Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35505279)

...
I think their working towards change but I also think they need help.

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35505324)

What help would actually be effective? From whom would that help come?

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35505334)

common sense and all i've said already or close to it. me. :D

Originally Posted by Skie (Post 35505425)

I can see them using the original Superhub as the lower tier device for 30-60 and the new one as the device delivered with the 'premium' tiers. Just like they did with the Hub/Superhub originally. Even if its just to help ship the remaining stock.
[SEPH]: That's not their style. Skie. Peter (ex-VM) has told you all how it'll work

The plan of only having one device is probably a good one, but it did not survive the battlefield and is made increasingly less relevant if a second version of the Superhub comes out only a few years after the Superhub itself graced our connections.
[SEPH]: I don't see that as logical, I'm afraid. A laptop is fairly obsolete after three years as more powerful chipsets emerge. At minimum the SH2 is analagous. Plus lets'hope VM have learned the lessons regarding the lame SH1

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35505446)

[SEPH]: That's not their style. Skie. Peter (ex-VM) has told you all how it'll work

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35505454)

That was a differnet DOCSIS scenario from today's, Ben.

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35505456)

Again, SH1/SH2 - wireless N. Plus then the lower tiers were not DOCSIS 3.

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35505484)

Now, to all intents and purposes, it's a D3 world. What we're all looking for in your responses is an actual clue as to what VM would do if it differs from Peter's view.