Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33660384)

Chris 14-01-2010 14:45

Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
I have split some posts out of the 'coming soon to Virgin Media' thread, as they have absolutely nothing to do with that topic, but may still be of interest.

Nook29 14-01-2010 15:39

Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank_Butcher (Post 34944933)
Signed up today as this site is such a useful source of information, mainly down to Media Boy so thank you for your hardwork and constant updates.

One quick question that has no doubt already been answered - what are the chances of Virgin Media getting Sky Sports HD? ESPN HD has wet my appetite but don't want to join Sky to get Sky Sports HD if there is feint possibility Virgin may get the rights.

Media Boy - Do you have a twitter account for all the latest updates?

It all depends on Ofcom. They need to get things sorted before the Tories get in power, otherwise we'll probably never see any Sky HD channels on Virgin Media.

Mobes 14-01-2010 16:10

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nook29 (Post 34944944)
It all depends on Ofcom. They need to get things sorted before the Tories get in power, otherwise we'll probably never see any Sky HD channels on Virgin Media.

Did you just say Ofcom??? :shocked: :shocked: :shocked: :shocked:

Ben B 14-01-2010 17:06

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nook29 (Post 34944944)
It all depends on Ofcom. They need to get things sorted before the Tories get in power, otherwise we'll probably never see any Sky HD channels on Virgin Media.

IF the Tories get in power

Nook29 14-01-2010 17:13

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben B (Post 34945003)
IF the Tories get in power

They will.

Arthurgray50@blu 14-01-2010 17:18

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
I hope the bloody Tories don't in, l can see them trying to find money from somewhere, and the first thing they will hit, will be satellite customers, trying to introduce a licence for it.

Nook29 14-01-2010 17:22

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 34945016)
I hope the bloody Tories don't in, l can see them trying to find money from somewhere, and the first thing they will hit, will be satellite customers, trying to introduce a licence for it.

I hope they don't as well, but no other party will beat them.

ArronC07 14-01-2010 17:28

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nook29 (Post 34945010)
They will.

If they do you can kiss goodbye to the BBC, sadly I think I agree with you and they will get in and then Murdoch will have free riegn to ruin the BBC and do whatever else he likes- including bullying Virgin.

Ben B 14-01-2010 17:34

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
In the words of Gordon Brown "Change brings consequence"

Hiroki 14-01-2010 19:07

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Are the Tories planning to get rid of the BBC? If so that's one positive reason to vote for them I suppose

moroboshi 14-01-2010 19:30

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiroki (Post 34945125)
Are the Tories planning to get rid of the BBC? If so that's one positive reason to vote for them I suppose

I assume that's just flame bait.

The BBC is the one last quality programme maker left in the UK. Who else could make Planet Earth, Life, Lost China, Nature's Great Events, Last Chance to See, or of course, Top Gear.

Or maybe you just like the kind of tabloid, brain dead rubbish that C4, Sky and Living come up with. If the BBC ever went away, I would never watch broadcast TV again.

Hiroki 14-01-2010 19:43

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by moroboshi (Post 34945140)
I assume that's just flame bait.

The BBC is the one last quality programme maker left in the UK. Who else could make Planet Earth, Life, Lost China, Nature's Great Events, Last Chance to See, or of course, Top Gear.

Or maybe you just like the kind of tabloid, brain dead rubbish that C4, Sky and Living come up with. If the BBC ever went away, I would never watch broadcast TV again.

Nope it was a genuine question as I despise the BBC & their output. :dozey:

Chris 14-01-2010 19:53

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
I think you're going to be disappointed Hiroki - remember, Rupert was a pretty big fan of NuLiebour back in the late 1990s, yet Tony Bliar failed to destroy the BBC after he won the election. And the biggest Beeb-hater in the Commons is on the Liebour benches - one Gerald Kaufmann MP.

Maggy 14-01-2010 19:54

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiroki (Post 34945152)
Nope it was a genuine question as I despise the BBC & their output. :dozey:

Why?What is so bad about BBC programmes that you hate so much.

Their News?

Their nature programmes?

Their historical dramas and docudramsa.

Are you honestly saying that they have never produced anything that you like.

do you hate Monty Python?

soicky 14-01-2010 20:11

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Unfortunately yes.

Maggy 14-01-2010 20:17

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by soicky (Post 34945178)
Unfortunately yes.

My point is that the output of the BBC is so much wider than other TV organisations and aimed at a particularly large and diverse audience..How can anyone state that they categorically hate ALL of the output? :confused:

martyh 14-01-2010 20:39

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiroki (Post 34945152)
Nope it was a genuine question as I despise the BBC & their output. :dozey:


for what reason ?

punky 14-01-2010 20:43

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
I hope so too. I begrudge being taxed £142.50 a year whether I want to watch the BBC or (any other TV channel really) or not.

martyh 14-01-2010 20:44

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945196)
I hope so too. I begrudge being taxed £142.50 a year whether I want to watch the BBC or (any other TV channel really) or not.


so do i but doesn't mean i want it to disapear

Angua 14-01-2010 20:51

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Happy to pay the licence fee provided we still have the BBC. Superb value for money when compared to any other paid service (which mostly have ads as well as being charged for).

Would loathe and detest wall to wall adverts, constant soaps or reality TV shows.

punky 14-01-2010 21:07

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34945199)
so do i but doesn't mean i want it to disapear

Who says it has to?

Why not let the people who want to watch it commercial free stump up £142/year and the ones who don't want to watch it or don't mind commercials to watch it free.

With digital broadcasting and mediums like VM and Sky it really isn't impossible to do.

Simples.

---------- Post added at 22:07 ---------- Previous post was at 22:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 34945201)
Happy to pay the licence fee provided we still have the BBC. Superb value for money when compared to any other paid service (which mostly have ads as well as being charged for).

Would loathe and detest wall to wall adverts, constant soaps or reality TV shows.

There are a lot of things I think are value for money that I am sure you wouldn't. Fortunately you aren't forced to pay for them anyway.

ArronC07 14-01-2010 21:24

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945196)
I hope so too. I begrudge being taxed £142.50 a year whether I want to watch the BBC or (any other TV channel really) or not.

You can always not own a TV.

punky 14-01-2010 21:27

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945214)
You can always not own a TV.

Yeah, thanks for that.

ArronC07 14-01-2010 21:37

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
I personally think the BBC should be protected, commercial broadcasters continually fail to cater for the tastes that the BBC cater for and public service broadcasters like ITV fail to meet their public service commitments and get away with it. The BBC acts as a quality bar that forces other broadcasters to compete, remember a few years ago before Doctor Who was brought back? All the commercial broadcaster said that the family audience was dead and that it'd fail- 10 million extra people watched TV the night it launched. By that I don't mean 10 million people switched over, I actually mean that 10 million people switched on TV that didn't watch TV the previous Saturday and that kick started the revival of family programming on a Saturday evening. The commercial broadcasters would never have taken that risk and were quite happy to pump out the same old tired menu.

Now while I don't use all the services that the BBC provides I appreciate that some people do and that it's only possible by virtue of the way it's funded and I'm happy to pay for this to continue as it's part of the social contract of living in this country. Frankly I find the attitude that some people resent contributing shortsighted and selfish. Commercial TV costs you more anyway, even free to air channels because the cost of advertising is shifted onto the final cost of the product that is sold toyou. The BBC is fantastic value for money and the envy of the world and any politician worth his salt should be defending it from media families with no interest in the social way of life in this country other than how much money they can wring out it.

I'm of the opinion that if you don't want to pay for the BBC then don't own a TV and don't own a radio.

Chris 14-01-2010 21:47

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945220)
The commercial broadcasters would never have taken that risk and were quite happy to pump out the same old tired menu.

The really sad thing is, ITV, having been shown by the BBC that there is an audience for family fantasy drama on a Saturday evening, dipped its toe in the water with Primeval, which performed well for them for, IIRC, three years ... only for them to eventually can it, not because it was a flop, but because, no matter how good it was, Simon Cowell's plastic pop factory was always going to be more popular still. ITV, being a plc, always has to keep its sights firmly on the bottom line. Its decision was sad, but understandable.

That is why the BBC is now more important than ever. In a digital multi-channel age, where dozens of channels are compelled to scrap with each other to get the biggest possible audience for the lowest possible outlay, all we get is endless repeats of a few increasingly tarnished old favourites. Original programming consists of cheap soaps, safe, predictable police procedurals and the aforementioned Simon Cowell plus imitators.

The BBC, amongst a great many other things, is a guarantor of quality and variety.

ArronC07 14-01-2010 21:56

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945224)
The really sad thing is, ITV, having been shown by the BBC that there is an audience for family fantasy drama on a Saturday evening, dipped its toe in the water with Primeval, which performed well for them for, IIRC, three years ... only for them to eventually can it, not because it was a flop, but because, no matter how good it was, Simon Cowell's plastic pop factory was always going to be more popular still. ITV, being a plc, always has to keep its sights firmly on the bottom line. Its decision was sad, but understandable.

That is why the BBC is now more important than ever. In a digital multi-channel age, where dozens of channels are compelled to scrap with each other to get the biggest possible audience for the lowest possible outlay, all we get is endless repeats of a few increasingly tarnished old favourites. Original programming consists of cheap soaps, safe, predictable police procedurals and the aforementioned Simon Cowell plus imitators.

The BBC, amongst a great many other things, is a guarantor of quality and variety.

I totally agree and enjoy the BBC while you can because Cameron has sold himself out and the country out in return for support from Murdoch's popular rag.

Chris 14-01-2010 21:59

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945226)
I totally agree and enjoy the BBC while you can because Cameron has sold himself out and the country out in return for support from Murdoch's popular rag.

Now, there we disagree - as I noted eariler, Tony Blair similarly got cosy with Murdoch ahead of the 1997 election, and yet he didn't go on to kill off the Beeb, even though he had a pretty good go at neutralising them as an effective news organisation following the whole dodgy dossier debacle.

martyh 14-01-2010 22:06

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
the way i see it is if the beeb doesn't get license fee money they will have to advertise like the other channels efectively meaning the end of the bbc ,and there's only so much advertising revenue to go round so i would say that the beebs revenue will fall through the floor and leave them no choice but to show repeats and trashy reality shows if they survive a tall

zing_deleted 14-01-2010 22:46

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945224)
The really sad thing is, ITV, having been shown by the BBC that there is an audience for family fantasy drama on a Saturday evening, dipped its toe in the water with Primeval, which performed well for them for, IIRC, three years ... only for them to eventually can it, not because it was a flop, but because, no matter how good it was, Simon Cowell's plastic pop factory was always going to be more popular still. ITV, being a plc, always has to keep its sights firmly on the bottom line. Its decision was sad, but understandable.

That is why the BBC is now more important than ever. In a digital multi-channel age, where dozens of channels are compelled to scrap with each other to get the biggest possible audience for the lowest possible outlay, all we get is endless repeats of a few increasingly tarnished old favourites. Original programming consists of cheap soaps, safe, predictable police procedurals and the aforementioned Simon Cowell plus imitators.

The BBC, amongst a great many other things, is a guarantor of quality and variety.


Primeval is coming back

http://www.itv.com/drama/cult/primev...1/default.html

soicky 14-01-2010 22:53

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34945184)
My point is that the output of the BBC is so much wider than other TV organisations and aimed at a particularly large and diverse audience..How can anyone state that they categorically hate ALL of the output? :confused:

My reply was to the thread title.

Maggy 14-01-2010 22:58

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by soicky (Post 34945248)
My reply was to the thread title.

OK but if you didn't want to confuse others perhaps a more comprehensive reply would have avoided that possibility. ;)

slowcoach 14-01-2010 22:58

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Let's wait to see what Rothschild promised Mandelson in return for cracking down on music and film piracy..... ;)

Flyboy 14-01-2010 23:26

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945206)
Who says it has to?

Why not let the people who want to watch it commercial free stump up £142/year and the ones who don't want to watch it or don't mind commercials to watch it free.

With digital broadcasting and mediums like VM and Sky it really isn't impossible to do.

Simples.

So, do the ones who have paid the licence fee just close their eyes when the ads come on?

---------- Post added at 00:26 ---------- Previous post was at 00:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by slowcoach (Post 34945251)
Let's wait to see what Rothschild promised Mandelson in return for cracking down on music and film piracy..... ;)

But music and film piracy is theft. Why should some geek hacker get to watch movies for free and others have to pay for it?

RizzyKing 14-01-2010 23:53

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Technically it is not theft feel free to go and visit your local police station and ask them :). I resent paying the licence fee when the bbc is barely watched all year in our house and i don't quite support the quality argument either as you can see just as much tosh on the bbc as you can the others.

Do i think cameron will kill it off no i don't what i do think is that he will do away with automatic rises for the licence and maybe even introduce a cut in the fee but not kill it off. Why the bbc deserve the special protection they have is beyond me and being honest i have no problem with them having to compete in the commercial arena same as all the others.

If the audience is big enough for any subject it will be catered for as there will be sufficient revenue from it but keeping the bbc because they can cater to everyone and everything without a worry about the money side of it is not fair.

Maggy 15-01-2010 00:49

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34945270)
Technically it is not theft feel free to go and visit your local police station and ask them :). I resent paying the licence fee when the bbc is barely watched all year in our house and i don't quite support the quality argument either as you can see just as much tosh on the bbc as you can the others.

Do i think cameron will kill it off no i don't what i do think is that he will do away with automatic rises for the licence and maybe even introduce a cut in the fee but not kill it off. Why the bbc deserve the special protection they have is beyond me and being honest i have no problem with them having to compete in the commercial arena same as all the others.

If the audience is big enough for any subject it will be catered for as there will be sufficient revenue from it but keeping the bbc because they can cater to everyone and everything without a worry about the money side of it is not fair.

Well one day you will probably get your wish and if you think TV is tosh now you will find out this was the golden era of TV...;)

I shan't care as I'm planning to be dead by then..especially if I have end up relying on what passes for commercial TV because of your resentment at paying for a publicly funded tv station.

But then why pay your taxes for schools,roads,hospitals,street lighting and especially those parts of the town/infrastructure that you don't use..:shrug:

RizzyKing 15-01-2010 02:33

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Please don't try and use that argument Maggy because it is not the same and your well aware of that. Taxes are paid because in oneway or another we all benefit by a far greater margin then we all benefit by all paying the licence fee. Times change and things move on but the bbc isn't at anywhere near the same pace and the reason is because they have a nice cocoon called the licence to always gaurantee their revenue.

How about we charge all non sky\vm customers something so they can subsidise that for those of us that have it and yes it is the same thing. I am all for paying for what i use and what i make use of but that argument simply cannot be used in relation to the bbc. I don't want to see the end of the bbc but i do think they can manage on less money then they currently take from every household in the UK.

Nidge 15-01-2010 02:48

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 34945201)
Happy to pay the licence fee provided we still have the BBC. Superb value for money when compared to any other paid service (which mostly have ads as well as being charged for).

Would loathe and detest wall to wall adverts, constant soaps or reality TV shows.



Same here, do people really think that the licence fee will be dropped if any Government decides to get rid of the BBC? It's another easy cash cow for the Conservatives like Railtrack.

Sirius 15-01-2010 05:42

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945214)
You can always not own a TV.

Why should we have to go without a TV because we don't want to watch the BBC. At the moment i have no choice other than pay a tax on the BBC or not pay the tax to the BBC and then be barred from owning or operating a TV for channels that are free of the tax. Bit unfair if you ask me.

Bit like saying everyone must pay for a box of widgets even if you have no intention of using them.

---------- Post added at 06:42 ---------- Previous post was at 06:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nidge (Post 34945280)
Same here, do people really think that the licence fee will be dropped if any Government decides to get rid of the BBC? It's another easy cash cow for the Conservatives like Railtrack.

Or any other party

Angua 15-01-2010 06:52

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34945231)
the way i see it is if the beeb doesn't get license fee money they will have to advertise like the other channels efectively meaning the end of the bbc ,and there's only so much advertising revenue to go round so i would say that the beebs revenue will fall through the floor and leave them no choice but to show repeats and trashy reality shows if they survive a tall

More likely ITV, CH4 & 5 will suffer as the BBC would take a huge amount of advertising revenue because of its content.

LondonRoad 15-01-2010 08:11

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Personally I think the licence fee represents great value for money. I'd happily pay more if it meant less political interference.

The quality and diversity of BBC's output couldn't be sustained if it relied on advertising revenue. You only have to look at what has happened to ITV.

Earl of Bronze 15-01-2010 08:14

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
The BBC will not be dismantled under a Tory government, and certainly not one led by David Cameron. Catch a bloody grip of yourselves people.... :rolleyes:

punky 15-01-2010 08:21

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34945264)
So, do the ones who have paid the licence fee just close their eyes when the ads come on?

Are you deliberately obtuse?

For some decades now we have had the ability to restrict channels on the basis of payment. It isn't rocket science. Have BBC Free with commercials or BBC commercial free on VM, Sky, Top-up TV for the extra £12 a month extra.

If people had to pay £142 to a state-owned airline before they were allowed to fly anywhere (regardless if they fly or with whom), noone would stand for it. Its a poll tax. If I don't want to watch the BBC I still have to pay for it. It goes against everything that's fair and equitable in a reasonable society.

Horace 15-01-2010 08:39

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
We should abolish the NHS for the same reasons, I never use it so why should my taxes go to support it, if I ever need treatment I'll pay there and then. You'd think we lived in a society or something.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 08:39

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34945270)
Technically it is not theft feel free to go and visit your local police station and ask them :). I resent paying the licence fee when the bbc is barely watched all year in our house and i don't quite support the quality argument either as you can see just as much tosh on the bbc as you can the others.

Yeah but you still watch it though and you must appreciate that the BBC provides services for other people (you know those people who also live in the country but aren't in your immediate circle) that they find useful.

It's very simple, the BBC exists to provide a public service and that's paid for out of the licence fee and this protects them (mostly) from political interference. If you want to watch broadcast TV in this country you have to pay the licence fee to ensure public service TV is properly served. It's part of the social contract in this country- if you don't like it well no one is forcing you to own a TV...

Quote:

Do i think cameron will kill it off no i don't what i do think is that he will do away with automatic rises for the licence and maybe even introduce a cut in the fee but not kill it off. Why the bbc deserve the special protection they have is beyond me and being honest i have no problem with them having to compete in the commercial arena same as all the others.
Because they are a public service provider who offer services to cater all tastes regardless of if their is money to be made from that or not? That's why they are the only broadcaster to provide home grown children's entertainment and programmes for the blind and deaf. Are you saying you resent paying towards an organisation that in todays market ensures that children and disabled people have programming and are catered for?

You're really THAT selfish?


Quote:

If the audience is big enough for any subject it will be catered for as there will be sufficient revenue from it but keeping the bbc because they can cater to everyone and everything without a worry about the money side of it is not fair.
Maybe you could stop being so short sighted and stop thinking about yourself and perhaps try to see that the BBC is something that should be cherished and protected.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 09:03

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34945279)
Please don't try and use that argument Maggy because it is not the same and your well aware of that. Taxes are paid because in oneway or another we all benefit by a far greater margin then we all benefit by all paying the licence fee. Times change and things move on but the bbc isn't at anywhere near the same pace and the reason is because they have a nice cocoon called the licence to always gaurantee their revenue.

How about we charge all non sky\vm customers something so they can subsidise that for those of us that have it and yes it is the same thing. I am all for paying for what i use and what i make use of but that argument simply cannot be used in relation to the bbc. I don't want to see the end of the bbc but i do think they can manage on less money then they currently take from every household in the UK.

If you want to make Virgin and Sky have public service commitments and allow everyone to watch those programmes produced under those commitments then go ahead- that's a great idea.

---------- Post added at 09:57 ---------- Previous post was at 09:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34945284)
Why should we have to go without a TV because we don't want to watch the BBC. At the moment i have no choice other than pay a tax on the BBC or not pay the tax to the BBC and then be barred from owning or operating a TV for channels that are free of the tax. Bit unfair if you ask me.

You do have a choice, you either accept that owning a TV in this country has a social contract attached to it and that is contributing to the national cultural well being by paying a licence fee to the BBC so that everyone who owns a TV has their interests catered for regardless of if there's profit to be made from it or not or you don't own a TV.

Quote:

Bit like saying everyone must pay for a box of widgets even if you have no intention of using them.
Do those widgets add to and enrich the cultural life of this country regardless of if profit can be made from it? No? then that's a nonsense argument.

---------- Post added at 10:03 ---------- Previous post was at 09:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945305)
Are you deliberately obtuse?

For some decades now we have had the ability to restrict channels on the basis of payment. It isn't rocket science. Have BBC Free with commercials or BBC commercial free on VM, Sky, Top-up TV for the extra £12 a month extra.

If people had to pay £142 to a state-owned airline before they were allowed to fly anywhere (regardless if they fly or with whom), noone would stand for it. Its a poll tax. If I don't want to watch the BBC I still have to pay for it. It goes against everything that's fair and equitable in a reasonable society.

I bet you DO watch the BBC though. It's not unfair and inequitable to have a strong BBC that's paid for out of the licence fee, it's what allows this country to punch above it's weight in terms of its TV output, it's what ensures that all tastes and all sectors of society are catered for with their programming.

The BBC is something to be proud off and it's one of the only things left to feel proud to be British. I genuinely feel that the BBC is so much part of our way of life that if you're against the BBC, you're against something that is so fundamental to what it means to be British.

Damien 15-01-2010 09:08

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34945279)
Please don't try and use that argument Maggy because it is not the same and your well aware of that. Taxes are paid because in oneway or another we all benefit by a far greater margin then we all benefit by all paying the licence fee. Times change and things move on but the bbc isn't at anywhere near the same pace and the reason is because they have a nice cocoon called the licence to always gaurantee their revenue.

The unique position the BBC is in is why it is a cultural force in the world. From Planet Earth to the BBC World Service the Beeb has been, and continues to be, one of the most successful exports we ever had.

We are a small island with a relatively small population but outside of the United States we probably one of the most successful content producers in the world. This is a fantastic achievement and I don't understand why we as a country as so quick and eager to dismiss that.

Look at the other channels in the UK, the BBC is by far and away the best channel for British writers, directors and actors to succeed. A lot of our most successful artists started there because, free from commercial considerations, the BBC is in a position to take more risks and produce content for everyone however niche their tastes. Far better than ITV and it's obsession with reality shows and badly scripted, clichéd police dramas. You might agree that commercial success is a indicator of quality or at least of 'what people want' but I don't agree. Planet Earth is far better in terms of culture and impact than X-Factor. Yet there is not a channel in the world that would invest in something like it. Planet Earth is an example of why the BBC matters. It can decide that creating something wonderful, important, and educating is more important than commercial success.

Alternatively we could reduce our TV culture to reality shows and American Imports.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 09:11

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945316)
Have you actually watched the BBC recently? 3 minute 20sec (ITV standard) commercial breaks between programs, even ads between the news and weather. Programs deliberatly shortened so that you can be bombarded with ads for the BBC rubbish channels that nobody watches. Eastenders and strictly come dancing is reason enough to scrap the BBC. Sitcoms that only bring you situation, no comedy. The technical quality has also gone down the pan.

The ONLY quality part is the natural history unit in Bristol the rest is wall to wall rubbish. The news is SO biased I can't watch it.

So you do watch the Natural History output?

I personally don't and I really hate that stuff, but I appreciate that there are people that do like it and do watch it and I don't mind some of MY money going towards it because the BBC does provide stuff I do like to watch.

ITV costs you more per year than the BBC because the cost of making those programmes is paid for by advertising, the cost of which is passed onto the consumer in the form of higher prices to cover the cost of marketing.

Damien 15-01-2010 09:24

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945338)
So you'd have no problem with the BBC being subscription only? (My preferred option) If the BBC is so wonderful it'll have no trouble raising the cash else it should wither on the vine

There simply isn't enough people to make a HBO style thing work.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 09:26

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945338)
I've seen some of the output when it comes to commercial channels, mostly I've seen the rubbish when I visit relatives. I prefer to watch the likes of Discovery or Nat Geo.


So you like that stuff you watch that is on commercial channels that is produced by the BBC?

Those commercial channels wouldn't buy that stuff unless they were able to sell advertising space and that means they'd only buy stuff that if it's proven to be in high demand within their key demographic. They play safe within their own defined part of the market but it takes the BBC to produce it first, show it to great acclaim for them to be interested in buying it.

The BBC leads and the rest follow and you must at least give them a little acknowledgement for that. Your licence fee funding is going toward
the production of programmes you like that others don't, it's now our fault you wait until a commercial broadcaster buys up the rights to the repeats.



Quote:

So you'd have no problem with the BBC being subscription only? (My preferred option) If the BBC is so wonderful it'll have no trouble raising the cash else it should wither on the vine
Yes I do have a problem with the BBC being subscription only, as it is at the moment it HAS to cater for everybody because everybody contributes to it. Under a subscription model it'd be going for highest common denominator and it'd remove it's current tendency to take risks with programming that isn't considered to be "marketable".

The licence fee is the best way to ensure the BBC continues to take risks and continues to ensure everyone has something to watch.

punky 15-01-2010 09:29

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945325)
bet you DO watch the BBC though.

I have never said I don't.

Quote:

The BBC is something to be proud off
A poll tax is never something to be proud of.

Stuart 15-01-2010 09:30

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34945231)
the way i see it is if the beeb doesn't get license fee money they will have to advertise like the other channels efectively meaning the end of the bbc ,and there's only so much advertising revenue to go round so i would say that the beebs revenue will fall through the floor and leave them no choice but to show repeats and trashy reality shows if they survive a tall

The BBC would almost certainly survive the transition to commercials. ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 probably would not.

Why? Simple. When demand outstrips supply, prices go up. Demand for advertising space is pretty much fixed. However, the supply of advertising space has increased exponentially, thus driving prices (and therefore income for the commercial TV companies) down.

Think about it. A lot of people seem to consider the 80s and early 90s as the hey day for quality ITV drama. ITV, at the time, had an awful lot of money to spend on that quality drama. Mainly because there were only a few channels that had advertising, so the cost for each 30 second slot was astronomical. Now, we have over 300 channels, so the cost has gone through the floor. Adding the significant amount of advertising space that forcing the BBC to take advertising would would drive those prices even lower.

punky 15-01-2010 09:47

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Outstanding post Heero, will rep you when I can.

Quote:

I use the word illegitimate deliberately. The BBC license fee has zero democratic legitmacy. Having tried to ask questions about this taxation as an elected MP, I've been barred from doing so. We're forced to pay it, but no one we elect is able to oversee how it is spent.
Reminds me of the succinct slogan "No taxation without representation".

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:06

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945347)
I have never said I don't.



A poll tax is never something to be proud of.

It's not a poll tax, it's a licence to own a TV and it's goes towards funding the stuff you want to watch but I don't. I don't mind thouh because I appreciate that's what the BBC is there for and I bought a TV fully aware of that.

---------- Post added at 10:54 ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 ----------

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...love-seat.html

Quote:

The MP for Harwich said on Tuesday that the money had been well spent because his wife had recently given birth.

Mr Carswell, who has made his name as an anti-sleaze campaigner, made the claim after switching the designation of his second home to a property in his constituency, having claimed thousands of pounds for a London flat.


He initially designated the £1 million flat in south west London as his second home after being elected in 2005. He claimed more than £21,000 for a deposit, rent, food and furniture over 15 months.

The MP then began renting a £335,000 house in Thorpe Le Soken, Essex, in March 2007, and designated this as his second home. He again paid for the security deposit from his expenses.

He then used his allowances to pay for furniture, including the £655 "Maximus" love seat in deep moss brushed cotton, with extra fabric protection from sofa.com. Mr Carswell lives at the house with his wife, Clementine.

He said: "I bought the love seat and bed when moving into the home with my future wife. We have since got married and have had our first baby."

Since the couple moved in, Mr Carswell has claimed a total of £32,000 in expenses related to the house.

He also owns a property in Hertfordshire, which he rents out. Mrs Carswell sold her flat in south-west London for £500,000 last year.

The MP bills taxpayers for the entire rent of £1,250 per month and £2,280 annual council tax bills for the Essex house.

Since moving in, he has also claimed £1,605 for two sofas and £1,483 for a bed, mattress and chairs from ILVA.

He spent a further £700 for bedding and household extras at Peter Jones and The White Company.

Mr Carswell also claimed £453 for a fridge freezer, £400 for a washing machine, £99 for a garden strimmer and bin, and £377 for a radio, telephone, vacuum cleaner, iron and television.

In November 2007, he claimed £429 for four days' worth of gardening.

He also claimed for a range of items bought at Tesco, including a 74p washing line.

Mr Carswell rose to prominence in April last year when he became the first MP to publicly call for Mr Martin to resign over his decision to instigate a legal challenge to keep the details of MPs' expenses secret.

He criticised the Speaker for his handling of the row over MPs' expenses and for his failure to restore the integrity of Parliament. "Never has there been such bitter contempt for politicians or the standing of MPs been so low," he wrote at the time.

"We need to clean up Westminster politics and take action to restore faith in our political system." Mr Carswell, who worked as an adviser to David Cameron in the run-up to the 2005 election, last month tabled a no-confidence motion against Mr Martin.

Although the motion was not debated, it was widely credited with having helped prompt the Speaker's decision to resign later this month.

Last night Mr Carswell told The Daily Telegraph: "I have never used public money to pay a private mortgage. I have instead rented.

"It is true that I bought an armchair, sofa and some bedding, as well as a few other modest items of crockery and furniture. I believe this is entirely justified."

"Before making every claim, I have asked myself not only 'is it within the rules', but 'can I justify this to my local constituents'. In every instance I believe I can," he said.

SNAPSHOT
Douglas Carswell
Job: backbench Conservative MP for Harwich
Salary: £64,766
Total second home claims
2004-05: N/A
2005-06: £10,869
2006-07: £18,953
2007-08: £23,083
If Douglas Carswell was so concerned about the nation being ripped off maybe he should pay back that money he stole directly off the taxpayer without even contributing to our nations cultural wellbeing?

---------- Post added at 11:06 ---------- Previous post was at 10:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945358)
Oh contrau mon ami



Source

Even though ITV are cutting investment in programming commercial broadcasters still cost you more than the BBC. Advertising has to be paid for and has to cover the cost of making those shows and has to make a profit for the companies involved. Advertising costs form part of a marketing budget, marketing budgets are costed into the final cost of the products in the shops.

Quote:

The BBC poll tax raises about £3.6 billion (Source) plus this
Oh yes, every right wing shrill propaganda extremists wet dream the Daily Mail bleats on about the BBC because the Daily Mail wants to charge you to view news on the internet and is so running a smear campaign against it's biggest rival.

The Daily Mail and General trust avoided paying its fair share if tax last year by exploiting legal loopholes in the taxation legislation in a similar fashion to TESCO and their owner Lord Rothermere is a non-dom registered in France and avoids paying a bucket load of tax.

Obviously if they were that concerned about the nations finances they fix that and if Cameron was that serious about making Britain fairer he'd announce a crack down on these schemes.

But then it's easier to attack the BBC and keep the support of ones friends isn't it?


Quote:

And this from an MP:



Source
I've already addressed this. He should really do something about his expenses no? Surely he isn't trying to deflect attention away from his pilfering?


Quote:

Bring it on!
Eat that!

Damien 15-01-2010 10:06

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

I use the word illegitimate deliberately. The BBC license fee has zero democratic legitmacy. Having tried to ask questions about this taxation as an elected MP, I've been barred from doing so. We're forced to pay it, but no one we elect is able to oversee how it is spent.
The BBC is independent of government with good reason. It's a rather cheap shot because if MPs did have a say in how the BBC was governed the tact that would have been taken on here would be to question it's independence and compare it to governments which own TV stations and use it for self-promotion/censorship.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:11

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945385)
If that TV was rigged to ONLY watch the BBC then I'd agree but its not thus it IS a poll tax.

It ISN'T a poll tax, you can still vote if you don't pay it.



Quote:

So easy to shoot the messenger. :rolleyes:
Just as it's easy to avoid the fact that you use BBC services and refuse to pay for them, that MP's have their own agenda's and that you're being manipulated by people with a commercial interest in seeing the BBC dismantled. Obviously it's also easier to be told what to think.

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 10:14

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945388)
It ISN'T a poll tax, you can still vote if you don't pay it.





Just as it's easy to avoid the fact that you use BBC services and refuse to pay for them, that MP's have their own agenda's and that you're being manipulated by people with a commercial interest in seeing the BBC dismantled. Obviously it's also easier to be told what to think.

Such as being told to think I'm selfish if I don't agree with your viewpoint you mean?

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 10:15

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Would you pay a licence fee to the Sun newspaper in order to be able to read all the other newspapers?

Would you pay a licence fee for owning a toaster, with all fees going to Mr Warburton?

In the eyes of the BBC, people who don't have a TV are classed as liars and criminals. They will harass and bully the innocent.

Like some have already mentioned, the BBC should give the public a fair choice and go subscription only. But they won't do that, because they know they would go bust!

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:18

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas T (Post 34945390)
Such as being told to think I'm selfish if I don't agree with your viewpoint you mean?

I'm engaging in a debate but when all I see are rehashed arguments originally peddled by the BBC's commercial rivals what am I to assume is happening?

danielf 15-01-2010 10:20

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945391)
Like some have already mentioned, the BBC should give the public a fair choice and go subscription only. But they won't do that, because they know they would go bust!

Where's the fair choice in commercial TV? Every time I go to the shops I pay for the marketing spend that finances the dross put out by the commercial channels. Even if I don't own a tv...

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 10:22

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945394)
I'm engaging in a debate but when all I see are rehashed arguments originally peddled by the BBC's commercial rivals what am I to assume is happening?

You assume what you want I don't really care. Assuming that everyone who doesn't agree with you is selfish just shows your ignorance. If you tried debating or discussing and actually finding out peoples opinions instead of assuming you already know them you may get further.

Still that's just my 2p and all.

I'm one of those people who doesn't mind paying the licence - but then I don't pay as much as most people so maybe that's why.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:23

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945391)
Would you pay a licence fee to the Sun newspaper in order to be able to read all the other newspapers?

If the Sun was delivered free of charge and was legally bound to as impartial as it could be and was made to provide news on all areas of interests to everyone who read it, you'd have a point.

Quote:

Would you pay a licence fee for owning a toaster, with all fees going to Mr Warburton?
The market is pretty good at providing the nation with it's mass and niche bread requirements so I'm not sure what your point is here.

Quote:

In the eyes of the BBC, people who don't have a TV are classed as liars and criminals. They will harass and bully the innocent.
No in the eyes of the Licensing Authority people who don't own a TV don't have to pay.

Quote:

Like some have already mentioned, the BBC should give the public a fair choice and go subscription only. But they won't do that, because they know they would go bust!
I don't think a subscription model would work and would allow the BBC to maintain it's diverse output.

Damien 15-01-2010 10:25

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945395)
You're SO wrong, I only watch those BBC produced programmes on a commercial channel that the BBC gets the advertising revenue for, thus I am paying for what I WANT to watch rather than being forced to pay for the rest of the trash output..

Which shows? Bear in mind the BBC's position means they can produce more documentaries and education shows than a commercial channel could.

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:27

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas T (Post 34945399)
You assume what you want I don't really care. Assuming that everyone who doesn't agree with you is selfish just shows your ignorance. If you tried debating or discussing and actually finding out peoples opinions instead of assuming you already know them you may get further.

Still that's just my 2p and all.

I'm one of those people who doesn't mind paying the licence - but then I don't pay as much as most people so maybe that's why.

Well to be fair you've responded to a post that was a response to a post that was addressing someone else who'd used the Daily Mail as a central plank in support of his/her argument.

But yeah I guess its a fair cop to point out that suggesting that its selfish not to want to contribute to the BBC unless it only produces what they want is telling people what to think.

downquark1 15-01-2010 10:31

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Broadcast television is an antiquated medium. The only things I watch are on the bbc iplayer. If they abolish the license fee just turn iplayer into a subscription service and I will be happy.

To people who watch ITV, 4 and 5. What the hell are you watching? [cultural snobbery]

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 10:36

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArronC07 (Post 34945407)
Well to be fair you've responded to a post that was a response to a post that was addressing someone else who'd used the Daily Mail as a central plank in support of his/her argument.

But yeah I guess its a fair cop to point out that suggesting that its selfish not to want to contribute to the BBC unless it only produces what they want is telling people what to think.

If you are going to try and misquote me you could at least get it right.

you said 'Obviously it's also easier to be told what to think.'

THAT is the only part of what you've posted i've quoted. Nothing more and nothing less.

I've also suggested you may want to find out what people think before you you accuse them of being selfish.

I did not point out 'suggesting that its selfish not to want to contribute to the BBC unless it only produces what they want is telling people what to think.'


Anyway I'll leave you to it.

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 10:37

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
The simple point is, I want to be able to buy a TV without having to fork out extra money every year just to be able to use it, a TV does have other uses ya'know.

If you and others are so confident that the BBC are this all singing all dancing entertainment package and that the British public will be worse off without it, then you would have no problem with it going subscription only.

You want it, you pay for it.

I don't want it, but I still have to pay for it. Is that fair?

ArronC07 15-01-2010 10:39

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945395)
You're SO wrong, I only watch those BBC produced programmes on a commercial channel that the BBC gets the advertising revenue for, thus I am paying for what I WANT to watch rather than being forced to pay for the rest of the trash output.

So it's basically that you only want the BBC to produce stuff you want to watch and everyone else can get lost?

The BBC has produced those programmes and they've become popular, they are then sold onto commercial broadcasters. The demand was created by the BBC in the first place as they produced these programmes, showed them and they were popular. Left to the commercial broadcasters you wouldn't get those shows produced, you'd get ITV.

You're also paying and asking people who don't own a TV to pay for programmes you don't watch through the extra cost that's added to the cost of items you buy in the shops, is that fair?



Quote:

If the liberated BBC poll tax cash goes to the commercial channels in the form of advertising revenue or subscriptions I'll be ecstatic.
You can still vote if you don't pay your licence fee and if what you say came to pass the commercial broadcasters would have nothing to compete with in terms of raising the quality bar and you'd get wall to wall lowest common dominator TV that panders to the greatest number of people.

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 10:39

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945418)
The simple point is, I want to be able to buy a TV without having to fork out extra money every year just to be able to use it, a TV does have other uses ya'know.

If you and others are so confident that the BBC are this all singing all dancing entertainment package and that the British public will be worse off without it, then you would have no problem with it going subscription only.

You want it, you pay for it.

I don't want it, but I still have to pay for it. Is that fair?

You do NOT have to have a licence to OWN a TV.

edit - http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ15/

LondonRoad 15-01-2010 10:59

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945421)
In fact it is not an offence to own a TV without a licence, or to use said TV to watch tapes or DVDs. The actual offence is to watch/record broadcast TV as it is transmitted.


That's interesting. I've always thought it was an offence if you had equipment capable of receiving a transmission.

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 11:01

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas T (Post 34945420)
You do NOT have to have a licence to OWN a TV.

edit - http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ15/

But what if I just want to watch the channels I subscribe to and the standard commercial channels? I don't have a choice do I, I must pay or else.

All I want is that choice, why can't I have it?

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 11:18

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945430)
But what if I just want to watch the channels I subscribe to and the standard commercial channels? I don't have a choice do I, I must pay or else.

All I want is that choice, why can't I have it?

That is different to what you said before. I Was just pointing out a solution to your orginal statement.


You said 'The simple point is, I want to be able to buy a TV without having to fork out extra money every year just to be able to use it, a TV does have other uses ya'know.'

And you don't have to fork out extra money to use it and as you pointed out it does indeed have other uses.

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 12:08

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas T (Post 34945440)
That is different to what you said before. I Was just pointing out a solution to your orginal statement.

I know, sorry Thomas. It was just another question I needed to ask. :)

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 12:09

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945461)
I know, sorry Thomas. It was just another question I needed to ask. :)

Fair enough :)

Hugh 15-01-2010 12:16

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
It was pointed out earlier by a poster that the BBC news was biased.

I find it amusing that left-wingers think the BBC news is too right-wing, and right-wingers think the BBC news is too left-wing - bit of dissonance there, don't you think?

Angua 15-01-2010 12:22

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945316)
Have you actually watched the BBC recently? 3 minute 20sec (ITV standard) commercial breaks between programs, even ads between the news and weather. Programs deliberatly shortened so that you can be bombarded with ads for the BBC rubbish channels that nobody watches. Eastenders and strictly come dancing is reason enough to scrap the BBC. Sitcoms that only bring you situation, no comedy. The technical quality has also gone down the pan.

The ONLY quality part is the natural history unit in Bristol the rest is wall to wall rubbish. The news is SO biased I can't watch it.



:clap:

Watch a lot of BBC stuff and whilst there may be self promoting adverts between shows (great tea making time) they are not interrupted every 5 minutes for an ad break :dozey:

RizzyKing 15-01-2010 12:28

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
I amy be selfish but as someone that watches no bbc content and my wife watches eastenders only yes i resent paying a chrage of £142 a year. So do millions of others and we never get a say on it no choice in this at al. We get told each year how much extra we have to pay and only recently have the bbc even condescended enough to tell us how some of it is spent.

Also for those constantly telling me about how the bbc makes things no one else does or would can you tell me one type of show on the bbc i cannot watch on another channel that isn't bbc. fact is there is nothing unique about the content on the bbc and what there is on there you can find on other channels.

How about they cut back the number of radio stations and tv channels they have and manage with less because thats what the rest of us are going to have to do for some years to come but not the bbc oh no they have a protected no choice income.

My cousin recently had to choose between taxing his van for work or paying his licence fee as he is a builder and has not had a lot of work for a while and he is now getting the sort of threatening letters you would normally associate with loansharks.

It isn't democratic (something that is of upmost importance to some on here in other threads when it suits them) it isn't fair and while some of you may feel it provides value for money a hell of a lot of other people do not share that view and surely should have an alternative.

Hugh 15-01-2010 12:45

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Because it is part of being a society.

I have Private Health, why am I paying taxes towards the NHS (I don't object, btw).

Why do those people who send their kids to Private Schools still have to pay a portion of their taxes to pay for state schools.

Why do all of those of us who didn't go to University have to pay a portion of our taxes to support Universities (the fees don't cover much of the costs).

Why does a portion of my taxes go towards unemployment benefit, when in the last 35 years I have probably claimed about £1000 pounds in dole money.

I thought it was because, as a society, we try and contribute to do what's best for most, rather than what's best for some.

Angua 15-01-2010 12:46

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
The problem is the seemingly inextricable link between the licence fee and the BBC. If the BBC were funded solely through tax and it's own earnings would there still be the same argument. Then they would have the problem of having to keep sweet whoever is in government. Chances are you would still need to have a licence to receive broadcast TV, BBC or no BBC.

I have to pay car tax to drive on the public highway. Judging by the amount of potholes and the state of the roads in general the money is not well spent. At least the TV licensing allow breathing space for late/non payment. You would not get the same leniency from DVLA.

Anonymouse 15-01-2010 13:07

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LondonRoad (Post 34945428)
That's interesting. I've always thought it was an offence if you had equipment capable of receiving a transmission.

According to TVL, it is.

(Has anyone noticed they've dropped the 'Authority' bit? So they bloody well should, too - they are NOT an authority and never have been, and had no right to call themselves such)

They're at it again with me. They have opened an official investigation (yes, the statement was in red!). I'm soooo scared - especially as it isn't me they're after...they're addressing The Legal Occupier. Can't they be bothered to find out who's living there, or do they -quite rightly - have no legal authority to find out?). :rolleyes:

I still don't have a TV. I don't have a VCR or DVD recorder. All I have is a portable DVD player. They've opened their official investigation because I haven't contacted them - forgetting that I am under no legal obligation to do so. I'd be quite happy if they got a warrant or whatever and sent the police around - I will then sue for wrongful arrest, and the cops can bloody well send them the bill. I fully intend to allow them to waste their time and money, because I do not intend to cooperate with them in any way whatsoever.

I hate bullies. I sorted one out once by cracking him a good 'un. He never came near me again. I wish I could do the same with these morons, or that Her Majesty's Government would kick 'em into touch.

Actually, I do have plans to get a TV, and subscribe to Sky - but there's something slightly more important I need to do first, viz. get a job. TV is very low on my list of priorities.

Chris 15-01-2010 13:27

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 34945495)
According to TVL, it is.

Their wording is deliberately ambiguous, however you only need a licence to use receiving equipment for the purpose of receiving. You don't need a licence to use a TV as a monitor for your DVD player, even if the TV is capable of receiving broadcasts. You don't need a licence to use a VCR to watch your old video collection, even if the VCR is capable of receiving broadcasts. And you don't need a licence to use a computer, just because a website exists where you could, if you wanted to, go and watch broadcast TV.

The moment you use any of the above equipment, whilst attached to mains electricity, to watch broadcast TV, then you need to hold a valid TV licence in order for your activity to be legal. But not a moment before.

Quote:

(Has anyone noticed they've dropped the 'Authority' bit? So they bloody well should, too - they are NOT an authority and never have been, and had no right to call themselves such)
Well, yes and no. The BBC is a public authority with respect to its licencing functions. It delegates some of those functions to various other organisations. It may not be strictly correct for TVL itself to claim it is an authority, but it is acting on the direct instructions of, and on behalf of, a legal Authority, so the point is purely technical.

Chris 15-01-2010 13:34

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Yes, if you look hard enough, you can find a clear statement of the law with regards to when you do not need a licence - but notice how they link it with the following sentence, which suggests you should fill in a declaration form and submit to a visit by an enforcement officer.

You are not under any obligation to declare anything. You are not under any obligation to submit to any inspection, unless the officer has a warrant. However, presenting the information in the way they do allows people to form the impression that these obligations do exist.

Chris 15-01-2010 13:45

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
The paper licence itself always used to specify internal batteries - I may dig mine out later and double check that.

dilli-theclaw 15-01-2010 13:54

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945516)
The paper licence itself always used to specify internal batteries - I may dig mine out later and double check that.

I seem to recall that - it mentions being able to use your tv in a caravan if you're not also using at home at the samet time. But I can't see anything about internal batteries.

Mind you I can't read the bugger properly ;)

edit - no I found it....

'Use of TV equipment powered by internal batteries anywhere'
'by you and anyone who normally lives with you at the licensed place'

well that's what it says on my license :)

Maggy 15-01-2010 14:28

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34945480)
Because it is part of being a society.

I have Private Health, why am I paying taxes towards the NHS (I don't object, btw).

Why do those people who send their kids to Private Schools still have to pay a portion of their taxes to pay for state schools.

Why do all of those of us who didn't go to University have to pay a portion of our taxes to support Universities (the fees don't cover much of the costs).

Why does a portion of my taxes go towards unemployment benefit, when in the last 35 years I have probably claimed about £1000 pounds in dole money.

I thought it was because, as a society, we try and contribute to do what's best for most, rather than what's best for some.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Hiroki 15-01-2010 14:52

Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2010)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945164)
I think you're going to be disappointed Hiroki - remember, Rupert was a pretty big fan of NuLiebour back in the late 1990s, yet Tony Bliar failed to destroy the BBC after he won the election. And the biggest Beeb-hater in the Commons is on the Liebour benches - one Gerald Kaufmann MP.

Ah your right, damn.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34945165)
Why?What is so bad about BBC programmes that you hate so much.

Their News?

Their nature programmes?

Their historical dramas and docudramsa.

Are you honestly saying that they have never produced anything that you like.

do you hate Monty Python?

I HATE MONTY PYTHON :mad:

People can have their own opinions and I respect that and I know some people really enjoy the BBC but for me I want it abolished and quickly.

Last thing that I enjoyed on the BBC was Bottom and that was years ago and now I just think they are a drain on my recourses and I cringe every time someone flicks onto their channels it makes my skin crawl.

It's an outdated and it need to be abolished starting with the news as I despise that the most.

punky 15-01-2010 15:06

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34945480)
Because it is part of being a society.

I have Private Health, why am I paying taxes towards the NHS (I don't object, btw).

Why do those people who send their kids to Private Schools still have to pay a portion of their taxes to pay for state schools.

Why do all of those of us who didn't go to University have to pay a portion of our taxes to support Universities (the fees don't cover much of the costs).

Why does a portion of my taxes go towards unemployment benefit, when in the last 35 years I have probably claimed about £1000 pounds in dole money.

I thought it was because, as a society, we try and contribute to do what's best for most, rather than what's best for some.

You really can't compare a TV channel with socialised medicine, education and benefits.

I'm rather surprised you actually tried :erm:

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 15:07

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34945480)
Because it is part of being a society.

I have Private Health, why am I paying taxes towards the NHS (I don't object, btw).

Why do those people who send their kids to Private Schools still have to pay a portion of their taxes to pay for state schools.

Why do all of those of us who didn't go to University have to pay a portion of our taxes to support Universities (the fees don't cover much of the costs).

Why does a portion of my taxes go towards unemployment benefit, when in the last 35 years I have probably claimed about £1000 pounds in dole money.

I thought it was because, as a society, we try and contribute to do what's best for most, rather than what's best for some.

These all seem to be necessities that society would find it hard to cope with if they disappeared. I don't think anybody would find it hard to cope if the TV licence were to be abolished or at least be PPV.

Hugh 15-01-2010 15:09

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Can I ask why you despise the news, Hiroki?

---------- Post added at 16:09 ---------- Previous post was at 16:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945563)
You really can't compare a TV channel with socialised medicine, education and benefits.

I'm rather surprised you actually tried :erm:

They weren't comparisons, they were examples of where we, as a society, contribute to benefit others, even if we don't directly benefit ourselves.

I personally think the BBC educates and informs, mostly without bias, and so is worth keeping - ymmv.:)

Chris 15-01-2010 15:10

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945563)
You really can't compare a TV channel with socialised medicine, education and benefits.

I'm rather surprised you actually tried :erm:

Why can't you?

The BBC isn't 'a TV channel' by the way - a fact I'm sure you're well aware of. But if you genuinely don't understand the full reach and significance of the BBC's operations in the UK and worldwide, just say the word, I'm sure I or one or two others on here could lay it out for you. ;)

Flyboy 15-01-2010 15:35

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945305)
Are you deliberately obtuse?

There is no need to be rude.

Quote:

For some decades now we have had the ability to restrict channels on the basis of payment. It isn't rocket science. Have BBC Free with commercials or BBC commercial free on VM, Sky, Top-up TV for the extra £12 a month extra.
And what happens to transmissions when the adverts are on? Do they show a blank screen for five minutes, every quarter of an hour?

It wouldn't be sustainable anyway. If say twenty per cent didn't want to pay the licence fee wanted the BBC to show commercials, no company in their right mind would want to pay loads of money to access only twenty per cent of the audience.

Quote:

If people had to pay £142 to a state-owned airline before they were allowed to fly anywhere (regardless if they fly or with whom), noone would stand for it. Its a poll tax. If I don't want to watch the BBC I still have to pay for it. It goes against everything that's fair and equitable in a reasonable society.
I would love to have a state owned airline that costs me only one hundred and forty two pounds a year, if it meant I could fly anywhere I wanted, without having to pay anything more. I am pretty sure everyone in the country would be cock-a-hoop with a plan like that.

---------- Post added at 16:35 ---------- Previous post was at 16:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 34945358)


And this from an MP:



Source


Carswell is hardly a good source for advice on the funding of the BBC. His collaboration with Hannan on the NHS plan is testament to his bias.

Hiroki 15-01-2010 15:54

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34945565)
Can I ask why you despise the news, Hiroki?

I don't depise the news, just BBC news and I can give many reasons but it's mainly because they can't seem to have an impartial view when it comes to the problems in the middle east and they tend to swing one way more than the other. So I stick to other news outlets.

punky 15-01-2010 15:54

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34945565)
They weren't comparisons, they were examples of where we, as a society, contribute to benefit others, even if we don't directly benefit ourselves.

I personally think the BBC educates and informs, mostly without bias, and so is worth keeping - ymmv.:)

I think you are splitting hairs there if you believe there's a difference so be it.

And whilst you think the BBC educates (as do other channels) there is a wide gulf between a couple of documentaries and a full country-wide school system.

Things like police, fire and schools need to be funded any way possible. TV radio and websites? No. Certainly not justifing a poll tax.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945569)
Why can't you?

The BBC isn't 'a TV channel' by the way - a fact I'm sure you're well aware of. But if you genuinely don't understand the full reach and significance of the BBC's operations in the UK and worldwide, just say the word, I'm sure I or one or two others on here could lay it out for you. ;)

See above. I said TV channel for brevity's sake and as its the most visible and costly arm of the BBC. I don't think any part of the BBC justifies a pool tax.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34945582)
There is no need to be rude.

Trust me, I wasn't being rude. Certainly no more than you was being sarcastic.

Quote:

And what happens to transmissions when the adverts are on? Do they show a blank screen for five minutes, every quarter of an hour?
It is a simple matter of running two schedules. They will run out of alignment but who really would care? I they do want to re-align the schedules periodically they can just ommit the less commercially-viable filler stuff. And yes, even the BBC has that. Come on, its the 21st century, these things aren't that difficult.

Sure with analogue this was more difficult but with the digital age, there is no excuse.

Quote:

It wouldn't be sustainable anyway. If say twenty per cent didn't want to pay the licence fee wanted the BBC to show commercials, no company in their right mind would want to pay loads of money to access only twenty per cent of the audience.
20% of the TV market is very sizeable. And besides, if the BBC was value-for-money then everyone would pay £142/year


Quote:

I would love to have a state owned airline that costs me only one hundred and forty two pounds a year, if it meant I could fly anywhere I wanted, without having to pay anything more. I am pretty sure everyone in the country would be cock-a-hoop with a plan like that.
Very clever that you've taken my analogy out of context. OK, what if you don't want to fly?

That's the trouble here. The only attitude I seem to see from BBC supporters is that "I like the BBC so everyone else has to pay for it."

Flyboy 15-01-2010 15:59

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34945430)
But what if I just want to watch the channels I subscribe to and the standard commercial channels? I don't have a choice do I, I must pay or else.

All I want is that choice, why can't I have it?

Because I pay about fifty pounds a month for subscription television, that's about six hundred pounds a year. Paying just one hundred and forty-two pounds a year for television that is not commercial, or subscription, is pretty good value for money.

Sirius 15-01-2010 16:06

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34945613)
Because I pay about fifty pounds a month for subscription television, that's about six hundred pounds a year. Paying just one hundred and forty-two pounds a year for television that is not commercial, or subscription, is pretty good value for money.

Simple Why should i have to pay for something that if i had the choice i would not. I chose to watch the commercial channels and the subscription channels.

I would prefer not to have to pay for something that if i had the choice would then not watch. The BBC is no matter how people dress it up a tax on people who own a tv.
Quote:

Paying just one hundred and forty-two pounds a year for television that is not commercial, or subscription, is pretty good value for money.
But if you don't watch it WHY should you have to pay for it, Where is this right to choice that everyone says we should be proud of.

Damien 15-01-2010 16:15

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
You also fund museums and other cultural bodies with your taxes...

Chris 15-01-2010 16:21

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945612)
That's the trouble here. The only attitude I seem to see from BBC supporters is that "I like the BBC so everyone else has to pay for it."

A pity, because that's not what is being offered in support of the BBC here. Not by me, at any rate, and not by several of the other contributors.

I, for one, am not claiming everyone should pay for the BBC because I like it. There's plenty I don't like on the BBC, and there's output I can't even access - HD, for example - but I'm happy to see my licence fee funding it because I like the principle that underpins the way the BBC is funded and operated.

Sirius 15-01-2010 16:24

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 34945621)
You also fund museums and other cultural bodies with your taxes...

My question was why should i have to pay for something by law that if i don't use it i still have to pay for , however if i don't pay for that service it prevents me from using other rivals of that service who provide a similar service. ?

---------- Post added at 17:24 ---------- Previous post was at 17:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34945630)

I, for one, am not claiming everyone should pay for the BBC because I like it. There's plenty I don't like on the BBC, and there's output I can't even access - HD, for example - but I'm happy to see my licence fee funding it because I like the principle that underpins the way the BBC is funded and operated.

Then should those that choice not to watch or fund it be prevented from watching the BBC's competitors ??

Chris 15-01-2010 16:27

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34945615)
But if you don't watch it WHY should you have to pay for it, Where is this right to choice that everyone says we should be proud of.

Further to Damien's post, here's a list of museums your taxes pay to make free for everyone to visit:

http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache...uk&hl=en&gl=uk

You may or may not even be interested in museums, but even if you are, I expect that in your lifetime you won't visit most of these.

---------- Post added at 17:27 ---------- Previous post was at 17:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34945631)
Then should those that choice not to watch or fund it be prevented from watching the BBC's competitors ??

Yes. Because the chosen funding model is a licence on the operation of TV receivers. And that's a good thing, because simply not watching BBC output does not mean that you're not benefiting from the work of the BBC.

Flyboy 15-01-2010 16:38

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 34945612)

Trust me, I wasn't being rude. Certainly no more than you was being sarcastic.

Trust me, you were being rude, calling someone "obtuse" is rude. My remarks were to show the folly of your theory. Sarcasm, is not the same as being rude.

Quote:

It is a simple matter of running two schedules. They will run out of alignment but who really would care? I they do want to re-align the schedules periodically they can just ommit the less commercially-viable filler stuff. And yes, even the BBC has that. Come on, its the 21st century, these things aren't that difficult.
It is not "a simple matter of running two schedules," What would be the point? Given the choice, who would want to watch a second tier television channel?

Quote:

20% of the TV market is very sizeable. And besides, if the BBC was value-for-money then everyone would pay £142/year
Twenty per cent is not a very sizable portion of the market. The fact that it is only twenty-per cent, suggests that it is not sizable at all. No commercial business would bother investing serious money into a campaign where they have access to only one fifth of their target.


Quote:

Very clever that you've taken my analogy out of context. OK, what if you don't want to fly?
It is not out of context at all. In fact it was a very accurate perspective view of how such an enterprise would be compared to the BBC.

Jimmy-J 15-01-2010 16:40

Re: Will the Tories do Murdoch's bidding and kill off the BBC?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34945613)
Because I pay about fifty pounds a month for subscription television, that's about six hundred pounds a year. Paying just one hundred and forty-two pounds a year for television that is not commercial, or subscription, is pretty good value for money.

But I have a choice to subscribe to the channels I want to watch, SKY Sports etc... I don't want to to watch any BBC channels on my TV, I still have ample news and entertainment without them.

So where is my freedom of choice? I don't have one do I?


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum