Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2016 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702280)

denphone 07-11-2016 19:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35868358)
i don't like the crazy lady i think she's a wrong un .

She is certainly not my choice as the democrats candidate for president but she is far better then a man who is a bigot and racist and hates African Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians, , Muslims and now the disabled and has a track record of groping women and has a misogynist contempt of women so when that is the choice then it has to be Clinton rather then the total train wreck and megalomaniac that is Donald Trump.

heero_yuy 07-11-2016 19:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35868362)
She is certainly not my choice as the democrats candidate for president but she is far better then a man who is a bigot and racist and hates African Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians, , Muslims and now the disabled and has a track record of groping women and has a misogynist contempt of women so when that is the choice then it has to be Clinton rather then the total train wreck and megalomaniac that is Donald Trump.

Well if it's a choice between a mysogynist and being in low earth orbit...:erm:

Damien 07-11-2016 19:42

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868360)
Well they're both deranged to some extent. On balance I'd rather have the president talking to the Ruskies rather than lobbing missiles at them.:erm:

Both will talk to them. It just's one seems a lot more pro-Russian and wants to appease them than the other. Trump has even questioned NATO. There is a reason Russian media and the Kremlin are all going in for Trump and it's not because they have American (or Western) interests at heart.

papa smurf 07-11-2016 19:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868364)
Well if it's a choice between a mysogynist and being in low earth orbit...:erm:

what earth :shocked:

---------- Post added at 18:51 ---------- Previous post was at 18:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868365)
Both will talk to them. It just's one seems a lot more pro-Russian and wants to appease them than the other. Trump has even questioned NATO. There is a reason Russian media and the Kremlin are all going in for Trump and it's not because they have American (or Western) interests at heart.

that's a hefty load of paranoia your lugging around lad ;)

heero_yuy 07-11-2016 19:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Actually to be fair I don't think Trump is a misogynist ( Woman hater) On the contrary he's a bit too keen. :D

Damien 07-11-2016 19:59

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35868367)
that's a hefty load of paranoia your lugging around lad ;)

It's a paranoia shared by the head of MI5.

Mr K 07-11-2016 20:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
The most worrying thing for us is that Trump wants to get rid of the NATO commitment that an attack on one is an attack on all. No wonder Putin is rooting for him.

papa smurf 07-11-2016 20:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868379)
The most worrying thing for us is that Trump wants to get rid of the NATO commitment that an attack on one is an attack on all. No wonder Putin is rooting for him.

wow paranoia must be catching :Peace:

Mick 07-11-2016 20:41

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35868362)
She is certainly not my choice as the democrats candidate for president but she is far better then a man who is a bigot and racist and hates African Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians, , Muslims and now the disabled and has a track record of groping women and has a misogynist contempt of women so when that is the choice then it has to be Clinton rather then the total train wreck and megalomaniac that is Donald Trump.

Clinton and Obama Policies have done far worse things than all that crap you just posted about Trump, which I have to say is just the typical biased media narrative that is against him. I have said before Trump is no angel and he has been a nasty piece of work in the past but he is not the worse of the two at all. He also does not have a track record of groping women at all, not everyone is a sucker for believing the crap coming from made up lies about him.

I find it amazing that only in another topic, you and others cry foul of the media, shouting out propaganda etc etc yet don't when it doesn't suit here.

I base my views on Trump/Clinton on real hard facts and how history has played out and it's not looking at all, a rosey time line for Crooked Hillary, nor Obama.

But what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton has done in Syria and Libya, they should hang their heads in shame. The biggest Migrant crisis we have faced and those Migrants fleeing Africa, fleeing Syria have DIED trying to get to Europe, those two clowns, Clinton and Obama have much blood on their hands with their shower of crap policy after policy in Libya and Syria.

Yeah Gadaffi was a evil dictator, but Libya and for most part now North Africa was secure before their meddling but oh, not now, it's a big whole mess with ISIS having strongholds there and now also Syria. What a frigging mess those two clowns have left this part of the World in and you and others want one of those same corrupt, pathological and lying Clowns back in power.

Mr K 07-11-2016 20:44

Re: US Election 2016
 
Oh I don't know, I think Den summed it up perfectly. Did you think Hitler wasn't that bad Mick?

papa smurf 07-11-2016 20:50

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868385)
Oh I don't know, I think Den summed it up perfectly. Did you think Hitler wasn't that bad Mick?

:cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader::woot ::woot::woot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Mick 07-11-2016 20:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868385)
Did you think Hitler wasn't that bad Mick?

:notopic:

Hom3r 07-11-2016 20:59

Re: US Election 2016
 
Clinton is the lesser of 2 evils.

Mick 07-11-2016 21:01

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35868387)
:cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader::cleader::woot ::woot::woot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

:rofl:

---------- Post added at 20:01 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35868393)
Clinton is the lesser of 2 evils.

In your opinion.

Hom3r 07-11-2016 21:06

Re: US Election 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
If I didn't have work on Wednesday I'd watch the results come in.

denphone 07-11-2016 21:07

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868384)
Clinton and Obama Policies have done far worse things than all that crap you just posted about Trump, which I have to say is just the typical biased media narrative that is against him. I have said before Trump is no angel and he has been a nasty piece of work in the past but he is not the worse of the two at all. He also does not have a track record of groping women at all, not everyone is a sucker for believing the crap coming from made up lies about him.

I find it amazing that only in another topic, you and others cry foul of the media, shouting out propaganda etc etc yet don't when it doesn't suit here.

I base my views on Trump/Clinton on real hard facts and how history has played out and it's not looking at all, a rosey time line for Crooked Hillary, nor Obama.

But what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton has done in Syria and Libya, they should hang their heads in shame. The biggest Migrant crisis we have faced and those Migrants fleeing Africa, fleeing Syria have DIED trying to get to Europe, those two clowns, Clinton and Obama have much blood on their hands with their shower of crap policy after policy in Libya and Syria.

Yeah Gadaffi was a evil dictator, but Libya and for most part now North Africa was secure before their meddling but oh, not now, it's a big whole mess with ISIS having strongholds there and now also Syria. What a frigging mess those two clowns have left this part of the World in and you and others want one of those same corrupt, pathological and lying Clowns back in power.

l don't need to take things from a biased media Mick as Donald Trump whether one likes it or not has voiced his opinions about all the groups l have named out of his own mouth time and time again over nearly 30 years and if you look online on YouTube and other type sites its there coming out of his own mouth unless one thinks he did not say those things about all these groups and even just watching the news earlier where they showed some clips of his comments made me utterly shudder that this man might be president of America in a couple of days and that is a frightening prospect indeed and yes Hilary Clinton is not exactly my type of leader as she has too many warts and baggage on her but sorry but god help us if Trump becomes American president on Wednesday as that is a very chilling prospect l hope never happens.

Mick 07-11-2016 21:50

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35868397)
becomes American president on Wednesday as that is a very chilling prospect l hope never happens.

I feel the same way about Clinton, she would be an absolute disaster as President and she is far too corrupt.

Despite his behaviour, I am prepared to give Trump a chance over one who has already had some form of chance and failed miserably and she would be likely to lead us in to a very dark war with Russia, I would very much like to avoid that, because we'd be caught in the middle of it, in more ways than one.

Mr K 07-11-2016 21:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868409)
Despite his behaviour, I am prepared to give Trump a chance over one who has already had some form of chance and failed miserably and she would be likely to lead us in to a very dark war with Russia, I would very much like to avoid that, because we'd be caught in the middle of it, in more ways than one.

Giving someone a chance with the nuclear codes is a bit of a risk. Trumps love in with Putin is also something not to be welcomed - we won't be benefiting that's for sure.

Damien 07-11-2016 22:03

Re: US Election 2016
 
A good insight into why some might support Trump: http://www.ap.org/explore/divided-am...vival-bid.html

Quote:

Mike Kirk leans across the counter of the pawnshop where he works for $11 an hour. It’s less than half what he made in the mines, but the best he can do these days.

He and two customers ponder what this city might look like in 10 years if nothing changes. Many of the storefronts on the narrow downtown streets are empty. Some of the buildings burned. Their blackened shells, “condemned” signs taped to the doors, stand as a symbol of how far they’ve fallen.

In 10 years? A ghost town, one customer offers. The other wonders if it might simply cease to exist.
There are places like this across America — poor and getting poorer, feeling left behind while the rest got richer. But nowhere has the plummet of the white working class been as merciless as here in central Appalachia. And nowhere have the cross-currents of desperation and boiling resentment that have devoured a presidential race been on such glaring display.
We're seeing the same here where the division is increasingly between those who benefit from the current economic situation and those who do not. Between college-educated (American speak) and non-college educated voters.

Of course it's also possible to read too much into things like that and see it as an easy answer. Brexit had a pretty diverse range of support from differing economic groups whereas I read the average income for Trump supporters is $60,000 but it's interesting anyway.

Mr K 07-11-2016 22:18

Re: US Election 2016
 
Seems things are swinging Clinton's way.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37884603

Mick 07-11-2016 22:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868410)
Giving someone a chance with the nuclear codes is a bit of a risk. Trumps love in with Putin is also something not to be welcomed - we won't be benefiting that's for sure.

I disagree with all you just said.

---------- Post added at 21:33 ---------- Previous post was at 21:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868416)
Seems things are swinging Clinton's way.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37884603

But not really.

I am looking at the Drudge report and it's looking very favourable for Trump in Florida, North Carolina and Colorado in early voting. He's outperformed Mitt Romney in the 2012 Election by a LOT!

Mr K 07-11-2016 22:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868420)

But not really.

I am looking at the Drudge report and it's looking very favourable for Trump in Florida, North Carolina and Colorado in early voting. He's outperformed Mitt Romney in the 2012 Election by a LOT!

"The Drudge Report is a politically conservative American news aggregation website. The Drudge Report has a history of fabricating or misrepresenting stories"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drudge_Report (ooh the name Breibart is mentioned aswell !)

Think I trust the BBC more, but we'll find out soon thank God.

vincerooney 07-11-2016 22:42

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868384)
Clinton and Obama Policies have done far worse things than all that crap you just posted about Trump, which I have to say is just the typical biased media narrative that is against him. I have said before Trump is no angel and he has been a nasty piece of work in the past but he is not the worse of the two at all. He also does not have a track record of groping women at all, not everyone is a sucker for believing the crap coming from made up lies about him.

I find it amazing that only in another topic, you and others cry foul of the media, shouting out propaganda etc etc yet don't when it doesn't suit here.

I base my views on Trump/Clinton on real hard facts and how history has played out and it's not looking at all, a rosey time line for Crooked Hillary, nor Obama.

But what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton has done in Syria and Libya, they should hang their heads in shame. The biggest Migrant crisis we have faced and those Migrants fleeing Africa, fleeing Syria have DIED trying to get to Europe, those two clowns, Clinton and Obama have much blood on their hands with their shower of crap policy after policy in Libya and Syria.

Yeah Gadaffi was a evil dictator, but Libya and for most part now North Africa was secure before their meddling but oh, not now, it's a big whole mess with ISIS having strongholds there and now also Syria. What a frigging mess those two clowns have left this part of the World in and you and others want one of those same corrupt, pathological and lying Clowns back in power.

Yes i think the trump being that evil plotline has been exaggerated. But i also think the whole clinton corrupt thing has been exaggerated. Using a private server for emails has been done by many secretary of states. That has never been mentioned before. Both parties have slung as much exaggerated sh*t at each other its incredible. Clintons emails are corrupt yet no one has really seen the "bad" emails yet they assume they are. Trump is ready to cause world war 3 and yet we have no real evidence of that except hes fencing in some mexicans. I doubt that causes world war 3.

It has been a nasty election with social media causing a lot of the nastiness. With unclaimed allegations being thrown out by opposition supporters with nasty vile messages going back and forth with little to no evidence.

The real question is ignoring all the b/s allegations

Who has more experience to be president of the worlds super power? A woman who has been secretary of state and a senator or a man with no political experience whatsoever but has made millions in real estate. That is the one question people must answer. Forget emails. Forget "crimes" against women which havent been proven in a court of law. Forget wild accusations and fantasies about what ifs...

Who has the most experience for the most powerful job?

Thats clinton.

Thats all this election should be based about.

Mick 07-11-2016 22:52

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868425)
"The Drudge Report is a politically conservative American news aggregation website. The Drudge Report has a history of fabricating or misrepresenting stories"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drudge_Report (ooh the name Breibart is mentioned aswell !)

Think I trust the BBC more, but we'll find out soon thank God.

I couldn't careless who you trust. More fool you. Is that the same BBC who Sir Cliff Richard is suing because they tried to ruin his life?

Please. :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 21:52 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by vincerooney (Post 35868428)

Thats clinton.

Thats all this election should be based about.

Not necessarily, she has BAD experience.

martyh 07-11-2016 22:55

Re: US Election 2016
 
Has either of them put forward any policies ? aside from Trump wanting to build a wall i don't actually remember any policies being mentioned in the campaign just days and days or bitching at each other

Damien 07-11-2016 22:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
We'll see tomorrow if Florida, North Carolina and Colorado go to Trump. If all three of them do then, unless Clinton pulls out a surprise in Ohio or Arizona then he wins.

One note of caution though. Drudge is using absolute numbers but the early voting has spiked up across the bored so it's percentages that matter.

Mick 07-11-2016 23:23

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35868432)
Has either of them put forward any policies ? aside from Trump wanting to build a wall i don't actually remember any policies being mentioned in the campaign just days and days or bitching at each other

http://presidential-candidates.insid...s-Donald-Trump

ianch99 08-11-2016 00:48

Re: US Election 2016
 
A message from the German people:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/11/26.jpg

(from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37895601)

Paul 08-11-2016 01:54

Re: US Election 2016
 
So they support Trump then ?

ianch99 08-11-2016 03:01

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35868452)
So they support Trump then ?

Of course ..

TheDaddy 08-11-2016 03:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35868432)
Has either of them put forward any policies ? aside from Trump wanting to build a wall i don't actually remember any policies being mentioned in the campaign just days and days or bitching at each other

Banning Muslims till we know what the hell is going on, make America great again, grab 'em by the pussy, were they policies :shrug:

denphone 08-11-2016 07:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868409)
I feel the same way about Clinton, she would be an absolute disaster as President and she is far too corrupt.

Despite his behaviour, I am prepared to give Trump a chance over one who has already had some form of chance and failed miserably and she would be likely to lead us in to a very dark war with Russia, I would very much like to avoid that, because we'd be caught in the middle of it, in more ways than one.

Look its all about differing opinions on these issues Mick as if everybody agreed about everything in this world we would all be a bunch of exact genetic clones and that would be pretty boring IMO.

techguyone 08-11-2016 10:27

Re: US Election 2016
 
I had a little chuckle when I put these two comments together - just in fun.

Quote:

Banning Muslims till we know what the hell is going on, make America great again, grab 'em by the pussy, were they policies
Quote:

Look its all about differing opinions on these issues Mick as if everybody agreed about everything in this world we would all be a bunch of exact genetic clones and that would be pretty boring IMO.

heero_yuy 08-11-2016 11:18

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

HILLARY Clinton has cancelled a planned fireworks display to celebrate her previously presumed victory tomorrow night.

The extravagant show had been organised to take place on a barge in New York’s Hudson River only 30 minutes after polls shut on November 8.
Hillary Clinton had already organised a victory firework display for election day next week

But it has now been reported that Clinton has cancelled the display, possibly after getting the jitters following a narrowing of her lead in the polls.

According to the New York Post, NYPD chief of intelligence Tommy Galati made the revelation at a city press conference on Election Day security.

He reportedly told journalists: “They do have a permit for fireworks, but at this point we believe the fireworks are cancelled.”

When asked by a reporter why the display was cancelled, Galati responded: “I cannot tell you that.”
Linky

Not so confident now eh?

Meanwhile:

Quote:

THE whole world is bracing itself for an almighty panic if Donald Trump wins the presidency tonight.

If you thought the tantrum after the EU referendum was bad, brace yourself for much, much worse. It will be, as The Donald promised, “Brexit times ten”.


Everybody needs to grow up and calm down. Donald Trump is not the end of the free world. Yes, he’s a grotesque, orange loudmouth. Yes, his fans can be a bit nutty. But Trump isn’t a fascist — no matter how much his opponents insist otherwise.

He is, at best, a charlatan and at worst a con artist, and the greatest trick he has pulled off is convincing the people that he wants to Make America Great Again. He really only wants to satisfy his massive ego.

If he beats Clinton tonight, it’ll be mission accomplished. He’ll probably spend the next four years telling everyone how clever he is while his more sensible running mate, Mike Pence, carries the bags. - Freddy Gray
Full piece

Damien 08-11-2016 12:15

Re: US Election 2016
 
Polls now open. Full election underway and, barring any surprises, we'll know tomorrow morning - maybe quite early depending what happens.

Mr K 08-11-2016 12:21

Re: US Election 2016
 
I bet Mick is first in the queue, even if he's not eligible ;)

Damien 08-11-2016 12:22

Re: US Election 2016
 
Is there a hidden Trump vote to 'do a Brexit'? Will there be a big gender divide? Will Latino voters block Trump from the Presidency?

We might know some of this during the day, clues to what is happening.

Mr K 08-11-2016 12:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868504)
Is there a hidden Trump vote to 'do a Brexit'? Will there be a big gender divide? Will Latino voters block Trump from the Presidency?

1. probably, but not enough of them. 2. yes, blokes are more daft. 3. Lets hope so.

I'm building a bunker in the garden in case.......

downquark1 08-11-2016 13:27

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868160)
No one tried to shoot him. The guy was a protestor. Someone else shouted out 'gun' and then the confusion happened.

This time yes. There was that UK guy who intended to shoot him.

Chris 08-11-2016 13:55

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868504)
Is there a hidden Trump vote to 'do a Brexit'? Will there be a big gender divide? Will Latino voters block Trump from the Presidency?

We might know some of this during the day, clues to what is happening.

Here's an instant expert cheat sheet ... it should help anyone interested to spot the significant results as they come in.

https://jag.my/2016/election-night-g...ntial-results/

thenry 08-11-2016 14:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Is she President yet

Damien 08-11-2016 15:04

Re: US Election 2016
 
Florida is the big early one. Hopefully they call that early

---------- Post added at 14:04 ---------- Previous post was at 13:10 ----------



Looks like high turnout so far. People reporting long lines even at 6am. America really needs to sort out their electoral system, it's needs to be kicked off to a independent body instead of letting the states' manage it. No politics, just open as many polling places as they can for as long as they can.

heero_yuy 08-11-2016 15:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35868526)
Is she President yet

Remember that they're 6-9 hours behind us and the polls don't close until 10pm local time.

Quote:

Trump is off to a slight early lead in the 2016 presidential election, winning over the voters of three New Hampshire precincts by a 32-25 margin over Hillary Clinton.

Polls in the tiny New Hampshire towns of Dixville, Hart’s Location and Millsfield opened just after midnight Tuesday and closed as soon as everyone had voted.
Linky

The exception that proves the rule. :D

denphone 08-11-2016 15:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868547)
Remember that they're 6-9 hours behind us and the polls don't close until 10pm local time.



Linky

The exception that proves the rule. :D

Well this is the prediction of Nate Silver, who famously predicted the US election result in all 50 states in 2012 but remember predictions are a bit like opinion polls as they can be as much wrong as they can be right.:)

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/...cid=538twitter

Damien 08-11-2016 15:59

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35868550)
Well this is the prediction of Nate Silver, who famously predicted the US election result in all 50 states in 2012 but remember predictions are a bit like opinion polls as they can be as much wrong as they can be right.:)

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/...cid=538twitter

Not a prediction really. He is saying it's a 70% chance.

Mick 08-11-2016 17:00

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868527)

America really needs to sort out their electoral system, it's needs to be kicked off to a independent body instead of letting the states' manage it. No politics, just open as many polling places as they can for as long as they can.

This I do agree with you on. :D

16 years ago, the Democrats still try to cling to the claim that in that Election in 2000: Al Gore vs. George W. Bush, Bush stole it via Florida. Media had declared early victory in Florida for Gore and then it suddenly flipped back to Bush.

The current Vice President Joe Biden says Gore was the Elected President in 2000 and Former President Jimmy Carter says there was no doubt Gore won the election. Hillary Clinton also said Bush was 'selected' President, thus, a veiled claim that Bush wasn't the legitimate President, isn't this her saying in another form that the system was "Rigged"?

So Trump's claim during this election that the system is "Rigged", the electoral system in America certainly is vulnerable to rigging, because of the State by State management of it. Reports of Dead people being registered to vote and voting, people who have already voted in one State, crossing in to another State to vote again, voting machines switching votes cast etc etc and even the US Postal Service, has had claims of more than a few postal ballots disappearing.

Mr K 08-11-2016 17:07

Re: US Election 2016
 
For the 'greatest democracy in the world', they do seem to have a lot of problems. Voter intimidation of those who don't look like they'll support Trump seems an issue.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwndzmxXUAATRu6.jpg

Damien 08-11-2016 18:28

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868562)
This I do agree with you on. :D

16 years ago, the Democrats still try to cling to the claim that in that Election in 2000: Al Gore vs. George W. Bush, Bush stole it via Florida. Media had declared early victory in Florida for Gore and then it suddenly flipped back to Bush.

Nobody really knows who 'won' Florida. A big problem with the recount was discerning who people voted for because the ballots themselves where confusing. There was a suspiciously high number of votes for Ralph Nader, the 3rd party candidate, who was positioned just under Al Gore on the ballot. The theory is many people accidentally voted for him, thus Al Gore should have won, but how can you ever know that?

If it had gone the other way Bush could have seen himself cheated as well.

Quote:

So Trump's claim during this election that the system is "Rigged", the electoral system in America certainly is vulnerable to rigging, because of the State by State management of it.
That also makes it harder to rig. Too many people would have to be in on it including both parties. Trump is saying it's rigged because it stokes anger in his base.

---------- Post added at 16:30 ---------- Previous post was at 16:11 ----------

Clinton has WON her first state! And it's....

Spoiler: 
Guam and it's 0 electoral college votes


---------- Post added at 17:28 ---------- Previous post was at 16:30 ----------

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...rs-want-230935

Quote:

More voters this year are looking for a strong leader than in previous presidential elections, according to an early morning exit poll, whose results could shift significantly over the course of Election Day.
That would bode well for Trump

Kursk 08-11-2016 18:46

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868565)
That would bode well for Trump

A suspiciously high number of voters with the names Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble and Grubb are being recorded in the early stages. This election is rigged ;).

denphone 08-11-2016 18:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868580)
A suspiciously high number of voters with the names Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble and Grubb are being recorded in the early stages. This election is rigged ;).

Bit disappointing that there were only 13 episodes of such a wonderful wonderful series.:)

Mick 08-11-2016 19:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
It's Rigged LOL!

Ballots switching from Trump to Clinton right in front of peoples eyes !

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/...head-to-polls/

Hugh 08-11-2016 20:14

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868594)
It's Rigged LOL!

Ballots switching from Trump to Clinton right in front of peoples eyes !

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/...head-to-polls/

You're right! ;)

http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/vote-f...-rigged-fraud/

Mick 08-11-2016 20:17

Re: US Election 2016
 
If I was voting, I would insist on a Paper ballot. This is a shambles.

RizzyKing 08-11-2016 20:21

Re: US Election 2016
 
Seems they would be better off using our system as imperfect as it is never seen an ink mark jump from one to the other.

Mr K 08-11-2016 20:21

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868602)
If I was voting, I would insist on a Paper ballot. This is a shambles.

Yeah but what if they give you a pencil that keeps breaking, or they rub out of your vote, or even worse eat your vote ? I'm sure this is how Dave won the last election, there were some very sick looking people suspiciously near the ballot box.

Damien 08-11-2016 20:22

Re: US Election 2016
 
Happened in 2008 too. Thousands and thousands of machines across the nation and one or two will malfunction

Mick 08-11-2016 20:37

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868607)
Yeah but what if they give you a pencil that keeps breaking, or they rub out of your vote

I would take my own Pen. Like I did in the EU Referendum. Some Polling Stations were not allowing own pens until someone googled that there is no legal obligation to use the provided pencils at the booth and showed this to the Polling staff.

Hugh 08-11-2016 20:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
The problems have been with polling machines - you can't use a pen with them, as you press buttons to choose the candidates.

Damien 08-11-2016 20:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
They don't use pens because they're worried about people switching them with Ines that have invisible ink but yeah you can use your own.

Trump has started a lawsuit against Nevada for allowing people to vote past 10pm last Friday but that's the law if people are in line. Think it's starting...

Mr K 08-11-2016 20:44

Re: US Election 2016
 
Its probably an early admission of defeat. He can't win with the electorate so try the courts.

Hugh 08-11-2016 20:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868614)
They don't use pens because they're worried about people switching them with Ines that have invisible ink but yeah you can use your own.

Trump has started a lawsuit against Nevada for allowing people to vote past 10pm last Friday but that's the law if people are in line. Think it's starting...

http://uk.businessinsider.com/what-h...6-11?r=US&IR=T
Quote:

But as Clark County spokesman Dan Kulin told the AP, allowing everyone in line when the polls close to vote is the law.

"If there's a line when closing time comes, we just keep processing voters until there's no more line," he said. "We're flexible because we want people to vote."

Many (if not all — I couldn't find any that didn't follow this rule) states have laws on the books requiring every person in line when the polls close to be able to vote. If this happens to you, stay in line.

"It's one of the most basic principles of electoral democracy," Ned Foley, director of Ohio State University's Election Law @ Moritz, wrote for Medium. "If you go to the polls when they are open, and you are a registered and qualified voter, then as long as you wait in line, you are entitled to cast your ballot even if the line is so long that you must wait until after the scheduled time for the polls to close."
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(1d...me=mcl-168-720
Quote:

Sec. 720.

On the day of any election, the polls shall be opened at 7 o'clock in the forenoon, and shall be continuously open until 8 o'clock in the afternoon and no longer. Every qualified elector present and in line at the polls at the hour prescribed for the closing thereof shall be allowed to vote.

Mick 08-11-2016 20:52

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35868613)
The problems have been with polling machines - you can't use a pen with them, as you press buttons to choose the candidates.

I know which is why I would request a paper ballot with my own pen in hand, which in some polling stations you can, others may not allow them.

Damien 08-11-2016 20:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
Case has already been thrown out. They couldn't tell the judge what the actual issue was.

Mick 08-11-2016 20:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868614)

Trump has started a lawsuit against Nevada for allowing people to vote past 10pm last Friday but that's the law if people are in line. Think it's starting...

There is more to that story.

Sky News are saying:

Quote:

Donald Trump has sued the registrar of voters in Clark County, Nevada.

The Republican candidate claimed a Las Vegas polling station had improperly been allowed to remain open last week to accommodate people lined up to vote.

The lawsuit claims election officials "intentionally co-ordinated with democratic activists" to skew the vote.
http://news.sky.com/story/live-final...ction-10648907

Damien 08-11-2016 21:01

Re: US Election 2016
 
Yeah but they didn't produce any evidence of that and even if they did the law is to keep the polls open.

Mick 08-11-2016 21:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868621)
Yeah but they didn't produce any evidence of that and even if they did the law is to keep the polls open.

I know but they were saying people were arriving at the line after Poll closing time. I thought it was only those in the line at the time of closing still permitted to cast their vote?

Jimmy-J 08-11-2016 21:10

Re: US Election 2016
 



Happened in 2008 too. :D


Mr K 08-11-2016 21:13

Re: US Election 2016
 
The Donald isn't even confident of Mrs Donalds vote....
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/11/25.jpg

Damien 08-11-2016 23:03

Re: US Election 2016
 
Just over an hour to the first polls close.

---------- Post added at 22:03 ---------- Previous post was at 21:52 ----------

Turnout seems very, very high

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 00:14

Re: US Election 2016
 
When should one expect the first States to declare? Sorry I know you've said before. I'm up at 5am again today so can follow from then.

Damien 09-11-2016 00:36

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35868640)
When should one expect the first States to declare? Sorry I know you've said before. I'm up at 5am again today so can follow from then.

5am it could well be over.

First states declare soon but they're safe Republican. 1am we might see some real info

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 01:23

Re: US Election 2016
 
CNN seem to be quick. Trump ahead in Florida. Now back to Clinton. So if he loses Ohio and Florido we can call it a night?

Damien 09-11-2016 02:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35868642)
CNN seem to be quick. Trump ahead in Florida. Now back to Clinton. So if he loses Ohio and Florido we can call it a night?

Pretty much.

Don't get too excited about the numbers swapping back and forth like that though. It depends where certain areas start reporting.

---------- Post added at 01:56 ---------- Previous post was at 00:34 ----------

This is getting very close

Mick 09-11-2016 04:11

Re: US Election 2016
 
It's been very close in Florida. As it stands I think Trump will win Florida over 134,000 votes more than Hillary now, now at 95% results in. Very little space left for Clinton to take hold.

I think he's got Ohio.

Trump only needs 119 to get to 270, now at 151 ECV.

Damien 09-11-2016 04:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
He's won I think

---------- Post added at 03:38 ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 ----------

It's look quite likely Trump wins but Clinton gets more votes.

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 04:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
He just took Florida.

North Carolina and Utah.

Trump wins Wisconsin!

Iowa to Trump

Damien 09-11-2016 05:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
On the bright side the pound is going to gain against the dollar

Russ 09-11-2016 05:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
There's an American I work with who came out with a chilling prediction yesterday - if Trump gets in he'll end up working to overturn their law that says no president can be in office for more than 2 terms. It wouldn't be easy or acceptable to many but apparently the people he'd need to convince are all Rebuplicans too.

Might be a tall order but I get the impression he's the kind of egomaniac who'd give it a try.

denphone 09-11-2016 05:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
God help America , god help us all...:(

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 06:13

Re: US Election 2016
 
Trump slightly ahead in Pennsylvania

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 06:48

Re: US Election 2016
 
The madman is actually doing it.

martyh 09-11-2016 07:42

Re: US Election 2016
 
I'm gonna take a crash course in building really big walls

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 07:46

Re: US Election 2016
 
He's took Pennsylvania.

I think we can call this now...

Donald J Trump 45th President of the United States

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 08:01

Re: US Election 2016
 
Astonishing. The absolute madman pulled it off and pretty much swung the lot. The year someone spoke exactly what they were thinking and won the election...

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 08:07

Re: US Election 2016
 
Clinton HQ John Podesta tells everyone to go home and get some sleep... Hillary won't be speaking.

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 08:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
He best put that in an email to make sure everyone can see it. :D

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 08:41

Re: US Election 2016
 
President Trump to speak soon

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/07/po...age/index.html

Damien 09-11-2016 09:03

Re: US Election 2016
 
Congrats to Mick first off. He called it against the polls. Ironically it might seem the polls were largely right in terms of the vote but they got the states so very wrong.

My biggest fear is Trump will have a Republican house and little opposition. This would be less scary had the Democrats won the both houses. I am worried what happens with NATO. Europe needs to step up now as Trump is ambivalent if not outright hostile to the organisation which really has helped keep the peace in Europe.

Not sure what else. So much of Trump's platform scares me. I think his attitude towards minorities and women is abhorrent. His desire to deport all undocumented migrants is unrealistic. His wall is unrealistic. His promises to communities are unachievable (opening coal mines in a country soaring on natural gas?!)

I think we're still seeing the after effects of 2008 but we thought America was immune because no country has recovered better than they have.

Not sure what else to say

Chris 09-11-2016 09:17

Re: US Election 2016
 
I came here to suggest someone should "concede" the election to Mick, and Damian already has. :tu:

denphone 09-11-2016 09:18

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868669)
Congrats to Mick first off. He called it against the polls. Ironically it might seem the polls were largely right in terms of the vote but they got the states so very wrong.

My biggest fear is Trump will have a Republican house and little opposition. This would be less scary had the Democrats won the both houses. I am worried what happens with NATO. Europe needs to step up now as Trump is ambivalent if not outright hostile to the organisation which really has helped keep the peace in Europe.

Not sure what else. So much of Trump's platform scares me. I think his attitude towards minorities and women is abhorrent. His desire to deport all undocumented migrants is unrealistic. His wall is unrealistic. His promises to communities are unachievable (opening coal mines in a country soaring on natural gas?!)

I think we're still seeing the after effects of 2008 but we thought America was immune because no country has recovered better than they have.

Not sure what else to say

l basically sadly agree with everything you have said there Damien.:tu:

thenry 09-11-2016 09:25

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35868526)
Is she President yet

Incredible stuff :LOL:

Damien 09-11-2016 09:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
thenry can you make that smaller, it's screwing up the thread.

figgyburn 09-11-2016 09:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
The last mighty roar of the white baby boomers.brexit and trump.changes happening too fast.tech,losing jobs overseas,letting in unvetted immigrants who may have terrorist leanings,liberal policies re gay,lesbians and individuals proffessing to be of no fixed gender w.t.f. and if you spoke out against any of the above you were castigated by the liberal media.let the fun begin.

thenry 09-11-2016 09:30

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868675)
thenry can you make that smaller, it's screwing up the thread.

Removed. Didn't realise sorry.

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 09:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868616)
Its probably an early admission of defeat. He can't win with the electorate so try the courts.

Don't think I'll be coming to you for racing tips chap.

Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 35868676)
The last mighty roar of the white baby boomers.brexit and trump.changes happening too fast.tech,losing jobs overseas,letting in unvetted immigrants who may have terrorist leanings,liberal policies re gay,lesbians and individuals proffessing to be of no fixed gender w.t.f. and if you spoke out against any of the above you were castigated by the liberal media.

Trump now president elect, HC admits defeat. Congratulates DT by phone. (R4 Today programme)

Brexit 2.0 and for many of the same reasons, not least being the out of touch liberal elite in the capitals who are unaffected by their own policies.

Initial analysis shows HC ahead in cities but way behind in the country. (R4)

Quote:

Let the fun begin.
Indeed.

Damien 09-11-2016 09:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
The analysis of what happened here is going to be very complicated.

Clinton appears to have won the popular vote. She seems to have lost because Trump really got out of the vote in rural areas and, presumably, didn't match him in urban areas. She appears to have done worse amongst ALL demographics other than women and college-educated voters but the exit polls are suspicious. They have Trump as being seen as less qualified, people being more worried about him, believing Clinton is better for the economy and so on only for them to vote for him.

Look at everything so far turnout might actually be down. It may simply be that Trump got his vote out and Clinton didn't.

Chris 09-11-2016 09:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868679)
The analysis of what happened here is going to be very complicated.

Clinton appears to have won the popular vote.

Where are you reading that? BBC currently has Trump 0.6 points ahead on the popular vote.

Damien 09-11-2016 09:47

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35868682)
Where are you reading that? BBC currently has Trump 0.6 points ahead on the popular vote.

Large parts of California still have to come in.

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 09:48

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868679)
The analysis of what happened here is going to be very complicated.

Clinton appears to have won the popular vote. She seems to have lost because Trump really got out of the vote in rural areas and, presumably, didn't match him in urban areas. She appears to have done worse amongst ALL demographics other than women and college-educated voters but the exit polls are suspicious. They have Trump as being seen as less qualified, people being more worried about him, believing Clinton is better for the economy and so on only for them to vote for him.

Look at everything so far turnout might actually be down. It may simply be that Trump got his vote out and Clinton didn't.

Not quite yet:

Quote:

Nov 9, 2016 at 1:54 am ET
Highlights
Popular Vote Is Still Very, Very Close

Checking back in on the popular vote, which is getting much closer: Mr. Trump has 55.7 million votes to Mrs. Clinton's 54.5 million, giving him a lead of 1.2 million votes nationwide.

But Mrs. Clinton may well yet pull off a popular vote victory — much of heavily Democratic California remains uncounted. California is also notorious for counting slowly, so it could be hours or even days before we have a preliminary popular vote total.
WSJ live

Damien 09-11-2016 09:52

Re: US Election 2016
 
fair enough, we'll wait and see on that.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum