Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   General Entertainment (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Babylon 5 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=12976)

dilli-theclaw 21-05-2004 20:50

Babylon 5
 
Mod Edit (Tez): This thread contains the majority of the B5 posts from the ST:Enterprise thread, split from said thread by Pem :)

(there may still be the odd ST post in this & the odd B5 post in the ST:E thread though, due to the problems of trying to split a thread which was as mixed as the ST:E thread. Also, Pem has made a seperate thread for the posts about Richard Biggs' death, HERE)





Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
OMG, season 5 of B5 was so crap :(


As Xac said, the network told JMS to tie things up in s4..but then gave him a fifth season. So s4 was v rushed in parts, & he had nothing decent left really for s5.


I think B5 peaked with season 3.

So far I've got 1 2 and 3.... (only 34 episodes left to watch :))

I'm definately getting season 4. I suppose i'll end up getting season 5 - but just to have the whole set :)

ZrByte 21-05-2004 20:52

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
OMG, season 5 of B5 was so crap :(


As Xac said, the network told JMS to tie things up in s4..but then gave him a fifth season. So s4 was v rushed in parts, & he had nothing decent left really for s5.


I think B5 peaked with season 3.

Sad really that happened, also sad that Crusade was scrapped (even though it was never as good as B5 it had its moments).
B5 was at its best from the beggining of s3 right through to the end of s4 IMO :)
Im just upto the episode at the moment when they have destroyed the super Omega destroyers and Ivonova is dying.

dilli-theclaw 21-05-2004 20:52

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Every season of B5 was crap. They tried copying startrek and failed. Why do you think they dont make it anymore. nuff said

1) the didn't try to copy star trek
2) their is a new series in pre-production

like you said - nuff said. ;)

ZrByte 21-05-2004 20:55

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Every season of B5 was crap. They tried copying startrek and failed. Why do you think they dont make it anymore. nuff said

Actually DS9 copied B5 far more often than B5 copied anything startrek did, and other than the slight similarities that B5 and DS9 shared I would say they where very different.
Also by your logic was TOS, TNG, DS9 & Voyager crap?? coz they dont make them anymore either... nuff said :)

Defiant 21-05-2004 20:56

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dilligaf1701
1) the didn't try to copy star trek

Haha yea right

Quote:

Originally Posted by dilligaf1701
2) their is a new series in pre-production

yea of course like the spin off called Excalibur. Oops no that flopped big time didn't it

Mal 21-05-2004 20:59

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Every season of B5 was crap. They tried copying startrek and failed. Why do you think they dont make it anymore. nuff said

Sorry, got to disagree there.

It was not trying to copy ST. B5 had a couple of series long story arcs, unlike ST where things were forgotten in the next episode. It didn't solve their problems by using technobabble and (I know, cynical) not a utopian view of the future of mankind.

dilli-theclaw 21-05-2004 21:01

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Haha yea right

yea of course like the spin off called Excalibur. Oops no that flopped big time didn't it

Laughing at me doens't mean you're right. If you honestly believe that B5 was trying to rip star trek off then you need to open your eyes a bit. Aside from both being on a space station - there are numerous differences....

Mostly it looks like Enterprise is currently trying to copy B5 - with a story arc format.

And you can't tell what the new series is like until you've seen it.

Defiant 21-05-2004 21:04

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dilligaf1701
Laughing at me doens't mean you're right. If you honestly believe that B5 was trying to rip star trek off then you need to open your eyes a bit. Aside from both being on a space station - there are numerous differences....

Mostly it looks like Enterprise is currently trying to copy B5 - with a story arc format.

And you can't tell what the new series is like until you've seen it.

Hmm okay then you dont wont to talk about Excalibur then well thats understandable nuff said

dilli-theclaw 21-05-2004 21:06

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Hmm okay then you dont wont to talk about Excalibur then well thats understandable nuff said

And you don't want to mention the other points raised since your post - that's understandable - nuff said.

Xaccers 21-05-2004 21:09

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
Every season of B5 was crap. They tried copying startrek and failed. Why do you think they dont make it anymore. nuff said

JMS started writing it back in the 80's before STNG came out.
It had plot and story line and continuity, which weren't in ST so couldn't have been copied :D
JMS wrote it for 5 series, that's why it finished, it wasn't canned.
Bab 5 came along and showed DS9 how to really have a station based show.
Voyager also copied the shadows with the borg killing species, you know the one which Kes said were planning to wipe everything in our galaxy out, but suddenly turned out to be really nice chaps after all. :rolleyes:

Tezcatlipoca 21-05-2004 21:10

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Just because Excalibur flopped, doesn't mean that the original B5 was crap or a failure.

B5 was a very well made series, with a well-done over-arching story (JMS even had a "bible" for it, rather than just make it up as he went along).

But, anyway. B5 & the various Trek series each had their own plus & minus points. I like both Trek & B5, for different reasons.

dilli-theclaw 21-05-2004 21:12

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
Just because Excalibur flopped, doesn't mean that the original B5 was crap or a failure.

B5 was a very well made series, with a well-done over-arching story (JMS even had a "bible" for it, rather than just make it up as he went along).

But, anyway. B5 & the various Trek series each had their own plus & minus points. I like both Trek & B5, for different reasons.

Too right - I like both and each for their own reasons.

I do think that Enterprise will end on season 4 tho.

Maggy 21-05-2004 21:30

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
I think B5 was the BEST SF series EVER.It had no continuity problems either because it was written to finish in a certain time and place unlike the never ending cash cow of the ST universe.

I'm sure Excalibur would have done the same if it hadn't been pulled by yet another bunch of stupid,woolly,lame brained suits that wouldn't recognise a high class SF series if it tripped them up saying please put me on the tv. Of course if programme schedulers could actually stop switching SF programmes about it might help.As soon a show gets put into another time slot or gets shifted earlier or later it's bound to lose viewers.

Have you seen how many SF tv progs have been axed recently?Replaced by what?Bluddy Big Brother!!! and little brother,sister,cousin,aunty and uncle reality show. :mad:

Tezcatlipoca 21-05-2004 21:33

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas
Of course if programme schedulers could actually stop switching SF programmes about it might help.As soon a show gets put into another time slot or gets shifted earlier or later it's bound to lose viewers.

Agh, I hate that. C4 always did that to B5 :mad: (& they & the BBC are just as bad with other things too)

ZrByte 21-05-2004 21:34

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
Just because Excalibur flopped, doesn't mean that the original B5 was crap or a failure.

B5 was a very well made series, with a well-done over-arching story (JMS even had a "bible" for it, rather than just make it up as he went along).

But, anyway. B5 & the various Trek series each had their own plus & minus points. I like both Trek & B5, for different reasons.

I could have sworn it was called cruisades (spelling??) not Excalibur, wasnt Excalibur the name of the ship?

Ive got a background book about babylon 5, quite fun to read, its interesting reading about first contact between Earth & Naans and what happened to the first three stations (I know it tells you what happened during the series but this goes into a bit more detail)

Tezcatlipoca 21-05-2004 21:46

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZrByte
I could have sworn it was called cruisades (spelling??) not Excalibur, wasnt Excalibur the name of the ship?

LOL, you're right :dunce:

The series was "Crusade", while the ship (captained by the guy from Midnight Caller!) was the "Excalibur".

Mr_love_monkey 21-05-2004 21:49

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
The series was "Crusade", while the ship (captained by the guy from Midnight Caller!) was the "Excalibur".

Didn't he play the Devil in 'American Gothic' as well?

Edit : Gary Cole, that's his name

dr wadd 21-05-2004 23:41

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey
Didn't he play the Devil in 'American Gothic' as well?

Edit : Gary Cole, that's his name

I came to the conclusion that unless you cast Gary Cole as a disc jockey your show is doomed to be cancelled before its time.

dr wadd 21-05-2004 23:43

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Defiant
yea of course like the spin off called Excalibur. Oops no that flopped big time didn't it

Well, I could score cheap points by pointing out that Crusade, technically speaking, was never cancelled, merely put on a production hiatus. ;)

dr wadd 22-05-2004 00:02

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
B5 best villain - Has to be Bester, no doubt about it. The Shadows you can`t really cast as the villains, I don`t think, as that was simply what they were. I thought Bester had great depth to him, and while he was an objectional little sod, he wasn`t quite totally evil and at times you could almost sympathise with him, all the stuff with Carolyne Sykes for example.

Best B5 Good Guy - G'Kar by a long mile. Sure, he didn`t start off as the nicest of characters, but his gradual evolution into an incredibly noble figure made his eventual siding with the forces of light that much better.

Graham 22-05-2004 00:05

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dr wadd
B5 best villain - Has to be Bester, no doubt about it. The Shadows you can`t really cast as the villains, I don`t think, as that was simply what they were. I thought Bester had great depth to him, and while he was an objectional little sod, he wasn`t quite totally evil and at times you could almost sympathise with him, all the stuff with Carolyne Sykes for example.

Damn, yes, good point. He was such an utterly self-righteous ba$$$$d at times "I'm a people person, how can anyone not like me" he was almost like a modern Torquemada.

Quote:

Best B5 Good Guy - G'Kar by a long mile. Sure, he didn`t start off as the nicest of characters, but his gradual evolution into an incredibly noble feature made his eventual siding with the forces of light that much better.
Another good point. All the Trekkies who were claiming that B5 was just a rip-off were saying things like "Oh the Narn are a copy of the Klingons, the Centauri are the comic relief like the Ferengi, the Earth Alliance is like the Federation" etc etc, boy were *THEY* ever *WRONG*...!!

Xaccers 22-05-2004 00:06

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Be seeing you

dr wadd 22-05-2004 00:12

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Be seeing you

D'oh, I had to stop for a minute there before realising you hadn`t gone off on a tangent with The Prisoner.

Graham 22-05-2004 00:12

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Be seeing you

Would you like some Spoo? It's quite fresh...!

Xaccers 22-05-2004 00:20

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham
Would you like some Spoo? It's quite fresh...!

"The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" whoosh, clang, wheee, jingle

dr wadd 22-05-2004 00:24

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by keithwalton
Excelsior would of been a fine name.

They couldn`t have called it the Excelsior. As the first ship in its class (NX-01) then that would have to be an Excelsior class ship. We don`t get those until Kirk's time.

Graham 22-05-2004 02:27

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
"The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" whoosh, clang, wheee, jingle

<Warble> "April Fool!" <Warble> said Kosh as Sheridan Jumped...! :D

ZrByte 22-05-2004 02:42

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dr wadd
When I first started watching B5 it was "so obvious" to me that the Centauri were going to be the bumbling comic relief and the Narn the bad guys in "evil" looking makeup. The gradual revelation of who these two races really were threw every Star Trek cliche out of the window. Sad to say *I* was one of those Trekkies. I soon learned not to take anything in the show at face value.

B5 has since become by far my favourite TV show of all time. Sorry Defiant, I`m as big a Trek nerd as they come, but it can`t hold a candle to B5.

Its so true, in B5 nothing is clear cut. In most SciFi you are given basic ground rules, these are the bad guys, we are the good guys etc, but B5 has this whole grey area. This really works for the storyline, like towards the end of the shadow war when you find what the shadows true goal was (sure they went about it the wrong way, but where they really bad??), and when the super good guys (The Vorlons) decided to go on a rampage destroying entire planets because one of them was killed and as such they became far more evil then the shadows.
Was it ever explained what Kosh was? was he the leader of the Vorlons? all it took was the word of Kosh for the Vorlon fleet to openly attack the shadows, and all it took was his death for the Vorlons to loose thier sanity (Just like when the minbari attacked the humans).

As for my favorite SciFi im torn between B5 and Stargate SG-1.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dr wadd
B5 best villain - Has to be Bester, no doubt about it. The Shadows you can`t really cast as the villains, I don`t think, as that was simply what they were. I thought Bester had great depth to him, and while he was an objectional little sod, he wasn`t quite totally evil and at times you could almost sympathise with him, all the stuff with Carolyne Sykes for example.

Best B5 Good Guy - G'Kar by a long mile. Sure, he didn`t start off as the nicest of characters, but his gradual evolution into an incredibly noble figure made his eventual siding with the forces of light that much better.

Now those are two I really hadnt thought of, you gotta love G'Kar (especially when he gets drunk in the king arthur episode 'a late delivery from avalon' )
Bester is far too weasily for me to rank as No1 bad guy but hes certainly in the top 3, especially after what he does to garibaldi.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham
Again, agreed. "Messages from Earth", "Severed Dreams" and "Point of No Return" are three of the most powerful episodes with their own mini-arc that *really* drive home the point that there is just *no way back* for the B5 crew. I also loved the Series 3 intro monologue:

"Babylon 5 was our last, best hope for peace.

"It failed".

couldnt agree more :)


Quote:

Hmm, not so sure here, after all, the Vorlons weren't so good after all, even though Kosh ended up more helping the good guys.
Kosh himself was never like his replacement though, he seemed gentler, as I said above I think he may have been thier leader or at least one of the oldest of the vorlons.
I awlays had a feeling they where going to elaborate on this slightly, the vorlon that replaced kosh is clearly the same vorlon that is with Kosh in Dukats quarters in the movie 'In The Beggining' I was wondering if maybe there are two sides to a vorlon (A dark and a light) and the Kosh on B5 was the light side, wich kept them in balance, when the light was killed all that was left was the dark side wich is why the new Vorlon was kinda crazy. (just an idea but I would have liked to have seen some more insight into why the new vorlon was so mad)

Quote:

For me in B5 it's Marcus Cole, he was just *sooo* cool!

Disappearing on B4 and then popping up saying "well, that would be the most inconvenient time for us to be captured, so it was most likely to happen" :D

And I loved the Minbari fighting pike!
I did like Marcus, but he was never a favourite of mine, the charactor itself wasnt the problem its that at times he was too English to be English, reflecting the typical stereotype Americans seem to have of us (dont get me wrong I think hes cool, Its just some of the things he said could make me shudder, not because of what he said but because of how he said them).


And finally a quote any B5'er worth thier metal will know "Sweedish meatballs" :D

EDIT: Ive reconsiddered my favorite SciFi baddie, it has to be Apophis from SG-1, that guy is like a cockroach, no matter what they do he always seems to come back, it really wouldnt supprise me if he was the new badguy for S8 (that is assuming Anubis is actually dead himself)

Xaccers 22-05-2004 02:49

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Mr Morden

Graham 22-05-2004 12:32

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZrByte
Its so true, in B5 nothing is clear cut. In most SciFi you are given basic ground rules, these are the bad guys, we are the good guys etc,

Oh gods, tell me about it. Also (although B5 is also somewhat guilty of this) you get alien "monocultures". There's lots of variety where humans are concerned (and who, of course, come from Earth, not "human), but you get Romulans from Romulus, Klingons from Klingon (although later ret-conned to Q'ronus or whatever wierd spelling it is), Narns from the Narn Homeworld, and Centauri from Centauri Prime and the ones you see on screen are a sort of archetype (or cliche) of the entire culture.

Quote:

all it took was the word of Kosh for the Vorlon fleet to openly attack the shadows, and all it took was his death for the Vorlons to loose thier sanity (Just like when the minbari attacked the humans).
I don't think it was quite that, but since the Vorlons and the Shadows had been fighting through intermediaries for so long that maybe it was just that they decided that now the gloves were off they were going to win this thing once and for all.

Quote:

I awlays had a feeling they where going to elaborate on this slightly, the vorlon that replaced kosh is clearly the same vorlon that is with Kosh in Dukats quarters in the movie 'In The Beggining' I was wondering if maybe there are two sides to a vorlon (A dark and a light)
From what I've read of the background to B5 (which is a fair bit!), originally JMS planned on having the Great War being effectively a civil war between the two "halves" of the Vorlons which was why the Minbari with the Changeling net was able to poison Kosh in the Pilot episode, because he knew the "weak spot" in Kosh's encounter suit.

Quote:

I did like Marcus, but he was never a favourite of mine, the charactor itself wasnt the problem its that at times he was too English to be English, reflecting the typical stereotype Americans seem to have of us (dont get me wrong I think hes cool, Its just some of the things he said could make me shudder, not because of what he said but because of how he said them).
Ok, yes, I can see that, but it wasn't really his fault was it? And *NO* American could *EVER* deliver that wonderful line "Bloody hell!" right!

Graham 22-05-2004 12:35

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Mr Morden

"What do you want?" :devsmoke:

I once considered getting a T-shirt made up with that wonderful pic of Morden's face (did anyone else notice that he was often lit with a slight "up-light" effect that makes someone look so evil?) and underneath the slogan:

Morden and Associates: Call 1-800-WHAT-DO-U-WANT? :D

Maggy 22-05-2004 14:30

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZrByte



Kosh himself was never like his replacement though, he seemed gentler, as I said above I think he may have been thier leader or at least one of the oldest of the vorlons.
I awlays had a feeling they where going to elaborate on this slightly, the vorlon that replaced kosh is clearly the same vorlon that is with Kosh in Dukats quarters in the movie 'In The Beggining' I was wondering if maybe there are two sides to a vorlon (A dark and a light) and the Kosh on B5 was the light side, wich kept them in balance, when the light was killed all that was left was the dark side wich is why the new Vorlon was kinda crazy. (just an idea but I would have liked to have seen some more insight into why the new vorlon was so mad)

The reason that Kosh's replacement was so awful was because the Vorlons interceding on Sheridans request led to Kosh dying.This meant in turn that the Shadows were on to the influence of the Vorlons and thus the 1000 year 'peace' between the races was off.Then the REAL nature of both species was then revealed in the totally ruthless behaviour of the 'new' Kosh in dealing with everyone and the way the Shadows stepped up the annexing of planets.It was this change that partly allowed Sheridan to really discover what was at stake and to come up with a way of finally persuading both species that it was time the younger races decided their own fate.

Incog :D

ZrByte 24-05-2004 15:55

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas
The reason that Kosh's replacement was so awful was because the Vorlons interceding on Sheridans request led to Kosh dying.This meant in turn that the Shadows were on to the influence of the Vorlons and thus the 1000 year 'peace' between the races was off.Then the REAL nature of both species was then revealed in the totally ruthless behaviour of the 'new' Kosh in dealing with everyone and the way the Shadows stepped up the annexing of planets.It was this change that partly allowed Sheridan to really discover what was at stake and to come up with a way of finally persuading both species that it was time the younger races decided their own fate.

Incog :D

This vorlon behaves in a similar fashion in the movie 'In The Beggining' and that is set more than 12 years before Kosh dies, this Vorlon always seems more agressive whenever it speaks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by In The beggining
================================================== =====

Delenn - Are you a Vorlon?? (Inquisitivley)
Kosh - Yes (Calmly)
Ulkesh - Yes (aggresivley)
Delenn - What is your name??
Kosh - Kosh
Ulkesh - Silent pause looks towards Kosh

================================================== =====

Kosh - The truth points to itself
Delenn - What??
Kosh - Repeats, slightly more clearly, The truth points to itself
Delenn - I do not understand (Confused)
Ulkesh - You will (sounds slightly irritated by Delenn not understanding)
Delenn - But...
Ulkesh - Snaps at Delenn GO NOW!!
Kosh - GO!! then gently says Before it's too late.

Just as an example what I mean :) though I do agree with the rest you said.

Note: Even though Ulkesh says its name is Kosh it is actually credited as Ulkesh so I figured I would use that name to make it clearer.

Graham 24-05-2004 19:12

Re: Star Trek : Enterprise
 
But "We are all Kosh"

Of course "I have always been here" too...!

Tezcatlipoca 29-05-2004 01:06

Re: Babylon 5
 
This thread contains the majority of the B5 posts from the ST:Enterprise thread, which Pem has split from the ST:E thread :)

[there may still be the odd ST post in this & the odd B5 post in the ST:E thread though, due to the problems of trying to split a thread which was as mixed as the ST:E thread]

So, post away :)

ZrByte 29-05-2004 01:17

Re: Babylon 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
This thread contains the majority of the B5 posts from the ST:Enterprise thread, which Pem has split from the ST:E thread :)

[there may still be the odd ST post in this & the odd B5 post in the ST:E thread though, due to the problems of trying to split a thread which was as mixed as the ST:E thread]

So, post away :)

Thanks, we did kinda Hijack the Enterprise thread :) though I notice you forgot to copy over the posts about Richard Biggs untimley death.

Paul 29-05-2004 01:21

Re: Babylon 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZrByte
...... though I notice you forgot to copy over the posts about Richard Biggs untimley death.

No I didn't - you just missed them > http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...ad.php?t=12975

Earl of Bronze 29-05-2004 01:49

Re: Babylon 5
 
If I remember my rumour's correctly. The reason Crusade did'nt get a second season, was because of wrangling between the production company and Fox (I think). Basically, they spent so much time arguing about the story arc that a number of the actors contracts ran put, so they went on to other projects. Leaving a promising show to die.

Bloody Fox. :mad:

Richard M 29-05-2004 01:59

Re: Babylon 5
 
Do they still make this???
Wow, I remember when it started, they used Amiga 4000s to create the special effects. :eek:

Tezcatlipoca 29-05-2004 02:10

Re: Babylon 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Earl of Bronze
If I remember my rumour's correctly. The reason Crusade did'nt get a second season, was because of wrangling between the production company and Fox (I think). Basically, they spent so much time arguing about the story arc that a number of the actors contracts ran put, so they went on to other projects. Leaving a promising show to die.

Bloody Fox. :mad:


It wouldn't surprise me. Fox likes to mess with good shows, it also likes to cancel them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard M
Do they still make this???

Nope :(

Babylon 5 ran for only five years - but this length was planned originally by its creator, J Michael Straczynski (sp?) (he wrote a proper 5 year story arc, rather than just make it up as he went along).

It has had a few different TV movies, set before & after the original B5 series.

There was also a shortlived spin-off series, called Crusade. I think there may have been plans for another too.

Quote:

Wow, I remember when it started, they used Amiga 4000s to create the special effects. :eek:
LOL, yeah. A4000s running Video Toasters IIRC.

ZrByte 29-05-2004 02:34

Re: Babylon 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pem
No I didn't - you just missed them > http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...ad.php?t=12975

Oh I see, it got a new home of its own :) silly Me :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum