![]() |
Cancel culture at the BBC
What's happened to free speech? Seems you can be a politician with your own news TV show but a natural history boffin can't talk about the decline of the countryside for fear of upsetting snowflakes.
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Indeed what has happened to free speech as they are now trying to muzzle Gary Lineker.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The Radio Times(page 17) says it's 5 episodes only, with a sixth AVAILABLE on iPlayer. It's stated because of "BBC editorial policy constraints". I suppose because it's opinion only.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The BBC have a even bigger crisis on their hands tonight with Alan Shearer and Ian Wright deciding to not appear on MOTD tomorrow.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The Attenborough headline is misleading. The series was commissioned by the BBC as a 5-part series and all of those will be shown. Two charities then commissioned another episode from the same production company based around the series and the BBC later picked that up as well. There might be a debate on if that one-off special should be on broadcast television but it's not as simple as the BBC 'pulling' an episode.
But the Gary Linker thing is completely pathetic. He isn't BBC News, he stated his opinion on his personal Twitter feed. Complete overaction and pandering to a few outraged idiots. I don't think his Tweet was very smart - comparing things to the Nazis is often silly - but it's not a reason to force him to step down from presenting a sports program. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:58 ---------- Previous post was at 20:53 ---------- Quote:
Personally I just class him with many gobby "stars" who think just becasue they are famous they can post about politics. He should have stuck to football. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
It's not simply about what he was talking about, it's the language used.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
The BBC top guy is a big Tory donor . No bias there... |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Labour donor. Eg 2010 Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1678487588 https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1678487588 https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1678487588 |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Corbyn was closer to one of Hitler's policies than Braverman's immigration policy. Also remember that Corbyn was a proven sympathiser with the terrorist's cause against Israel.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Lord S, like so many with money, will back whoever brings in more for him at the time. Murdoch is another one who changes tune depending on how the wind is blowing.
As for the BBC, massive own goal in lots of ways. Might aswell make it another Govt dept. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
You just don't like rich people. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
:redcard: There's acres of space between those ears Gary. Get off my son you're talking 110% tosh.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
MOTD will air with no presenters at all.
That'll make a nice change, more action, less hot air. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 04:34 ---------- Previous post was at 04:33 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
It's not as if he mouthed off on Match of the Day either. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:10 ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 ---------- Quote:
As Alan Sugar demonstrates so successfully, its impartiality rules clearly depend on who you are and what issue of the day you feel like mouthing off about. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Mouthing off is our speciality here.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The BBC currently has tight restrictions on what its news team can say on social media but not its other presenters. If it wants to review its rules that's one thing, but it can't operate in an ad hoc manner as it's done with Linneker and expect it to work.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Remember when Andrew Neil, who presented the political programmes Sunday Politics and This Week on BBC One, Daily Politics & Politics Live on BBC2, sometimes hosted Newsnight on BBC2, The Andrew Neil Interviews on BBC1, all whilst posting outspoken political opinions in the Spectator, various newspapers, and Twitter, was pulled up for breaching the BBC Impartiality Rules?
No, me neither… |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Football Focus replaced with Bargain Hunt as they've no presenter. :D
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
No episode has been banned. They only made 5. The "sixth" was NOT made by the BBC and is going to be made available on iPlayer anyway. Plenty of examples of where nature programmes have highlighted damage caused by "invasive alien species". |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Journalists have been leaving the BBC in their droves for this reason, the BBC simply do not want their staff criticising the sitting government, I guess because they have to keep relying on the government to get their funding renewed.
Looks like it has gone up a level since they employed this new dodgy chairman though. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Not sure why the Chairman of the BBC needs to hold the same political views as the Prime Minister. Surely you pick the best person for the job, not ask your mates down the pub who's up for it? |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Not necessarily to do with political views, but somebody you know. There's no job advert with interviews etc. They still have to be approved by Parliament and the Privy Council. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Wild Isles is a five part series commissioned by the BBC and made by Silverback Films.
Saving our Wild Isles is a one-episode film commissioned by the RSPB and WWF and made by Silverback Films. RSPB/WWF commissioned their film because they knew Silverback were making a series for the BBC and wanted a piece that would pick up on the issues raised in the series and become the basis for their campaigning. The BBC later purchased the rights to show Saving Our Wild Isles. It has opted to put it on the iPlayer and not broadcast it a week after Wild Isles concludes. Thus far are the facts. Why they have done this … well, discuss … |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
And what a banal explanation in attempting to dismiss the worst sort of cronyism to boot ---------- Post added at 12:53 ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1678540127 Here’s another one about when someone complained about Chris Packham’s tweets (Countryfile & SpringWatch presenter on the BBC) just under two years ago. https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1678540504 I wonder what has changed since then… https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1678540504 Really opens your eyes, doesn’t it? |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Have I woken up in Russia?
A freelance sports presenter taken off air for criticising the government on an entirely different platform? Sounds more like RT than the BBC. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The BBC website posted a video in 2018 "Gary is not involved in any news or political output for the BBC, and as such, any expression of his personal political views, does not affect the BBC's impartiality."
https://twitter.com/implausibleblog/...89134692663296 |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Maybe the beeb has cottoned on to him being a bore? His pundit mates will be “taking the knee” next to show solidarity with the great Gary and his fall from grace. Time for a re-think on all of the tiresome footy shows and their endless cliche-spouting non-celebrities.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Maybe this whole thing has been orchestrated so as to get him to resign or dismiss him? The BBC cuts are now really starting to bite and they may feel that they can no longer afford his obscene salary, but want to make it look like he left of his own accord or that they had no choice but to dismiss him?? If he does go it will help the BBC's finances. He won't starve and will probably be picked up by Sky or elsewhere. MOTD will be shown tonight without comment or punditry which, from what i've heard, will suit most football fans and save a fortune. If he does go, you can bet that all those supporting him will be fighting like rats in a sack for his job. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
As has already been pointed out, things changed under the latest chairman, and all the staff knew this, as Im quite sure did Lineker. Quote:
I hope they stick to their guns, and he finds out hes not. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The BBC will back down. They've completely screwed this up, if anything whoever made this decision might have to go.
The weird thing is the noise around this had started to die down. A few Tory MPs did the rounds saying he should go and the Daily Mail did a few front pages but after Lineker refused to apologise and it seemed the BBC had decided the matter was closed the attention died down. Then the BBC went and tried to appease them and ended up alienating everyone else including most of their staff. They've had to pull TV shows and radio programs. There are now rumours the rebellion will extend past the sports on-air talent as well. The BBC might have a full-scale mutiny on their hands for an act of cowardice. If this goes on much longer I think a lot of the BBC staff might just strike until Richard Sharp goes. The other thing about the suspension was it brought attention to him. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
If the text hasn’t changed, and there’s nowhere else the BBC can point to for a similar application yet Lineker can point to Alan Sugar and Government acolytes posting as they wish, it could be a very costly error at the expense of the public purse. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
The difference is the Government didn't complain about him. BBC News Presenters should be impartial on Twitter. Everyone else should be judged on how relevant their politicisation is to their role at the BBC. Otherwise, does it extend to presenters of Strictly Come Dancing? What about documentaries? Does Brian Cox need to be politically neutral on Twitter lest his science shows are brought into disruption? |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Rules may have changed in the last few years or they may have stayed the same. What's clear is that they only seem to be enforced if a presenter does not follow the government's agreed line. That's worrying.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
In case you're gagging to know what I think:
1. The BBC has seriously lost its way. 2. Lineker was wrong to compare UK government actions with Nazi Germany. 3. Lineker is obviously free to say what he wants. He's not a political reporter or new reader. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
So .... one person asks a question, another answers it ... twitter (?).
Was there a reason for your post ? |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
I'm not arguing if he's right or wrong on the point he makes, but I feel there's an important distinction between criticising language and criticising actions. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Not sure where Redwood is coming from on this tweet - someone who helped devise some big privatisations knows more about how markets work than most people so playing naive with this question fools no one. But that's another debate! |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
That’s the interesting thing about the Redwood tweet above - a complete deflection from the issue at hand. I do disagree with what the state broadcaster pays for the presenters of English football highlights compared to the pittance it pays for actual live football in Scotland. However it’s irrelevant to the issue at hand. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
The ‘Nuff said’ bit is about the donations to my Party that the top echelons at the BBC have made. I tell you, I’m one of the last true Conservatives remaining. If the BBC hasn’t been leant one and then bent, my whatsit’s a kipper. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Remember, this is from the man who posted this just under three months ago... https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1678623076 |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
MOTD would be far better just showing the highlights, just think of the money they'd save.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
This whole clown show is a direct result of the Government directing their Tory stooges in the BBC to get Lineker to apologise for speaking the truth to power. In essence, they wished to suppress free speech. Some points to consider:
- as is shown above, Lineker had no case to answer re: abiding by the BBC rules on impartiality. See examples for Sugar, etc. - impartiality works both ways. BBC Chairman installed by government-appointed panel that included a Conservative party donor and prospective MP, as well as the wife of the former chair of the Spectator who worked with Boris Johnson when he edited that political magazine. BBC Board member Robbie Gibb, brother of Tory MP and former minister Nick Gibb, a clear Tory party agent. - if he was a right-wing Football Presenter and had expressed his views on turning back boats, sending families fleeing war and seeking asylum away with no chance of return, etc. nothing would have happened - he did not, as had been claimed, compare the Government to Nazis. What he did was compare the rhetoric & language used with that of the democratically elected German National Socialist Workers' Party as they rose to power. This is an important distinction where the lessons of history should be discussed and seen to be discussed. The poetic irony is that one of the National Socialists' most effective tools was to suppress & silence voices of opposition heard in the mass media of the time (newspapers & radio) - hilariously, if the roles were reversed, the right-wing press plus the useful idiots would all be screaming "wokerati, snowflakes, etc." for supressing free speech. - lastly here's someone else who is saying *exactly* what Lineker said: Quote:
Maybe they'll go after the 81-year old Holocaust survivor next, for consistency? This is all about control .. nothing more |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
If it means less sport on the BBC I'm happy.However my other half will be peeved.
Also I've given up expecting the BBC to stand up to outside interference from all and any political entities that really should leave the BBC alone.The politicians don't pay for it,we the public do.They need to butt out whatever their political leanings and those responsible for running the BBC should say so. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Quote:
For anyone wondering, No, I didnt see it, I never watch it, I view match highlights on the Sky Sports site. ---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:39 ---------- Quote:
Secondly, I really dont see him questioning how it works, just asking a question, to which he got an answer [which may or may not be the correct answer]. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
I saw John Deadwood tweeting earlier how good it was, so much more action, yes just a shame it was only on a fraction of the time it usually is, who'd have thought Deadwood was a fan |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
You’re kidding! |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
I always thought the BBC was leftist leaning out to get the more conservative at every opportunity.
Personally I think that as the BBC is paid for by the public they should put public interest first and while remaining balanced not be afraid to challenge anyone of any particular leaning. In one sense they don't need to be popular as they don't rely on advertising and the worry of loss of revenue from that source but that also means they need to reflect a wide range of views and maybe even challenge views that are popular if they aren't "right". |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
I see part of the climbdown has Lineker thanking Tim Davie. Clearly wanting to make sure he isn’t the fall guy.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Such an egregious assault on freedom of speech demands it in a public sector institution that’s supposedly impartial. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
I think what we have learned here, along with the incidents surrounding Marcus Rashford and Tyrone Mings is that you take on footballers at your peril!
Being very wealthy with a strong public image but not coming from a privileged background is an unusual combination even today. Couple that with the very strong self belief you need to reach the top of the game gives a powerful force |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Especially Gary Lineker of all people - Mr Nice Guy himself. He carries an immense amount of moral authority and publicly climbing in the ring with him on an issue like this was never going to end well for any BBC manager or politician.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Maybe he’ll be a Labour MP one day. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
The BBC caved in, what a surprise.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Worse, it brought more focus on Richard Sharp with it becoming more widely known about his connections to Johnson. Whilst they are different roles it looks so bad to suspend Lineker for making a political comment on his personal Tweeter feed whilst your Chairman is a Tory Donor and helped arrange a loan to the Prime Minister who appointed him! ---------- Post added at 16:39 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Even some Tory MPs now coming out saying they wont vote for it. Complete own goal by the BBC.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Interesting albeit hardly unexpected.
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
I'm surprised no-one has posted Gary is now coming back to MOTD, not that I give a toss about football.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...9&postcount=78 Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
I have no interest in football either, but 'it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. There's more to it & at stake than first appears.
|
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
One thing is almost certain - as you imply, there's more to play out. Good fun. |
Re: Cancel culture at the BBC
Quote:
Quote:
Corbyn is defiantly not an Anti-Semitic, also he doesn't sympathise with terrorists when it comes to Israel.. the issue is he supports the Palestinians who are the victims of almost daily genocide by Israel so the media and the backstabber in Labour labelling him as one. on the Subject of Sugar he's was afraid of Corbyn as he would have been forced to actually pay more taxes also if Corbyn did get he would have scrapped the House of Lords sugar would have to work for his money then. ---------- Post added at 21:10 ---------- Previous post was at 21:05 ---------- Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.