Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33658523)

Reedy 27-11-2009 01:09

Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Apparently the tallies almost 400 children and expected to rise significantly as the investigation continues! Sadly not all will face justice.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20091126/...u-3fd0ae9.html

Quote:

The four archbishops, obsessed with secrecy and avoiding scandal, protected abusers and reputations at all costs.

The four - John Charles McQuaid who died in 1973, Dermot Ryan who died in 1984, Kevin McNamara who died in 1987, and retired Cardinal Desmond Connell - did not hand over information on abusers.

Even when Cardinal Connell gave 17 names to officers in 1995, the Commission later found there were 28 priests with allegations against them at that time.
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/6...bishopscov.jpg

Nidge 27-11-2009 04:49

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
It's been going on for years, the Catholic faith is well known for assaults on children including sexual assaults.

Maggy 27-11-2009 09:26

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nidge (Post 34916375)
It's been going on for years, the Catholic faith is well known for assaults on children including sexual assaults.

Hang on I think you are accusing every member of the catholic church there.I'm sure you didn't mean to.

After all it was a few Catholic priests who were responsible of this disgusting behaviour and the hierarchy of the Irish catholic community(and possibly )the Vatican who protected them who deserve to be vilified, not the ordinary people of the Catholic faith.

Peter_ 27-11-2009 09:35

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
It is no surprise that the Catholic church once again covered up abuse by the clergy and just moved them into another parish where they were able to carry on with their abuse on fresh victims.

This kind of thing has to all intents and purposes has been condoned by the Vatican by the simple fact that nothing was ever done to prevent this happening.

LondonRoad 27-11-2009 09:43

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Those who protect the paedophiles are every bit as guilty of any further abuse as the abusers themselves. :mad:

Maggy 27-11-2009 09:50

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34916414)
It is no surprise that the Catholic church once again covered up abuse by the clergy and just moved them into another parish where they were able to carry on with their abuse on fresh victims.

This kind of thing has to all intents and purposes has been condoned by the Vatican by the simple fact that nothing was ever done to prevent this happening.

In fact they ignored the inquiry.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/8382010.stm

Quote:

The inquiry into sex abuse by Catholic priests in Ireland has disclosed that the Vatican ignored formal requests for information.
The inquiry asked for details of reports on abuse sent to the Vatican by the Dublin archdiocese in 2006.
The Vatican did not reply but told the Irish Foreign Affairs department the request "had not gone through appropriate diplomatic channels".

Peter_ 27-11-2009 09:53

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
No surprise that it was ignored because they always bury their heads in the sand when abuse issues come to light.

Reedy 27-11-2009 12:22

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
I wonder how many of the Catholic clergy are paedophiles? They're in the news weekly with new reported cases, I'm guessing it had little to do with God and they were using it as a front to gain access to children knowing they have the protection of the church and pretty much immune to justice. A disgusting abuse of power and trust!

All involved in the cover-ups and should face justice as an accessory rather than just handing out hundreds of millions of pounds in compensation, which incidentally was probably donated by the church members, so in a sick sense they're really funding it.:shocked:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...e-victims.html

zing_deleted 27-11-2009 12:28

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Time the Vow of Chastity was ebolished after it was never placed because of the bible anyway but to stop preists breeding and passing on the wealth. Also the fact that married ex CoE preists are allowed to have families etc has to take the pee somewhat.

Peter_ 27-11-2009 12:37

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zing (Post 34916501)
Time the Vow of Chastity was ebolished after it was never placed because of the bible anyway but to stop preists breeding and passing on the wealth. Also the fact that married ex CoE preists are allowed to have families etc has to take the pee somewhat.

In some places the priest was there to help if the husband was to put it mildly a bit jaffa and then some of the younger parishioners tended to have a look of the local priest.:D

Still probably happening now with many priests becoming secret fathers.

nomadking 27-11-2009 13:37

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zing (Post 34916501)
Time the Vow of Chastity was ebolished after it was never placed because of the bible anyway but to stop preists breeding and passing on the wealth. Also the fact that married ex CoE preists are allowed to have families etc has to take the pee somewhat.

They know about the Vow of Chastity long before they enter the priesthood. I'm not sure how an inability to have relationships with, or a lack of desire for women translates into sexual attacks on young boys.

At the very least, they should not be allowed to have relationships with parishioners, as it is a similar situation to a Doctor-Patient relationship, they know their secrets and vulnerabilities.

SMG 27-11-2009 14:22

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Again its a case of a few rotten apples contaminating the rest. Every "Straight" priest has to live down these abusers.:td:

papa smurf 27-11-2009 18:15

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reedy (Post 34916496)
I wonder how many of the Catholic clergy are paedophiles? They're in the news weekly with new reported cases, I'm guessing it had little to do with God and they were using it as a front to gain access to children knowing they have the protection of the church and pretty much immune to justice. A disgusting abuse of power and trust!

All involved in the cover-ups and should face justice as an accessory rather than just handing out hundreds of millions of pounds in compensation, which incidentally was probably donated by the church members, so in a sick sense they're really funding it.:shocked:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...e-victims.html

i have oft wondered myself about this ie is this church an easy place for pedophile rings to exist given that pedophilia is covered up at all levels just to save face .

RizzyKing 27-11-2009 19:37

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Well whatever the truth is there seems to be a problem within the catholic church in identifying these people and when identified dealing with them properly. While this is about ireland lets not forget this is not the first instance of this it has happened in the US and other places. I have no views on the vow of chasity and given anyone who enters into the priesthood knows about it i don't think it is fair to use that as a reason why some go into abusing young children. What needs to happen is for the catholic church to come completely clean about all this admit any wrongs, put right whatever is failing on their end and start again. Whatever they do no innocent child should have to suffer at the hands of someone who is looked upto and trusted with their deepest secrets as priests are.

Mr Angry 28-11-2009 00:58

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34916662)
i have oft wondered myself about this ie is this church an easy place for pedophile rings to exist given that pedophilia is covered up at all levels just to save face .

It used to be, but recently God's rotweiller decided he was ashamed of the past behaviour of certain priests (who had been caught) and he was determined to make things a bit more difficult for kiddie fiddlers to either join his gang or for exsting deviants to perpetrate their acts.

He was, of course, talking Barlocks.

If a nation can be repulsed at the shortcomings of Harringay Council in their complicity / ineptitude in the abuse and murder of "baby P" to the extent that their chief executive can be summarily sacked then how come nobody is calling for the Pope to be sacked?

Reedy 28-11-2009 01:54

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
I say anyone who intentionally protects a known paedophile to avoid justice is as guilty as the paedophile themselves. If a link can be proven, then yes there should be justice, no matter how high up it goes. Being a member of any organisation should not mean you're immune from the law of the land.

Damien 28-11-2009 11:27

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMG (Post 34916550)
Again its a case of a few rotten apples contaminating the rest. Every "Straight" priest has to live down these abusers.:td:

I agree. Although straight might not be the best word since gay people would fail that test ;)

nomadking 28-11-2009 13:38

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Angry (Post 34917001)
It used to be, but recently God's rotweiller decided he was ashamed of the past behaviour of certain priests (who had been caught) and he was determined to make things a bit more difficult for kiddie fiddlers to either join his gang or for exsting deviants to perpetrate their acts.

He was, of course, talking Barlocks.

If a nation can be repulsed at the shortcomings of Harringay Council in their complicity / ineptitude in the abuse and murder of "baby P" to the extent that their chief executive can be summarily sacked then how come nobody is calling for the Pope to be sacked?

Or God, as he seems to be ok with them being his agents.

Reedy 29-11-2009 01:15

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
If they've already had to pay out 'Hundreds of millions' in compensation for sex abuse, How do they fund if all, or how will they fund it all! Somethings got to give. Why does the news only mention compensation, why aren't the implicated facing justice like other paedophiles?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091126...s-f858358.html

Quote:

Counsellors are bracing themselves for an onslaught of crisis calls after the latest horrific revelations of a Catholic Church cover-up of clerical sex abuse.

Some of the country's leading victim support services, which saw as much as a 300% surge in calls after the Ryan Report in May, said they were preparing for a similar reaction to the Dublin Archdiocese inquiry.

Nidge 29-11-2009 08:49

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Lock them all up in a room and douse them with petrol then throw a match in there. Like I posted above it's been going on for years.

Reedy 03-12-2009 14:05

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Apparently it's now the gays fault so says the Vatican.

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/10/01...t-paedophiles/

Quote:

A Vatican official has said that the child sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church was caused by gay men preying on teenage boys, rather than paedophilia.

Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican's permanent observer to the UN, read out a statement after a meeting of the UN human rights council in Geneva.

Russ 03-12-2009 14:10

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
If it's true that the majority of the abuse was against teens then the following is worth pointing out...

Quote:

Tomasi added that it would be "more correct" to refer to ephebophilia, a homosexual attraction to adolescent males, than paedophilia.
Although to suggest ephebophilia is exclusive to homosexuals is off-the-charts wrong.

martyh 03-12-2009 14:12

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reedy (Post 34920372)
Apparently it's now the gays fault so says the Vatican.

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/10/01...t-paedophiles/

but surely if a gay man attacks a 14-15yr old its still classed as paedophilia ,i didn't think paedophiles were restricted to one sex

Reedy 03-12-2009 14:17

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
That's what I thought.

Russ 03-12-2009 14:19

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Paedophillia doesn't relate to teenage victims though.

martyh 03-12-2009 14:26

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34920387)
Paedophillia doesn't relate to teenage victims though.


that depends on the definition you use "sexual abuse of a minor" or sexual abuse of a prepubescent
the first one tends to be a legal term and the second a psychological one very confusing i know and should be clarified

Chris 03-12-2009 14:26

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34920379)
but surely if a gay man attacks a 14-15yr old its still classed as paedophilia ,i didn't think paedophiles were restricted to one sex

No, paedophile crimes are generally classed as those against pre-teens, but in any case 'paedophile' is more of a sociological category, it's certainly not a legal one. There isn't any single offence called 'paedophilia' in law, there are a number of different offences depending on the age of the victim and the nature of the act.

Sex with a 10 year old and sex with a 15 year old are not the same thing.

nomadking 03-12-2009 14:28

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34920379)
but surely if a gay man attacks a 14-15yr old its still classed as paedophilia ,i didn't think paedophiles were restricted to one sex

I think it's just that the term 'paedophilia' is not gender specific, just as the term 'incest' is not gender specific. It doesn't mean that the person doesn't have specific preferences(sex/race/hair colour etc).

martyh 03-12-2009 14:37

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 34920393)
No, paedophile crimes are generally classed as those against pre-teens, but in any case 'paedophile' is more of a sociological category, it's certainly not a legal one. There isn't any single offence called 'paedophilia' in law, there are a number of different offences depending on the age of the victim and the nature of the act.

Sex with a 10 year old and sex with a 15 year old are not the same thing.

thanks for the clarification

And as someone else suggested shouldn't the church be held accountable (at least partly)for covering up the behaviour of some of it's priests .If they have paid out millions in compensation isn't that an admition of guilt?

Chris 03-12-2009 14:40

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
I don't know about the current law, but the new vetting and barring rules the CRB (or Disclosure Scotland north of the border) will be working to from next year will certainly make it an offence not to pass on such information about an employee. Anyone, Catholic bishops included, who gets caught trying to cover up something like this in future is going to be liable to a sizeable fine at the very least, and quite possibly some jail time.

Russ 03-12-2009 14:40

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34920398)
thanks for the clarification

And as someone else suggested shouldn't the church be held accountable (at least partly)for covering up the behaviour of some of it's priests .If they have paid out millions in compensation isn't that an admition of guilt?

Prosecution should go as high as possible in the Catholic church. I'm willing to accept the pope and his predecessors were unaware but still I'm sure this goes high.

BBKing 03-12-2009 14:50

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Tomasi added that it would be "more correct" to refer to ephebophilia, a homosexual attraction to adolescent males, than paedophilia.
BBKing further added that Tomasi is talking out of his priestly backside - it's an abuse of power thing, and no priest is going to dare present it as that because the power is the whole point of the organised religion racket, even more so than the delectable youngsters on hand.

Paedophile priests? Is the Pope a Catholic?

Russ 03-12-2009 15:03

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing (Post 34920407)
BBKing further added that Tomasi is talking out of his priestly backside

Wiki seems to suggest his backside might be being used for something other than talking out of.

Russ 03-12-2009 19:39

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
Of course, one way to get off a prison sentence would be so say you're too fat...

RizzyKing 03-12-2009 20:13

Re: Catholic Church 'Covered Up' Child Sex Abuse
 
So the church is offended at the idea of straight priests abusing boys of whatever age so they label them all homosexual as that fits nicely into the homophobic belief the catholic church has. Either way they put it perverts got into the church abused people they were tasked with caring for and top figures in the catholic church have both known about it and in some cases helped cover it up. Arrests should be made and not just a few low level sacrificial lambs but some of those higher up who knew and at best did nothing and at worst covered it up.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum