![]() |
help
i have a picture of my grandfather when he was in the lincolnshire regiment.
it was done in 1921,i dont know if it is a photograph or a print,sketch or what. the only trouble is it is starting to fade fast. anybody any ideas how i can stop it fading would be greatly appreciated. thanks andy 1 |
Re: help
one way would be to have it laminated, would be preserved forever then :)
|
Re: help
you can only stop it fading by keeping it away from the light. I suggest you get it scanned and then view the copy rather than the original and put the original away.
|
Re: help
I would agree with both of you - in addition, take it into a Photography shop and see what the Pro's think.
|
Re: help
Quote:
Incog. |
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
i have the picture in a frame,and i have thought about scanning it.
i was just wondering if maybe there is some sort of acid or something on the picture,and i was wondering if there is any way of neutralising it . it is not in direct sunlight.but the person who had the picture before me removed it from its original frame,and threw the picture in a cupboard.since then it has gone very yellow and is starting to fade very fast,thats why i wondered if there could be any acid or whatever on it. |
Re: help
Light is what is causing it to fade fast, now summer is here light is stronger (apart from overcast wimbledon fortnight). Also humidity and temperature variance don't help (all those things they try to control in an art gallery)
Scanning and reprinting would be a good idea, as might be getting this done professionally. Then put it in a dark place (ask a local photographers for a photo paper bag from a box of paper he has finished with) Photo Paper quality was not as high and processing was not as dilligent back then, the paper will have an acid pH and it probably was not stopped and fixed properly. |
Re: help
i've got a feeling it is not a photograph.its thicker than normal photo paper of that time.
anybody suggest a good picture restorer in or around lincoln. |
Re: help
Quote:
How about scanning it in and letting us see. Art teacher making this request. :) Incog. :D |
Re: help
Scanning it in is a great idea and I suggest you do that now.
We have done this for our old family photos and it is great. You can then hand the cd's out to family members too. As for the original piece, I would suggest you take it to a special photographers where they can see if it can be cleaned up. Then store it in a dry place away from direct sunlight and humidity. |
Re: help
DONT ASK US
Scan it then before you touch it take it to someone who knows. He are far too dumb to be offering advice on something as priceless as that :) |
Re: help
Quote:
I want to see if it is any kind of painting or printing first. |
Re: help
can't scan it in lads its to large for an attachment
|
Re: help
Quote:
Or scan a small part of it. Incog. |
Re: help
thanks for your help lads.i think i will try to get some professional advice on this matter.
regards andy 1 |
Re: help
Quote:
Anyway do let me know what you find out. Incog. OH and LADS??? I'm a laddess. ;) |
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
If strong light is going to affect it then surely scanning the photo willy nilly is going to make it deterioate faster?
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Quote:
When a gallery gets a watercolour imaged or photographed, the professional will use flash but this is one day of flash exposure. Compare to allowing visitors to use flash photography, on a popular image, this could mean 100 flash exposures a day 300 odd days a year. The sort of light level that would cause fading. |
Re: help
Quote:
Secondly you answered on behalf of a group of whom you do not know the full skill set, this group is not so much the bunch of techies and geeks you would expect to find on a forum, but includes people from all walks of life. We have teachers, opticians, radio DJs, leatherworkers, etc, I would not be suprised if an art restorer was lurking somewhere, they watch TV too (well I imagine they do - History channel?), and that is really the common bond of this thread, NTL DTV and other cable services. What you probably should have said was don't ask me, but I would seek expert advice IMHO, you may not find that here, but lets see what others have to say. Others including myself feel we did have something constructive to say (including ultimately getting experts involved). I think it was written in a way that irritated, indicating to the OP that they should stop asking such questions and go elsewhere, but if you look at threads on here all kind of diverse questions are asked. Lifes experience from many of the members contribute to a constructive and useful answer. |
Re: help
In reality would you try to repair an old priceless photo yourself if you had no experience? You can give all the advice in the world but you are not there to do anything surely the handling of the task should be left to the experts.
|
Re: help
Well yes I would.
The problem is that if it is a photo, then it cannot be repaired, photos fade in light over time, it's a result of the paper printing process light is used to create the image, then stop (basically an acid to stop the chemical reaction) is used to halt that reaction, but although called stop it really only slows it to a crawl. The only thing you can do to prevent this is keep them in the dark (as it is a light based reaction), then you cannot see them! If this is a photo, then this is how you preserve the original, to keep on view you need to reprint it. The reprint is a new chemical reaction and will last another 100 years or so. If you have printed pictures on an inkjet printer using cheap refill ink and cheap paper, you will often find, in a frame that these images will be degrading in 6 months or so, the blacks start going grey, the reds pink. HP and Kodak have invested ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£ÃƒÆ ’‚£Ãà¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚£ in getting their papers and inks as permenant as possible, while keeping them water based. If the OP has a high quality scanner (2400x4800), then realistically the scanned image created using that at full resolution will be as good as any the pro's create (probably better as it will not be a production line job). If that image is then submitted to an on line printing process then you will get a new permanant copy to display. Others on this site, or just digital graphic artists could probably do wonders to a high quality digital image adjusting the colour profile, contrast etc to reflect the impact of sun fading and restore. The image might need to be FTP'd as if it is this high res it will not email hapily, but the end result would probably be better than the pros. |
Re: help
1 Attachment(s)
here is the picture,anybody any ideas how to clean it up,even improve the jpeg.
thanks andy 1 |
Re: help
sorry, I still dont understand what you mean 'clear up' or improve the jpeg
|
Re: help
Looks a bit better, cant really extract more detail otherwise it becomes a bit grainy.
http://www.scottyb.co.uk/images/grandad2.JPG P.s. How do you make it a thumbnail? :confused: |
Re: help
A nice picture, now you have it scanned in taking it to a proffessional photo shop would be your best bet.
No doubt someone here will be taking your attachment & having a go at improving it. I'm only capable of, adding a moustache & beer froth on the top lip. :D |
Re: help
thanks theblueraja
thats improved it a bit,you can see what i mean about it fading,especially under his bandelero. damien what i meant was maybe make the backgound white instead of yellow.make the picture more like it originally was. still its not bad for a picture that is 80 years old. |
Re: help
thanks for the reply zoombini
its been smoking park drive fags for 70 years perhaps thats why its gone yellow.lol |
Re: help
|
Re: help
Hmmm.
Another stab at this methinks.... Any Better? http://www.scottyb.co.uk/images/grandad3.JPG Any more than this just starts to loose detail elsewhere, (look at the emblum on the hat). Still it has more "white" round the background. Still - its no bad. |
Re: help
The image was probably sepia printed in the first place
http://www.ephotozine.com/techniques....cfm?recid=105 A sepia toned print not only gives a pleasant tonal range, it also has a longer archival lifetime than an untreated print, because silver sulphide is more stable than pure silver. Your scanned image is 333*458 pixels. Thats not very big. Have you shrunk it to get it to upload to Cable Forum? What size is the original photograph? Images on screen look far bigger than they do when printed at high quality. This image is about 1in bu 1.5in printed. |
Re: help
thanks damien,best one yet
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
no it was definately not sepia.yes i have shrunk it to be able to upload it.the original picture is 12 by 16 inches.
wow theblueraja thats more like i remember it when i was a boy thanks guys and incognitas. |
Re: help
|
Re: help
See, you need an expert to do the job. :D :D
I think the original colouring looks better than white background, after all who has thier picture taken against a white wall? |
Re: help
sorry theblueraja damiens picture came up before yours did see above message.
please i don't mean to offend any body |
Re: help
you always get one don't you zoombini
|
Re: help
:erm:
Wonders how someone will react to having their grandpa "vandalised"... |
Re: help
Quote:
No probs i wasnt offended, i just wasnt sure what you were looking for (or even if you were) after i whitened the background like you asked. ;) |
Re: help
Quote:
Point taken, apologies Andy. |
Re: help
if it isn't a secret,how did you do it
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
apology accepted zoombini.
i still think it looks better with the white background,my only point is and i don't like to criticise,its possibly a bit grainy the blueraja.but still when i see what youv'e done with it it still makes me go wow. |
Re: help
Thats the problem, if you try and change something too much it can become a bit grainy.
If you can send me as full size a scan as you can i can see what i can do with more detail if you like. PM Me if your interested and i will give you my e-mail address. |
Re: help
AFAIK you can send it to photoprint.co.uk or somewhere similar & get it printed.
|
Re: help
|
Re: help
sorry theblueraja i dont know how to scan the picture in to make it bigger.
|
Re: help
sorry damien no offence but i still like the one with the white background by theblueraja.
|
Re: help
ok dokey
|
Re: help
manners, i forgot to say thanks any way damien.
|
Re: help
I have changed the background to pure white but that makes the photo look very odd as you grand dad is the same and the background is white
|
Re: help
hi damien what i'm trying to say is in theblueraja's picture my grandfather stands out more,it is more like the picture as i remember it in the 50's 60's 70's.the yellow colour as only occured in the last 10 yrs.
|
Re: help
ok
|
Re: help
Damien - I would rep you for effort alone if i didnt need to spread it around a bit more matey.
|
Re: help
1 Attachment(s)
I didn't use Photoshop this time I turned to Paint Shop Pro 7 and used the fade correction tool.I hope it helps?
Incog. |
Re: help
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: help
I think pauls is good although it look grainy
|
Re: help
true true but maybe just a touch dark,but its still theblueraja's with the white background (page 3).
please no offence meant to anyone,i thank you all for your efforts. regards andy 1 |
Re: help
Quote:
However I think it wouldn't hurt to visit an expert Photographer for some advice.One of those independant people. Personally however I rather like the original.It has a very nice quality to it, as faded as it is. Incog. |
Re: help
Yeah, I agree with incog it has a nice feel to keep the whole picture right as it where
|
Re: help
ok, I did one based on the way BJ did it only I have managed to scale back the grainy feeling only it might not be so good as his
http://homepage.mac.com/damienoneill/remake.jpg :shrug: |
Re: help
There, you have loads to play with now.
|
Re: help
|
Re: help
thats the idea damien,now youv'e got me in a fix i like it as much as theblueraja's.
|
Re: help
Quote:
|
Re: help
Nice .... Better than my one - nowhere near as grainy.
But BJ???? What would Mr Freud think? Tut-tut :D |
Re: help
I just wish you would take the size down a little. ;)
It's rather overpowering at the size it is now. |
Re: help
Quote:
Then email that image to him, hopefully it will be under the 3Mb NTL mail limit. Otherwise upload it to your NTL webspace where he can download it from. Quote:
|
Re: help
Yeah, Then i can have another stab at it to :)
|
Re: help
http://homepage.mac.com/damienoneill/onemoretime.jpg
Made it a bit less blurry its smaller to meet incogs point so request the bigger version if needed...... |
Re: help
Could always attach the image to the post instead of shrinking it, that way we just see the thumbnail ;)
|
Re: help
the filesizes are quite big, It would suck a lot of bandwidth
|
Re: help
now your cooking damien.double WOW.
tell me did you want me to scan it larger. thanks andy 1 |
Re: help
Well i am happy with the picture i have it all down to you! What do you want done to the above image?
Personally even if you give me a bigger one i would only make it smaller anyway the one you gave was big enough |
Re: help
thanks a lot damien.
i'm quite happy with the last one,now i will get my son to print it off on A4 size photographic paper. although does anybody know if i can take the jpeg anywhere and get a print larger than A4. |
Re: help
you should be able to. Do you want me to post the bigger version? Also I can make it a bit darker (the man not the background)
|
Re: help
|
Re: help
any chance of the bigger version.and maybe one slightly darker so you can still see his eyes
|
Re: help
that is the bigger version.......
|
Re: help
also if you like i can make into a little avatar so you can have it under your name like i have the english/french flag under mine?
|
Re: help
Damien those images aren't excessive in their file sizes but are very big on screen :eek: Can you attach them to the post next time as this thread would be a severe problem for anyone using a dial up account ;)
|
Re: help
3 Attachment(s)
Here we are small, large and one thats a bit lighter
I am now removing all of my other images |
Re: help
Some very nice work there Damien and thanks for attaching them, the page load time was starting to suffer a bit at times LOL ;)
|
Re: help
Me thinks that this thread has a candidate or two for Most Helpful Post of July.
Hint. ;) Incog. |
Re: help
an avatar would be nice damien,the middle thumbnail if possible.
then if you could tell me what to do to put it after my name. thanks |
Re: help
andy is that ok? Anything else? DO you want it as a smaller picture so you can have it as your avatar?
|
Re: help
yes please
|
Re: help
Quote:
I am making it now, |
Re: help
Quote:
Then go into your forum User CP and select "edit avatar", about half way down that screen you have the oprion to upload the image you want to use from your computer. Select browse and then navigate to where you saved the image and then click the image file in question and then select "save changes" at the bottom of the window. It should then upload the image as your avatar picture. |
Re: help
thanks paul when i get the avatar of damien i will do it
|
Re: help
2 Attachment(s)
Here ya go,
EDIT: I have made one to fit into the background |
Re: help
i've done it damien lets see if it works.
|
Re: help
yep it works :)
but use the other one i just posted so it fits into the backround |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 21:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum