![]() |
Peers at the trough?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10439805.stm
Quote:
:mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
I find it staggering.. I had to go through some many hoops to even attempt to claim my train fares to and from my recent first aid course , and that was just £2.60 a day, yet it seems working in Westminster, you can claim for pretty much anything.
I say "attempt" because work requires tickets, or other proof. However, I used my Oyster and for some reason, although they are able to give me print outs showing money coming off my pre-pay balance, TFL deny I made any journeys on that card on that period.. But that's a moan for another thread. |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Still, We knew that all along didn`t we. Thieving *******s.:mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
They are an arachic link to the past and a drain the country could well do without. However they have been a buffer thats kept out some crazy laws so I guess its swings and roundabouts |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Can't believe I missed this, I must be slipping in my old age and not paying enough attention to the propaganda of the right wing press.... :)
Quote:
I wonder how many of us wouldn't have been prosecuted in similar circumstances?? :mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Great! :mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
as i understand it this woman owns more that one property -that means one can be sold off to repay the money she stole
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
secondly ,how in gods name can the House of Lords not be able to force a peer to repay a debt owed .If i was cought fiddling expenses on that level i would be hauled in front of the courts by the company and ordered to pay the money back not to mention losing my job Thirdly ,why can't they pay her the £300 a day expenses but just not give it her untill the debt is payed |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
apparently only the queen can do that ,so i ask myself ,why doesn't she ---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:46 ---------- and another thing ,how come Commons members get sent to jail (well some do ) but peers of the realm don't ? |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Quote:
Apparently, Keir Starmer (Director of Public Prosecutions) Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
I always thought people convicted lost peerage so why is Archer kept his too. Although Zing makes valid point the peers have kept some scandalous bills from seeing light of day. Its corrupted by governments giving peerage to make sure the onus is balanced into there favour so there crazy bills get in. Its scandalous they not forced to pay back what they stole even worse allowed back they should be stripped and jailed. £300 a day criminally disgusting wage. Most are millionairres although deserve a pay it should be token £100 a day still healthy £500 a week. |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
For some reason the link in my previous post no longer works so here it is again:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1dhk1ZRKj :confused: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all! |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Does not surprise me they have their snouts in the trough on the wider issue why do they do it,because they can i guess is the answer, and because uintil caught they think they are immune from the rules that govern us ie the non elite of society, its all very corrupt sadly.:( ---------- Post added at 15:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ---------- Quote:
Its hard to see how those in the House of lords who have done time is some cases,and will not repay fiddled expenses in others have the gall to return,if it was me i would never show my face again.:mad: ---------- Post added at 15:14 ---------- Previous post was at 15:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Their Lordship's aren't paid (for being a peer at least). That said they should obey the spirit of the law as that's really what counts. They should have expenses paid where reasonable but shouldn't claim where they don't need to. That said sometimes the letter of the law means they have to claim that way even when it's "silly".
As for those peers gaoled, they should pay back before they resume their seats and maybe even not be allowed to affect laws linked to the crimes they have been found guilty of. (Some still have good brains and abilities that it would be a waste to not use.) |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-2031031.html As for letting them carry on sitting well nobody is indispensable despite having brains,i am sure brainy people are frothing at the mouth to get in for all the privelidge the title brings with it, for example if i robbed a bank (many would say those peers robbed the public bank) i doubt wether i would get a job ever again in the financial service sector,or anywhere else perhaps and i would be sacked from my current one without a doubt. Yet these peers are allowed to remain well surely if their brains were that good they would never have got themselves into the mess they did,their brains would have told them it was not worth it.!;) |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Breathtaking gall!! :mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Yet another? |
Re: Peers at the trough?
If she's guilty of breaking the rules, she should be punished.
However, from the same story in the Times http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/p...cle3427510.ece Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Sacked is the only option for anyone stealing money or committing fraud |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Or heaven forbid, jail.
Better yet, jail term, plus 50% interest on the amount stolen. |
Re: Peers at the trough?
She paid the money that what have been spent on hotels, to the person she was staying with. It was only for a total of 12 days spread over six weeks. She spent other times at a hotel.
If somebody claimed long term for a room in somebody else's house and they were not sleeping in that room, but with their lover who was receiving the money to help pay of their mortgage, then that would be fraud. Claiming expenses for your constituency home whilst supposedly staying in a room at your sister's house or you are provided with government housing(ie 10 Downing St), would again be fraud. |
Re: Peers at the trough?
I reckon it's about time we heard of some 'oversights' which actually cost our glorious leaders some money. That'd help redress the balance a little. :D
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
This is even more damning than the first part?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Good! |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
More nice 'work' if you can get it eh? It seems their consciences don't get the better of them when it comes to allowances... |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Reasons why a revolution is inevitable, are springing up constantly in government. aren't they.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum