Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

OLD BOY 30-04-2021 20:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078463)
"rejoin them" referred to the Single Market and Customs Union, not the EU.

I don’t think you’ve grasped the problem with that! Brexiteers voted to regain their sovereignty and to forge our own trade deals to increase the wealth-making capacity of this country.

Re-joining the Single Market and Customs Union puts us in a worse position than had we not left the EU. Why on Earth would any sensible person want that?

Sephiroth 30-04-2021 21:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078463)
"rejoin them" referred to the Single Market and Customs Union, not the EU.



I'm sure they can help us ease the problems, but the solution might not make for comfortable reading for you!

I'm not sure what form "being done with them" might take, as we have left the EU!

For a start, not referring to them as "our friends" but rather to take a colder tone so as to properly reflect their tone.

Then to realign our agricultural sector so that cheeses and other products we import become home-grown. I think that's an adjustment that will naturally occur as farmers seize the opportunity.

Just be shot of them.

1andrew1 30-04-2021 22:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36078465)
I don’t think you’ve grasped the problem with that! Brexiteers voted to regain their sovereignty and to forge our own trade deals to increase the wealth-making capacity of this country.

Re-joining the Single Market and Customs Union puts us in a worse position than had we not left the EU. Why on Earth would any sensible person want that?

I was explaining to Seph how trade friction could be avoided which seems to be his objective. I noted he wouldn't like the solution!

Sephiroth 30-04-2021 23:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078468)
I was explaining to Seph how trade friction could be avoided which seems to be his objective. I noted he wouldn't like the solution!

Reduced trade friction between the UK & EU is not an attractive proposition because it means that they make the rules. As OB said, the majority of the UK didn't want that and the EU's current behaviour militates against any reconciliation.

Threatening to turn off the vaccine tap was, effectively, a potential death threat to many Brits. Enemy comes to mind.


1andrew1 01-05-2021 11:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078473)

Threatening to turn off the vaccine tap was, effectively, a potential death threat to many Brits. Enemy comes to mind.

Our European friends have supplied us with millions of vaccine doses. That situation was not about threatening the UK, it was about putting pressure on AstraZeneca. How many doses have we supplied our European friends with?

papa smurf 01-05-2021 11:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078496)
Our European friends have supplied us with millions of vaccine doses. That situation was not about threatening the UK, it was about putting pressure on AstraZeneca. How many doses have we supplied our European friends with?

The factories in Europe that we signed contracts with supplied millions of vaccines as per contractual agreement, the Eu supplied nothing that i am aware of.

heero_yuy 01-05-2021 12:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36078499)
The factories in Europe that we signed contracts with supplied millions of vaccines as per contractual agreement, the Eu supplied nothing that i am aware of.

Indeed it is the EU that is threatening to stop shipments of vaccine to this country as contracted for.

Chris 01-05-2021 12:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078496)
Our European friends have supplied us with millions of vaccine doses. That situation was not about threatening the UK, it was about putting pressure on AstraZeneca. How many doses have we supplied our European friends with?

Yeah ... let's knock this on the head right now.

To reiterate Papa's point: The EU supplied us with nothing. The British government has contracts with private companies. These have supplied the vaccine. To claim the EU was somehow responsible for this, and that we should be grateful, is to normalise the idea that normal rules of trade and contract exist only at the whim of governments. That says nothing good about respect for rule of law within the EU.

We have no reason to be grateful, or to consider the EU our 'friends', just because they have not yet arbitrarily intervened in the normal flow of international trade between their territory and ours. The same, sadly, cannot be said for Australia.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 12:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The UK's relationship with the EU is like Sky's with VM's. They'll co-operate when it's in their interests and will compete with each other when it's not.

To pretend that the two are enemies as some suggest is ridiculous and dangerous. The UK's enemies are more likely to be countries Iran and Russia.

Sephiroth 01-05-2021 12:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078496)
Our European friends have supplied us with millions of vaccine doses. That situation was not about threatening the UK, it was about putting pressure on AstraZeneca. How many doses have we supplied our European friends with?

You're coming out as a true Remainer now. Not quite the 'patriotic Brit' that your self-description would render in peoples' minds. The fact that you provocatively emphasis the term "our European friends" proves that you are blind to the aggressive language publicly deployed by the EU.

The EU has NOT supplied any vaccine to the UK. Commercial factories have produced vaccine and sent it to the UK. Once you start according supremacy of commercial trade to a governmental executive (the EC), then you're on the slippery slope to dictatorship. Not worth of a 'patriotic Brit'.


---------- Post added at 11:35 ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078510)
The UK's relationship with the EU is like Sky's with VM's. They'll co-operate when it's in their interests and will compete with each other when it's not.

To pretend that the two are enemies as some suggest is ridiculous and dangerous. The UK's enemies are more likely to be countries Iran and Russia.

That's rather one sided, don't you think?

jonbxx 01-05-2021 12:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078473)
Reduced trade friction between the UK & EU is not an attractive proposition because it means that they make the rules. As OB said, the majority of the UK didn't want that and the EU's current behaviour militates against any reconciliation.

Threatening to turn off the vaccine tap was, effectively, a potential death threat to many Brits. Enemy comes to mind.


But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

Carth 01-05-2021 12:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Russia hasn't nuked us . . . I guess that means we're friends? :D

1andrew1 01-05-2021 13:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078511)
[COLOR="Blue"]
That's rather one sided, don't you think?

Eh? Not at all. "They" refers to the UK and the EU.

---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078515)
Russia hasn't nuked us . . . I guess that means we're friends? :D

It means we're alive! :D

Poisoning a British police officer in Salisbury with novichok is not the most friendly of gestures.

Chris 01-05-2021 13:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078514)
But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

This is nonsense on stilts. Respect for rule of law isn't a deliberate friendly act. It's neutral. We don't decide each morning whether we're going to follow the rules today. Normal behaviour is simply to do so, and nobody should expect to get a pat on the back for it.

Following the financial crisis of 2008, the UK made bilateral loans to the Republic of Ireland that allowed that country to access finance on more favourable terms than it could secure by going to the money markets directly. That's an example of a deliberate, friendly act. It went over and above the normal rules (while not breaking them) in order to help a neighbour.

Sephiroth 01-05-2021 13:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078514)
But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

Beg to differ. If they were threatening us and didn't then carry out their threat doesn't make them friendly in any sense.

The USA is a red herring. They haven't threatened us and vaccines are now being exported by American company. https://www.reuters.com/business/hea...th-2021-04-29/ (paywall but the headline says it all + the quote below):

Quote:

The vaccine shipment, produced at Pfizer's Kalamazoo, Michigan plant, marks the first time the drugmaker has delivered abroad from US facilities after a Trump-era restriction on dose exports expired at the end of March, the source said.


---------- Post added at 12:21 ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078516)
Eh? Not at all. "They" refers to the UK and the EU.

---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------


It means we're alive! :D

Poisoning a British police officer in Salisbury with novichok is not the most friendly of gestures.

Nor is the EU threatening to withhold exports of the vaccine to the UK.


---------- Post added at 12:22 ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078521)
This is nonsense on stilts. Respect for rule of law isn't a deliberate friendly act. It's neutral. We don't decide each morning whether we're going to follow the rules today. Normal behaviour is simply to do so, and nobody should expect to get a pat on the back for it.

Following the financial crisis of 2008, the UK made bilateral loans to the Republic of Ireland that allowed that country to access finance on more favourable terms than it could secure by going to the money markets directly. That's an example of a deliberate, friendly act. It went over and above the normal rules (while not breaking them) in order to help a neighbour.

... who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

Chris 01-05-2021 13:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Further to the point about the USA, the American decision to invoke emergency defence laws to prevent drug exports was known and understood from a very early stage and was factored into the purchase agreements HMG signed with drugmakers with facilities there. There was no arbitrary, unfriendly attempt to intervene in a privately negotiated contract after the fact.

The EU's behaviour has been quite different. It has, in essence, alleged breach of contract, for which they ought to seek remedy in the courts. However, instead of going to court, they have acted as judge and jury and made regulations allowing them to intervene directly, effectively making a judicial ruling in their own favour.

---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
.. who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

Well, to be fair to them, that Anglophobe Varadkar didn't become teeshirt until 2017.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 14:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078526)
However, instead of going to court

??? That's exactly what the EU is doing.
Quote:

European Union lawyers on Wednesday demanded AstraZeneca (AZN.L) immediately deliver COVID-19 vaccines from its factories in Britain, in a move that risks reigniting a spat with London over scarce vaccine supplies.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...rt-2021-04-28/

---------- Post added at 13:05 ---------- Previous post was at 12:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
Nor is the EU threatening to withhold exports of the vaccine to the UK.

False equivalence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
... who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

A Telegraph op ed writer doesn't fully appreciate that the UK is now a third country, I get that. But it doesn't mean anyone's being royally stiffed over.

jonbxx 01-05-2021 14:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
OK, so if I understand, preventing vaccine exports AND preventing the export of materials that allow other countries to make vaccines is all cool but suggesting that you might do similar is not.

If the EU just stopped exports without threatening to do so beforehand, that would be OK? I guess that is how the UK prohibits exports of lifesaving drugs..

Chris 01-05-2021 14:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078528)
??? That's exactly what the EU is doing.

Having already taken extrajudicial measures, as you well know. Australia has been denied a shipment, others have been threatened.

Carth 01-05-2021 14:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

European Union lawyers on Wednesday demanded AstraZeneca (AZN.L) immediately deliver COVID-19 vaccines from its factories in Britain
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

papa smurf 01-05-2021 14:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078533)
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

Correct, stamping your feet and shouting demands isn't quite the same as a judicial hearing.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 15:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078533)
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

It depends upon the circumstances in which you say it. In the bath, possibly not :D but at a court hearing like this one, yes.

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078532)
Having already taken extrajudicial measures, as you well know. Australia has been denied a shipment, others have been threatened.

You said that the EU ought to seek remedy in the courts. I pointed out that they are doing exactly this. Hopefully we can concur on this.

Chris 01-05-2021 16:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078536)
It depends upon the circumstances in which you say it. In the bath, possibly not :D but at a court hearing like this one, yes.

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------


You said that the EU ought to seek remedy in the courts. I pointed out that they are doing exactly this. Hopefully we can concur on this.

No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

Sephiroth 01-05-2021 17:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078539)
No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

I've been saying that about Andrew for months.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 20:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078539)
No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

You're crediting the EU's actions on vaccine procurement with more respect than they deserve, Chris. They've blundered along like a drunk in a dark alleyway and eventually have reached the correct route with this week's court hearings.

Carth 02-05-2021 00:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078555)
You're crediting the EU's actions on vaccine procurement with more respect than they deserve, Chris. They've blundered along like a drunk in a dark alleyway and eventually have reached the correct route with this week's court hearings.

So you think the EU are correct in challenging an agreement they made with AstraZeneca which - apparently - contained the phrase "best reasonable efforts", and now because the incompetent and 'tight-arsed' EU realise their mistake they're also demanding vaccine from from the UK, who made a much better deal.

get that chip off your shoulder mate, it's dragging you down :p:

1andrew1 02-05-2021 01:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078566)
So you think the EU are correct in challenging an agreement they made with AstraZeneca which - apparently - contained the phrase "best reasonable efforts", and now because the incompetent and 'tight-arsed' EU realise their mistake they're also demanding vaccine from from the UK, who made a much better deal.

get that chip off your shoulder mate, it's dragging you down :p:

What I'm saying - and I do hope you're able to step up and agree with me on this - is that if the EU or any other purchaser has a dispute with the AstraZeneca then they should sort it out with them, using the courts as a last resort. They shouldn't resort to back door solutions like blocking exports.

Sephiroth 02-05-2021 08:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078585)
What I'm saying - and I do hope you're able to step up and agree with me on this - is that if the EU or any other purchaser has a dispute with the AstraZeneca then they should sort it out with them, using the courts as a last resort. They shouldn't resort to back door solutions like blocking exports.

Your statement above sits oddly with what you said in this post:

Quote:

But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

1andrew1 02-05-2021 19:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078592)
Your statement above sits oddly with what you said in this post:


The post you quote was posted by someone else entirely - jonbxx! :D

Sephiroth 02-05-2021 20:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078614)
The post you quote was posted by someone else entirely - jonbxx! :D

Bit of an oops there. Sorry.

Mad Max 02-05-2021 20:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078618)
Bit of an oops there. Sorry.


A senior moment :D

1andrew1 02-05-2021 23:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
How it started:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36067588)
The UK has put the EU into its place. It's really upset them and they deserve no less for their arrogance. They're treating us like shit and it would be a weakness on our part if we caved. We are not being petty.

How it finshed:

Quote:

Britain set to formally recognise EU's ambassador for first time

Row over status of João Vale de Almeida has 'chilled' relationship between London and Brussels

Foreign Office sources have now told The Times that the decision has led to an “unhealthy chilling effect” on talks between diplomats on both sides in Brussels.

In retaliation to the move, Britain’s ambassador to Brussels was frozen out of negotiations, with sources adding that negotiations on key areas such as fishing and customs had been made more difficult.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...st-time-since/

Sephiroth 03-05-2021 00:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078626)

Consolation prize would be that the UK re-affirms that it considers the EU to be an "international organisation" (which it really is) but is making the concession for pragmatic reasons.

The EU are not our friends and we should make that clear.

Sephiroth 05-05-2021 09:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Who'd a thought it? Here's the paywall link for those able:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...aign=DM1409761


Quote:

France threatens to cut off Jersey's electricity as Brexit fishing row grows
Self-governing British Crown Dependency would face all-island power cuts if the French threat was carried out
Quote:

France threatened to cut off Jersey's electricity supplies on Tuesday as the row over post-Brexit fishing rights between Paris and London deepened.

"We are ready to use these retaliation measures," Annick Girardin, the maritime minister, told lawmakers in the French parliament. "I am sorry it has come to this. We will do so if we have to."

Ms Giradin mentioned the underwater cables that supply Jersey, the largest of the Channel Islands, with about 95 percent of its electricity and suggested they could be shut down. The remaining five per cent of its electricity is provided by on-island diesel generators.
Quote:

On Friday, the UK authorised 41 ships to fish in waters off Jersey. The French fisheries ministry said this was accompanied by new demands "which were not arranged or discussed, and which we were not notified about".

The new measures set out "where the ships can go and cannot go", as well as the number of days the fishermen can spend at sea and using what machinery, the ministry claimed.

"This is absolutely unacceptable," Ms Girardin said. "If we accept this for Jersey, it would imperil our access everywhere."

David Jones, the deputy chairman of the European Research Group of Tory MPs, told The Telegraph: "This is straightforward demanding money with menaces, which is not the way a 21st century democratic country behaves. The simple fact is this is bullying in order to get the UK to back down on fishing."

1andrew1 05-05-2021 10:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078804)
Who'd a thought it?

Especially when we were promised downsides wouldn't happen.
Quote:

"There will be no downside to Brexit, only a considerable upside."
David Davis, 14 July 2016

Sephiroth 05-05-2021 10:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078807)
Especially when we were promised downsides wouldn't happen.

Quote:

"There will be no downside to Brexit, only a considerable upside."
David Davis, 14 July 2016
Who'd a thought that the EU would be as nasty as it is? (Quite a few of us, actually).
Who'd a thought that Mrs. May would take orders from the EU?

Chris 05-05-2021 11:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078807)
Especially when we were promised downsides wouldn't happen.

I'm pretty sure David Davis didn't have in mind the sort of sanctions the civilised world reserves for rogue states. Why would he have?

You sound more and more like Lord Haw-Haw, Andrew.

1andrew1 05-05-2021 11:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078815)
I'm pretty sure David Davis didn't have in mind the sort of sanctions the civilised world reserves for rogue states. Why would he have?

You sound more and more like Lord Haw-Haw, Andrew.

French fishermen are amongst the most militant workers in Europe and known for their undue influence. To pretend otherwise is delusional.

But in the context of this situation, I'm very dubious of this threat getting remotely close to being carried out.

Hugh 05-05-2021 11:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Fuller explanation from the Jersey local press.

https://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2...ng-row-erupts/

I think the French have over-reacted.

1andrew1 05-05-2021 11:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078818)
Fuller explanation from the Jersey local press.

https://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2...ng-row-erupts/

I think the French have over-reacted.

French fishermen over-react? Surely not. :D

Jaymoss 05-05-2021 12:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078821)
French fishermen over-react? Surely not. :D

Never negotiate with terrorists ;) just cuz they have swing in France means nothing they have no swing here

Chris 05-05-2021 12:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078817)
French fishermen are amongst the most militant workers in Europe and known for their undue influence. To pretend otherwise is delusional.

But in the context of this situation, I'm very dubious of this threat getting remotely close to being carried out.

Yeah ... I'm pretty sure that characterising David Davis' comments as delusional for not allowing for the militancy French fishermen is missing his point by quite a bit. One might even suspect you're wilfully doing so.

1andrew1 05-05-2021 13:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078824)
Yeah ... I'm pretty sure that characterising David Davis' comments as delusional for not allowing for the militancy French fishermen is missing his point by quite a bit. One might even suspect you're wilfully doing so.

French fishermen were a known quantity in 2016. If you choose to ignore that, so be it.
That being said, I believe the electricity threat to be an empty one. Those making the threat are deluded too.

Mad Max 05-05-2021 13:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
For cod sake what next!

Chris 05-05-2021 13:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078828)
French fishermen were a known quantity in 2016. If you choose to ignore that, so be it.
That being said, I believe the electricity threat to be an empty one. Those making the threat are deluded too.

As I suspected ... wilful ignorance. If this is the best you can do, I won’t trouble you any further.

Sephiroth 05-05-2021 14:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Sod the French fisherman and their nasty government. Reading the article linked by Hugh, the French fisherman are way out of order and the licences need to be enforced. If they blockade the ports against UK boats landing their catch, then the dispute mechanism must be inviked.

They really are the enemy.


papa smurf 06-05-2021 09:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
UK sends Royal Navy ships to patrol Jersey amid fishing row with France

Fishermen who claim their rights are being unfairly restricted are protesting at Jersey's St Helier port.

No 10 said it was sending two Navy vessels to "monitor the situation".

HMS Severn, which has previously been used to shadow Russian navy warships off the English coast, and HMS Tamar arrived near Jersey on Thursday morning.

The ships are routinely used for fisheries protection - with sailors able to board other boats for spot checks.


Oh dear how sad for the poor french fishermen, i feel sure that in the fullness of time these fishing permits can be sorted out but as the EU knows the wheels of bureaucracy turn extremely slowly ,i'm sure given 6-15 years it can be ironed out.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57003069

Maggy 06-05-2021 10:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just another distraction from Boris's home life.;)

papa smurf 06-05-2021 10:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
French military ship heads to Jersey to join post-Brexit fishing protest as Royal Navy patrols waters


French authorities have confirmed to Sky News that a patrol vessel, Military Ops ship Athos, will be arriving "imminently" to carry out a "patrol mission

https://news.sky.com/story/uk-to-sen...-port-12297840


It's all getting exiting now -ww scallop?

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 10:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36078876)
Just another distraction from Boris's home life.;)

A gratuitous piece of prejudice. The situation in Jersey is very important in terms of the EU treaty with the UK/Jersey.

papa smurf 06-05-2021 10:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078878)
A gratuitous piece of prejudice. The situation in Jersey is very important in terms of the EU treaty with the UK/Jersey.

:clap:

Chris 06-05-2021 11:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36078876)
Just another distraction from Boris's home life.;)

Yes, it was very obliging of French politicians to help Boris out by threatening to cut off Jersey's electricity supply. And those French fishermen are obviously massive Boris fans, cluttering the port like that.

Maggy 06-05-2021 12:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078881)
Yes, it was very obliging of French politicians to help Boris out by threatening to cut off Jersey's electricity supply. And those French fishermen are obviously massive Boris fans, cluttering the port like that.

No just more opportunism from Boris trying to be Churchillian.;)

Julian 06-05-2021 12:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
No matter. The French will bravely run away shortly :)

Hugh 06-05-2021 12:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Nice to see the Telegraph being selective in their history...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1620297014

Forgetting to mention the other aspects, like deporting the Jewish people in Jersey to the death camps, deporting other Islanders en masse to Germany, where many died in labour camps, sending Jersey Resistance members to concentration camps, built fortifications using forced labour, which killed thousands of imported slave labourers, amongst many other horrific actions.

But at least they kept the lights on...

(my brother has lived in Jersey for nearly 30 years, having moved there in the 90s - the locals do not remember the Occupation fondly, so this headline is going down like a turd in a trifle)

Chris 06-05-2021 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
But everybody knows Adolf and Eva were perfect dinner guests, as long as you kept the conversation off religion and politics ...

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 12:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078889)
Nice to see the Telegraph being selective in their history...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1620297014

Forgetting to mention the other aspects, like deporting the Jewish people in Jersey to the death camps, deporting other Islanders en masse to Germany, where many died in labour camps, sending Jersey Resistance members to concentration camps, built fortifications using forced labour, which killed thousands of imported slave labourers, amongst many other horrific actions.

But at least they kept the lights on...

(my brother has lived in Jersey for nearly 30 years, having moved there in the 90s - the locals do not remember the Occupation fondly, so this headline is going down like a turd in a trifle)

Well, yes. Why should the Torygraph mention something that isn't the case? You're being silly, imo.

Hugh 06-05-2021 12:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078891)
Well, yes. Why should the Torygraph mention something that isn't the case? You're being silly, imo.

Are you saying the Nazis didn't do the things I referred to? :confused:

The Telegraph is comparing the current farrago with the Nazi occupation, and highlighting part of the Nazi occupation as a positive against what is currently happening - "tone deaf" doesn't even begin to describe it.

Carth 06-05-2021 12:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I quite fancy Fish & Ships for lunch . . . with scraps :bsmack:

jonbxx 06-05-2021 12:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
So when jersey insists on treaty arrangements being adhered to and not trying to 'to understand and help ease the problems', it's send in the gunboats time. Jersey is not being very friendly towards France here it seems

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 12:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078892)
Are you saying the Nazis didn't do the things I referred to? :confused:

The Telegraph is comparing the current farrago with the Nazi occupation, and highlighting part of the Nazi occupation as a positive against what is currently happening - "tone deaf" doesn't even begin to describe it.

Now you're being even sillier. The Torygraph's report is exactly correct and you're making mischief out of it. There's no way anyone other than a fool/troublemaker would interpret the report as portraying the Nazis in a positive light; it is a factual observation and portrays the French minister in a very poor light.

---------- Post added at 11:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078894)
So when jersey insists on treaty arrangements being adhered to and not trying to 'to understand and help ease the problems', it's send in the gunboats time. Jersey is not being very friendly towards France here it seems

Jon, the gunboats was a Boris type decision - and quite right too because the militant French have form.

Why does Jersey have to be very friendly to France when they (fishermen) want to pillage the fishing grounds and not adhere to the licences that they have been granted?

And threatening to cut electricity (a commercial contract) is a friendly act by France?

And why hasn't France (or Jersey) invoked the formal treaty dispute mechanism?


Hom3r 06-05-2021 13:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078890)
But everybody knows Adolf and Eva were perfect dinner guests, as long as you kept the conversation off religion and politics ...


Smeg head :D

Hugh 06-05-2021 13:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078895)
Now you're being even sillier. The Torygraph's report is exactly correct and you're making mischief out of it. There's no way anyone other than a fool/troublemaker would interpret the report as portraying the Nazis in a positive light; it is a factual observation and portrays the French minister in a very poor light.

---------- Post added at 11:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:49 ----------



Jon, the gunboats was a Boris type decision - and quite right too because the militant French have form.

Why does Jersey have to be very friendly to France when they (fishermen) want to pillage the fishing grounds and not adhere to the licences that they have been granted?

And threatening to cut electricity (a commercial contract) is a friendly act by France?

And why hasn't France (or Jersey) invoked the formal treaty dispute mechanism?


Except it isn't...

https://www.theislandwiki.org/index...._and_Rationing
Quote:

Foodstuffs which had previously been scarce were now non-existent, and the Channel Islands were effectively in [Post D-Day state of siege|a state of siege]], with the Allies making no attempt to recapture them and the Germans having no intention of surrendering. The populations of the islands were squeezed in the middle, heading to starvation, and the German troops were, if anything, even more badly affected.

One by one, foodstuffs and essential commodities ran out, with no hope of replenishment until the end of the war. Gas supply ceased on 4 September and some 50 public ovens were opened by the States in various parts of St Helier. From October 1 the electricity supply became uncertain and the current was shut off each evening.
https://the-history-girls.blogspot.c...in-ww2-by.html
Quote:

By Christmas 1944, electricity was no longer available. Candles became scarce, and winter evenings were spent in semi-darkness by the light of a tin can full of oil, with a bootlace for a wick. Lack of warmth and gnawing hunger made winter on Jersey a true misery.
You state
Quote:

There's no way anyone other than a fool/troublemaker would interpret the report as portraying the Nazis in a positive light
They are comparing the Nazis positively against the French - the Nazis also made the trains run on time, but we don't use them as a comparison when LNER/GW/Arriva trains are late, because it was where they made the trains run on time to was the major issue...

1andrew1 06-05-2021 13:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078815)
You sound more and more like Lord Haw-Haw, Andrew.

As we've seen today, it's not me who is falsely claiming the Nazis kept the electricity on in Jersey. That's the Brexit-supporting Daily Telegraph.;)

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 13:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078898)
E<SNIP>
You state

They are comparing the Nazis positively against the French - the Nazis also made the trains run on time, but we don't use them as a comparison when LNER/GW/Arriva trains are late, because it was where they made the trains run on time to was the major issue...

.... and there was Vichy France. You should lay off the Nazi thing.

The important takeaway is that the French threat to cut off power is a state-issued hostile act.

Carth 06-05-2021 14:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Never mind what the bloody papers say (either pro or anti Brexit), when are we gonna grow a pair and sink a few boats :sniper: :Yes:

Hugh 06-05-2021 14:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078900)
.... and there was Vichy France. You should lay off the Nazi thing.

The important takeaway is that the French threat to cut off power is a state-issued hostile act.

You may wish to relay that to the Government "source" who said it, and the Telegraph which gave it such prominence… ;)

Anyhoo, back in the Land of Not Comparing Things to Nazis, the Times gives a non-emotional view on this idiocy…

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/w...rsey-dst59fl9j
Quote:

The political stakes are high for President Macron and Boris Johnson.

What are the political implications in Britain?
The prime minister wants to show British voters, who are going to the polls today, that he is standing up for Britain’s sovereignty over its coastal waters and rights to decide on fishing licences.

This issue is particularly acute in Scotland and Hartlepool because of anger that Johnson did not look after the fishing industry when negotiating a post-Brexit fisheries deal with the EU late last year.

By standing up to France and the EU, he hopes to show voters from Scotland and Hartlepool that the government is defending Britain’s fishing industry by using the UK’s clout on the international stage.

What is going on in France?
The French president is trailing in the opinion polls behind Marine Le Pen, the far-right leader, ahead of closely contested elections in a year’s time.

Macron must show French voters, who value France’s fishing communities as symbolic of the country’s spirit, that he can defend a key national interest against Brexit Britain.

Other European leaders are also keenly aware that Le Pen, a Eurosceptic populist, will capitalise on the disputes to attack the EU because French boats are being disadvantaged under rules Brussels negotiated with the UK.
Quote:

Can France unilaterally cut off electricity supplies?
No. Any such move would be illegal under the terms of various energy treaties and the EU-UK trade and cooperation agreement, which has a formal dispute settlement procedure.

While independent dispute arbitration takes place, the EU — rather than France individually — can take unilateral economic measures, including tariffs. The agreement states that the EU can take “compensatory measures commensurate to the economic and societal impact of the change in the level and conditions of access to waters”. But it adds: “Such impact shall be measured on the basis of reliable evidence and not merely on conjecture and remote possibility.”

In 2026, when EU-UK energy trading agreements come up for renewal at the same time as a renegotiation on fishing rights, France will use the threat of cutting power or increasing the cost of electricity supplies as a bargaining chip.

Can Jersey fulfil its own energy requirements?
Jersey Electricity, which supplies customers on the island, certainly thinks so. Today it assured customers that if electricity supplies from France were disrupted, its own power stations had the “capacity to supply Jersey’s electricity requirements”.

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 14:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
@Hugh

A sensible analysis.


Hugh 06-05-2021 14:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078901)
Never mind what the bloody papers say (either pro or anti Brexit), when are we gonna grow a pair and sink a few boats :sniper: :Yes:

As ex-Military, it always concerns me when people who haven’t been in "the line of fire" seem keen for others (not themselves) to be placed in harm’s way… :erm:

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 14:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
What should really be of concern is that our military is called into action only on a valid basis.

Politics apart, I feel that stationing two armed vessels on a "watching brief" at St Helier bay, presumably also to prevent an illegal blockade, is perfectly reasonable.

Hugh, in his irritating mission to target the writer in this thread rather than the issue at hand should take note.



Carth 06-05-2021 14:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078904)
As ex-Military, it always concerns me when people who haven’t been in "the line of fire" seem keen for others (not themselves) to be placed in harm’s way… :erm:

Military or not, if anyone threatens me or family they get one warning before hell breaks loose :p:


Probably the reason I never joined up to be honest, I'd have even had the Red Arrows fitted with napalm :D

Hugh 06-05-2021 14:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Totally understand your reasoning on a personal level, but at a nation-state level, it's a bit different - lot more can go wrong, lot more people can get hurt.

jonbxx 06-05-2021 16:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078895)
Why does Jersey have to be very friendly to France when they (fishermen) want to pillage the fishing grounds and not adhere to the licences that they have been granted?

And why hasn't France (or Jersey) invoked the formal treaty dispute mechanism?

The argument the French fisherman seem to have is that the terms of the licences they have (or indeed have not) been granted was changed at the last minute. Any changes needed to be non-discriminatory, scientifically based and notified in advance and I understand that this was not done.

Apparently, the Commission is in talks with the UK and Jersey on these changes.

That said, a lot of this will blow over at, ooh, about one minute past ten tonight...

Pierre 06-05-2021 16:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078892)
Are you saying the Nazis didn't do the things I referred to? :confused:

The Telegraph is comparing the current farrago with the Nazi occupation, and highlighting part of the Nazi occupation as a positive against what is currently happening - "tone deaf" doesn't even begin to describe it.

It is obviously an attempt at humour. Not really getting exorcised over.

1andrew1 06-05-2021 16:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078909)
The argument the French fisherman seem to have is that the terms of the licences they have (or indeed have not) been granted was changed at the last minute. Any changes needed to be non-discriminatory, scientifically based and notified in advance and I understand that this was not done.

Apparently, the Commission is in talks with the UK and Jersey on these changes.

That said, a lot of this will blow over at, ooh, about one minute past ten tonight...

Exactly. :D

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 16:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078909)
The argument the French fisherman seem to have is that the terms of the licences they have (or indeed have not) been granted was changed at the last minute. Any changes needed to be non-discriminatory, scientifically based and notified in advance and I understand that this was not done.

Apparently, the Commission is in talks with the UK and Jersey on these changes.

That said, a lot of this will blow over at, ooh, about one minute past ten tonight...

Prolly so. Thus no need to trade blows for now!

papa smurf 06-05-2021 17:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
'Next time it will be WAR!' – French fishermen vow 'we will be back' after fleeing Jersey


https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...-navy-standoff


All this boat barging and bumping is just like a busy day on the Norfolk broads.

Chris 06-05-2021 17:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Most of the French boats cleared off around half past 3, presumably once they’d finished lunch. All quite civilised really.

Taf 06-05-2021 17:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The French boats made me post on another site:

Quote:

It's the French way. Don't like something? Protest and blockade, but achieve nothing.
I got grief for that from French posters of course. All blaming Brexit.

So I replied, and they all went silent.

Quote:

This is not a UK/EU thing. The UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the self-governing Crown Dependency is "responsible for its own territorial waters".

The Channel Islands have never been part of the EU, so this has nothing to do with Brexit.

TheDaddy 06-05-2021 18:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078889)
Nice to see the Telegraph being selective in their history...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1620297014

Forgetting to mention the other aspects, like deporting the Jewish people in Jersey to the death camps, deporting other Islanders en masse to Germany, where many died in labour camps, sending Jersey Resistance members to concentration camps, built fortifications using forced labour, which killed thousands of imported slave labourers, amongst many other horrific actions.

But at least they kept the lights on...

(my brother has lived in Jersey for nearly 30 years, having moved there in the 90s - the locals do not remember the Occupation fondly, so this headline is going down like a turd in a trifle)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078895)
Now you're being even sillier. The Torygraph's report is exactly correct and you're making mischief out of it. There's no way anyone other than a fool/troublemaker would interpret the report as portraying the Nazis in a positive light; it is a factual observation and portrays the French minister in a very poor light.[COLOR="Silver"]

On one of the islands they actually built a death camp for post invasion British Jews iirc. Imo if anyone is being silly it's that paper, my grandfather was sub editor or something there years ago, I doubt he'd recognise the paper now sadly.

---------- Post added at 17:46 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078900)
.... and there was Vichy France. You should lay off the Nazi thing.

The important takeaway is that the French threat to cut off power is a state-issued hostile act.

Vichy France that rounded up more Jews than the Nazis asked for, they need reminding of that at every opportunity imo until they recognise their history

Hugh 06-05-2021 19:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36078916)
The French boats made me post on another site:

Quote:

It's the French way. Don't like something? Protest and blockade, but achieve nothing.
I got grief for that from French posters of course. All blaming Brexit.

So I replied, and they all went silent.
Quote:

This is not a UK/EU thing. The UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the self-governing Crown Dependency is "responsible for its own territorial waters".

The Channel Islands have never been part of the EU, so this has nothing to do with Brexit.

Mostly…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/57001584
Quote:

Jersey's status is complicated because it is not part of the UK, and it was never part of the European Union.

It is what's known as a Crown dependency, which means it has substantial freedom from Westminster, and exercises day-to-day control over its fishing waters.

However, the UK government is ultimately responsible for its international relationships. That's why access to fishing waters around the Channel Islands are dealt with specifically in the new UK-EU trade agreement.

pip08456 06-05-2021 22:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078889)
Nice to see the Telegraph being selective in their history...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1620297014

Forgetting to mention the other aspects, like deporting the Jewish people in Jersey to the death camps, deporting other Islanders en masse to Germany, where many died in labour camps, sending Jersey Resistance members to concentration camps, built fortifications using forced labour, which killed thousands of imported slave labourers, amongst many other horrific actions.

But at least they kept the lights on...

(my brother has lived in Jersey for nearly 30 years, having moved there in the 90s - the locals do not remember the Occupation fondly, so this headline is going down like a turd in a trifle)

In context, the headline is correct.

Hugh 06-05-2021 22:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36078939)
In context, the headline is correct.

Except, as posted today @12:27, post #863, it isn’t…

Quote:

Except it isn't...

https://www.theislandwiki.org/index...._and_Rationing
Quote:

Foodstuffs which had previously been scarce were now non-existent, and the Channel Islands were effectively in [Post D-Day state of siege|a state of siege]], with the Allies making no attempt to recapture them and the Germans having no intention of surrendering. The populations of the islands were squeezed in the middle, heading to starvation, and the German troops were, if anything, even more badly affected.

One by one, foodstuffs and essential commodities ran out, with no hope of replenishment until the end of the war. Gas supply ceased on 4 September and some 50 public ovens were opened by the States in various parts of St Helier. From October 1 the electricity supply became uncertain and the current was shut off each evening.
https://the-history-girls.blogspot.c...in-ww2-by.html
Quote:

By Christmas 1944, electricity was no longer available. Candles became scarce, and winter evenings were spent in semi-darkness by the light of a tin can full of oil, with a bootlace for a wick. Lack of warmth and gnawing hunger made winter on Jersey a true misery.


papa smurf 06-05-2021 22:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078941)
Except, as posted today @12:27, post #863, it isn’t…


By Christmas 1944, electricity was no longer available. Candles became scarce, and winter evenings were spent in semi-darkness by the light of a tin can full of oil, with a bootlace for a wick..


Sounds like the 70s.

pip08456 06-05-2021 22:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078941)
Except, as posted today @12:27, post #863, it isn’t…

Then perhaps those quotes would have been better to lead with rather than the atrocities we all know the Nazis were guilty of.

Hugh 06-05-2021 22:23

Re: Britain outside the E
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36078943)
Then perhaps those quotes would have been better to lead with rather than the atrocities we all know the Nazis were guilty of.

Perhaps I was highlighting the inappropriateness of using Nazis* as a standalone positive comparator, whilst ignoring the full picture…


*using the old "remember how bad the Nazis were, well, the French are worse" approach…

Sephiroth 06-05-2021 22:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

By Christmas 1944, electricity was no longer available. Candles became scarce, and winter evenings were spent in semi-darkness by the light of a tin can full of oil, with a bootlace for a wick..
Well, of course - we'd bombed the crap out of French Infrastructure.

Quote:

AF bombers began daylight bombing of targets in northern France. 18 RAF Boston light bombers attacked targets in northern France, targeting power stations, rail marshalling yards, and other targets of military importance.
https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?ba...y%20importance.



---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078945)
Perhaps I was highlighting the inappropriateness of using Nazis* as a standalone positive comparator, whilst ignoring the full picture…


*using the old "remember how bad the Nazis were, well, the French are worse" approach…

As in you got it wrong.

pip08456 07-05-2021 00:31

Re: Britain outside the E
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078945)
Perhaps I was highlighting the inappropriateness of using Nazis* as a standalone positive comparator, whilst ignoring the full picture…


*using the old "remember how bad the Nazis were, well, the French are worse" approach…

Or you could also add the British invented concentration camps and were complicit in the selling of of millions of slaves, as well as many other atrocities, depends what you want as your comparator.

TheDaddy 07-05-2021 00:52

Re: Britain outside the E
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36078962)
Or you could also add the British invented concentration camps and were complicit in the selling of of millions of slaves, as well as many other atrocities, depends what you want as your comparator.

Big difference between British South African concentration camps and nazi death camps, so big as not to be comparable imo

Hugh 07-05-2021 01:27

Re: Britain outside the E
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36078962)
Or you could also add the British invented concentration camps and were complicit in the selling of of millions of slaves, as well as many other atrocities, depends what you want as your comparator.

But the topic of conversation was "Nazis in the CIs being compared to current day French actions" and I was highlighting the inappropriateness of the Government source’s comment, as relayed to me by someone who lives there.

We could, of course, have raised the point of the French taking back Normandy and Anjou in the early 1200s, but there comes a point when it’s obvious one is just trying to obfuscate and derail the debate…

Sephiroth 07-05-2021 10:34

Re: Britain outside the E
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078966)
But the topic of conversation was "Nazis in the CIs being compared to current day French actions" and I was highlighting the inappropriateness of the Government source’s comment, as relayed to me by someone who lives there.

We could, of course, have raised the point of the French taking back Normandy and Anjou in the early 1200s, but there comes a point when it’s obvious one is just trying to obfuscate and derail the debate

.... which you do rather well.

This part of the debate is all about what I've said all along: The EU wants to punish the UK for Brexit and anything we do that touches them puts the UK in the wrong from their point of view.

Their record includes:
  • Threat to stop vaccine exports from the EU sited plants to the UK;
    Legal action over the UK's need for more time to implement the NI customs arrangements;
    The latest fun& games in Jersey;
    MEP ratification over the Treaty on the basis of VdL's assurance that "it comes with teeth".


1andrew1 13-05-2021 00:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
What kind of person negotiates a deal like that? Best have a word with the person who negotiated it! :D
Quote:

Brexit minister says NI Protocol operation is ‘not sustainable’

The UK's Brexit Minister Lord Frost has said it is hard to see that the way the Northern Ireland Protocol is currently operating "can be sustainable for long".

He was speaking after a visit to Northern Ireland.

The protocol is the part of the Brexit deal which creates a border in the Irish Sea.

It was agreed by the UK and EU in October 2019 and was subject to further negotiation in 2020.

It keeps NI in the EU single market for goods and means EU customs rules are enforced at its ports.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-57075664

Carth 13-05-2021 12:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079323)
What kind of person negotiates a deal like that? Best have a word with the person who negotiated it! :D

You're starting to sound like my wife, she sometimes asks questions where she already knows the answer. She thinks she's being clever too ;) :p:

1andrew1 13-05-2021 12:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36079341)
You're starting to sound like my wife, she sometimes asks questions where she already knows the answer. She thinks she's being clever too ;) :p:

I'm sure you're both clever. ;)

Carth 13-05-2021 12:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079342)
I'm sure you're both clever. ;)

One of us, not saying which one :D

Hugh 13-05-2021 14:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078909)
The argument the French fisherman seem to have is that the terms of the licences they have (or indeed have not) been granted was changed at the last minute. Any changes needed to be non-discriminatory, scientifically based and notified in advance and I understand that this was not done.

Apparently, the Commission is in talks with the UK and Jersey on these changes.

That said, a lot of this will blow over at, ooh, about one minute past ten tonight...

Strangely enough, earlier this week...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-57068658
Quote:

Jersey has granted French fishermen more time to meet its new rules in a bid to solve a fishing licence dispute.

The extension until 1 July is a sign of "good faith" that the row over France's post-Brexit rights can be solved, the Government of Jersey said.

French authorities in Normandy have also lifted a ban on Jersey fishermen landing their catches in its ports.
Why don't the French use this? :D

Sephiroth 13-05-2021 15:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I can't see what the French are arguing about in the Jersey licence.
https://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDoc...0Schedule2.pdf

There's no point in providing a selective quote as there's nothing to compare it with.

The EU/UK Cooperation agreement says the following on page 274 (my emphasis):
https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/re...X-1-PART-1.PDF

Quote:

1. By derogation from Articles FISH.8(1) and (3) to (7) [Access to waters], FISH.9 [Compensatory measures in case of withdrawal or reduction of access] and Annex FISH.4 [Protocol on access to waters], each Party shall grant vessels of the other Party access to fish in its waters reflecting the actual extent and nature of fishing activity that it can be demonstrated was carried out during the period beginning on 1 February 2017 and ending on 31 January 2020 by qualifying vessels of the other Party in the waters and under any treaty arrangements that existed on 31 January 2020.
Quote:

"qualifying vessel" means, in respect of fishing activity carried out in waters adjacent to the Bailiwick of Guernsey, the Bailiwick of Jersey, the Isle of Man or a Member State, any vessel which fished in the territorial sea adjacent to that territory or that Member State on more than 10 days in any of the three 12 month periods ending on 31 January on, or between, 1 February 2017 and 31 January 2020;
For certain, the "qualifying vessels" were licensed in according with the Agreement's requirements, "demonstration" being key to what has actually transpired.

From my reading, the row about the conditions of the licence hinges on the term "extent and nature". The Agreement is otherwise silent on the conditions (unless thare is something about allocation of stocks that would take the rest of my life to fathom in the Agreement).

Seems to me that the French fishermen don't like the effects of Brexit. Sod 'em. The EU should have thought of that before creating conditions that drove us out.


Hugh 13-05-2021 16:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Here it is from the horse’s mouth (the Jersey Government)

http://www.gov.je/News/2021/Pages/FisheriesUpdate.aspx
Quote:

The UK and Jersey have defended Jersey’s new fishing licences for EU vessels. Jersey has indicated its willingness to work with the Commission and French Authorities to resolve the current concerns. Jersey has confirmed that it remains open to considering a range of evidence of a qualifying fishing vessel’s track record, and that it will amend licences if further evidence is provided.

As a sign of good faith, Jersey has offered to give recently licensed French vessels until 1 July 2021 to provide further evidence of their track record. It has been made clear that any outstanding evidence must be provided during this period.

This extension to 1 July applies only to VMS vessels now licensed under the TCA and is not an extension of the previous Bay of Granville amnesty, which provided a general extension for all VMS vessels licensed under that agreement.

The letter also confirms that Jersey is ready to act swiftly to ensure that vessels which submit the required additional evidence to demonstrate their previous fishing record in Jersey waters, will have that reflected in their licence and their activities will not be disrupted.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36079355)
I can't see what the French are arguing about in the Jersey licence.
https://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDoc...0Schedule2.pdf

There's no point in providing a selective quote as there's nothing to compare it with.

The EU/UK Cooperation agreement says the following on page 274 (my emphasis):
https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/re...X-1-PART-1.PDF

For certain, the "qualifying vessels" were licensed in according with the Agreement's requirements, "demonstration" being key to what has actually transpired.

From my reading, the row about the conditions of the licence hinges on the term "extent and nature". The Agreement is otherwise silent on the conditions (unless thare is something about allocation of stocks that would take the rest of my life to fathom in the Agreement).

Seems to me that the French fishermen don't like the effects of Brexit. Sod 'em. The EU should have thought of that before creating conditions that drove us out.


Excellent passive-aggressiveness there - we didn’t want to leave, they made us do it… ;)

Sephiroth 13-05-2021 16:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36079356)
Here it is from the horse’s mouth (the Jersey Government)

http://www.gov.je/News/2021/Pages/FisheriesUpdate.aspx

Excellent passive-aggressiveness there - we didn’t want to leave, they made us do it… ;)

Trust you to pick on the emotional argument. But, of course, your interpretation is ridiculously flawed.

The EU had become something that the UK rejected by majority in the Referendum. That drove us out. Sod 'em.

jonbxx 13-05-2021 17:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Who didn't see the 'Brexit is the fault of the EU' argument coming? I thought Brexit was the route to the land of opportunity and people voted leave for a brighter future, not because French people were nasty to them.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum