![]() |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
I'll stick to Heinz beans* if you don't mind. I'm off to bed, nosdawch / oiche mhaith. Peace. *A special chow mein from the Oriental Inn - 02890 611999 |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
OK, at least now you've confirmed that you're in the habit of offering commentary on things you've no experience of - that clears things up a little. Quote:
However, I didn't query your right to complain. I asked you where your "they smell" attitude fitted in with the context / concept of "love thy neighbour" and "do unto others". Perhaps you find that, like your "throw a Paddy" remark, a bit too akward to explain? Anyway, I'll save you the bother / indignity by suggesting that we fall back on Ye Olde trustworthy "back on topic" clause - rather than command a factually sensible answer. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
So, no change there then. |
Re: smoking and the pub
After reading the last page or 2 of posts on this "off" topic im now craving a ciggie after 17 years without one
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
That's right, my views haven't changed. Now, with your permission, any chance we can get back on topic now? |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
(cue complaint about "faith persecution") Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Defences" to what exactly? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
I know 100% it's not an attack on me - but you continue to ignore my requests. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Russ I think you'll find it's you who dragged things back off topic and insisted in engaging me by implying that I was baiting you. I had no intention of discussing your faith or taking the subject matter off topic. My closing comments in post #1425 were as follows. "Let's not get hung up on your "faith" perseution complex. I stated it was a bizarre interpretation of one of the tenets of your faith and that is exactly what it is - I'm not about to get into a theological debate over a display of your own contradictiory ignorance, sorry. Lets move on and stick to the subject at hand." So please, let's move on. Thanks. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
Good, I'm glad. Just as long you stand by your word this time. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
One of them, lets call him #1425, asked not to discuss religion but the other, I think his name was #1427, insisted in raising it and this resulted in a third party, #1435 getting involved. There was a bit of a melee and the bouncers were called in - turns out #1427 knew all the bouncers and worked as one himself. He was a bit deft with the old grappling. I can tell you, it was all a bit hairy for a while, but they all counted to ten and it got sorted out. All in all it was a splendid evening - I do miss the old character of the smoke filled bar though. I think not being allowed to smoke in bars is a good thing. What does everyone else think? |
Re: smoking and the pub
Can we all return to the topic NOW please.
Jefferspn T |
Re: smoking and the pub
I hope whatever no smoking legislation you guys implement is better thought out than that which was initially drafted here in Northern Ireland.
The "law" as it stands over here is full of holes. There are reams of contradictions and unenforcable caveats. I believe that the smoking ban was well intentioned but badly put together (by non smokers actually). We have ridiculous scenarios over here in the current legislation where it's technically "illegal" to smoke at a bus stop and home visit employees (community care, meals on wheels, locum doctors etc etc) are unable to do their job if they are asked to visit a smoker at their home. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Ok bus stops can be enclosed. Its to late for me ive been massively overweight ive taken hordes of various drugs and abused my body for a large amount of my life so im screwed. My 10 year old daughter however hasnt and isnt and I do not want her exposed to the very real dangers of passive smoking. You as a very strong advocate of human rights must concede that if me and you were in the same room one of us would have their rights infringed by the other ie you wanting to smoke me wanting you not to so who desides whos rights take priority? the one who knows the dangers but accepts them or the the one who wants to protect his/her health. The second part of what you said I agree is stupid
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum