![]() |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Hmm...I get a feeling of deja vu.
Isn't this argument precisely the same as what happened a couple of years back when the Sky Basics were pulled from Virgin Media. Sky harped on about pouring loads of money into Sky One, Virgin wanted it on the cheap etc. Fast forward over a year and Sky offered a better deal because the advertisers were kicking up a stink. Obviously the difference this time is the advertisers can't complain because the channel has never been on Virgin and they haven't lost their audience. But to quote that song "It's all just a little bit of history repeating!" :D |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Last time round, Sky wanted Virgin to pay a price that reflected Sky's investment in programming on Sky One (in essence they wanted Virgin to help them pay the king's ransom it cost to steal Lost off C4). This flew in the face of the conventional means by which these things are normally agreed (you pay for a channel based on its popularity, not based on what its owner has lavished on it).
Sky might just have got away with this tactic had they not only recently used the popularity argument to negotiate a vastly reduced rate for carriage of the channels VM owned at the time. VM was rightly able to point out that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Nevertheless, Sky threw its toys out the pram and spent a few weeks being faced with the reality of ratings sliced by a third and advertisers making dangerous noises about wanting lower rates for slots on Sky One before eventually cutting a deal that essentially valued Sky Basics and VM's channels on the same basis. All of which is now a bit academic as VM has sold the lot to Sky anyway. As you say, Sky won't be as worried about advertising rates this time round because the channel has never been on VM, so nobody is going to complain that viewing figures are lower than they thought they would be. On the other hand, I would not be at all surprised if once again Sky's valuation of the channel in negotiations with VM has more to do with what Sky has spent on it rather than what it's actually worth in ratings terms. |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Their big problem - well, one of their problems - is the American super-size advert breaks in their programmes. It makes it very difficult to really stick with a show unless you badly want to. The hard core will sit through it but a lot of casual viewers won't. I certainly never watched anything on Sky One unless I really wanted to.
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
For US shows, just start watching 20 minutes after the start for a 1 hour show; you'll end up finishing at the same time as the TV broadcas, minus add breaks! |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
Only for the Hogfather and going postal in HD for me since it came back. And that was recorded to miss ads..... |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
I am not a big sky fan,But sky are willing to invest in programs for there channels it is only natural they want to recover some of there cost not only from there own subscribers but from selling there channels to other tv providers.Vm decided to pull out of the channels and program market by selling there channels so what do they expect,If there not willing to invest in programs why should they expect to get them from sky for next to nothing.They should have thought about all this before they sold the channels especially to sky.
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
We don't know what figures are involved here so we can't realte 'next to nothing' to anything or other channel agreement
As I've said before I'd much rather Virgin get it for the right price rather than at any price |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
Sky bought some programming for an over inflated price and they want VM to pick up the tab. Sky are like the dodgy car salesman here. |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
|
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
Problem with this statement is that it is free to all Sky Subscribers till September IIRC. Then, I have read, it will go into the variety pack. Therefore Sky are not positioning it as a premium channel like moveis etc but part of their standard channels. It could almost be right to concider it a basic channel like Sky 1 etc. Why then should Virgin help pick up the tab on a channel that Sky will not charge its own customers for at all if included in a current package. :confused: I say wait till Sky come back begging for any crumbs Virgin are willing to pay for what appears from viewing figures to be a channel even their own customers arn't watching :p: |
Re: Guardian: "Sky Atlantic won't be on Virgin Media soon, says BSkyB boss"
Quote:
That TIVO thingie you've got should do the job :D Sorry DF; I tried to resist... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum