![]() |
Sending GMAIL via NTL
am I the only one having problems sending email via Outlook and smtp.gmail.com ?
Pop Gmail coming in works fine but I am unable to send. I even played around with ports but this was futile. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Was working fine for me this morning.
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/as...488981033.aspx :) |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
useful info above thanks..
I was a bit hopeful when I noticed that microsoft specified Gmail and not gmail for the smtp section. No joy. Clicking test the 1st 4 compelete, including 'finding smtp' but the test send fails. Time to configure 'Thunderbird' and try that. I am also behind a 'Router' so am wondering if that has anything to do with it. .................................................. ............................... ok, just tried Thunderbird and it works fine!!!!!!!!! Time to do a permanent switch maybe. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Use ntl's smtp [smtp.ntlworld.com] instead... that definitely works.
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
if he uses ntl's smtp kind of ruins the point of using gmail :)
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
HTH :) |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
It makes little difference to e-mail whose smtp you use. I thought the main point of gmail was for the storage and incoming mail. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
THe problem with using ntl's SMTP servers is that you have to specify a valid ntl email address to send email, so you couldn't send 'from' your gmail account, only set it as a reply-to.
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Hi.
Works fine for me with these settings:- incoming: pop.gmail outgoing: smtp.gmail account name: whatever@gmail.com password: gmail password Then:- Outgoing mail server, My server requires authentication, checked. Settings button. Use same settings as my incoming mail server. Or you could click the other radio button and put you gmail details in there. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
Maybe Outlook is being anal about the certificate too? |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
The reason is you cannot send an email from gmail using ntlworld smtp mail server.
If you could do that then there would be all kinds of spoofing going on thats simply not how email works. You can change the reply to address(different thing) but the email will be sent from username@ntlworld.com. The only 2 ways to send from gmail is on the web mail interface or with the gmail smtp server. To send mail you have to authenticate to the server etc. Ntl authentication I believe is just needing the user to match to a valid ip range and be recently have logged into pop. Gmail will need a valid user/pass and of course this is authenticated on the actual gmail mail server. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
So all the 'from' addresses in spam are NOT spoofed?
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
The spam you get is done in different methods, viagra emails etc.
Return-Path: <kvn6hb@mchsi.com> Received: from aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050425060218.DSFP29397.mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for <xxxxxx@ntlworld.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:02:18 +0100 Received: from adsl-2-26-49.mia.bellsouth.net ([65.2.26.49]) by aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with SMTP id <20050425060217.WVZE10174.aamta07-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@adsl-2-26-49.mia.bellsouth.net> for <xxxxxx@ntlworld.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:02:17 +0100 To: xxxxxx@ntlworld.com From: "Janna Bettye" <kvn6hb@mchsi.com> Reply-To: "Janna Bettye" <kvn6hb@mchsi.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:05:55 -0600 Subject: \/ALl1UM, AMBlEEN, \/lAGGRRA; ClAALL1S. XAANAX, ATlVAN, TRAMAD00L, ALPRAAZ0LAM being anything Message-ID: <zt4p513wgn85l19omgfekvn6hb@mchsi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.4981.5075 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="--GHOVCIGQTWL-WHWGWQRHXMAI" The line in bold is the server that sent it, or I should say relayed it, quite often spam relays through various servers so it harder to track back to the source. But back on topic, I think the original poster was misunderstood. I think he was sending through gmail to not use ntl mail server. I do the same I dont use ntl for any email I consider important since from my own experience I have found email to get lost and delayed, and my own email servers have spam and virus filters as well. Obviously if he then used ntl smtp server to send his mail he would be defeating the purpose of wanting to send thru his specific smtp server, and the reciever of the email would know it came from ntl which he might not want them to see. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
As for SMTP you don't even need to be able to access the account you're sending from. I sent meself an email from an address I just made up on the spot and didn't own, again, via NTL SMTP, not using an ntl address at either end... and guess what, it worked. [Didn't bother replying though.] This is how email addresses are spoofed :rolleyes: And while I'm at it I may as well go for the hat-trick. To use NTL's SMTP, all you need to be is on the NTL network. You can send addresses from any account via SMTP because it needs naff-all authentication, not even a user name and password in some cases, in the cases it does, it doesn't suddenly divert it as though it's sent from that address. Trust me, I've done it. :rolleyes: 3-0, nffc walks off with the match ball. Forest win for a change :LOL: |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
What you are doing is actually just sending them all through your uni account using a different reply to address.
In case of authentication, you will find most isps only dont use user/pass auth because they instead restrict via ip ranges, when using 3rd party smtp you will need authentication. I just sent my self an email from my ntl smtp server, I tried to change the email address in the account otions in outlook but it got rejected by the smtp server, so I then just changed the from field which I have been trying to explain throughout this thread and it worked. Here is the headers. Return-path: <realuser@ntlworld.com> Envelope-to: chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:19:15 +0000 Received: from mail by web1.hostingfreak.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DRbx2-000Ozg-Kj for chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:19:15 +0000 Received: from smtpout17.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.17] helo=mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by web1.hostingfreak.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DRbx2-000Ozd-Hj for chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:19:04 +0000 Received: from aamta06-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050429201859.JHQA28254.mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta06-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for <chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:18:59 +0100 Received: from homeamd2200 ([82.21.26.x]) by aamta06-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050429201859.SILX5678.aamta06-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@homeamd2200> for <chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:18:59 +0100 From: <spoofed@ntlworld.com> Sender: "Chris" <realaddress@ntlworld.com> To: <chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org> Subject: 111 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:27:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01C54D02.4C47E2A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcVM+ebrZwsJkCIXSEu1/sTiHn2f2Q== X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 0000000074FC67B5865BC244AE0A93B4F54BA94224EC2200 Message-Id: <20050429201859.SILX5678.aamta06-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@homeamd2200> X-Antivirus-Scanner: Scanned with Exiscan. You should still use an antivirus. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on web1.hostingfreak.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.0.2 Try sending me an email from your ntl account and spoof it, I will reply to your actual ntl account. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Ich don't think so... I've filtered some of the more, shall we say, identifiable info...
From - Fri Apr 29 21:26:17 2005 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Received: from server ([other ip]) by sdf; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:37 +0100 Received: from asd ([ip] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by dsf with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1DRc3D-00052f-00 for dgdf; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4272984C.8090207@domain> Disposition-Notification-To: email Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:48 +0100 From: me User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: <mail> Subject: Re: woot References: <4272980E.9030804@domain> In-Reply-To: <4272980E.9030804@domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0517-5, 29/04/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact x@y.com for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean No hint of changing any reply-tos there. I rest my case. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Still waiting an email from you to chrysalis@chrysalisnet.org :) on your ntl account.
the headers you posted look incomplete to me. Was that from your uni or ntl? To repeat I tried this test a few more times, ntl's smtp server rejects me sending if I change my email address in the outlook properties, I can only change the [from] (reply to) address. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
I've fabricated addresses and sent messages via ntl smtp before though. They may have changed it :( |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
Code:
telnet smtp.ntlworld.com 25 |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
test1: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<postmaster@ntlworld.com> 250 Sender <postmaster@ntlworld.com> Ok rcpt to:<test@test.com> 250 Recipient <test@test.com> Ok test2: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<test@gmail.com> 250 Sender <test@gmail.com> Ok rcpt to:<test@test.com> 250 Recipient <test@test.com> Ok test3: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<madeupaddress554@ntlworld.com> 250 Sender <madeupaddress554@ntlworld.com> Ok rcpt to:<test@test.com> 550 you are not allowed to send mail to <test@test.com> test4: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<postmaster@ntlworld.com> 250 Sender <postmaster@ntlworld.com> Ok rcpt to:<madeupaddress544@ntlworld.com> 550 Invalid recipient: <madeupaddress544@ntlworld.com> test5: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta04-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<> 250 Sender <> Ok rcpt to:<test@test.com> 550 relaying mail to test.com is not allowed test6: 220 ESMTP server ready helo 250 aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com mail from:<test> 250 Sender <test> Ok rcpt to:<test@test.com> 550 you are not allowed to send mail to <test@test.com> |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
I got an email from a ntl address but some non standard method must have been used since the from address is Return-path: <", From: ".
In normal circumstances you will not be able to spoof your from path, although I think there was a misunderstanding in this whole discussion. Yes you can post from ntl smtp and make the reply goto gmail. --edit-- I see its from obvious :) |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
No reply to email from 'Tester'[test.com] yet....
|
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
yeah you wont get one, as I couldnt find it.
NTL email servers to be honest are setup quite poorly not needing authentication, and I am shocked you was able to do a full spoof like that. |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Quote:
Some ISPs do this - it forces you to share/ advertise your ntlworld email address. NTL do not - and don't go giving them ideas... IIRC Freeserve do not even let you use off-net smtp servers (on standard ports), all outgoing mail on Port 25(?) is directed through their smtp servers - which I guess is a good way to trap spammers? |
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL
Well anti spam groups have been pressuring broadband and dialup isps to enforce authentication which I think is a good thing, of course I dont agree with forcing all port 25 traffic through their own smtp servers such as I know AOL do.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum