![]() |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
Simple example: £100m profit with 20% tax = £20m to pay leaving £80m gain. Instead suffer £50m losses leads to £50m profit = £10m tax paid leaving £40m gain, rather than the £30m gain if the losses weren't allowed against tax. |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
Farage is clever enough to work it all out i'm sure ;) Like Bozza he's only in it for himself, and his personal wealth. |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Here is the latest polling out today, from Panelbase.
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Anyone had any MP's at their doors yet?
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
It's tell us what the % is of those who voted in 2016, would now vote in the General Election, 2019. |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
. . and then people will say we're thick ;) |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
I can't remember if I've said this before, but since the UK is (in theory) a democracy I'm going to say it anyway. :p:
From the Notebooks of Lazarus Long: If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for...but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. If this is too blind for your taste, consult some well-meaning fool (there is always one around) and ask his advice. Then vote the other way. This enables you to be a good citizen (if such is your wish) without spending the enormous amount of time on it that truly intelligent exercise of franchise requires. - Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough For Love I have followed this rule for decades. Unfortunately, when I first started doing so, I was led (or pushed) to a logical conclusion Heinlein might not have thought of: what happens when you want to vote against all the parties because you don't trust or agree with any of them? The only logical answer to this is to vote for none, i.e. not to vote at all. So except for the 1997 election, I haven't voted for decades. (Even then, I was acting in accordance with Heinlein's principle - I wasn't voting for Labour, because Tony Blair always got my back up with that creepy smile; I was voting against the Tories because I'd bloody well had enough of 'em and so, I imagine, had millions of other voters. Of course "New Labour" turned out to be just a different flavour of Conservatism, but that's another debate.) This, however, does not mean, as several politicians have said, that I and the millions who agree with me are apathetic. This is not the case. We do care. We simply object to all the available choices. Which is why I want to see a new choice added to the ballot paper, one familiar to Richard Pryor fans from the remake of Brewster's Millions: NONE OF THE ABOVE. Give us that option and I will quite happily vote. Such an option would mean that abstainers would no longer effectively be disenfranchised because their voice wasn't heard. With that option, they would have to be heard - and with millions voting that way as I strongly suspect they would, it would make all the parties sit up and take notice. This option seems to me to be the ultimate expression of democracy: a way of telling all the parties you don't agree with any of them, without wasting your vote by spoiling the ballot paper or being self-disenfranchised by not voting at all. For the record, I voted for Brexit, which I'm sure will come as no surprise to y'all. :p: I am frankly disgusted with the way successive Prime Ministers (none of whom we actually voted for!) have dragged their feet over this. We, the electorate who pay their damn salaries, told them what we wanted them to do. It is their responsibility and their duty to do as they were damn well told. The size of the Referendum majority was and is irrelevant. It was a majority vote. They should therefore abide by it. End of. "But will you be voting this time?" I hear you cry. Hmm. Good question. I haven't decided yet. Though Boris Johnson seems to be pushing for what I and millions of others told the government what we wanted done, I'm not convinced by him or what he's offering. Frankly, I don't trust him. Or Corbyn. Or any of them. I don't really believe democracy works any more in this country. NONE OF THE ABOVE is the only proper answer IMO. "Suppose They Gave An Election And Nobody Came?" - now that I'd pay to see! :D |
Re: Election 2019, Week 1
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum