![]() |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
Oh, and it won't be uncapped either. Apart from that, 100% spot on! :tu: __________________ I don't mind all the discussion on both sides, but I think it's time something was done about the obvious trolls that are just posting crap. Anyone with a name like 'big ba*tard' is clearly here for one reason only, and that's to disrupt the board. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Has anyone touched on the subject of when people use their connection most?
If NTL decide to introduce hard caps, wouldn't people be using their connections most in the evening when they can be infront of the PC and carefully watching the amount they download? Wouldn't that have a noticeable impact on other users? |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
I'm getting near to the unsubscribe option myself because I'm finding this thread rather tedious at present.We are just going round in circles and some exchanges have gone beyond heated...to downright rude.. :( Incog. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
To all those who state that as average user usage increases companies such as NTL will re-evaluate their caps. Yes right. Once the caps are in place they will stay. We will end up paying a standing charge, which includes X GBs, and then pay per GB over that. IMO caps are the thin end of the wedge which will allow ISPs to milk their service over time and turn it into another PaYG system. And to those saying its consumer choice to move ISPs. Yes it is. Pity it's such a ball ache moving from NTL to an alternate ISP. Get a BT line installed. Get Sky installed. Get the BT tested for DSL use (and your stuffed if it fails). Get DSL. Once your on DSL then switching is a breeze but getting there is a major pain. I hope the rumours I heard recently about Cable operators being forced to open their networks for competitors to use was more than a rumour as then switching ISPs would be far easier. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
I disagree with them. :wavey:
I'm all for caps - I like my service nice and fast, without the 24 x 7 bandwidth hogs who feel the need to download the entire internet each month. Caps are the obvious way to limit such people - and if it drives them away from ntl then even better. :D __________________ Well passing lightly over the fact that you have no proof that anybody's internet connection has been degraded by other users downloading 24 x 7, this attitude is utterly astonishing. The only possible excuse for you is a vested interest in ntl's profits. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
There is an assumption from some users that if they have a 3Mb connection or whatever speed they are on, that they should get this speed all the time. This is not guaranteed by any ISP and the likelihood is that the faster speeds become, the less they are able to get the full speed of the connection. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
"There can be many reasons for having 3Mb other than having to max it out all the time but the blinkers some high users have on prevent them from seeing this."
List these many reasons. |
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
But you can hit the cap on a 3mb connection is around 60ish minutes, what i dont understand is that if what most people are saying on here is that the majority of servers on the internet cannot handle multiple connections at high speed due to their bandwidth restrictions, then whats the point of a 3mb tier ?, I dont gain anything other that hitting a cap set far too low for a 3mb connection, the argument you can surf faster is cr*p, what difference does it make surfing at 2mb over 3mb sod all as far as i can see...the only reason for a 3mb tier is for downloading nothing else and if its restricted whats the point ?
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
So if you haven't, why are you "all for caps"? What possible reason could you have for wanting a capped service?
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
I don't subscribe to the idea that you need only have a connection that is just fast enough to download your daily needs in 24 hours. neither do I subscribe to the idea that you have to max out your connection all of the time and certainly not 24/7. I could give you many reasons but why should I? It doesn't take much imagination to think of reasons for having a fast connection and not using it at the max 24/7. __________________ Quote:
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
|
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion Here Please.
I am interested in the tech side of things what can ntl do about bandwidth to improve the situation some tests are being run on adsl 2 which could mean 20 meg connections next year then if its not messed up theres vdsl which could offer 40 meg.I think a mistake was made a long time ago im not sure what the mistake was as i dont know enough about ntl and cable to know but i know 20 meg is available in france with no cap and 100 meg in japan the write up was in a resent micromart about how we in the uk are falling behind,so to reiterate my question what can ntl do to change the situation and create a speed comparable to what adsl2 at least and bandwidth broadening to allow for higher caps,Im only asking out of interest without moaning whining or having a go at someonelol lol lol http://www.nwfusion.com/news/tech/20...echupdate.html adsl2 link
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum