Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating' (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33669417)

Maggy 10-09-2010 07:39

Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11243976

Quote:

The cost of old age on health services in industrialised nations may need to be re-measured, a study suggests.
Rising life expectancies and improved health means the population is ageing more slowly and the burden may not be as dramatic as feared, scientists say.
The US and Austrian study in Science magazine proposes a new way of measuring ageing which is not reliant on fixed chronological ages.
This will help calculate the cost of old age and retirement more accurately.
Quote:

Michelle Mitchell, charity director for Age UK, said: "This study clearly shows viewing older people simply as a 'burden to society,' is an out-of-date concept.
"On the contrary, increasing longevity and improved health care mean many older people are able to make a very positive and important contribution to our society.
An interesting idea that might support the idea of raising the retirement age..

Taf 10-09-2010 08:26

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
I see evidence that work age is slipping from 16 to 65 to something more like 20 to 69. Same number of years, but a later start due to poor employment prospects for teenagers.

TheNorm 10-09-2010 19:56

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35088855)
...An interesting idea ..

Yes, very!

Personally I think people should be allowed to work as long as they wish (provided they are capable). The idea of forcing someone to stop working simply because of their age is ridiculous.

nomadking 10-09-2010 20:00

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Then you have to get into arguments about whether they are capable or not. If you have a definite fixed upper age limit then there can be no arguments. Lower age limits are fixed for the same reason.

Peter_ 11-09-2010 21:12

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
I want to retire on my retirement day which is already 7 months over the age of 65 due to govenment rules as I want to enjoy retirement and not have to worry about keeping a job until I die which is what they want to happen as they are loath to pay pensions.

I do think that the should be an age limit after which you can no longer work as otherwise where are the jobs going to come from for the younger people if the workforce continues to age.

colin25 11-09-2010 21:17

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
I thought the issue was that we need people to work longer, as we don't have the supply of younger people, and the cost of pensions is getting more expensive.

Alas, I will need to work until over 65...if i still have a job. Next 10 years, if you see an old guy flipping burgers in mcdonald's..and you aren't seeing a reflection..it might be me :D

Peter_ 11-09-2010 21:20

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35089818)
I thought the issue was that we need people to work longer, as we don't have the supply of younger people, and the cost of pensions is getting more expensive.

Alas, I will need to work until over 65...if i still have a job. Next 10 years, if you see an old guy flipping burgers in mcdonald's..and you aren't seeing a reflection..it might be me :D

I would retire at 60 given the chance as I want to enjoy freedom from drudgery and no longer having to work and my mortgage will be a distant memory at 60 as well.:)

Maggy 11-09-2010 21:23

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Masque (Post 35089822)
I would retire at 60 given the chance as I want to enjoy freedom from drudgery and no longer having to work and my mortgage will be a distant memory at 60 as well.:)

I wanted to be able to retire at 60..unfortunately because of the levelling up of the retirement age from 60 for women I have to go until I'm nearly 63.In fact it means my husband will retire before me..no fair.:(

LondonRoad 11-09-2010 21:25

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Masque (Post 35089822)
I would retire at 60 given the chance as I want to enjoy freedom from drudgery and no longer having to work and my mortgage will be a distant memory at 60 as well.:)

Good attitude.

My retirement age will totally determined by finances. It may when I'm 70 or it may be on Monday if those lottery numbers have rolled properly.;)

gazfan 11-09-2010 21:57

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Masque
I do think that the should be an age limit after which you can no longer work as otherwise where are the jobs going to come from for the younger people if the workforce continues to age.

In an ideal world retired people would be users of goods & services, which would help provide employment for those providing said amenities.

Unfortunately that relies on the premise that people retiring will have sufficient disposable income to make such a situation sustainable.

With hindsight it can be seen that this level of income after retirement may only be possible for people who have made provision over & above the requirements that qualify for a 'state pension'.

In the worst case people might find that 'compulsory' retirement would plunge them into a scenario where they are still paying off a mortgage/car loan/credit card - which their pension entitlement won't cover. These people will, probably, want to carry on working, rather than deal with the consequences of their remaining debts.

Interest rates currently are such that private or occupational pension schemes are suffering badly. The number of schemes being moved from a 'final salary' basis is a consequence of this - too many schemes are in deficit - and, in fact are having an effect on employment, the Royal Mail being a case in point, their pension deficit being a major factor in the decision to float the business.

colin25 12-09-2010 07:14

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
I should also say..if I win the lottery, it won't be me in the burger joint, unless it was only three numbers :)

Angua 12-09-2010 07:20

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
The NHS funding is already variable as to what part of the country you are in so tihs is no surprise.

Dai 12-09-2010 08:01

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazfan (Post 35089838)
Interest rates currently are such that private or occupational pension schemes are suffering badly.

That, and the current low interest rates are what will hit me hard. The original plan was to liquidate my property investments and take an income from capital invested. Now, there's no interest available so I'd have to be living off my capital. Also the value of an annuity from my private pension scheme has dropped dramatically recently.

All in all, it looks like I'll be working for a year or two yet..

Maggy 12-09-2010 09:47

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
I still can't see where the jobs will be available for anyone over 65?Are we all going to be in retail selling to each other..I can't see me teaching at 70..and I know that it's against the law these days to discriminate on the grounds of age but how likely is it that they won't just make the elderly workers redundant in the present climate so when the economy improves they can get in younger workers.:(

Ignitionnet 12-09-2010 10:20

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35089911)
The NHS funding is already variable as to what part of the country you are in so tihs is no surprise.

Que?

My contribution to my pension scheme is quite prodigious precisely to ensure I can retire at some point before I'm too old to actually do anything with that retirement.

Quick check suggests I'd have the equivalent of £1320 / month at current prices if I maintain current contributions. Main concern is paying for my housing, I need to purchase and pay for a home before then which is looking rather difficult with the housing market as screwed as it is here.

Dai 12-09-2010 10:37

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35089950)
I still can't see where the jobs will be available for anyone over 65?Are we all going to be in retail selling to each other..(

We'll all be doddering about in B&Q shouting at the customers.

---------- Post added at 11:37 ---------- Previous post was at 11:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35089959)
Que?

My contribution to my pension scheme is quite prodigious precisely to ensure I can retire at some point before I'm too old to actually do anything with that retirement.

My recent comparisons show my property investment to have done rather better than my PP scheme.
With hindsight I would have been better off forgetting about a private pension and instead buying another house or two.

Ignitionnet 12-09-2010 11:41

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaiNasty (Post 35089971)
My recent comparisons show my property investment to have done rather better than my PP scheme.
With hindsight I would have been better off forgetting about a private pension and instead buying another house or two.

Which is precisely the reason my own home is unaffordable for me :)

Dear Gordon's fault for removing the higher rate tax relief - people invest in property, property goes up in value making it yet more attactive, more people invest, etc, etc. Causes minor issues for people like me who would traditionally be able to purchase a home though. Anyway slightly off topic.

Hugh 12-09-2010 12:34

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35089959)
Que?

My contribution to my pension scheme is quite prodigious precisely to ensure I can retire at some point before I'm too old to actually do anything with that retirement.

Quick check suggests I'd have the equivalent of £1320 / month at current prices if I maintain current contributions. Main concern is paying for my housing, I need to purchase and pay for a home before then which is looking rather difficult with the housing market as screwed as it is here.

Yup - only way to ensure a (reasonably) comfortable retirement is to save (be it in a Pension Fund or property - btw, pension funds are cyclical, so as long as we take a medium-to-long term view of savings, we should be OK); problem I have, like a lot of people in IT, is that I changed jobs roughly every four or five years, and whilst you can transfer your contributions, you lose the companies contributions and pay transfer fees. I tried to mitigate this in the early 90's by taking out a personal pension, and convincing the companies I worked at to contribute to it; that worked until I joined BT Cellnet, who weren't as flexible (ho-hum).

So, at the moment, I have about five little pensions which should return about £500 a month, I am in a final salary pension which (if I can hang on for 12 more years, and into which I pay 14% of my gross salary) will give me a quarter of my salary, and the mortgage gets paid off late next year (meeting one of my goals, which was paying off the mortgage before I was 55 (just)); (then I will probably have to pay for my daughter's wedding a few years after that, which should manage to take most of our savings....:dozey:).

However, as I said at the beginning, I don't think the state pension will pay for much more than the basics, so it is up to us all to put something away to make our retirement, whenever it happens, a bit more enjoyable.

MartJ 12-09-2010 18:28

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Took early retirement last year, paid enough into my pension to allow me to retire at 57.

Problem is I got bored after about 6 months so now setting up a small business to keep me occupied. Converting a hobby into a businees so I will doing something I enjoy.

TheNorm 12-09-2010 18:41

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MartJ (Post 35090138)
Took early retirement last year, paid enough into my pension to allow me to retire at 57.

Problem is I got bored after about 6 months so now setting up a small business to keep me occupied. Converting a hobby into a businees so I will doing something I enjoy.

Well done! Stories like yours give me strength on difficult days at work.

LondonRoad 12-09-2010 18:48

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
At 40 years of age I was pretty much on target to retire at 55.

At 51, I'm pretty much crossing my fingers that I'll have some retirement years before I'll croak. :(

During my 40s I did manage to squeeze in 1 divorce, remarried and had 2 kids.:D

I reckon I'm getting more enjoyment bringing my kids up just now than I would have tearing lumps out of golf course when I'm 55.

PeteLockwood 12-09-2010 19:24

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
im 21, during my life time i will pay many fold more tax than the current load of pensioners and i will not have a state pension at all, work 'til i drop

Peter_ 12-09-2010 20:07

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteL (Post 35090173)
im 21, during my life time i will pay many fold more tax than the current load of pensioners and i will not have a state pension at all, work 'til i drop

At your age you seriously need to consider your options and start paying into a pension ASAP.

Hugh 12-09-2010 20:42

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteL (Post 35090173)
im 21, during my life time i will pay many fold more tax than the current load of pensioners and i will not have a state pension at all, work 'til i drop

Wanna bet? ;)

at the moment, I pay around £3k a month Income Tax and NI, and have done so (sometimes a lot more, sometimes a little less) for the last 10 years.

Sweeping generalisations - not a proposition's best friend....:D

LondonRoad 12-09-2010 20:50

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 35090231)
Wanna bet? ;)

at the moment, I pay around £3k a month Income Tax and NI, and have done so (sometimes a lot more, sometimes a little less) for the last 10 years.

Sweeping generalisations - not a proposition's best friend....:D

I'd love to be in the position that I had to pay £3k tax per month.:D

Ignitionnet 12-09-2010 21:24

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LondonRoad (Post 35090237)
I'd love to be in the position that I had to pay £3k tax per month.:D

You wouldn't want the bills that come with that kind of income believe me ;)

gazfan 12-09-2010 21:24

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteL (Post 35090173)
im 21, during my life time i will pay many fold more tax than the current load of pensioners and i will not have a state pension at all, work 'til i drop


Proportionately the amount of tax you pay won't be much different to 'the current load of pensioners' - I'm not sure what point you are trying to make with that statement?

Can you quote any links to support your assertion that you won't receive a state pension?

In any case I thought you were looking to enrol in the Armed Forces - in which case you would benefit from their pension scheme.

Quote:

Your pension will start to build up from your first day of paid service, and after 35 years' service you could achieve a pension worth 50% of pensionable pay. Longer service up to a maximum of 40 years will count towards your pension.
from

http://www.army.mod.uk/join/terms/1141.aspx

I would, personally, always recommend an occupational pension as the most desirable option - especially as you can (currently) start taking it before the state retirement age.

The statement above implies a person joining the Army at age 21 could 'retire' on half pensionable pay at age 56 - that hardly amounts to a 'work 'til I drop' scenario?

LondonRoad 12-09-2010 21:35

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35090269)
You wouldn't want the bills that come with that kind of income believe me ;)

I've got the bills for that level of income.... just not got the matching level of income.;)

Ignitionnet 12-09-2010 21:50

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteL (Post 35090173)
im 21, during my life time i will pay many fold more tax than the current load of pensioners and i will not have a state pension at all, work 'til i drop

No you won't - prior to Gordon's hiking up of the tax burden to pay for his vision of Britain taxes have been relatively low and remain so compared with the levels of taxation paid in the past.

Hugh 12-09-2010 21:53

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LondonRoad (Post 35090237)
I'd love to be in the position that I had to pay £3k tax per month.:D

But would you want the sleepless nights, the stomach ulcers, the stress and depression, the never knowing if you were going to be summarily dismissed on a whim - that's what the people who work for me have to endure......


(j/k ;))

LondonRoad 12-09-2010 21:59

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 35090286)
But would you want the sleepless nights, the stomach ulcers, the stress and depression, the never knowing if you were going to be summarily dismissed on a whim - that's what the people who work for me have to endure......


(j/k ;))

:D:D Have you no compassion.

It's the likes of you that are keeping those bolshey national health nurses in employment. :D

Maggy 12-09-2010 22:11

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
It should be remembered that there are currently many OAPs who living costs are pitiful through no fault of their own and have been the victims of the unforeseen machinations of others.The Maxwell pension fund fiasco comes to mind.:(

gazfan 12-09-2010 22:44

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35090290)
It should be remembered that there are currently many OAPs who living costs are pitiful through no fault of their own and have been the victims of the unforeseen machinations of others.The Maxwell pension fund fiasco comes to mind.:(

That is true & should be taken into account, as you say.

However, even so, the concept that people should be responsible for making their own arrangements for their retirement should, in my opinion, be more prevalent.

Do supply teachers qualify for benefits under the teachers pension scheme, Maggy?

Dai 13-09-2010 05:48

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazfan (Post 35090298)
THowever, even so, the concept that people should be responsible for making their own arrangements for their retirement should, in my opinion, be more prevalent.

Thought I'd done that - then the State and the people that own them ate it all up.

PeteLockwood 13-09-2010 16:37

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35090290)
It should be remembered that there are currently many OAPs who living costs are pitiful through no fault of their own and have been the victims of the unforeseen machinations of others.The Maxwell pension fund fiasco comes to mind.:(

i am not familiar with that ?

and i am not having a dig at them (the current oap's) at all just stating that somebody of my age i honestly think would be stupid to expect a state pension

---------- Post added at 17:37 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by gazfan (Post 35090298)
However, even so, the concept that people should be responsible for making their own arrangements for their retirement should, in my opinion, be more prevalent.

yeah i agree with you however for the amount of tax we ALL pay through our lifetime it is only fair the state provide is with a few years of rest before we croak it

Maggy 14-09-2010 06:38

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteL (Post 35090700)
i am not familiar with that ?

Robert Maxwell

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1249739.stm

Avoid the repeated part and move to the bottom to get the meat of the tale..;)

PeteLockwood 14-09-2010 11:15

Re: Cost of ageing population 'needs re-calculating'
 
bloody hell, dodgy man


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum