Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=25829)

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 17:40

Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Were all DOOOOMED i tell you - DOOOOOMED :D

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm

Quote:

A fireball created in a US particle accelerator has the characteristics of a black hole, a physicist has said.
Those crazy men in white coats.

Earl of Bronze 17-03-2005 17:47

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Keeeeeeewwwwwwwwl.

I remember reading a ''Popular Science'' book (by John Gribbin I think), and if memory serves, he talked about making Black Holes as a power sourse.

Prolly make a really good hoover as well. ;)

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 17:50

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
The new Dyson suckmaster - now with 8 Black holes.

ScaredWebWarrior 17-03-2005 17:54

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Fortunately it was only the characteristics of a black hole - if they'd actually created one it would have simply swallowed up the entire lab!

Since I think these particle physicists only make it up as they go along, that probably wouldn't have ben a great loss. :D

I mean how can you take a quark seriously?

Flubflow 17-03-2005 18:06

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior

I mean how can you take a quark seriously?

Depends if your'e a Hawkwind fan.

Macca371 17-03-2005 18:22

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Atoms I can take, quarks I can take, but strings? Now you're just being silly, there's no way on Earth you can know this stuff!

dilli-theclaw 17-03-2005 18:25

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
I read a short story once where you could buy little 'pet' black holes. You were only supposed to feed them so much.

Of course in the story one person fed his black hole too much and the world was wiped out.

Of course this won't happen in this case....

But it does make you wonder.

Well it makes ME wonder.

Sort of.

homealone 17-03-2005 19:10

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Diamond
Atoms I can take, quarks I can take, but strings? Now you're just being silly, there's no way on Earth you can know this stuff!

string theory is more like philosophy than science, but the level of mathmatics required to understand it is beyond most people (including me ;) ).

If experiments like the one described and the new one being built by CERN, the Large Hadron Collider, which are both looking for the theoretical 'Higgs bosun', yield results leading to a better understanding of the nature of sub atomic matter, we could really start to get near the 'unified' theory.

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 19:53

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Higgs is very substance of what makes matter (allegedly) and gives it its mass IIRC.

String theory on the other hand i believe relates to gravity and well, goes right over my head - but it essentially the underlying principle behind the unified theory of everything. (Which even Einstein could'nt crack)

My head hurts now. :D

Ramrod 17-03-2005 20:02

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.
*whew*! :erm:

iadom 17-03-2005 20:02

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
To quote Mike Harding, " its got bu-gg-er all to do with me so i'm going to bed " :D

homealone 17-03-2005 20:11

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
Higgs is very substance of what makes matter (allegedly) and gives it its mass IIRC.

String theory on the other hand i believe relates to gravity and well, goes right over my head - but it essentially the underlying principle behind the unified theory of everything. (Which even Einstein could'nt crack)

My head hurts now. :D

absolutely - strings are an attempt to describe all the forms of energy - gravity, radiation, etc as being made of the same thing, just in a different manifestation.

The fact it requires the concept of multiple dimensions, beyond the 4 we are 'used to' is what makes it slightly unbelievable - especially when different proponents of the theory can't agree on how many of these extra dimensions are required.

But when dealing with stuff at the vanishingly small, especially at the level where quantum effects start to make a difference, is incredibly difficult - have a look at some of the pics from the LHC project

http://jeffbarbee.com/old/cern.htm

- course it would be a lot easier with a naquada generator ;)

Graham 17-03-2005 21:07

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
I mean how can you take a quark seriously?

Depends on whether it has Charm or if it's just Strange... :D

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 21:31

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by homealone
absolutely - strings are an attempt to describe all the forms of energy - gravity, radiation, etc as being made of the same thing, just in a different manifestation.

The fact it requires the concept of multiple dimensions, beyond the 4 we are 'used to' is what makes it slightly unbelievable - especially when different proponents of the theory can't agree on how many of these extra dimensions are required.

But when dealing with stuff at the vanishingly small, especially at the level where quantum effects start to make a difference, is incredibly difficult - have a look at some of the pics from the LHC project

http://jeffbarbee.com/old/cern.htm

- course it would be a lot easier with a naquada generator ;)

I read the other day there actually that it will almost be impossible to prove string theory one way or the other as they are so small that they would be practically impossible to detect.

Which seems to be to be a damn fine excuse if your trying to prove something.

At least Dark Matter holds some weight (if you get that joke you probably read New Scientist too much :D )

Earl of Bronze 17-03-2005 21:40

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
I read the other day there actually that it will almost be impossible to prove string theory one way or the other as they are so small that they would be practically impossible to detect.

Which seems to be to be a damn fine excuse if your trying to prove something.

At least Dark Matter holds some weight (if you get that joke you probably read New Scientist too much :D )

Hardy har...... ;)

I finished reading this book a couple of months ago. God did it boil my head, but I even managed to understand some of it. :)

From what I remember, the author was driving at the idea that ''Strings'' where about the ''Planck'' (sp?) lenght.

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 22:19

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Earl of Bronze
Hardy har...... ;)

I finished reading this book a couple of months ago. God did it boil my head, but I even managed to understand some of it. :)

From what I remember, the author was driving at the idea that ''Strings'' where about the ''Planck'' (sp?) lenght.

Planks constant?

http://members.aol.com/profchm/plank.html

downquark1 17-03-2005 22:21

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
I mean how can you take a quark seriously?

Ahem ;)

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 22:24

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Lol

downquark1 17-03-2005 22:30

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Fortunately it was only the characteristics of a black hole - if they'd actually created one it would have simply swallowed up the entire lab!
Only when it's mass and thus gravity is sufficient to overcome the electrostatic force or strong nuclear force. Not sure which with a black hole.

Although I'm not sure what the difference between a "light" black hole and a normal mass is...

Earl of Bronze 17-03-2005 22:54

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

I just checked the book, and according to the author (on page 140) the planck length is given as 10 -33 centimeters.

In the worlds of the author -

''To get a sense of scale, if we where to magnify an atom to the size of the known universe, the Planck Length would barely etent to the height of a tree''

TheBlueRaja 17-03-2005 22:55

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
I still think this bit is the best...

Quote:

However, even if the ball of plasma is a black hole, it is not thought to pose a threat. At these energies and distances, gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.
Its not thought to eh... Inspiring that is.

downquark1 17-03-2005 22:58

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
I still think this bit is the best...



Not thought to eh... Inspiring that is.

I wanna know how they are going to get it out of the accelarater and what they are going to do with it.

Assuming it can be moved or even "seen" anymore.

homealone 17-03-2005 23:32

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1
I wanna know how they are going to get it out of the accelarater and what they are going to do with it.

Assuming it can be moved or even "seen" anymore.

well, just as maglev trains are a development of theory, this all may lead to 'antigravity' - what would you do with it? :)

Gareth 17-03-2005 23:40

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
erm, have these people never even played Half Life? Don't they know that this kinda stuff really should be left well alone?

Theodoric 17-03-2005 23:46

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Although the Beeb seems to have got its facts a little wrong.

These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun.

The temperature of the sun's surface is about 6000C, which gives a result of a mere 1.8 million degrees. I imagine that they mean 300 times hotter than the centre of the sun, which is about 10 million degrees.

Tezcatlipoca 18-03-2005 00:03

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
erm, have these people never even played Half Life? Don't they know that this kinda stuff really should be left well alone?


LOL, don't want to create a resonance cascade :erm: ;)

ScaredWebWarrior 20-03-2005 22:40

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja

I tell you, physicists are as thick as two short plancks ;)

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=planck's+constant - where Google's 'calculator' will tell you what it is.
__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1
Assuming it can be moved or even "seen" anymore.

I read something years ago that suggested the might be manipulated with an electro-magnetic field...

dilli-theclaw 20-03-2005 22:41

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gareth
erm, have these people never even played Half Life? Don't they know that this kinda stuff really should be left well alone?

Some scientists won't be happy 'till they blow everything up :(

'See I TOLD you that's what would happen!!'

ScaredWebWarrior 20-03-2005 22:43

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

...gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole.
Duh? A black hole is where enough matter is brought together such that the gravitational forces collapse the object in on itself.

So gravity is everything in the formation of a black hole.

downquark1 21-03-2005 10:53

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
I think this has just been creative journalism
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...blackhole.html
Quote:

The collisions were powerful enough to break the nuclei into gluons and quarks, the most basic building blocks of matter. The particles created a plasma fireball 300 million times hotter than the surface of the sun. In a paper published on Cornell University's arxiv.org Web site, Nastase wrote that, based on his calculations, the fireball behaved like a black hole, absorbing streams of particles and radiating them as heat.

For now, any fears of the collider creating a civilization-destroying supergravity vortex are misplaced. The forces involved in the experiment were simply too weak, and the theoretical black hole was very short-lived. How brief? Divide a second by 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Xaccers 21-03-2005 14:09

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
Duh? A black hole is where enough matter is brought together such that the gravitational forces collapse the object in on itself.

So gravity is everything in the formation of a black hole.

Ah but how do you know that the strong or weak nuclear forces don't play a greater role?

ScaredWebWarrior 21-03-2005 14:24

Re: Run for the Hills - Black hole created in lab
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Ah but how do you know that the strong or weak nuclear forces don't play a greater role?

Unfortunately I don't have the book to hand. It was called THE COLLAPSING UNIVERSE by Isaac Asimov (one of his non-fictional books)

In it he says something like:
Quote:

"Gravitation, then, is by far the weakest of the four forces. Even the so-called weak force is 10,000 trillion trillion times as strong as gravitation."

"It is no wonder, then, that nuclear physicists, when studying the behavior of subatomic particles, take into account the nuclear force, the electromagnetic force, and the weak force but totally ignore gravitation. Gravitation is so weak that it simply never influences the course of events within atoms and atomic nuclei by a measurable amount."
But in this case we're not looking at particles, but masses something like 3x our Sun, at which point gravity becomes the overwhelming force nonetheless.

I suggest that anyone who want to understand more on this subject find a copy of Asimov's book, because despite being quite old, it's probably one of the most accesible sources on this subject for those who haven't studied much physics since leaving education.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum