Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Peers at the trough? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33666719)

Osem 29-06-2010 08:39

Peers at the trough?
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10439805.stm

Quote:

More than 150 peers have been claiming a £174 tax-free overnight allowance for staying in London, despite owning a property there, a report says.
Nice 'work' if you can get it eh?
:mad:

Maggy 29-06-2010 09:15

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

The findings come as the government has outlined plans to pay peers a flat rate of £300 a day to attend the House of Lords.
The regime, due to take effect in October, compares with a current maximum daily limit of £334.
I thought I was lucky to get £100 a day for each day of supply teaching..:erm:

Stuart 29-06-2010 11:36

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
I find it staggering.. I had to go through some many hoops to even attempt to claim my train fares to and from my recent first aid course , and that was just £2.60 a day, yet it seems working in Westminster, you can claim for pretty much anything.

I say "attempt" because work requires tickets, or other proof. However, I used my Oyster and for some reason, although they are able to give me print outs showing money coming off my pre-pay balance, TFL deny I made any journeys on that card on that period.. But that's a moan for another thread.

budwieser 29-06-2010 19:53

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35048567)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10439805.stm



Nice 'work' if you can get it eh?
:mad:

Obviously corrupt Governments are not just a thing for third world countries then. :erm:
Still, We knew that all along didn`t we. Thieving *******s.:mad:

zing_deleted 29-06-2010 20:12

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by budwieser (Post 35048834)
Obviously corrupt Governments are not just a thing for third world countries then. :erm:
Still, We knew that all along didn`t we. Thieving *******s.:mad:

Peers are not elected so they are not really Governement
They are an arachic link to the past and a drain the country could well do without. However they have been a buffer thats kept out some crazy laws so I guess its swings and roundabouts

budwieser 29-06-2010 21:04

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zing (Post 35048842)
Peers are not elected so they are not really Governement
They are an arachic link to the past and a drain the country could well do without. However they have been a buffer thats kept out some crazy laws so I guess its swings and roundabouts

Sorry mate, my mistake. I just got mixed up with the politicians and expenses.:)

Osem 01-11-2010 17:32

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Can't believe I missed this, I must be slipping in my old age and not paying enough attention to the propaganda of the right wing press.... :)

Quote:

Expenses: Baroness Uddin, Lord Bhatia, Lord Paul ordered to repay £200,000
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...ay-200000.html

I wonder how many of us wouldn't have been prosecuted in similar circumstances?? :mad:

Osem 14-11-2011 16:14

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Suspended Labour peer Baroness Uddin is set to be allowed back into the House of Lords without repaying the £125,000 she owes in wrongly claimed expenses.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15718233

Great! :mad:

Sirius 14-11-2011 16:16

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35330121)

That is so wrong on so many levels.

papa smurf 14-11-2011 16:23

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
as i understand it this woman owns more that one property -that means one can be sold off to repay the money she stole

martyh 14-11-2011 16:41

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35330126)
That is so wrong on so many levels.

firstly "wrongly claimed" should read "knowingly stole from the tax payer"

secondly ,how in gods name can the House of Lords not be able to force a peer to repay a debt owed .If i was cought fiddling expenses on that level i would be hauled in front of the courts by the company and ordered to pay the money back not to mention losing my job

Thirdly ,why can't they pay her the £300 a day expenses but just not give it her untill the debt is payed

papa smurf 14-11-2011 16:43

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35330140)
firstly "wrongly claimed" should read "knowingly stole from the tax payer"

secondly ,how in gods name can the House of Lords not be able to force a peer to repay a debt owed .If i was cought fiddling expenses on that level i would be hauled in front of the courts by the company and ordered to pay the money back not to mention losing my job

Thirdly ,why can't they pay her the £300 a day expenses but just not give it her untill the debt is payed

she's a disgrace to the house and the nation there must be a way to oust her

martyh 14-11-2011 16:48

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35330141)
she's a disgrace to the house and the nation there must be a way to oust her


apparently only the queen can do that ,so i ask myself ,why doesn't she

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:46 ----------

and another thing ,how come Commons members get sent to jail (well some do ) but peers of the realm don't ?

papa smurf 14-11-2011 16:48

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35330143)
apparently only the queen can do that ,so i ask myself ,why doesn't she

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:46 ----------

and another thing ,how come Commons members get sent to jail (well some do ) but peers of the realm don't ?

petition time ;)

martyh 14-11-2011 16:53

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35330145)
petition time ;)

nope that just won't cut it ,this is definitely an angry mob brandishing pitch forks occasion

Osem 14-11-2011 17:07

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35330143)
apparently only the queen can do that ,so i ask myself ,why doesn't she

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:46 ----------

and another thing ,how come Commons members get sent to jail (well some do ) but peers of the realm don't ?

I think that's all down to the interpretation by the Lords authorities and, in particular, official guidance offered after the event.

Quote:

....it has emerged that there was no definition of 'main address' in any of the guidance to peers - meaning they were free to nominate any property they like.

Then, in guidance produced only last month, the Clerk of the Parliament Michael Pownall, a senior Lords official suggested that visiting a property once a month was enough to qualify. The move was agreed by the House Committee chaired by Speaker Baroness Hayman.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1257391/Absurd-rules-allow-expenses-fiddling-peers-dodge-justice.html#ixzz1dhk1ZRKj

Apparently, Keir Starmer (Director of Public Prosecutions)

Quote:

could barely disguise his frustration as he explained that the rule change meant he could not authorise charges against Lady Uddin. He said the guidance would inevitably have been seized on by defence lawyers.

martyh 14-11-2011 17:10

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35330151)
I think that's all down to the interpretation by the Lords authorities and, in particular, official guidance offered after the event.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1dhk1ZRKj

so basically the peers can make their own rules :rolleyes: that figures :mad:

mertle 14-11-2011 17:10

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35330143)
apparently only the queen can do that ,so i ask myself ,why doesn't she

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:46 ----------

and another thing ,how come Commons members get sent to jail (well some do ) but peers of the realm don't ?

sadly she dont care.

I always thought people convicted lost peerage so why is Archer kept his too.

Although Zing makes valid point the peers have kept some scandalous bills from seeing light of day. Its corrupted by governments giving peerage to make sure the onus is balanced into there favour so there crazy bills get in.

Its scandalous they not forced to pay back what they stole even worse allowed back they should be stripped and jailed.

£300 a day criminally disgusting wage. Most are millionairres although deserve a pay it should be token £100 a day still healthy £500 a week.

Sirius 14-11-2011 17:11

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35330145)
petition time ;)

Set one up and i will sign it and advertise the bugger as much as i can.

Osem 14-11-2011 17:25

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
For some reason the link in my previous post no longer works so here it is again:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1dhk1ZRKj

:confused:

denphone 14-11-2011 19:53

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35330126)
That is so wrong on so many levels.

And l will second that.

Osem 15-11-2011 15:07

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35330128)
as i understand it this woman owns more that one property -that means one can be sold off to repay the money

Only in your world matey! :mad:

Osem 14-12-2011 10:21

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Peers who wrongly claimed expenses will be banned from returning to the House of Lords until they repay the money.

There had been suggestions two suspended peers would return to the Lords and use their daily allowance to pay off the money they owed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16175509

I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all!

denphone 14-12-2011 12:59

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35345215)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16175509

I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all!

Yes it does beggar belief that they tried to get their offices back.:(

richard1960 14-12-2011 14:14

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35345215)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16175509

I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all!

I still cannot understand why the Lords cannot find a way of banning these people completely for ever, there you have these "elite" who have the power to change laws in some cases fiddling IE Lord Taylor,Lord Hanningfield,Lady uddin,and Perjurors in the case of Jeffrey Archer all able to eventually sit again in judgment of us all.

Does not surprise me they have their snouts in the trough on the wider issue why do they do it,because they can i guess is the answer, and because uintil caught they think they are immune from the rules that govern us ie the non elite of society, its all very corrupt sadly.:(

---------- Post added at 15:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35330154)
Set one up and i will sign it and advertise the bugger as much as i can.

Not sure how to set one up but like you i would sign it if there was one.!

Its hard to see how those in the House of lords who have done time is some cases,and will not repay fiddled expenses in others have the gall to return,if it was me i would never show my face again.:mad:

---------- Post added at 15:14 ---------- Previous post was at 15:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35345215)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16175509

I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all!

After voluntarily working for a political party and meeting lots of our elected representatives both good and not so good i can believe they have the gall,some of them are completely shameless:mad:,although i l like to think they are in the minority.

tweetiepooh 14-12-2011 14:33

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Their Lordship's aren't paid (for being a peer at least). That said they should obey the spirit of the law as that's really what counts. They should have expenses paid where reasonable but shouldn't claim where they don't need to. That said sometimes the letter of the law means they have to claim that way even when it's "silly".

As for those peers gaoled, they should pay back before they resume their seats and maybe even not be allowed to affect laws linked to the crimes they have been found guilty of. (Some still have good brains and abilities that it would be a waste to not use.)

richard1960 14-12-2011 14:44

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35345337)
Their Lordship's aren't paid (for being a peer at least). That said they should obey the spirit of the law as that's really what counts. They should have expenses paid where reasonable but shouldn't claim where they don't need to. That said sometimes the letter of the law means they have to claim that way even when it's "silly".

As for those peers gaoled, they should pay back before they resume their seats and maybe even not be allowed to affect laws linked to the crimes they have been found guilty of. (Some still have good brains and abilities that it would be a waste to not use.)

Peers although not offically paid get a £300 attendance allowance plus "expenses" ,if they want and some do they can come into London sneak off and do some shopping and go home although obviously many stay,so it is a pay of sorts.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-2031031.html

As for letting them carry on sitting well nobody is indispensable despite having brains,i am sure brainy people are frothing at the mouth to get in for all the privelidge the title brings with it, for example if i robbed a bank (many would say those peers robbed the public bank) i doubt wether i would get a job ever again in the financial service sector,or anywhere else perhaps and i would be sacked from my current one without a doubt.

Yet these peers are allowed to remain well surely if their brains were that good they would never have got themselves into the mess they did,their brains would have told them it was not worth it.!;)

Osem 24-04-2012 18:54

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Suspended peer Baroness Uddin will return to the House of Lords in May after repaying more than £125,000 she wrongly claimed in expenses.

The politician follows fellow peer Lord Hanningfield, who has returned to Parliament after he repaid £30,000.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17827746

Breathtaking gall!! :mad:

Sirius 24-04-2012 18:58

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35418693)

If that was you or me we would have been in jail.

Osem 27-05-2012 18:13

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Labour MPs are calling for an investigation into an expenses claim by the co-chair of the Conservative Party, Baroness Warsi, in 2008.

Questions are being asked about whether she paid rent at a London house, for which she claimed an allowance.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18227036

Yet another?

Hugh 27-05-2012 18:27

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
If she's guilty of breaking the rules, she should be punished.
However, from the same story in the Times
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/p...cle3427510.ece
Quote:

The Acton flat is understood to be owned by Dr Wafik Moustafa, a Conservative donor and former electoral candidate, who is now engaged in a dispute with the party and Lady Warsi.

Sirius 27-05-2012 18:32

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35433606)
If she's guilty of breaking the rules, she should be punished.


Sacked is the only option for anyone stealing money or committing fraud

AdamD 27-05-2012 22:35

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Or heaven forbid, jail.

Better yet, jail term, plus 50% interest on the amount stolen.

nomadking 27-05-2012 22:48

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
She paid the money that what have been spent on hotels, to the person she was staying with. It was only for a total of 12 days spread over six weeks. She spent other times at a hotel.

If somebody claimed long term for a room in somebody else's house and they were not sleeping in that room, but with their lover who was receiving the money to help pay of their mortgage, then that would be fraud. Claiming expenses for your constituency home whilst supposedly staying in a room at your sister's house or you are provided with government housing(ie 10 Downing St), would again be fraud.

Osem 28-05-2012 07:04

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
I reckon it's about time we heard of some 'oversights' which actually cost our glorious leaders some money. That'd help redress the balance a little. :D

devilincarnate 28-05-2012 16:40

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
This is even more damning than the first part?

Quote:

The baroness had declared the property on the register of ministerial interests but she failed to inform the register of Lords' interests that she was letting the property.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18227036

nomadking 28-05-2012 18:44

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35433955)
This is even more damning than the first part?



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18227036

Why is it that damning? The letting of the property came a lot later(June 2010). The expenses issue was 2 years earlier(early 2008).

devilincarnate 28-05-2012 19:29

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35433992)
Why is it that damning? The letting of the property came a lot later(June 2010). The expenses issue was 2 years earlier(early 2008).

If you read what I quoted and also she has only just has this information come to light? Plus this as well?

Quote:

In a separate development, Lady Warsi admitted not fully declaring rental income from the Wembley flat after she moved out in June 2010.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18234167

nomadking 28-05-2012 20:04

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35434006)
If you read what I quoted and also she has only just has this information come to light? Plus this as well?



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18234167

She reported the rental income on the register of Ministers' interests and more importantly for tax purposes, she just forgot a different register of Lords' interests. Nothing was really hidden, so why all the fuss?
Quote:

"When the discrepancy became apparent this week, I immediately informed the Registrar of Lords' Interests of its omission. I repeat: at all times my ownership of the flat and the fact that it was being let out was fully disclosed to Cabinet Office officials and HM Revenue and Customs, and was appropriately reported on the register of Ministers' interests held by the Government."
Speaking of reporting of income for tax purposes, whatever happened to Tessa Jowell and her hubby about their tax dodging and money laundering. They eventually paid the tax, but had deliberately planned not to, until they were caught out. Eventually paying the tax is proof that they wanted to dodge it.

devilincarnate 28-05-2012 20:38

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35434023)
She reported the rental income on the register of Ministers' interests and more importantly for tax purposes, she just forgot a different register of Lords' interests. Nothing was really hidden, so why all the fuss?
Speaking of reporting of income for tax purposes, whatever happened to Tessa Jowell and her hubby about their tax dodging and money laundering. They eventually paid the tax, but had deliberately planned not to, until they were caught out. Eventually paying the tax is proof that they wanted to dodge it.

Ok I will stand up and be corrected :( But all of these who have cheated should be shot :mad:

Osem 27-09-2012 21:08

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Two Conservative peers jailed for expenses fraud have been warned they could return to prison unless they pay back tens of thousands of pounds.

Lord Taylor of Warwick was told to pay £151,000 while former leader of Essex County Council Lord Hanningfield was ordered to pay £37,000.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19746949

Good!

Osem 17-12-2013 10:46

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Half the members of the House of Lords clock in and out of Parliament for a few minutes a day in order to claim a £300 daily attendance allowance, a former Conservative peer has said.

Lord Hanningfield made the claim when challenged to explain his own attendance record.

The Daily Mirror alleges on 11 of 19 occasions he attended the Lords in July he spent less than 40 minutes there.

There is no suggestion the peer broke any rules.

Members of the House of Lords are not paid a salary but can claim a daily allowance of £300 if they attend a sitting.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25411182

More nice 'work' if you can get it eh?

It seems their consciences don't get the better of them when it comes to allowances...

martyh 17-12-2013 11:53

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35655580)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25411182

More nice 'work' if you can get it eh?

It seems their consciences don't get the better of them when it comes to allowances...

I think the Lords needs sorting out and i thought that was being done but obviously not ,and for Hanningfield to suggest that most Lords do it then there is definitely something wrong with the system

Gary L 17-12-2013 13:37

Re: Peers at the trough?
 
Reasons why a revolution is inevitable, are springing up constantly in government. aren't they.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum