![]() |
Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I called Orange the other day to see if they have any Video calling bundles on Pay Monthly, and they simply said no! So I asked why and they said, it was simply because Video calling and 3G phones are not catching on.
So that means video calling someone on Orange will cost 30p per minute, Video calling someone on another network costs 50p per minute. I also asked if the 3G reception would be expanded as its not very good in my area, they said no! And they also told me that no more new content will be added to Mobile TV for now. So is this the begining of the end of Orange 3G? Its disappointing as i'm on a really good service plan for calling and texting,as it will mean transfering to Hutchison 3G, no other 3G network works as well,in fact Hutchison 3G's reception seems better than Orange's in my house. Whats everyone elses thoughts on this??? |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I think the phone companies were foolish to spend all that money on 3G licences quite frankly.
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Video calling never did take off in this country..but will more web intergrated handsets coming out (like i-phone, G1..etc) 3G will have a place in the UK...
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I thought the UK and European goverments made it compulsary for them to get 3G licences as I thought thats why Hutchison sold off Orange and then used that money to buy 3G licences and build an actual network.
I think 3G activity such as Video calling ect... is much more popular on the 3 network than any of the others, 3's network coverage is better than the others (3G wise). I think thats why Cable and Wireless and United Artists(US West) sold off One2One back in 1999. One2One was a national and not an international network, the network coverage needed a lot of investment and a 3G licence needed to be purchased plus roll out of 3G masts. And both companies were under financial pressure with rolling out digital Cable TV and paying the debt off which they accumalated in building Cable TV networks. |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I'm on Orange pay monthly with a 3G Nokia video phone but I don't use video calling. It's never really interested me to be honest.
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Thats why I dont see the point in getting phones with all these features if your not gonna use them!
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I do use the 3G for browsing etc, and Google Maps is too slow on a 2G connection.
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I'm on the o2 Simplicity deal, I get 600mins/1000texts but o2 allow you to exchange your minutes for video calling - good thing is, 1 mobile minute = 1 video calling minute which is brilliant.
Edit: By exchange, you can use unlimited (upto 600 in my case) of mixture, e.g. 245 video mins, and 355 normal mins. |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
Heres the current 3G coverage of all networks: O2: 55% Vodafone: 60% T-Mobile: 70% Orange: 80% Hutchison 3G(3): 92% Heres the current 2G coverage: O2: 99% Vodafone: 99% T-Mobile: 97% Orange: 98% Hutchison 3G: 0% (3 use the Orange 2G network for 2G coverage) So the best 3G networks for coverage are Hutchison 3G and Orange. And the best 2G networks for coverage are O2,Vodafone and Orange. And the best paging coverage which covers 99% of the UK population is Page One Communications, Page One was formerly Mercury Paging and was a part of Cable and Wireless. Page One and Vodafone are the only paging services remaining. |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
I think if one of the 'big four' kept to GSM only, but drastically undercut the other operators call costs, they would have the lions share of the UK market now and the other operators would be in serious trouble if not bust. In 4 years, I've made maybe 5 or 6 3G calls! |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I don't know anyone who uses 3G for video calling, but I know plenty who use it for internet access... It *does* have a use, just not the one it was originally hyped for.
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
I'd be lost without my internet on my phone, and so many apps use internet access too |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
The reason for O2 being the smallest is because of the overnight transformation it recieved in 2001/2.
In December 2001,BT Cellnet,Genie and BT Mobile operations in Germany,Holland and Ireland demerged away from the BT Group and formed 'MMO2 Group', Because they were new,they didnt have that much revenue,they also had little time to compete with Hutchison 3G as Hutchison planned to launch there service in 2002. MMO2 sold off O2 Holland to cover some of the 3G costs. In 2005/6 MMO2 became O2 plc and was eventually taken over by Telefonica who are expanding the O2 brand to there original operations including its Spanish operations, there is now much more hope that O2 3G will get better now that it has better funding. BT only got rid of it because they knew what 3G would be like, BT where also rolling out Broadband and where behind the Cable companies,so BT needed funding to roll out Broadband and catch up with NTL,Telewest and Smallworld. And lastly, 3G technology was also orginally set up for better mobile internet not just video calling! |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
what's that new network thingamajiggy that's being tested right now? something or the other to do with the government? :dunce:
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Not too sure but ofcom wants the 3G networks to merge.
T-Mobile 3G is to merge with Hutchison 3G Vodafone 3G is to merge with Orange 3G That is to increase 3G coverage rapidly,each of the above networks with the exception of Hutchison 3G will have there own 2G networks,but a merged network would offer more coverage. Each network would have its own customer base as usual. So that means T-Mobile,3 and Virgin Mobile customers will get 100% good quality coverage whilst Orange and Vodafone users will get around 95% coverage. |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
I tend to only use You Tube on my mobile or any videos or downloads when i'm under 3G coverage, the 2.5G coverage is slow!!!
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Using your phone to make UMTS call drains the battery significantly quicker than if you have it set to GSM, You'll also get more dropped calls.
|
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
Quote:
:tiptoe: *whispers* what's a UMTS? :dunce: |
Re: Orange 3G-peasy dream seems shattered
3G .... the frequency used is higher thus the signals don't go as far and therefore needs to suck more power transmit the same distance as the 2G and 3G cabinets are 99% of the time co-located.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum