Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Cancel culture at the BBC (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711781)

1andrew1 10-03-2023 17:35

Cancel culture at the BBC
 
What's happened to free speech? Seems you can be a politician with your own news TV show but a natural history boffin can't talk about the decline of the countryside for fear of upsetting snowflakes.
Quote:

BBC 'decide to NOT broadcast David Attenborough episode over rightwing backlash fears'

The BBC have reportedly decided to not broadcast an episode of David Attenborough's new series over fears it would spark a backlash from Tory politicians and the rightwing press.

The new series on British wildlife will not be shown as it fears themes of the destruction of nature would risk a backlash.

The highly anticipated series will focus on the Wild Isles, showing the beauty of nature in the British Isles.

Narrated by David Attenborough, the series will include five episodes and will be first broadcast on Sunday on BBC One.

The sixth episode, which has been filmed, is understood to take a look at the losses of nature in the UK.

It will examine what caused the declines and also include examples of rewilding.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...fa69da8cc&ei=9

denphone 10-03-2023 17:39

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Indeed what has happened to free speech as they are now trying to muzzle Gary Lineker.

Mr K 10-03-2023 18:04

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36147903)
Indeed what has happened to free speech as they are now trying to muzzle Gary Lineker.

Free speech has no place in the new Brexit Britain. Think like us or be silenced..... Gary might be right about us going back to 1930s Germany.

nomadking 10-03-2023 18:39

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The Radio Times(page 17) says it's 5 episodes only, with a sixth AVAILABLE on iPlayer. It's stated because of "BBC editorial policy constraints". I suppose because it's opinion only.

denphone 10-03-2023 18:41

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The BBC have a even bigger crisis on their hands tonight with Alan Shearer and Ian Wright deciding to not appear on MOTD tomorrow.

Damien 10-03-2023 18:44

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The Attenborough headline is misleading. The series was commissioned by the BBC as a 5-part series and all of those will be shown. Two charities then commissioned another episode from the same production company based around the series and the BBC later picked that up as well. There might be a debate on if that one-off special should be on broadcast television but it's not as simple as the BBC 'pulling' an episode.

But the Gary Linker thing is completely pathetic. He isn't BBC News, he stated his opinion on his personal Twitter feed. Complete overaction and pandering to a few outraged idiots. I don't think his Tweet was very smart - comparing things to the Nazis is often silly - but it's not a reason to force him to step down from presenting a sports program.

Paul 10-03-2023 20:58

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36147904)
Free speech has no place in the new Brexit Britain.

Are you trying to imply this is the fault of Brexit, or just generally being an ass again ?

---------- Post added at 20:58 ---------- Previous post was at 20:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36147908)
But the Gary Linker thing is completely pathetic. He isn't BBC News, he stated his opinion on his personal Twitter feed. Complete overaction and pandering to a few outraged idiots. I don't think his Tweet was very smart - comparing things to the Nazis is often silly - but it's not a reason to force him to step down from presenting a sports program.

Many companies have rules about what you can and cannot say on social media if its likely to damage the company reputation, and Im pretty sure the BBC recently said it was cracking down on this, so they had to take action.

Personally I just class him with many gobby "stars" who think just becasue they are famous they can post about politics. He should have stuck to football.

nomadking 10-03-2023 21:13

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
It's not simply about what he was talking about, it's the language used.

1701-e 10-03-2023 21:32

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147917)
It's not simply about what he was talking about, it's the language used.

Alan Sugar can spout carp without any comeback.

The BBC top guy is a big Tory donor . No bias there...

nomadking 10-03-2023 21:45

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1701-e (Post 36147918)
Alan Sugar can spout carp without any comeback.

The BBC top guy is a big Tory donor . No bias there...

And what extreme language did he use?
Labour donor.
Eg 2010
Quote:

Enterprise tsar Lord Sugar has donated £400,000 to the Labour Party, he announced.
The Labour peer said he gave the boost to the party's coffers to assist with its running costs during the General Election campaign.
Lord Sugar, star of BBC show The Apprentice, said he had donated cash during previous campaigns.

Hugh 10-03-2023 22:34

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147919)
And what extreme language did he use?
Labour donor.
Eg 2010

Not very impartial…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1678487588

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1678487588

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1678487588

Sephiroth 10-03-2023 22:53

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Corbyn was closer to one of Hitler's policies than Braverman's immigration policy. Also remember that Corbyn was a proven sympathiser with the terrorist's cause against Israel.

Mr K 10-03-2023 22:53

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Lord S, like so many with money, will back whoever brings in more for him at the time. Murdoch is another one who changes tune depending on how the wind is blowing.

As for the BBC, massive own goal in lots of ways. Might aswell make it another Govt dept.

Sephiroth 10-03-2023 23:02

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36147927)
Lord S, like so many with money, will back whoever brings in more for him at the time. Murdoch is another one who changes tune depending on how the wind is blowing.

As for the BBC, massive own goal in lots of ways. Might aswell make it another Govt dept.

Sugar is Jewish. Corbyn is anti-semitic and led the Labour Party that Sugar had previously supported.

You just don't like rich people.

nomadking 10-03-2023 23:04

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36147927)
Lord S, like so many with money, will back whoever brings in more for him at the time. Murdoch is another one who changes tune depending on how the wind is blowing.

As for the BBC, massive own goal in lots of ways. Might aswell make it another Govt dept.

Nonsense. He supported Labour until Corbyn took over.

Dave42 10-03-2023 23:08

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36147901)
What's happened to free speech? Seems you can be a politician with your own news TV show but a natural history boffin can't talk about the decline of the countryside for fear of upsetting snowflakes.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...fa69da8cc&ei=9

free speech is only allowed if you saying right wing things Andrew sadly BBC right wing bias is beyond a joke now

1701-e 10-03-2023 23:26

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36147930)
free speech is only allowed if you saying right wing things Andrew sadly BBC right wing bias is beyond a joke now

Exactly. Fiona Bruce writing off wife beater Stanley Johnson.... Only a broken nose. Yeah right.

Kursk 11-03-2023 00:22

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
:redcard: There's acres of space between those ears Gary. Get off my son you're talking 110% tosh.

Paul 11-03-2023 01:32

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
MOTD will air with no presenters at all.

That'll make a nice change, more action, less hot air.

TheDaddy 11-03-2023 04:34

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1701-e (Post 36147918)
Alan Sugar can spout carp without any comeback.

The BBC top guy is a big Tory donor . No bias there...

Indeed, speaking of no bias the chairman donated £400k to the tories and facilitated an £800k loan to bozo but there's no bias there and didn't I read something earlier about an Attenborough documentary not being shown on bbc for fear of a right wing backlash wtf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36147926)
Corbyn was closer to one of Hitler's policies than Braverman's immigration policy. Also remember that Corbyn was a proven sympathiser with the terrorist's cause against Israel.

Which one was he closer to?

---------- Post added at 04:34 ---------- Previous post was at 04:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36147935)
MOTD will air with no presenters at all.

That'll make a nice change, more action, less hot air.

Shame it can't be permanent and for that reason, might actually start watching it again

Damien 11-03-2023 07:19

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36147915)
Many companies have rules about what you can and cannot say on social media if its likely to damage the company reputation, and Im pretty sure the BBC recently said it was cracking down on this, so they had to take action.

Personally I just class him with many gobby "stars" who think just becasue they are famous they can post about politics. He should have stuck to football.

He can post what he wants within reason. You don't have to listen, I don't follow him on Twitter. Politics is everywhere so I don't see why talking about it should only be limited to the self-appointed gobby political commentators, at least people like Linker have done something with their lives beyond talking about politics.

It's not as if he mouthed off on Match of the Day either.

jfman 11-03-2023 09:10

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36147935)
MOTD will air with no presenters at all.

That'll make a nice change, more action, less hot air.

I’m not sure it’ll have more action it might just be shorter. Agree on the hot air.

---------- Post added at 09:10 ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36147930)
free speech is only allowed if you saying right wing things Andrew sadly BBC right wing bias is beyond a joke now

The state broadcaster is worthy of its counterparts in Iran, Russia or North Korea.

As Alan Sugar demonstrates so successfully, its impartiality rules clearly depend on who you are and what issue of the day you feel like mouthing off about.

Sephiroth 11-03-2023 09:42

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Mouthing off is our speciality here.

1andrew1 11-03-2023 09:45

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The BBC currently has tight restrictions on what its news team can say on social media but not its other presenters. If it wants to review its rules that's one thing, but it can't operate in an ad hoc manner as it's done with Linneker and expect it to work.

Hugh 11-03-2023 10:20

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Remember when Andrew Neil, who presented the political programmes Sunday Politics and This Week on BBC One, Daily Politics & Politics Live on BBC2, sometimes hosted Newsnight on BBC2, The Andrew Neil Interviews on BBC1, all whilst posting outspoken political opinions in the Spectator, various newspapers, and Twitter, was pulled up for breaching the BBC Impartiality Rules?

No, me neither…

jfman 11-03-2023 11:11

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Football Focus replaced with Bargain Hunt as they've no presenter. :D

nomadking 11-03-2023 12:01

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36147936)
Indeed, speaking of no bias the chairman donated £400k to the tories and facilitated an £800k loan to bozo but there's no bias there and didn't I read something earlier about an Attenborough documentary not being shown on bbc for fear of a right wing backlash wtf



Which one was he closer to?

---------- Post added at 04:34 ---------- Previous post was at 04:33 ----------



Shame it can't be permanent and for that reason, might actually start watching it again

Yet more nonsense. It was a political appointment, so you are going to choose somebody you know.
No episode has been banned. They only made 5. The "sixth" was NOT made by the BBC and is going to be made available on iPlayer anyway.
Plenty of examples of where nature programmes have highlighted damage caused by "invasive alien species".

Chrysalis 11-03-2023 12:19

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Journalists have been leaving the BBC in their droves for this reason, the BBC simply do not want their staff criticising the sitting government, I guess because they have to keep relying on the government to get their funding renewed.

Looks like it has gone up a level since they employed this new dodgy chairman though.

1andrew1 11-03-2023 12:27

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147958)
Yet more nonsense. It was a political appointment, so you are going to choose somebody you know.
No episode has been banned. They only made 5. The "sixth" was NOT made by the BBC and is going to be made available on iPlayer anyway.
Plenty of examples of where nature programmes have highlighted damage caused by "invasive alien species".

All six were made by Silverback Films, not the BBC. There are different statements on why the extra episode is not being shown on a linear channel. From The Guardian "Senior sources at the BBC told the Guardian that the decision not to show the sixth episode was made to fend off potential critique from the political right." The BBC denies this.

Not sure why the Chairman of the BBC needs to hold the same political views as the Prime Minister. Surely you pick the best person for the job, not ask your mates down the pub who's up for it?

Kursk 11-03-2023 12:35

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36147953)
Football Focus replaced with Bargain Hunt as they've no presenter. :D

Thanks Gary:D.

nomadking 11-03-2023 12:39

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36147965)
All six were made by Silverback Films, not the BBC. There are different statements on why the extra episode is not being shown on a linear channel. From The Guardian "Senior sources at the BBC told the Guardian that the decision not to show the sixth episode was made to fend off potential critique from the political right." The BBC denies this.

Not sure why the Chairman of the BBC needs to hold the same political views as the Prime Minister. Surely you pick the best person for the job, not ask your mates down the pub who's up for it?

The "sixth" episode was NOT commissioned by the BBC. Sounds like the "episode" it's purely opinion.


Not necessarily to do with political views, but somebody you know. There's no job advert with interviews etc. They still have to be approved by Parliament and the Privy Council.

jfman 11-03-2023 12:46

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147969)
The "sixth" episode was NOT commissioned by the BBC. Sounds like the "episode" it's purely opinion.


Not necessarily to do with political views, but somebody you know. There's no job advert with interviews etc. They still have to be approved by Parliament and the Privy Council.

https://publicappointments.cabinetof...rporation-bbc/

Chris 11-03-2023 12:49

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Wild Isles is a five part series commissioned by the BBC and made by Silverback Films.

Saving our Wild Isles is a one-episode film commissioned by the RSPB and WWF and made by Silverback Films.

RSPB/WWF commissioned their film because they knew Silverback were making a series for the BBC and wanted a piece that would pick up on the issues raised in the series and become the basis for their campaigning.

The BBC later purchased the rights to show Saving Our Wild Isles. It has opted to put it on the iPlayer and not broadcast it a week after Wild Isles concludes.

Thus far are the facts. Why they have done this … well, discuss …

TheDaddy 11-03-2023 12:53

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147958)
Yet more nonsense. It was a political appointment, so you are going to choose somebody you know.
No episode has been banned. They only made 5. The "sixth" was NOT made by the BBC and is going to be made available on iPlayer anyway.
Plenty of examples of where nature programmes have highlighted damage caused by "invasive alien species".

Well you'd know about nonsense considering I never said it was banned

And what a banal explanation in attempting to dismiss the worst sort of cronyism to boot

---------- Post added at 12:53 ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36147969)


Not necessarily to do with political views, but somebody you know. There's no job advert with interviews etc. They still have to be approved by Parliament and the Privy Council.

The people that say because of his omissions they couldn't scrutinise his appointment properly...

Hugh 11-03-2023 13:17

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36147952)
Remember when Andrew Neil, who presented the political programmes Sunday Politics and This Week on BBC One, Daily Politics & Politics Live on BBC2, sometimes hosted Newsnight on BBC2, The Andrew Neil Interviews on BBC1, all whilst posting outspoken political opinions in the Spectator, various newspapers, and Twitter, was pulled up for breaching the BBC Impartiality Rules?

No, me neither…

In fact, when someone complained about his posts on Twitter to the BBC, this was the reply (just over two years ago).

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1678540127

Here’s another one about when someone complained about Chris Packham’s tweets (Countryfile & SpringWatch presenter on the BBC) just under two years ago.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1678540504

I wonder what has changed since then…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1678540504

Really opens your eyes, doesn’t it?

Inactive Digital 11-03-2023 13:39

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Have I woken up in Russia?
A freelance sports presenter taken off air for criticising the government on an entirely different platform? Sounds more like RT than the BBC.

1andrew1 11-03-2023 14:14

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The BBC website posted a video in 2018 "Gary is not involved in any news or political output for the BBC, and as such, any expression of his personal political views, does not affect the BBC's impartiality."
https://twitter.com/implausibleblog/...89134692663296

Kursk 11-03-2023 15:22

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Maybe the beeb has cottoned on to him being a bore? His pundit mates will be “taking the knee” next to show solidarity with the great Gary and his fall from grace. Time for a re-think on all of the tiresome footy shows and their endless cliche-spouting non-celebrities.

TheDaddy 11-03-2023 15:44

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36147994)
Maybe the beeb has cottoned on to him being a bore? His pundit mates will be “taking the knee” next to show solidarity with the great Gary and his fall from grace. Time for a re-think on all of the tiresome footy shows and their endless cliche-spouting non-celebrities.

Call me old fashioned but I prefer a bore to a director of news that's guilty of materially misleading the audience, the beeb should cotton on to the fact that their audience is literally dying off year by year and maybe not go out of their way to find ways to alienate large swathes of what's left, maybe that's the plan destroy it by stealth, just like they've done with the nhs

RichardCoulter 11-03-2023 15:45

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36147994)
Maybe the beeb has cottoned on to him being a bore? His pundit mates will be “taking the knee” next to show solidarity with the great Gary and his fall from grace. Time for a re-think on all of the tiresome footy shows and their endless cliche-spouting non-celebrities.

Totally agree.

Maybe this whole thing has been orchestrated so as to get him to resign or dismiss him?

The BBC cuts are now really starting to bite and they may feel that they can no longer afford his obscene salary, but want to make it look like he left of his own accord or that they had no choice but to dismiss him??

If he does go it will help the BBC's finances. He won't starve and will probably be picked up by Sky or elsewhere.

MOTD will be shown tonight without comment or punditry which, from what i've heard, will suit most football fans and save a fortune.

If he does go, you can bet that all those supporting him will be fighting like rats in a sack for his job.

jfman 11-03-2023 15:48

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36147996)
Totally agree.

Maybe this whole thing has been orchestrated so as to get him to resign or dismiss him?

The BBC cuts are now really starting to bite and they may feel that they can no longer afford his obscene salary, but want to make it look like he left of his own accord or that they had no choice but to dismiss him??

If he does go it will help the BBC's finances. He won't starve and will probably be picked up by Sky or elsewhere.

MOTD will be shown tonight without comment or punditry which, from what i've heard, will suit most football fans and save a fortune.

If he does go, you can bet that all those supporting him will be fighting like rats in a sack for his job.

A proposed format so successful that it’s not used for domestic leagues anywhere in the world.

Paul 11-03-2023 16:24

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36147988)
The BBC website posted a video in 2018 "Gary is not involved in any news or political output for the BBC, and as such, any expression of his personal political views, does not affect the BBC's impartiality."

That was 4+ years ago.
As has already been pointed out, things changed under the latest chairman, and all the staff knew this, as Im quite sure did Lineker.
Quote:

Impartiality is at the heart of Director General Tim Davie's strategy for the corporation, as he has declared many times.
He [Lineker] now seems to thing hes bigger and more important then the BBC or the programme(s) he presents/presented.
I hope they stick to their guns, and he finds out hes not.

Damien 11-03-2023 16:30

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The BBC will back down. They've completely screwed this up, if anything whoever made this decision might have to go.

The weird thing is the noise around this had started to die down. A few Tory MPs did the rounds saying he should go and the Daily Mail did a few front pages but after Lineker refused to apologise and it seemed the BBC had decided the matter was closed the attention died down.

Then the BBC went and tried to appease them and ended up alienating everyone else including most of their staff. They've had to pull TV shows and radio programs. There are now rumours the rebellion will extend past the sports on-air talent as well. The BBC might have a full-scale mutiny on their hands for an act of cowardice.

If this goes on much longer I think a lot of the BBC staff might just strike until Richard Sharp goes. The other thing about the suspension was it brought attention to him.

jfman 11-03-2023 16:32

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148000)
That was 4+ years ago.
As has already been pointed out, things changed under the latest chairman, and all the staff knew this, as Im quite sure did Lineker.

He [Lineker] now seems to thing hes bigger and more important then the BBC or the programme(s) he presents/presented.
I hope they stick to their guns, and he finds out hes not.

Have the rules changed, or is it simply a more vindictive application of them depending on which side of the political fence you sit.

If the text hasn’t changed, and there’s nowhere else the BBC can point to for a similar application yet Lineker can point to Alan Sugar and Government acolytes posting as they wish, it could be a very costly error at the expense of the public purse.

Damien 11-03-2023 16:34

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148000)
That was 4+ years ago.
As has already been pointed out, things changed under the latest chairman, and all the staff knew this, as Im quite sure did Lineker.

Alan Sugar was tweeting against the unions just before Christmas. The Apprentice is still airing. Karren Brady is a Tory Peer and she is on the show with him.

The difference is the Government didn't complain about him.

BBC News Presenters should be impartial on Twitter. Everyone else should be judged on how relevant their politicisation is to their role at the BBC. Otherwise, does it extend to presenters of Strictly Come Dancing? What about documentaries? Does Brian Cox need to be politically neutral on Twitter lest his science shows are brought into disruption?

1andrew1 11-03-2023 17:33

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Rules may have changed in the last few years or they may have stayed the same. What's clear is that they only seem to be enforced if a presenter does not follow the government's agreed line. That's worrying.

Sephiroth 11-03-2023 17:43

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
In case you're gagging to know what I think:

1. The BBC has seriously lost its way.

2. Lineker was wrong to compare UK government actions with Nazi Germany.

3. Lineker is obviously free to say what he wants. He's not a political reporter or new reader.

Hugh 11-03-2023 20:16

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1678565646

Paul 11-03-2023 23:21

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
So .... one person asks a question, another answers it ... twitter (?).

Was there a reason for your post ?

Kursk 11-03-2023 23:31

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148031)
So .... one person asks a question, another answers it ... twitter (?).

Was there a reason for your post ?

Looks like a sideswipe at Seph; the leftie remoaners don't like his opinions (which reflect the views of the silent majority) so they're trying to cancel him.

Sephiroth 11-03-2023 23:31

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148031)
So .... one person asks a question, another answers it ... twitter (?).

Was there a reason for your post ?

To annoy OB?

1andrew1 12-03-2023 00:09

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148016)
In case you're gagging to know what I think:

1. The BBC has seriously lost its way.

2. Lineker was wrong to compare UK government actions with Nazi Germany.

3. Lineker is obviously free to say what he wants. He's not a political reporter or new reader.

I agree with most of what you say but Lineker was comparing the language used by the government, not its actions.

I'm not arguing if he's right or wrong on the point he makes, but I feel there's an important distinction between criticising language and criticising actions.

Sephiroth 12-03-2023 00:13

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36148035)
I agree with most of what you say but Lineker was comparing the language used by the government, not its actions.

I'm not arguing if he's right or wrong on the point he makes, but I feel there's an important distinction between criticising language and criticising actions.

Thank you for the correction. Yes - that's what I should have said and was in the back of my mind. To suggest that Braverman usedg Nazi language is reprehensible.

1andrew1 12-03-2023 00:14

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148033)
To annoy OB?

Jolly japers, clearly.

Not sure where Redwood is coming from on this tweet - someone who helped devise some big privatisations knows more about how markets work than most people so playing naive with this question fools no one. But that's another debate!

jfman 12-03-2023 00:14

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36148035)
I agree with most of what you say but Lineker was comparing the language used by the government, not its actions.

I'm not arguing if he's right or wrong on the point he makes, but I feel there's an important distinction between criticising language and criticising actions.

I don’t think Seph was arguing that point either. Seph disagrees, but respects Lineker’s right to say it. Language is ultimately an action.

That’s the interesting thing about the Redwood tweet above - a complete deflection from the issue at hand. I do disagree with what the state broadcaster pays for the presenters of English football highlights compared to the pittance it pays for actual live football in Scotland.

However it’s irrelevant to the issue at hand.

Hugh 12-03-2023 10:21

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148031)
So .... one person asks a question, another answers it ... twitter (?).

Was there a reason for your post ?

I was highlighting the irony of an avid free-marketer questioning how the free market worked…

Ms NTL 12-03-2023 10:36

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36148025)

Love it. Below the belt.

---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36148055)
I was highlighting the irony of an avid free-marketer questioning how the free market worked…

Ooooh, I wanted to say that!

Sephiroth 12-03-2023 11:17

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36148055)
I was highlighting the irony of an avid free-marketer questioning how the free market worked…

You’ve somewhat overthought your analysis of JR’s tweet. Frankly, I’d rather he kept out of this sort of nonsense.

The ‘Nuff said’ bit is about the donations to my Party that the top echelons at the BBC have made. I tell you, I’m one of the last true Conservatives remaining. If the BBC hasn’t been leant one and then bent, my whatsit’s a kipper.


1andrew1 12-03-2023 12:06

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148066)
You’ve somewhat overthought your analysis of JR’s tweet. Frankly, I’d rather he kept out of this sort of nonsense.

He should have gone into business after Thatcher resigned and then retired gracefully. He's tarnished his reputation since then and needs to step aside at the the next election and let someone else have a chance.

Hugh 12-03-2023 12:12

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148066)
You’ve somewhat overthought your analysis of JR’s tweet. Frankly, I’d rather he kept out of this sort of nonsense.

The ‘Nuff said’ bit is about the donations to my Party that the top echelons at the BBC have made. I tell you, I’m one of the last true Conservatives remaining. If the BBC hasn’t been leant one and then bent, my whatsit’s a kipper.


In what way?

Remember, this is from the man who posted this just under three months ago...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1678623076

1andrew1 12-03-2023 12:12

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148066)

The ‘Nuff said’ bit is about the donations to my Party that the top echelons at the BBC have made. I tell you, I’m one of the last true Conservatives remaining. If the BBC hasn’t been leant one and then bent, my whatsit’s a kipper.

Maybe not by Ministers directly but by the Board appointments and by Conservative MPs writing to the BBC about Lineker.

Sephiroth 12-03-2023 14:33

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36148074)
Maybe not by Ministers directly but by the Board appointments and by Conservative MPs writing to the BBC about Lineker.

Chairman of the party probably had a word. Even if he didn’t, it’s not a good look.

Mad Max 12-03-2023 16:06

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
MOTD would be far better just showing the highlights, just think of the money they'd save.

ianch99 12-03-2023 16:14

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
This whole clown show is a direct result of the Government directing their Tory stooges in the BBC to get Lineker to apologise for speaking the truth to power. In essence, they wished to suppress free speech. Some points to consider:

- as is shown above, Lineker had no case to answer re: abiding by the BBC rules on impartiality. See examples for Sugar, etc.

- impartiality works both ways. BBC Chairman installed by government-appointed panel that included a Conservative party donor and prospective MP, as well as the wife of the former chair of the Spectator who worked with Boris Johnson when he edited that political magazine. BBC Board member Robbie Gibb, brother of Tory MP and former minister Nick Gibb, a clear Tory party agent.

- if he was a right-wing Football Presenter and had expressed his views on turning back boats, sending families fleeing war and seeking asylum away with no chance of return, etc. nothing would have happened

- he did not, as had been claimed, compare the Government to Nazis. What he did was compare the rhetoric & language used with that of the democratically elected German National Socialist Workers' Party as they rose to power. This is an important distinction where the lessons of history should be discussed and seen to be discussed. The poetic irony is that one of the National Socialists' most effective tools was to suppress & silence voices of opposition heard in the mass media of the time (newspapers & radio)

- hilariously, if the roles were reversed, the right-wing press plus the useful idiots would all be screaming "wokerati, snowflakes, etc." for supressing free speech.

- lastly here's someone else who is saying *exactly* what Lineker said:



Quote:

Suella Braverman has refused to apologise to a Holocaust survivor who said describing migrants as an “invasion” was akin to language the Nazis* used to justify murdering her family.

The Home Secretary was confronted by Joan Salter, 81, during a meeting in her Hampshire constituency of Fareham on Friday evening, with footage of the exchange, provided by the charity Freedom From Torture.

Ms Salter, who has been recognised with an MBE for her work on Holocaust education, likened Ms Braverman’s rhetoric on migrants attempting to cross the English Channel to that of the Nazis* during the Second World War.
* again, Ms Salter did not use the word Nazi in her address to Braverman. She was citing the language used that ultimately led to the dehumanising and murder of the Jews.

Maybe they'll go after the 81-year old Holocaust survivor next, for consistency?

This is all about control .. nothing more

peanut 12-03-2023 16:15

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36148098)
MOTD would be far better just showing the highlights, just think of the money they'd save.

I saw a bit of MOTD without the commentary, now I don't really follow football but it was like watching 'Unwind with ITV' it was really weird, not something I'd want to watch again.

Mad Max 12-03-2023 16:20

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36148100)
I saw a bit of MOTD without the commentary, now I don't really follow football but it was like watching 'Unwind with ITV' it was really weird, not something I'd want to watch again.

What i actually meant was it would be better without the studio panel commentating on the games, not the actual match commentary.

Maggy 12-03-2023 17:00

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
If it means less sport on the BBC I'm happy.However my other half will be peeved.
Also I've given up expecting the BBC to stand up to outside interference from all and any political entities that really should leave the BBC alone.The politicians don't pay for it,we the public do.They need to butt out whatever their political leanings and those responsible for running the BBC should say so.

Mad Max 12-03-2023 17:20

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36148107)
If it means less sport on the BBC I'm happy.However my other half will be peeved.
Also I've given up expecting the BBC to stand up to outside interference from all and any political entities that really should leave the BBC alone.The politicians don't pay for it,we the public do.They need to butt out whatever their political leanings and those responsible for running the BBC should say so.

I'm not 100% sure but I don't think there's a lot of sport on the BBC.

Paul 12-03-2023 17:41

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36148100)
I saw a bit of MOTD without the commentary, now I don't really follow football but it was like watching 'Unwind with ITV' it was really weird, not something I'd want to watch again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36148101)
What I actually meant was it would be better without the studio panel commentating on the games, not the actual match commentary.

The viewing figures apparently show almost 1/2 million more viewers than last week, and its highest total since the start of November last year.

For anyone wondering, No, I didnt see it, I never watch it, I view match highlights on the Sky Sports site.

---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36148055)
I was highlighting the irony of an avid free-marketer questioning how the free market worked…

First of all you're assuming we all know hes an "avid free-marketer".
Secondly, I really dont see him questioning how it works, just asking a question, to which he got an answer [which may or may not be the correct answer].

ianch99 12-03-2023 17:44

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36148032)
Looks like a sideswipe at Seph; the leftie remoaners don't like his opinions (which reflect the views of the silent majority) so they're trying to cancel him.

Oh, the irony :D

TheDaddy 12-03-2023 20:31

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36148100)
I saw a bit of MOTD without the commentary, now I don't really follow football but it was like watching 'Unwind with ITV' it was really weird, not something I'd want to watch again.

I hope they try it next on Question Time, without Fiona Bruce

I saw John Deadwood tweeting earlier how good it was, so much more action, yes just a shame it was only on a fraction of the time it usually is, who'd have thought Deadwood was a fan

Mr K 12-03-2023 20:43

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36148136)
I hope they try it next on Question Time, without Fiona Bruce

I saw John Deadwood tweeting earlier how good it was, so much more action, yes just a shame it was only on a fraction of the time it usually is, who'd have thought Deadwood was a fan

JR is a massive soccer ball fan. Wokingham and Emmbrook FC are massive ( in Wokingham). They are always on MOTD.

Kursk 12-03-2023 21:19

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36148115)
Oh, the irony :D

Whoosh. Leftie Remoaner :D

ianch99 12-03-2023 22:59

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36148141)
Whoosh. Leftie Remoaner :D

Well done. Took a while but you got there, good job.

Kursk 13-03-2023 09:37

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36148153)
Well done. Took a while but you got there, good job.

Aww, thank you. I wanted you to know that someone does still read your posts even though it seems only to be me ;)

Sephiroth 13-03-2023 10:12

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36148164)
Aww, thank you. I wanted you to know that someone does still read your posts even though it seems only to be me ;)


You’re kidding!

tweetiepooh 13-03-2023 10:48

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
I always thought the BBC was leftist leaning out to get the more conservative at every opportunity.


Personally I think that as the BBC is paid for by the public they should put public interest first and while remaining balanced not be afraid to challenge anyone of any particular leaning. In one sense they don't need to be popular as they don't rely on advertising and the worry of loss of revenue from that source but that also means they need to reflect a wide range of views and maybe even challenge views that are popular if they aren't "right".

1andrew1 13-03-2023 11:33

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Gary Lineker is to return to BBC screens this weekend after reaching a deal with the corporation
  • The BBC will begin an independent review of its social media guidelines, focusing on how it applies to freelancers outside news - like Lineker
  • Lineker takes to Twitter to say he is "immeasurably proud" to work for the BBC and "cannot wait to get back in the MOTD chair"
  • The BBC’s current social media guidance will remain in place while the review is carried out
  • Director general Tim Davie acknowledges it contains "grey areas" and says enforcing impartiality is a difficult balancing act
  • He says he has not bowed to pressure from one political party or another.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ente...-arts-64938252

jfman 13-03-2023 12:01

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
I see part of the climbdown has Lineker thanking Tim Davie. Clearly wanting to make sure he isn’t the fall guy.

1andrew1 13-03-2023 12:48

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36148171)
I see part of the climbdown has Lineker thanking Tim Davie. Clearly wanting to make sure he isn’t the fall guy.

Will there be a fall guy?

jfman 13-03-2023 12:54

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36148175)
Will there be a fall guy?

Hopefully.

Such an egregious assault on freedom of speech demands it in a public sector institution that’s supposedly impartial.

ianch99 13-03-2023 13:18

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36148176)
Hopefully.

Such an egregious assault on freedom of speech demands it in a public sector institution that’s supposedly impartial.

Doubt it will happen. The amount of Government influence within senior BBC management will protect them on this issue. What is more likely is that the corrupt appointment of the Chairman will means he has to go but this will take its time to play out, if at all.

jonbxx 13-03-2023 14:08

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
I think what we have learned here, along with the incidents surrounding Marcus Rashford and Tyrone Mings is that you take on footballers at your peril!

Being very wealthy with a strong public image but not coming from a privileged background is an unusual combination even today. Couple that with the very strong self belief you need to reach the top of the game gives a powerful force

Chris 13-03-2023 14:41

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Especially Gary Lineker of all people - Mr Nice Guy himself. He carries an immense amount of moral authority and publicly climbing in the ring with him on an issue like this was never going to end well for any BBC manager or politician.

Kursk 13-03-2023 14:52

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

This is just an immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s
Quote:

Lineker takes to Twitter to say he is "immeasurably proud" to work for the BBC and "cannot wait to get back in the MOTD chair"
Oh I get it now...Gary had learnt a new long word at the footy school of punditry and he wanted to use it before anyone else nabs it. Or was he being a sneaky clever clogs again? :monkey:

Sephiroth 13-03-2023 14:52

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 

Maybe he’ll be a Labour MP one day.

Kursk 13-03-2023 15:02

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36148185)

Maybe he’ll be a Labour MP one day.

Well he couldn't even keep Gazza in order so he's well qualified.

Paul 13-03-2023 15:12

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
The BBC caved in, what a surprise.

1andrew1 13-03-2023 16:09

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36148181)
Especially Gary Lineker of all people - Mr Nice Guy himself. He carries an immense amount of moral authority and publicly climbing in the ring with him on an issue like this was never going to end well for any BBC manager or politician.

Agreed! Take on a national treasure with whom many viewers have grown up with at your peril!

Damien 13-03-2023 16:39

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36148188)
The BBC caved in, what a surprise.

They had no ability to fight it. They completely screwed this up. Lineker had the public on his side, he had a mass walkout of BBC Sport on his side, their argument was not watertight and even the Government whose Ministers had spent the week whining about him backed off and didn't give any support for the BBC's decision.

Worse, it brought more focus on Richard Sharp with it becoming more widely known about his connections to Johnson. Whilst they are different roles it looks so bad to suspend Lineker for making a political comment on his personal Tweeter feed whilst your Chairman is a Tory Donor and helped arrange a loan to the Prime Minister who appointed him!

---------- Post added at 16:39 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36148184)
Oh I get it now...Gary had learnt a new long word at the footy school of punditry and he wanted to use it before anyone else nabs it. Or was he being a sneaky clever clogs again? :monkey:

Immeasurably is not a particularly complicated or advanced word? I wouldn't think anyone using it is trying to be clever. It's not like Russell Brand who liked to vomit a thesaurus onto every article he wrote. It's a perfectly cromulent word.

Chrysalis 13-03-2023 16:56

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Even some Tory MPs now coming out saying they wont vote for it. Complete own goal by the BBC.

1andrew1 13-03-2023 17:01

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Interesting albeit hardly unexpected.
Quote:

BBC chair Richard Sharp under growing pressure to quit over Gary Lineker row

Keir Starmer describes Sharp’s position as ‘increasingly untenable’ as Rishi Sunak offers lukewarm defence of BBC chair


The BBC chair, Richard Sharp, is under increasing pressure to quit after the corporation apologised over its handling of the impartiality row surrounding the Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker.

Keir Starmer called on the government to examine how it could protect a “truly independent and impartial” BBC.

He told ITV News: “I think Richard Sharp’s position is increasingly untenable. I think most people watching the complete mess of the last few days would say how on earth is he still in position and Gary Lineker has been taken off air? This is a mess of the BBC’s own making. They need to sort it out and sort it out fast.”

On his flight to the US, Sunak offered a lukewarm defence of the man who was once his boss at Goldman Sachs and who was later recruited by Sunak as an unpaid government adviser when he was chancellor during the Covid pandemic.

Even before the Lineker row erupted, Sharp faced calls for his resignation because when applying for the job of BBC chair, he did not disclose his role in helping Boris Johnson get access to a loan facility, reportedly worth about £800,000.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ry-lineker-row

Chrysalis 13-03-2023 17:02

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Following the announcement, The Telegraph has identified a number of other BBC stars who have shared political opinions without sanction.
https://12ft.io/proxy?&q=https%3A%2F...ity-guidelines

1andrew1 13-03-2023 17:34

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 36148205)

I think the Telegraph is playing catch-up, these names have been discussed over the last few days.

pip08456 13-03-2023 17:35

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
I'm surprised no-one has posted Gary is now coming back to MOTD, not that I give a toss about football.

Hugh 13-03-2023 17:38

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36148213)
I'm surprised no-one has posted Gary is now coming back to MOTD, not that I give a toss about football.

Post #78 at 11:33 today.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...9&postcount=78

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36148169)

Quote:

Gary Lineker is to return to BBC screens this weekend after reaching a deal with the corporation
The BBC will begin an independent review of its social media guidelines, focusing on how it applies to freelancers outside news - like Lineker
Lineker takes to Twitter to say he is "immeasurably proud" to work for the BBC and "cannot wait to get back in the MOTD chair"
The BBC’s current social media guidance will remain in place while the review is carried out
Director general Tim Davie acknowledges it contains "grey areas" and says enforcing impartiality is a difficult balancing act
He says he has not bowed to pressure from one political party or another.’


pip08456 13-03-2023 18:20

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36148214)

Obviously missed it due to lack of interest.

RichardCoulter 13-03-2023 20:09

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
I have no interest in football either, but 'it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. There's more to it & at stake than first appears.

Sephiroth 13-03-2023 20:57

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36148225)
I have no interest in football either, but 'it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. There's more to it & at stake than first appears.

Nah - the BBC are assholes, Lineker is an asshole, the whingeing opposition are assholes and the whingeing government not much better.

One thing is almost certain - as you imply, there's more to play out.

Good fun.

punkrock101 13-03-2023 21:10

Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36147926)
Corbyn was closer to one of Hitler's policies than Braverman's immigration policy. Also remember that Corbyn was a proven sympathiser with the terrorist's cause against Israel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36147928)
Sugar is Jewish. Corbyn is anti-semitic and led the Labour Party that Sugar had previously supported.

You just don't like rich people.


Corbyn is defiantly not an Anti-Semitic, also he doesn't sympathise with terrorists when it comes to Israel.. the issue is he supports the Palestinians who are the victims of almost daily genocide by Israel so the media and the backstabber in Labour labelling him as one. on the Subject of Sugar he's was afraid of Corbyn as he would have been forced to actually pay more taxes also if Corbyn did get he would have scrapped the House of Lords sugar would have to work for his money then.

---------- Post added at 21:10 ---------- Previous post was at 21:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36148168)
I always thought the BBC was leftist leaning out to get the more conservative at every opportunity. ".

Maybe back during the Labour days and the early years of the collation but now it's a Tory outfit. more and more conservatives are getting top jobs there and right wing bias journalists like Laura Kuenssberg are getting free rein to say what they like. you would swear sometimes BBC News has turned into GB News with the amount a rightwing leaning stories they put on.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.