![]() |
Internet approaches addressing limit
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10105978.stm
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
migration to ipv6 should help
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
it would only affect NEW service providers/providers expanding their address ranges anyway.
IPv6 needs implementing, however I don't know many people that use it yet... |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
They've said this for the last 5 years. If they were seriously panicking, they'd have rammed through changes by "law".
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
There are ways to work around the IP addressing limit if you consider them
1) IPV6 2) Split the net into 2. amend webpages with net1.www.website.tld and net2.www.website.tld etc, set the domain name servers to route according to the prefix. etc etc |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
DNS servers don't do routing?
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:25 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
I heard that foreign language web addresses are now allowed. Was it Egypt the first one?
Many apologies, I meant non-latin web addresses. |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
Egypt: مصر (Egypt) Saudi Arabia: السعودية (AlSaudiah) United Arab Emirates: امارات (Emarat) Russia now has its own too: рф e.g: http://президент.рф ... but this is all off topic! |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
|
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Quote:
Chinese (simplified) Chinese (traditional) Greek Hindi Japanese Korean Persian Russian Tamil Yiddish |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
Back to the original subject, does anyone know when VM plan to start implementing IPv6 allocations to end-users? Is it being used in their core or for STBs yet?
Cheers. |
Re: Internet approaches addressing limit
the sad thng is there is still big swaths of ip's unused.
it is true the amount of 'allocated' ip's is high but some big organisations have a low 'utilisation' of these ip's such as the US government and some big companies. When we reach the tipping point I suspect some of these ip's will be unallocated. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum