![]() |
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
so this was for nothing
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24240168 |
Re: Riots
It certainly does not come under traditional definition of a witness giving evidence which must not be opinion or hearsay but am not a legal expert.
|
Re: Riots
Sorry but I have as much sympathy for the likes of Duggan as they have for their many victims.
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:59 ---------- Previous post was at 10:57 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Inquest has heard that it was a phone, not a gun, according to a witness. This inquest is going on a long time:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...s-8980615.html I am still not clear on if he had a gun or not. edit: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24947695 Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
While I do agree on some part with the Armed Police as they've got to make a snap decision which can result in the loss of a life. |
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
So a witness several floors up, whose first instinct was to make money from the footage by selling it, initially says it was a gun then changes his mind to it being a phone AFTER reading newspaper reports and admits in court he hates the Police is classed as credible when he says Duggan was executed???
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum