Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Security & Virus Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢ (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=28485)

Richard M 11-05-2005 19:08

The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
One week, one unpatched XP box
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]
Summary

I freed up a Linux box this week and I had an interesting idea.
In these days of the wild internet, I wondered what would happen to an unpatched Windows XP computer.

Well, I'm going to get a good chance to find out as this weekend is the start of The Experiment? - place an unpatched, unprotected Windows XP Pro computer on the internet and watch the results.
I happen to have several spare XP Pro disks, and the one I'm going to be using is the very first edition - no service packs here folks.

Machine Spec

The computer used is nothing particularly special, but is ideal because it's exactly the sort that your mum or dad will be using to check their mail and sell stuff on eBay.
  • AMD Athlon 1800+
  • 512MB PC133 SDRAM
  • 80GB IDE hard disk
  • NVidia GeForce 4 MX440
  • Soundblaster Live 5.1 soundcard
  • Standard 10/100 ethernet card

As previously stated, it will be Windows XP Pro running a default installation.
The only exceptions are detailed below.

Software & Firewall Configuration

There are several important changes that will be made to the OS:
  • Enabling of "Remote Desktop" - this will let me check the computer from work and lets me log in from any computer at home.
  • TCP/IP - static IP addressing will be used and the computer will be placed in a DMZ to protect the part of the network I want to keep secure.
  • The reserved ports 1-1024 will be opened on the firewall and configured to port-forward to the new machine.

Schedule

So when will this happen, and how?

I'll format the disk (currently running Linux) then install Windows XP on Saturday at around 12PM (UK time).
The configuration mentioned in the previous chapter will then take place, then the ethernet cable will be connected to the switch.

The test will run for one week, unless something really interesting happens that forces me to cut the test short or extend it.

Expectations & Possibilities

I'm expecting the box to be "0wned" within an hour, possibly less.
Depending on what happens, I might do some random browsing on a default Internet Explorer - sites that your kids might visit for example, all those flashing banner ads giving away free smiley icons etc.

I'm also expecting to be hit hard by the Blaster worm, this can cause the machine to reboot constantly which will make the test a bit difficult.
If this turns out to be the case, I'll have to stop the RPC service although it'll be interesting to see how long it takes to get infected.

SANS has a top 10 Windows threats list available.

Comments

Please post your comments in the below forum thread

Paul K 11-05-2005 19:15

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
What's the IP then ;)

MovedGoalPosts 11-05-2005 19:16

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
If you aren't actually doing anything on the PC, it may take a while for it to get infected with something. It's visiting sites, getting dodgy emails and the like that is the real killer.

Paul 11-05-2005 19:19

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
What's the reason for doing this ? - it probably isn't going to last long, but not many such machines really exist.

Even the pc I bought in late 2002 had SP1 on it.

Richard M 11-05-2005 19:20

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
If you'd like to spam the article link to hell on websites in the coming days, feel free. ;)
I'm going to submit the link to several computer news websites myself, security problems need to be brought to attention.

TheBlueRaja 11-05-2005 19:20

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul
What's the IP then ;)

What he said...

Richard M 11-05-2005 19:22

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M
What's the reason for doing this ? - it probably isn't going to last long, but not many such machines really exist.

Even the pc I bought in late 2002 had SP1 on it.

Thanks for mentioning that, I recently read somewhere that around 40% of XP machines do not have SP1 - can't find the link though.

punky 11-05-2005 19:39

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/article.php?a=67

1 unpatched XP box, 1 week.
This should be interesting...

Good luck. The other day I put a clean installed XP SP1 computer on the internet, and got a net send alert within about 10 seconds , and within about 5 mins, it had already been exploited. This was exploited before I had chance to download MS antipyware (which isn't as good as it first seems now, I think). The spyware I, (or MS antispyware and spybot S&D), couldn't get rid of it, so I had to delete, reinstall, and then reinstall SP2, antispyware before connecting it to the net again.

If it is SP2 you might last a bit longer, but SP1 will probably be exploited in minutes. (On BT openworld's network anyway)

Its a bit annoying as I wouldn't mind having SP2 on my desktop, but the b****rd won't install, and I can't seem to get round it.

philip.j.fry 11-05-2005 19:41

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
What he said...

***** (probably) ;)

EDIT: Removed IP because after a traceroute I don't think it is.
EDIT #2: Ping phpfuture.net to see :)

Perhaps you should put up a Linux box as well for comparison Rich?

Gareth 11-05-2005 19:50

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
I'm with Paul M on this one... why exactly are you doing it? It's been done before. I remember seeing a report at sans about an out-of-the-box XP machine being compromised within 18 minutes. If I remember correctly, this article itself is a couple of years old now. I'll try and find it again if you're interested.

philip.j.fry 11-05-2005 19:52

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
I'm with Paul M on this one... why exactly are you doing it? It's been done before. I remember seeing a report at sans about an out-of-the-box XP machine being compromised within 18 minutes. If I remember correctly, this article itself is a couple of years old now. I'll try and find it again if you're interested.

Sshh, we all want the chance to pwn his machine, think I'll turn it into an ET server for the day :D

zing_deleted 11-05-2005 19:54

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
Thanks for mentioning that, I recently read somewhere that around 40% of XP machines do not have SP1 - can't find the link though.

I come up against this yesterday,The machine was bought from a local store resently and this come with xp with no service packs,the guy had wondered why his camera said usb to slow

MrBen 11-05-2005 21:09

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb
The machine was bought from a local store resently and this come with xp with no service packs

That's just shoddy in my opinion. It's not hard to install SP2 on a brand-new computer, if store uses a single image they could slipstream SP2 so they wouldn't even need to do anything after the install.

Windows XP Gold (i.e. no service packs) will now not get any further security updates.

Back on topic, I read it's only supposed to be about 20 minutes now before you get 'infected'. I wonder though if the ntl: port blocking will have an effect? ("...Blaster worms spread over port 135, which has already been blocked [by ntl:]")

Ben

Paul 11-05-2005 21:22

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
I'm with Paul M on this one... why exactly are you doing it? It's been done before. I remember seeing a report at sans about an out-of-the-box XP machine being compromised within 18 minutes. If I remember correctly, this article itself is a couple of years old now. I'll try and find it again if you're interested.

Well I wasn't worried about it being done before. I'm just curious about the reason for doing on a box with no SP at all, as SP1 has been around for so long now. I would be interested in that link about 40% of XP machines having no SP, as that's quite a surprise to me. :)

Chris W 11-05-2005 21:23

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBen
I wonder though if the ntl: port blocking will have an effect? ("...Blaster worms spread over port 135, which has already been blocked [by ntl:]")

Ben

I doubt it will effect a machine connected via nildram ;)

Richard M 11-05-2005 21:26

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
I'm with Paul M on this one... why exactly are you doing it?

Because I have a spare box, a spare Saturday and I'm interested in learning more about security. :)

MrBen 11-05-2005 21:28

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeybreath
I doubt it will effect a machine connected via nildram ;)

D'oh... read the profile first Ben :knock:

Richard M 11-05-2005 21:39

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
I'm with Paul M on this one... why exactly are you doing it? It's been done before. I remember seeing a report at sans about an out-of-the-box XP machine being compromised within 18 minutes. If I remember correctly, this article itself is a couple of years old now. I'll try and find it again if you're interested.

Well I wasn't worried about it being done before. I'm just curious about the reason for doing on a box with no SP at all, as SP1 has been around for so long now. I would be interested in that link about 40% of XP machines having no SP, as that's quite a surprise to me. :)

If the machine survives a week, then I'll install SP1 then give that another week.
__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.j.fry
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
What he said...

***** (probably) ;)

EDIT: Removed IP because after a traceroute I don't think it is.
EDIT #2: Ping phpfuture.net to see :)

Definitely isn't phpfuture.net:
Quote:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router [192.168.254.254]
2 20 ms 21 ms 20 ms lon1-adsl9-3.nildram.net [81.6.205.66]
3 29 ms 21 ms 20 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [213.208.106.194]
4 20 ms 20 ms 21 ms 84.12.225.132
5 22 ms 21 ms 20 ms 0125.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [64.21.115.61]
6 90 ms 89 ms 90 ms 0.ge-6-2-0.gbr2.nyc.nac.net [209.123.11.181]
7 89 ms 89 ms 89 ms 94.gi4-2.esd1.nyc.nac.net [64.21.102.14]
8 89 ms 89 ms 90 ms 10.gi1-1.esd1.tlw.nac.net [209.123.11.230]
9 90 ms 89 ms 89 ms ezzi.customer.tlw.nac.net [207.99.110.174]
10 91 ms 91 ms 93 ms 65.125.239.146
Quote:

Perhaps you should put up a Linux box as well for comparison Rich?
Good idea but I don't have any other spare machines ATM - the XP "0wned" machine is going to have XP SP2 installed soon because I need another Windows box.

Gareth 11-05-2005 22:08

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
Because I have a spare box, a spare Saturday and I'm interested in learning more about security. :)

Ahh, fair enuff then. I thought you were doing it to prove a point, and to publicise it to denounce MS, etc... in which case it'd likely be ignored by many. As a personal learning experience, I'm sure you'll find it useful. I find actually doing stuff to be the best way to get my head around something.

Paul 11-05-2005 22:34

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
If the machine survives a week, then I'll install SP1 then give that another week.

If it survives a week without getting infected by blaster it'll be a miracle. I still see it hitting my external server firewalls regularly. :disturbd:

philip.j.fry 12-05-2005 08:59

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
Definitely isn't phpfuture.net:

That's bizarre, I would swear my traceroute last night terminated in a machine connected via nildram. Oh well, back to the drawing board :)

Richard M 14-05-2005 13:21

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Hmm... I'm having a problem.
Windows blue screened during the installation and now it keeps doing it. :erm:

Flubflow 14-05-2005 14:13

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Have you taken precuations to make sure that, when compromised, it does not get used as a spam drone.

Richard M 14-05-2005 14:15

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Nope, I want this to be as realistic as possible.

BTW - I'm formatting the IDE hard disk in my main PC now because it seems that Windows was BSOD'ing when getting to that stage in the setup.

Millay 14-05-2005 14:25

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
I silly connected a pc to an adsl connection a few months ago, after I had installed xp home sp1... within 2 minutes the machine was down and I was reformatting it... It can be quick trust me..

Richard M 14-05-2005 15:19

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
There seems to be a big problem with this machine - it won't install without BSOD'ing.
I got nearly to the end of the installation but then it blue screened.
I'll have to delay this for a week or so until I can get hold of another box.

Matthew 21-05-2005 23:18

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Any update?

bdav 22-05-2005 00:05

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Easy - You want to zero-write the hard disk.

Dump it in another windows machine, and google "(hard drive manufacture) low level format". Run this, and you should be laughing!

What happens when someone turns it into an annonymous proxy, and you end up as the hub of some internet crime spree? I had that - claranet not happy!:rolleyes:

Richard M 22-05-2005 00:30

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Aah cheers, tried to reinstall today but kept blue-screening.

bdav 22-05-2005 09:07

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Is that before 0-Writing the disk, or after?

Richard M 22-05-2005 12:01

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Before, I'll try to do that today if I have time.

AndrewJ 27-05-2005 22:31

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
update?

Raistlin 30-06-2005 23:48

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Any news Richard?

Richard M 01-07-2005 00:46

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Not had the time, I'll get round to it at some point.

nffc 01-07-2005 00:47

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
he got bored by the sound of it :D

Raistlin 01-07-2005 00:51

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
Not had the time, I'll get round to it at some point.

Here you go, now pull your finger out :D

Richard M 01-07-2005 00:56

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
It's just that hard disk hassles etc have got in the way of this.
I was beginning to wonder what the whole point of it was but I will do it sometime...

Halcyon 01-07-2005 01:21

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
Hop to it ! ;)
I'm expecting a thesis, 50,000 word report on this you know Richard.
;)

daz300 28-08-2005 10:09

Re: The Experimentâââ‚ ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢
 
update ????????????????


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum