Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33662496)

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 11:00

Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Looks as though striking works!

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle7054625.ece

Quote:

postal workers will receive a 2 per cent pay rise next month, followed by subsequent increases in 2011 and 2012 of 1.4 per cent and 3.5 per cent, respectively. Staff will receive a lump sum payment of £400 on ratification of the agreement and another £1,000 linked to delivery of workplace changes.
Quote:

Details of the deal include an immediate payment of £20.60 a week for delivery staff, equivalent to a 5.9 per cent pay increase, and £8 per week for mail centre staff, equivalent to 2.3 per cent. The working week will be cut by one hour to 39 hours. Maternity pay will increase from 18 to 26 weeks and paternity pay from one to two weeks.
The civil service strike continues also and things will probably only get worse as unions push back on public service cuts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...militancy.html

Quote:

A new analysis of official statistics shows that the average public sector worker went on strike 15 times as much as the average private sector worker - with 353,000 days lost last year. Ten years ago, only 70,000 days were lost across the public sector.
Labour policies not only got us in the same kind of financial poop as Greece he got us the same enlarged, militant, laurel cushioned public sector as well. Hail the Socialist Republic of Brownistan :D

Osem 09-03-2010 11:02

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
I'm so glad - I fully expect my 'service' from RM to improve now.... :rolleyes:

nomadking 09-03-2010 11:03

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
I'm sure that the cheque is in the post, to the Labour Party.

arcamalpha2004 09-03-2010 11:05

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
" Labour policies not only got us in the same kind of financial poop as Greece he got us the same enlarged, militant public sector as well. Hail the Socialist Republic :D "

Ofcourse, there were never any strikes when maggies gang were in power.
When a worker pays his/her dues there comes with it a right to withdraw labour, whatever the consequences may be in the end.

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 11:08

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004 (Post 34976958)
" Labour policies not only got us in the same kind of financial poop as Greece he got us the same enlarged, militant public sector as well. Hail the Socialist Republic :D "

Ofcourse, there were never any strikes when maggies gang were in power.
When a worker pays his/her dues there comes with it a right to withdraw labour, whatever the consequences may be in the end.

Those strikes which were caused by the previous Labour government enlarging and empowering a militant public sector you mean?

arcamalpha2004 09-03-2010 11:11

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34976960)
Those strikes which were caused by the previous Labour government enlarging and empowering a militant public sector you mean?


Sorry? elaborate please :)

Chris 09-03-2010 11:15

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004 (Post 34976958)
Ofcourse, there were never any strikes when maggies gang were in power.

Of course there were, there were loads. Funnily enough the Union barons didn't like it when Thatcher went to war on their little fiefdoms, and they put up a fight. But after the miners' strike ended, there was a steady decline in days lost to industrial action. Until Labour got in of course, and began laying the foundations for the upswing we are now seeing.

Quote:

When a worker pays his/her dues there comes with it a right to withdraw labour, whatever the consequences may be in the end.
A blinkered, self-serving attitude we fully expect to hear from dyed-in-the-wool trade unionists.

Osem 09-03-2010 11:28

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34976960)
Those strikes which were caused by the previous Labour government enlarging and empowering a militant public sector you mean?

Yeah they'd be the ones... :D

---------- Post added at 10:28 ---------- Previous post was at 10:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34976968)
Of course there were, there were loads. Funnily enough the Union barons didn't like it when Thatcher went to war on their little fiefdoms, and they put up a fight. But after the miners' strike ended, there was a steady decline in days lost to industrial action. Until Labour got in of course, and began laying the foundations for the upswing we are now seeing.

A blinkered, self-serving attitude we fully expect to hear from dyed-in-the-wool trade unionists.

Yep - to hell with the consequences, however severe. The supreme irony being that, in the long term, those who suffered most were usually the ones who went on strike.

arcamalpha2004 09-03-2010 11:29

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34976968)
Of course there were, there were loads. Funnily enough the Union barons didn't like it when Thatcher went to war on their little fiefdoms, and they put up a fight. But after the miners' strike ended, there was a steady decline in days lost to industrial action. Until Labour got in of course, and began laying the foundations for the upswing we are now seeing.

A blinkered, self-serving attitude we fully expect to hear from dyed-in-the-wool trade unionists.


Aye, she did a lot of good that bitch, her main claim to fame was stopping the kids milk.
Conservatives have a known track record with regard relationships with unions, so it is not just simply a problem associated with one particular party.

Chris 09-03-2010 11:33

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004 (Post 34976979)
Aye, she did a lot of good that bitch, her main claim to fame was stopping the kids milk.

Heaven forbid that people might take some personal responsibility for their children's nutrition.

Quote:

Conservatives have a known track record with regard relationships with unions, so it is not just simply a problem associated with one particular party.
There are different problems, depending on your point of view. Thatcherism was a big problem for the unions. She gave them a well-deserved hammering. Meanwhile Gordon Brown is a big problem for everyone else, because he has created the conditions that have allowed more and bigger strikes than we have seen in more than a decade.

Osem 09-03-2010 11:36

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004 (Post 34976979)
Aye, she did a lot of good that bitch, her main claim to fame was stopping the kids milk.

There was i thinking that her main claim to fame was the Falklands War. Must be mistaken I guess....

Anyway, with respect to who stopped school milk, Harold Wilson's Labour government were the original school milk snatchers, scrapping its provision to secondary schools in 1968:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_Milk_Act

So Thatcher really can't take all the credit...



---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34976982)
Heaven forbid that people might take some personal responsibility for their children's nutrition.

Well if they did that, there'd be mass unemployment within the nanny state. ;)

Spectato 09-03-2010 13:36

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Geez!
Try and be happy for them, with their tiny victory (in the big scheme of things).
I doubt any of them will be rushing out to their local Bugatti dealership on receiving the news.

Probably lead to lay-offs somewhere down the line anyway, to compensate for the pay rises, then some more strikes.

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 15:52

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34976982)
Heaven forbid that people might take some personal responsibility for their children's nutrition.

Heaven forbid that people might take some personal responsibility full stop these days :(

injuneer 09-03-2010 15:53

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Good for the posties I say, it's never exactly been the most highly paid job.

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 15:56

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spectato (Post 34977051)
Geez!
Try and be happy for them, with their tiny victory (in the big scheme of things).
I doubt any of them will be rushing out to their local Bugatti dealership on receiving the news.

Probably lead to lay-offs somewhere down the line anyway, to compensate for the pay rises, then some more strikes.

You'll forgive me if I don't get excited about them getting extra money, extra maternity / paternity leave, instant bonuses and working less hours while the private sector continues to make redundancies and enact pay freezes.

You seem to contradict yourself with your second paragraph. Be happy with them, thanks to them getting what they want this time we'll probably be getting some more strikes later. Yay.

---------- Post added at 14:56 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by injuneer (Post 34977133)
Good for the posties I say, it's never exactly been the most highly paid job.

No-one forced them to do it...

Perhaps I've a strange point of view here but it's one that if you're not happy about how much your job pays you go and find one that suits you more. If you are unable to then it would appear that this is all your skills are worth at this time, so either improve your skills or deal with it.

injuneer 09-03-2010 15:59

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34977134)
You'll forgive me if I don't get excited about them getting extra money, extra maternity / paternity leave, instant bonuses and working less hours while the private sector continues to make redundancies and enact pay freezes.

You seem to contradict yourself with your second paragraph. Be happy with them, thanks to them getting what they want this time we'll probably be getting some more strikes later. Yay.

---------- Post added at 14:56 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------



No-one forced them to do it...

Perhaps I've a strange point of view here but it's one that if you're not happy about how much your job pays you go and find one that suits you more. If you are unable to then it would appear that this is all your skills are worth at this time, so either improve your skills or deal with it.

Glad I don't live in your ideal world then.

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 16:07

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by injuneer (Post 34977136)
Glad I don't live in your ideal world then.

Actually I would regard it as the real world rather than this view of having a single job for life and if you're not happy with it strike until you get what you want so that you are happy. That to me is the 'ideal' world that certain people seem to think they are entitled to.

In the horrible real world people have to do things like accept some flexibility in times of strife, be prepared to move on if need be, react to the possibility of redundancy, etc.

That you seem to think this is somehow my 'ideal' world is, well, confusing. It's not an ideal world, it's at times a pretty harsh one, but it's the one most of the private sector live in, it's the one I've always worked in.

Russ 09-03-2010 16:11

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spectato (Post 34977051)
Geez!
Try and be happy for them, with their tiny victory (in the big scheme of things).

Excuse me if I find it hard to be happy for them when their success in this gives off the message that holding the general public to ransom is effective.

Ignitionnet 09-03-2010 16:17

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34976968)
But after the miners' strike ended, there was a steady decline in days lost to industrial action. Until Labour got in of course, and began laying the foundations for the upswing we are now seeing.

Yup.

http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/strikes.pdf

Ratio of public:private sector strike rates - 1999: 1.71, 2009: 15.07

In this 10 year span public sector workers went from striking on average 1.71 times more than the private sector to striking 15.07 times more.

cookie_365 10-03-2010 23:23

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34976952)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...militancy.html

Labour policies not only got us in the same kind of financial poop as Greece he got us the same enlarged, militant, laurel cushioned public sector as well. Hail the Socialist Republic of Brownistan :D

So when private sector Royal Mail workers strike it's proof of the enlarged, militant, laurel cushioned private sector? Hail the Capitalist Republic of Cameronistan?

Is that the way it works?

Hugh 10-03-2010 23:38

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Erm, the Royal Mail is a public limited company owned by HMG. Link
Quote:

Legal Status and Ownership details
The Government owns 100% of Royal Mail Holdings plc’s shares.The Secretary of State for BIS owns 50,004 ordinary shares plus one special share and the Treasury Solicitor holds one ordinary share.The special share relates to areas where special shareholder consent is required, including major transactions, board appointments/remuneration and borrowing.

Ignitionnet 10-03-2010 23:49

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cookie_365 (Post 34978037)
So when private sector Royal Mail workers strike it's proof of the enlarged, militant, laurel cushioned private sector? Hail the Capitalist Republic of Cameronistan?

Is that the way it works?

See above post for details, and the one above that re: private sector striking 1/15th as much as public sector.

There is no such thing as an 'enlarged' private sector, it's the private sector that pays for the public one so under most circumstances the larger it is the better, someone has to pay Gordon's bills for his socialist authoritarian paradise.

Nice try at redirection though, made me chuckle :)

injuneer 11-03-2010 10:43

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34977139)
Actually I would regard it as the real world rather than this view of having a single job for life and if you're not happy with it strike until you get what you want so that you are happy. That to me is the 'ideal' world that certain people seem to think they are entitled to.

In the horrible real world people have to do things like accept some flexibility in times of strife, be prepared to move on if need be, react to the possibility of redundancy, etc.

That you seem to think this is somehow my 'ideal' world is, well, confusing. It's not an ideal world, it's at times a pretty harsh one, but it's the one most of the private sector live in, it's the one I've always worked in.

I thought we had moved on from Victorian work ethics but I must be mistaken. A suppose a lot depends on your view of work, work to live or live to work. I have also worked in the private sector (except when PO telephones was government owned) most of my working life but in recent years I have a seen a steady decline in front line workers conditions, less staff, increased pressure usually resulting in a deteriorating customer experience, but management are not interested in that, only their profit margins. Therefore I am happy for those that can still make a stand against aggressive management, a luxury a few of us have in the private sector. One thing I have learnt is that your are just a statistic whatever your skills.
Right, I'm off to sell my copies of the Morning Star. ;)

Ignitionnet 11-03-2010 11:16

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by injuneer (Post 34978183)
I thought we had moved on from Victorian work ethics but I must be mistaken.

We have - that's why militant trade unionism is irrelevant now. Perhaps a reminder of where the movement came from would be useful:

Quote:

Besides acting to raise wages and improve working conditions, the federations espoused certain social reforms, such as the institution of free public education, the abolition of imprisonment for debt, and the adoption of universal manhood suffrage. Perhaps the most important effect of these early unions was their introduction of political action.
You might also be interested in this:

Quote:

One 1951 study found that instead of harming profits, unions increase the wages of about 10 to 15% of workers by about 10 to 15% by reducing the wages of the other 85 to 90% of workers by about 4%.
About the only social reform unions are interested in now is trying to get socialism / communism (Bob Crow's words) on us, indeed a union boss recently commented that we should all pay more tax to preserve public sector jobs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by injuneer (Post 34978183)
A suppose a lot depends on your view of work, work to live or live to work. I have also worked in the private sector (except when PO telephones was government owned) most of my working life but in recent years I have a seen a steady decline in front line workers conditions, less staff, increased pressure usually resulting in a deteriorating customer experience, but management are not interested in that, only their profit margins.

Quote:

The effect of union activities to influence pricing is potentially very harmful, making the market system ineffective. Because the price of labour is raised above the market rate, deadweight loss is created. Additional non-monetary benefits exacerbate the problem.
So who pays for the deadweight that Unions protect? Oh that'll be those customers they claim to care about. Companies will make their money somewhere and the unions holding their employer and in turn their customers to ransom is passed onto the consumer.

Unions don't care, at all, for anything besides getting the best deal for their members, regardless of the social or economic consequences. Unions are responsible for rampant inflation in the 70s and would happily do so again. They are, bizarrely, a group that claim to be socialist yet couldn't give two hoots about society.

My point was really quite simple. If you don't like your job you go elsewhere. If you've been in the same job for over 20 years you must like something about it, or you can't get a better deal elsewhere. If union members can't get a better deal elsewhere what makes them so special that they should be paid more and have better benefits than other people doing the same hours in the same job elsewhere?

There's the other issue with unions. They bleat on about equality, workers' rights, etc, but couldn't care less so long as their workers' get more rights and are more equal than everyone else.

Speak for yourself re: being a statistic by the way. I must have been more fortunate with my choice of employer.

injuneer 11-03-2010 12:40

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34978205)
We have - that's why militant trade unionism is irrelevant now. Perhaps a reminder of where the movement came from would be useful:



You might also be interested in this:



About the only social reform unions are interested in now is trying to get socialism / communism (Bob Crow's words) on us, indeed a union boss recently commented that we should all pay more tax to preserve public sector jobs.





So who pays for the deadweight that Unions protect? Oh that'll be those customers they claim to care about. Companies will make their money somewhere and the unions holding their employer and in turn their customers to ransom is passed onto the consumer.

Unions don't care, at all, for anything besides getting the best deal for their members, regardless of the social or economic consequences. Unions are responsible for rampant inflation in the 70s and would happily do so again. They are, bizarrely, a group that claim to be socialist yet couldn't give two hoots about society.

My point was really quite simple. If you don't like your job you go elsewhere. If you've been in the same job for over 20 years you must like something about it, or you can't get a better deal elsewhere. If union members can't get a better deal elsewhere what makes them so special that they should be paid more and have better benefits than other people doing the same hours in the same job elsewhere?

There's the other issue with unions. They bleat on about equality, workers' rights, etc, but couldn't care less so long as their workers' get more rights and are more equal than everyone else.

Speak for yourself re: being a statistic by the way. I must have been more fortunate with my choice of employer.

I used to think that at your age. Now I just play them at their own game. Stay until things inevitably go downhill after 3 or 4 years then apply for voluntary redundancy. At least it got my mortgage paid off. You are in the hands of bean counters.

Ignitionnet 11-03-2010 12:59

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by injuneer (Post 34978248)
I used to think that at your age. Now I just play them at their own game. Stay until things inevitably go downhill after 3 or 4 years then apply for voluntary redundancy. At least it got my mortgage paid off. You are in the hands of bean counters.

Nope I'm entirely within my own hands, take responsibility completely for myself and always have. I've been fortunate enough that things haven't gone downhill for me to hang around and wait for voluntary redundancy instead I've moved on when I've chosen to to jobs which actually provided higher pay and better conditions, as expected from a jobs market, but thank you for the suggestion.

Osem 11-03-2010 15:09

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cookie_365 (Post 34978037)
So when private sector Royal Mail workers strike it's proof of the enlarged, militant, laurel cushioned private sector? Hail the Capitalist Republic of Cameronistan?

Is that the way it works?


Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34978049)
Erm, the Royal Mail is a public limited company owned by HMG. Link

There you go again.... bringing those pesky facts into the argument...... :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34978261)
Nope I'm entirely within my own hands, take responsibility completely for myself and always have.

No wonder No.10 isn't on your Christmas card list then..... ;)

Ignitionnet 11-03-2010 15:41

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34978343)
No wonder No.10 isn't on your Christmas card list then..... ;)

I have described myself more than once as following Libertarianism which is totally at odds with the Authoritarian Socialist crap that No.10 come out with and that the Tories if they get in will likely continue a slightly watered down version of though with, of course, the Authoritarian side intact.

Quote:

Libertarians are committed to the belief that individuals, and not states or groups of any other kind, are both ontologically and normatively primary; that individuals have rights against certain kinds of forcible interference on the part of others; that liberty, understood as non-interference, is the only thing that can be legitimately demanded of others as a matter of legal or political right; that robust property rights and the economic liberty that follows from their consistent recognition are of central importance in respecting individual liberty; that social order is not at odds with but develops out of individual liberty; that the only proper use of coercion is defensive or to rectify an error; that governments are bound by essentially the same moral principles as individuals; and that most existing and historical governments have acted improperly insofar as they have utilized coercion for plunder, aggression, redistribution, and other purposes beyond the protection of individual liberty.

Osem 11-03-2010 15:49

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 34978369)
I have described myself more than once as following Libertarianism which is totally at odds with the Authoritarian Socialist crap that No.10 come out with and that the Tories if they get in will likely continue a slightly watered down version of though with, of course, the Authoritarian side intact.

Which is why is used the term No.10 and NOT Gordon Brown... ;)

Mr Angry 27-04-2010 21:03

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
Seems an agreement has been reached.

Chrysalis 30-04-2010 01:35

Re: Royal Mail Workers Pay Rises, Bonuses, Less Hours
 
What killed of strikes in private firms is the now common to employ staff from agencies on temp contracts.

Whilst strike rates may be down in the private sector and this is supposedbly a good thing, to me its an indication the modern private workplace is too imbalanced in favour of the employer.

The vast majority of jobs created now days are temporary and part time jobs, so if you strike whilst you a temp you can be sent packing with ease.

It is a balance that can never be perfect, either we have the modern corp era where workers rights and job security is minimal and as ignition said if you work in the private sector now days, redundancy is probably something to expect at some point in time. Or we have a job envirionment where the unions are too powerful aka the 70's. What thatcher didnt do was not great she just swung the balance the other way. Both sides of the coin have their downsides.

Now here is my own perspective on how things have panned out since 1997. From 1997 to when the recession started about 2007-2008 time most people were getting annual wage increases but they were typically below 'real' inflation. So in a boom wages were dropping behind and individual wealth was shrinking. What is happening now is I feel people still feel they playing catchup with living costs (especially house costs) and need higher wages to do that. If wage increases were more generous during the boom we may not have been in this situation as people would have had more savings and less debt when the recession started. The sad situation is the boom was fuelled by credit so come the recession people dont have the savings and instead have a load of credit that is putting them under pressure to increase earnings. Of course the business's in a recession will only be looking to shrink manpower costs so hence the layoffs and wage freezes.

With the public sector been taxpayer funded, the rules are different of course, eg. the nhs has no immediate danger of going bust. In a way its private vs public, private workers just want to pay less tax, in a era of greed that started since thatcher. Dropping public sector pay can help achieve that for them 'maybe'.

This day was coming tho, I still remember when brown announced the first big NHS budget increase and then finding out a big chunk of it went on pay increases for nurses, and then visiting a hospital soon after to see a shortage of doctors but plenty of nurses standing around idle chatting.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum