![]() |
Mephedrone & "legal highs"
The same drug that recienly cost the lives of two teenagers has struck again.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...rotum-off.html |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
november 2009
I wonder how many boozzers injured themselves or others the same time ;) |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Actually there's no proof that the drug cost them their lives, especially as they mixed it with methdone..
I'm no supporter of drugs and also think that this drug should be classified, but I do wish that they wouldn't sensationalise reports to do it |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
One less idiot in the gene pool..
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
I dont believe he died ...
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
A scrote now minus a scrotum, natures way of removing idiots.:D
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:44 ---------- Previous post was at 23:43 ---------- Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
It can't be that bad unless it stimulate Shatners Bassoon or make you cry all the water out your body.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbq3kc29Tmg The second it gets banned a minor change will be made to the formulation which will then take another good few months to be banned etc. If people are stupid enough to continue taking it after these deaths and testicular removals then banning it won't change a thing. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Does banning any drug REALLY make a difference to it's use?
Cannabis - illegal, roaring underground trade, no quality control, gets cut with all sorts of stuff Heroin - see above Crack - see above Crystal meth - see above. repeat until list of prohibited drugs is exhausted. Quite frankly all that banning a drug seems to do is help organised crime, since they become the main supplier and therefore the ones profiting from it. The only way to remove a banned substance from circulation is to remove the demand, and we don't have a way of doing that yet. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
Opiates are as a wide group either banned or controlled aren't they? You can't make a minor variation to morphine and sell it over the counter anything based on that structure is a no-no isn't it? |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
Not sure about MDMA/ecstasy, there have certainly been cases where people have walked from court when the drugs they have been found with were not actually ecstasy when tested even though they did have similar effects. ---------- Post added at 08:40 ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 ---------- Of course another option would be to legalise pretty much everything bar heroin and crack, tax it, enforce quality control and let people make their own choices... |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
The "underclass"?
I, and my brothers, came from "the underclass" (Govan in the 60's and 70's), and between us we became- a) IT Director at a University b) Director of Park Services for a major city c) Electrician, and resident of Jersey d) Engineer at a nuclear power station It helps no one when a large number of people who do not have the abilities, drive, or luck to progress in life, are classified along with those who chose not to. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
I would argue that a member of the 'underclass' who has achieved what foreverwar and his brothers have is of far more service to society than an incompetent inbred wastrel with inherited money. After all, one who is striving to achieve is far more likely to contribute something worthwhile to society as a whole than one whose only contribution to society is monetary contributions as they purchase things and contributing to society scandal pages.
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
So here we have a number of members calling this youth with no evidence to prove what kind of guy he is.The whole basis of these judgements are the fact he took this legal drug.
So you guys doing the judging. Have you always behaved yourself whilst bladdered? never tried a spilff or maybe a bit of billy? lived a totally clean life ? if you answered no to all but the last question then fair play if you answered differently then you are a hippocrite ---------- Post added at 11:54 ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 ---------- Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Actually zing, my previous post was entirely based on the actual USAGE of the term 'underclass' not an attempt to label anybody as such. The concept of describing someone as 'underclass' raised my ire on it's own although I did refer to inherited money wastrels.
My reasoning? Albert Einstein - a patent clerk, certifiable genius, contributed a lot to physics (Even if general relativity is demonstrably wrong) Thomas Alva Edison - used to sell candy and newspapers on a train. both could be described as being from the 'underclass' Conversely - Paris Hilton - inherited millionairess, arguably 'priviliged' - famous for flashing, being on sex tapes, taking columbian marching powder, and having the intellectual capacity of a pickled egg. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
it didnt aim it at any individual just those who have judged him purely by the fact he has tried this drug . Although I am sure they have staggered home on occassion perhaps singing loadly or disrupting traffic in a drunked haze lol
I to have come from the underclass and to an extent I am still in it although I no longer take illegal drugs although I have tried Salvia which is a legal high also |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
The key words here are 'came from'. You and I both had whatever it takes to escape and make something of our lives. The underclass I'm referring to are those without the drive or desire to do more than vegetate and live off our graft. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
I have managed to do this without feeling the need to rip off body parts or kill and mutilate my fellow men. I consider that my extensive experience in this field qualifies me to make an informed judgement, and I still think the guy's a ********. Please remember the rules on swearing.We would appreciate you not relying on the swear filter to get you out of trouble.Thanks in advance. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
this guy had a bad trip just because you have been lucky and not does not necessarily make you better than him although with all the stuff you admit you done you judged this youth with no evidence to support his character
I to have extensive experience and I have had a couple of bad trips in my life and have been terrified by them does that make me a ******** also? |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
A sensible suggestion?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...on-criminalise Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
While I am in no way defending the use of drugs (in fact, I do not agree with the use of drugs), it's worth remembering that they actually cause far fewer injuries than either Alcohol or driving, yet these seem to be considered relatively safe..
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Also, we'll have to assume that all of these 'victims' took this stuff through their own consent.
As has been discussed, all that society can do to provide 'guidance' is to make these substances illegal, but even that cannot and will not prevent people from taking them, and occasionally dying, and even less occasionally mutilating themselves. He wasn't hit by a drunk driver, randomly shot amid drive-by gang violence, caught up in malfunctioning farm machinery etc. He chose to take a drug for a cheap thrill and got more than he bargained for. Tough shizer! It's not anyone else's fault but his own. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
legalise all drugs. Tax them like fags and booze. At least there will be some money raised to deal with users rather than it all go to the pushers.
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
alcohol and nicotine are drugs. There's no difference. In fact they are both highly addictive substances and only legal through custom and practice. If alcohol was newly discovered tomorrow it would almost certainly become a class A banned substance.
Legalise them all and tax them. In a free society everyone should be free to go to hell in their own personal way and that way at least they make a contribution financially for their welfare. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
in fact less people would die form overdose if they all were legal as doses and quality would be monitored. All that making drugs illegal does is put the price up and put the business in the hands of violent criminals
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
It makes no difference what background you have, or what position you hold in society, if you take drugs & you rip your stones off whilst under the influence, its your own fault, no one else's.
To deliberately tear ones own scrotum off is not the work of a normal, sane person, hence, one less idiot in the gene pool. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
people experiment and a bad trip is not fun there is no information on this guy and the story is 4 months old . I do not recall seeing anyone mention a follow up story?
Have you never done something and thought that was stupid ? People take risks all the time from jumping out of a plane to climbing a mountain to taking drugs even smoking a ciggarette. Do you smoke btw? |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
Good God!! |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
You smoked thats a drug and its made blatantly obvious what it does to the body :)
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
A high proportion of guys also smoked. Perhaps it is a drug, but so is asprin. There is quite a difference. We don't often hear about people self harming because they smoke though. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Ok and I do not mean any offense but you know as well as I do the damage smoking does to the body. What is that if it is not self harm?
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
Doh! |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
^ Excellent article and its ironic that the the scrotum ripping story probably isn't true -
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12...drone_madness/ "As part of the evidence-gathering process, I looked at internet chat forums and blogs where individuals were writing about their experiences both in obtaining and using this substance," he told The Register. He explained it was from these sources that the original mention of scrotum-ripping originated, but that he was "clear in the report that the credence given to this latter sort of evidence should be low: this is an indicator of how much the drug is talked about and common themes that arise, rather than strong evidence for its effects". The police need to stop visiting 4chan for their 'evidence'. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
It's going to be made Class B 'within weeks'
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
problem is with a tweak of the formula some new killer will be straight onto the streets and legal.
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Yep, watching the Home Secretary on Sky News just their he was saying that even though it's currently 100% legal to import he will be ordering customs to seize any shipments of it coming into the UK from now on.
Good idea but why do I get the feeling it'll just end up as a legal battle between the importers and the government with the taxpayer ending up out of pocket through legal fees and compensation. |
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Quote:
|
re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Yep,and what a waste of resources at that.... we have enough REAL criminals on this island,without having to create new ones for activities that were perfectly legal about 100 years ago.
The war on drugs is a waste of time,money and human lives.Not one addict will be saved by all these law enforcement measures,not one kid will be safe from dealers and drugs through prohibition. What we need is an honest and open debate in this country about how we want to deal with our addictions in the future,cause what we are doing now isn't working,imo. |
Re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Teenagers' deaths 'not caused by mephedrone'
Quote:
|
Re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Like you couldn't see that coming
Was going to say maybe this will make them think twice next time before jumping to a conclusion - but I remembered I'm talking about the press and MPs. |
Re: Mephedrone & "legal highs"
Yes, it was hardly a surprise.
Maybe one day in the far future we will have an evidence-based drug policy, instead of one which is based upon appeasing the tabloids. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum