![]() |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
So no suggested sexual motive then, good. I'm glad people will hopefully pay more attention to the few facts that we do know about what happened from now on.
No point in trying to use pseudo-educated and eloquent language to hide the fact that we probably know less than 10% of what really happened. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Nor should we forget that proceedings are active, a trial is due, and we are bound by the same laws as the media when it comes to discussing details of the case pre-trial. Despite the fact he has admitted the killing ;)
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
But the reality is that there could be any number of plots/scenarios, ranging from the downright obvious, to the mind bogglingly complex, that culminated with the murder of Joanna Yeates. We can only wait and see what the trial dredges up, I just hope we get to hear the real version of events rather than a mere fantasy articulately engineered to yield the lesser manslaughter charge. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
If I were the betting type, I'd wager that you're quite correct. As unfortunate as that is for the enquiring minds among us.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Some slappage for the Mirror and the Sun might be in the pipeline.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13371918 Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Excellent.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
I hope he sues them for every last penny.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Jo Yeates' landlord settles libel case out of court
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14339807 Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
This, along with some of the shameless insinuations directed at the McCann family when Madeline went missing, serves to further underline the point that freedom of speech is subservient to an individual's right not to have their good name dragged through the mud.
This particular case highlights the media's recent trend towards pushing the boundaries of acceptable commentary and reporting while an unsolved case is under investigation. Had this individual eventually been sent to trial, he might have argued his right to a fair trial had been compromised by some of what was said about him. Justice is more important than selling papers, and I am reluctantly coming round to the view that media regulation backed up by criminal law is the only way we can now ensure this. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
His papers including the likes of the Sun and his News Channel Sky news can still control what news is published. Politicians will be terrified of him printing all of the stuff they have saved for such a day. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum