a lot more FTA content like CBS. Anyway I agree we are off topic and I doubt we will ever agree which is fine, it's just my opinion and it will not change. For the lower tier packages I think Sky offers far more than VM which I guess is what I am saying.

I've take the liberty of moving this to a more appropriate thread Mersey.

Sky don't really have lower tier packages like VM whose packages start at £6.50. The two packages you mention would cost £20, three times as much, but for £4.50 more than Sky's two packages you get ESPN and more HD plus a lot of channels much more popular than CBS. As for on demand they would lose catch up tv, and tv choice from the four most popular channels. Even though you say you don't want ESPN you still find the xl package to be sufficient value for money so it is not difficult to see why many people would find it to be much better vfm than the Sky two packs you suggested.

Ben B 31-10-2010 23:56

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Yay, XL is increasing in value, I like :)

Rivva 01-11-2010 00:24

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35116129)
You don't actually pay more than £23, it's just the billing and the way discounts are applied, at least that's what I think they mean.

Yes I know I've just been looking at my latest/recent eBill and everything seems to tally up. I must say they do complicate matters where the billing is concerned sometimes.

Maggy 01-11-2010 05:45

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rivva (Post 35116256)
Yes I know I've just been looking at my latest/recent eBill and everything seems to tally up. I must say they do complicate matters where the billing is concerned sometimes.

Sometimes? :confused:

I feel like there should be a special degree in deciphering VM billing and packages and bundles..I put them on a par with rail ticket pricing and rules on off peak rail travelling.

mersey70 01-11-2010 07:08

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116173)
I've take the liberty of moving this to a more appropriate thread Mersey.

Sky don't really have lower tier packages like VM whose packages start at £6.50. The two packages you mention would cost £20, three times as much, but for £4.50 more than Sky's two packages you get ESPN and more HD plus a lot of channels much more popular than CBS. As for on demand they would lose catch up tv, and tv choice from the four most popular channels. Even though you say you don't want ESPN you still find the xl package to be sufficient value for money so it is not difficult to see why many people would find it to be much better vfm than the Sky two packs you suggested.

I think you should be clearer that you are quoting prices that must include a phone line at £11.99, XL without a phone line is £29.50. What I am saying is a lower tier customer might be better paying £20 for 2 Sky packs for a wider choice of entertainment and on demand and they would still get the non XL HD channels, less Film 4. I am not comparing XL as these customers are obviously not on XL for one reason or another and will now lose the option of TV Choice. You also seem to be forgetting that non XL customers have to stump up a further £5 a month just for recording facilities. I don't see what is now unique about a non XL package, catch up is widely available anyway so it seems a terrible waste of technology.

For the record the stand alone prices are £12.50 (M+) £17.50 (L) and you would have to add £5 for V+ for both these packages or £29.50 (XL). I personally think for a lower tier customer on Sky's cheapest £19 Variety Pack (which offers far more pay channels and FTA that M+) with a Sky+ HD box with on demand content from Sky1 and Living offers a lot more choice than M+ with V+ (£17.50) and would maybe provide some and possibly more of the on demand content they will lose, but that's just my opinion. I am looking at it from the point of view of who provides the most content for the lower tier subscriber.

I am on record as saying XL is good value but that isn't the point, these customers with the TVC option now have to upgrade to XL just to receive the services they currently have, surely if they wanted XL they would have it anyway.

There would be uproar if Sky pulled a trick like this, let's have some balance.

ahardie 01-11-2010 08:44

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35116283)
I think you should be clearer that you are quoting prices that must include a phone line at £11.99, XL without a phone line is £29.50. What I am saying is a lower tier customer might be better paying £20 for 2 Sky packs for a wider choice of entertainment and on demand and they would still get the non XL HD channels, less Film 4. I am not comparing XL as these customers are obviously not on XL for one reason or another and will now lose the option of TV Choice. You also seem to be forgetting that non XL customers have to stump up a further £5 a month just for recording facilities. I don't see what is now unique about a non XL package, catch up is widely available anyway so it seems a terrible waste of technology.

For the record the stand alone prices are £12.50 (M+) £17.50 (L) and you would have to add £5 for V+ for both these packages or £29.50 (XL). I personally think for a lower tier customer on Sky's cheapest £19 Variety Pack (which offers far more pay channels and FTA that M+) with a Sky+ HD box with on demand content from Sky1 and Living offers a lot more choice than M+ with V+ (£17.50) and would maybe provide some and possibly more of the on demand content they will lose, but that's just my opinion. I am looking at it from the point of view of who provides the most content for the lower tier subscriber.

I am on record as saying XL is good value but that isn't the point, these customers with the TVC option now have to upgrade to XL just to receive the services they currently have, surely if they wanted XL they would have it anyway.

There would be uproar if Sky pulled a trick like this, let's have some balance.

We have already established in this thread what the price is without phone but it is immaterial anyway. I am using prices with phone just the same as the guy who started the thread in the VM community forum did. He said he was paying £13.50 for M+ and ondemand together. I think it's fair to say that most people who were on M+ or L and paying the £7 for ondemand were paying the lower amount. These are the people we are talking about.
Personally I wish that they wouldn't remove this option for the lower tiers but I am in agreement with Zantarous that there may be other more complex reasons for doing this other than they wanted to force people on to xl tv. Mainly because I think the take up of the £7 option would have been very limited anyway. So VM have got little to gain anyway.

mersey70 01-11-2010 08:57

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116300)
We have already established in this thread what the price is without phone but it is immaterial anyway. I am using prices with phone just the same as the guy who started the thread in the VM community forum did. He said he was paying £13.50 for M+ and ondemand together. I think it's fair to say that most people who were on M+ or L and paying the £7 for ondemand were paying the lower amount. These are the people we are talking about.
Personally I wish that they wouldn't remove this option for the lower tiers but I am in agreement with Zantarous that there may be other more complex reasons for doing this other than they wanted to force people on to xl tv. Mainly because I think the take up of the £7 option would have been very limited anyway. So VM have got little to gain anyway.

To be honest there is very little in the costs between the two, but there is quite a big difference in what content a lower tier subscriber gets access to with Sky and I think that is the point I am making. I object to VM almost forcing people onto the highest tier if they want to merely keep their current services. Sky (and to a lesser degree BT and Talk Talk) all seem to align their on demand content to your subscription so I see no reason why VM cannot do this too, why would VM be singled out by content providers?, I don't buy it.

If anyone thinks this is a fairer way of doing things then that's their prerogative, I just don't happen to think it is and I can't think of anything more to say, we shall disagree!

ahardie 01-11-2010 10:22

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
The take up for this at £7 would be so small I wonder if it is worth all the fuss. If vod is worth £7 to those on a tight budget it just shows how good value xl is. That's £7 for vod, £9 minimum for ESPN lets say£3 for HD as we get a lot of the more popular HD channels. Your already up to the minimum package price for Sky. I'm not arguing this because I think VM are wonderful. I just have no illusions about Sky either. I don't see them offering people who are less well off a package for £6.50, with or without telephone. And given that it seemed to be common knowledge at the time of the Sky 1 dispute that one of the sticking points was that Sky didn't want the channel on the M package I wouldn't rule out them having a hand in this. Unlikely yes, impossible no.

mersey70 01-11-2010 18:51

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116343)
The take up for this at £7 would be so small I wonder if it is worth all the fuss. If vod is worth £7 to those on a tight budget it just shows how good value xl is. That's £7 for vod, £9 minimum for ESPN lets say£3 for HD as we get a lot of the more popular HD channels. Your already up to the minimum package price for Sky. I'm not arguing this because I think VM are wonderful. I just have no illusions about Sky either. I don't see them offering people who are less well off a package for £6.50, with or without telephone. And given that it seemed to be common knowledge at the time of the Sky 1 dispute that one of the sticking points was that Sky didn't want the channel on the M package I wouldn't rule out them having a hand in this. Unlikely yes, impossible no.

Well first I do not know the take up of TVC at £7, what exactly are the numbers? My main gripe is that there is no flexibility, if you want TVC you have to have XL, if you want HD you have to have XL (less the FTA channels, same as Sky with any pack, you don't need to pay the £10) and if you're like me you end up whole genre's of channels you don't watch. You have to pay £5 for V+ if not on XL too, there are no such restrictions on a lower tier Sky subscriber although your OD content will of course be aligned to the sub. XL is great value, but only if you can afford it. One thing we do agree on is Sky's unlikely involvement in this decision, sometimes one might be forgiven for thinking VM are owned by a charitable organisation, not a load of predominantly american financial institutions who we know can be rather greedy. They are no different to Sky.

Also our price comparisons were (sort of) out of date anyway, I got a leaflet today with the post VAT increase tariff so they are closer again to Sky's, who already included the VAT increase.

ahardie 01-11-2010 19:46

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
I'm not sure what you mean about Sky's prices already being adjusted for VAT. I have been deliberately quoting Sky's pre VAT increase prices out of fairness to Sky as I don't know what VM's prices will be post VAT increase. I do know that one Sky pack (their minimum package)will be £19.50 after the VAT increase.

I don't think Sky's or VM's packages are any more flexible than each other but your presumption that Sky are better for people who don't want to pay much for their tv is clearly wrong. You can argue it whatever way you want but £6.50 is clearly better than £19.

mersey70 02-11-2010 07:21

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116628)
I'm not sure what you mean about Sky's prices already being adjusted for VAT. I have been deliberately quoting Sky's pre VAT increase prices out of fairness to Sky as I don't know what VM's prices will be post VAT increase. I do know that one Sky pack (their minimum package)will be £19.50 after the VAT increase.

I don't think Sky's or VM's packages are any more flexible than each other but your presumption that Sky are better for people who don't want to pay much for their tv is clearly wrong. You can argue it whatever way you want but £6.50 is clearly better than £19.

Have you got the answer to my question? How many people pay for TVC as you have indicated that you know, quote:- "The take up for this at £7 would be so small I wonder if it is worth all the fuss" end quote. I don't know the answer but clearly some people do pay for it.

I was quoting VM's current prices, for example line rental will be £12.24 post VAT increase.

£6.50 is clearly better than £19, I totally agree. Have you got a link on the VM website where someone can sign up for a £6.50 a month TV package and not pay anything else? That is a bargain and blows my argument out of the water, it's even better if you get a PVR as included in Sky's £19 pack, do you get one all for £6.50 a month?

ahardie 02-11-2010 08:52

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35116766)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116628)
I'm not sure what you mean about Sky's prices already being adjusted for VAT. I have been deliberately quoting Sky's pre VAT increase prices out of fairness to Sky as I don't know what VM's prices will be post VAT increase. I do know that one Sky pack (their minimum package)will be £19.50 after the VAT increase.

I don't think Sky's or VM's packages are any more flexible than each other but your presumption that Sky are better for people who don't want to pay much for their tv is clearly wrong. You can argue it whatever way you want but £6.50 is clearly better than £19.

Have you got the answer to my question? How many people pay for TVC as you have indicated that you know, quote:- "The take up for this at £7 would be so small I wonder if it is worth all the fuss" end quote. I don't know the answer but clearly some people do pay for it.

I was quoting VM's current prices, for example line rental will be £12.24 post VAT increase.

£6.50 is clearly better than £19, I totally agree. Have you got a link on the VM website where someone can sign up for a £6.50 a month TV package and not pay anything else? That is a bargain and blows my argument out of the water, it's even better if you get a PVR as included in Sky's £19 pack, do you get one all for £6.50 a month?

First of all no I don't know how many people take vod at £7. I stick by my statement though that at £7, which is more than the actual m package price take up is likely to be small.

Secondly this discussion started because you suggested that people who take the £7 option might move elsewhere and went on to say Sky is a viable option for them. Well the guy who you have been quoting in the community forum said he was on a £6.50 package, which he said is a good price for those who don't want to spend much on their tv.That was his figure (£6.50) not mine. He will (pre vat increase) have to pay a minimum £19 if he choses to move. Any saving he makes on line rental does not come close to making up for that. So yes your argument is blown out of the water.
This is my last post on the matter unless you can introduce something new to the discussion as we are going round in circles.

mersey70 02-11-2010 09:06

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35116785)

First of all no I don't know how many people take vod at £7. I stick by my statement though that at £7, which is more than the actual m package price take up is likely to be small.

Secondly this discussion started because you suggested that people who take the £7 option might move elsewhere and went on to say Sky is a viable option for them. Well the guy who you have been quoting in the community forum said he was on a £6.50 package, which he said is a good price for those who don't want to spend much on their tv.That was his figure (£6.50) not mine. He will (pre vat increase) have to pay a minimum £19 if he choses to move. Any saving he makes on line rental does not come close to making up for that. So yes your argument is blown out of the water.
This is my last post on the matter unless you can introduce something new to the discussion as we are going round in circles.

I didn't think you knew the figures so fair play for admitting that you don't.

Let's agree to disagree.

Digital Fanatic 06-11-2010 19:43

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
I know the figures for subs of TV Choice on M & L and it's tiny, so not many will be missing out. ;)

nfs6600 06-11-2010 21:39

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
Also worth pointing out that Sky Anytime+ eats into those on Sky Everyday Lite usage which is a paltry 2Gb a month. Want unlimited? That's £7.50 please sir! Oh, by the way, you still have to wait for 10% of the event to download before it even plays....

mersey70 07-11-2010 14:42

Re: TV Choice to be exclusive to XL customers only
 
That's right although I think £7.50 for unlimited 20mb broadband isn't bad although I guess it all depends what actual speed you get. I would find the wait for the initial download annoying although maybe that is balanced out with having access to the latest content.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum