![]() |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Interesting data on the balance of EU vs. non-EU immigration here - http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statist...ion_statistics
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
... and so it begins:
Quote:
It's going to get a lot harder methinks. |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
EU Border Agency: 1.8m+ Illegal Migrants in 2015, ‘Staggering’ Number Of Jihadis'
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
Not only have they tried to hide their ineptitude, they've persistently deceived the public about the scale of the problem and are still at it for the most part. You only have to listen to May praising our border controls against the backdrop of lorry loads of migrants being discovered at motorway service stations all over the place to know that our borders are porous and they don't really have to will to do anything about it. Far easier to talk tough using weasel words... The damage in the EU is done, the only question is how much has been done and how much more they will effectively allow to happen. If they continue to convey the message that the EU will accept anyone who claims to be fleeing war, abuse, persecution etc. then we shouldn't be surprised in many more migrants follow and the problems of integration, social unrest, criminality etc. that we've already seen escalate. |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
It may be an 'economic good' for some places but how does he intend to ensure that these migrants go where they're needed as opposed to pitching up on our doorstep where the minimum wages are higher and the benefits better? How do we prevent them adding further to the crippling demands imposed on the UK by legal net immigration running at over 1m every 3 years? What about the numerous serious non-economic realities of rapid mass migration which we're seeing all over Europe? What social and other costs are attached to those? |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Most net immigration, 208,000, is from outside the EU. The EU is 187,000. Within both figures are very many students, much needed skilled workers and dependents of folk already here. The only group to have a negative effect on UK wages are those agricultural workers that the government has allowed unscrupulous bosses to pay less than the minimum wage.
Why did they do this? 1. To keep food prices down, 2. For the same reason they have allowed immigration to remain high. i.e. to create demand in the economy, to boost business start ups and to increase tax revenue. Indeed without high immigration we may still be in recession. The disgusting thing about this that whilst the government has encouraged high immigration, its rhetoric has been in the opposite direction. (They lied to us and kidded us that austerity was saving the economy.) Just as bad is the fact that the didn't invest their increased tax receipts into help those areas hit hardest by immigration Solution? 1. Enforce the minimum wage / living wage so that indigenous workers take up agricultural industry jobs currently being filled by cheap labour 2. Build an economy that is less dependent on immigration by a) Borrowing to invest education and skills training, infrastructure, science and technology and particularly in green technology. Austerity holds the economy back and just gives an excuse for shrinking the state and for selling state services off to Tory mates. Asylum seekers and refugees are an issue nothing to do with the EU, but having to be managed by the EU. Out of the EU there would still be our international obligation to support and take asylum seekers and refugees. Because we are not in the Schengen area and because we have proper border controls we are able to stop known undesirables entering. If we invested more, not less , in border controls there would be far less illegals entering. That is a government problem, not an EU problem. |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
Meanwhile, I have to provide you with some facts that completely blows UKIP's Project Fear on our border control. The current situation in Germany is that refugees who are accepted at the the border only get temporary citizenship. If, after 3 to 5 years after having to renew their citizenship annually, they have jobs and living a normal life they will be eligble to apply for permanent residency. "Long-term residency is not enough to secure free movement rights If refugees end up staying in Europe permanently they can acquire long-term resident status – subject to meeting certain conditions – as per the 2003 EU Directive on the status of non-EU nationals who are long-term residents. This gives them the same rights as that of EU member state’s nationals in certain areas, although it does not bestow an absolute right to free movement on par with EU nationals. In any event, the UK, along with Ireland and Denmark, are exempt from this directive. This means that the UK does not have to allow non-EU nationals who are long-term residents of other member state into the UK if it does not want to. If it does allow them entry to the UK it is on the same basis as other non-EU nationals, i.e. meeting any relevant skills and income criteria. Therefore, the UK already has additional controls over immigration policy compared to other EU member states.http://openeurope.org.uk/today/blog/eu-migration-crisis-will-refugees-acquire-full-free-movement-rights" http://openeurope.org.uk/today/blog/...vement-rights/ |
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Covered under EU Freedom of movement
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
I think that this womans efforts need publicizing in light of the EUs efforts to import millions of muslims: Feminists Need To Know — Islam Kills Women
Quote:
|
Re: Unstoppable migration?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum