![]() |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
It does get a bit too predictable when you've been playing for quite some time.
Still, it's a great SP game, but I've no doubt HL2 will better it. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
The thing is - this is classic doom with fancy graphics and sound. Nothing more nothing less.
IMO - thats good enough. But HL2 will be better - was that in any doubt though (well it better be). :D |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
HL2 Beta - never played it - didnt want too - i want that baby to be "fresh" the first time it loads. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
DirectX is more than just Direct3D - it's sound (for 5.1/7.1 support), DirectInput, DirectPlay (chat and multiplayer) and quite a bit more. They probably mean it uses DirectX 9 hardware features like advanced Pixelshader, just like Doom does, but in the OpenGL API. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
First off, Doom3 should not be classed as DX9 at all, it's OpenGL 1.5. Secondly the finished version of Half-Life 2 will actually use both API's, but is Direct3D/DX9 by nature and default. Plus do you really think HL2 would be faster on ATI hardware if it were OpenGL only? The choice of DX9 just wasn't available for some reason on the leak. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Well I'm not gonna say much, but I'm gonna have a look at doom 3 tonight.
I am not expecting much, fancy gtraphics etc dont impress me that much. If it is essentially doom 1 and 2 then I'll be much annoyed, a re-hash and sold at full price is in my oppinion wrong. HL2, well it looks fancy, but I still say its also gimmicky. I wasnt that impressed with HL anyway so HL2 doesnt have much to beat. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
As for it simply being Doom 1 & 2 'rehashed' this is un true. It is however a retelling of the doom story as though the first 2 did not exist. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
I've seen a lot of reports of big FPS lag reductions when changing these config values :
"seta image_cacheMegs" change the number value to roughly 1/4 of your available ram (512 = 128, or 1GB = 256) †œseta image_useCacheââââ‚ ¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ã‚ to †œ1âà ¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚ Ã¢â‚¬ Å“seta image_CacheMinKâââ₠¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ã‚ to †œ20480â € *Note it won't give you an increase in FPS.. it may however enable you to run a higher resolution/detail setting without stuttering. (lag spikes) Anyone tried these yet? I'll be testing when I get home. |
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
Re: Doom III - summer 2004!
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum