![]() |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
The main channels in this country are becoming too expensive to run when viewed against the cost of new material, the reducing audience share and the amount of money the advertisers are willing to pay for their ads to appear. Their most valuable audiences are migrating to streaming, and that’s where the advertisers will go. You have not commented on the channels that are leaving in favour of streaming, but you are giving undue weight to those few channels that have returned. If you recall, for example, I said from the get-go that it was too early for BBC3 to go streaming only, and sure as eggs is eggs, the channel returned. That was not unexpected. Similarly, the return of those children’s channels to Sky reflected the fact that they could profit from Sky subscribers who had were not yet able to access streaming services through their subscriptions. We are never going to agree on this and in the end one of us will be proved right. Only ten more years to go and all will be clear. |
Re: The future of television
The loss of traditional channels in favour of the move to streaming continues. New streaming channels (FAST channels) are being established all the time. It will be interesting to see how popular the FAST channels will turn out to be.
Personally, I don’t think that any of them will turn out to be big players in the overall TV market in the long run. But at this stage, it’s all to play for. https://rxtvinfo.com/2025/sky-contin...n-the-horizon/ [EXTRACT] Over 20 channels drop off Sky satellite, with more to come this week. Some HD channels have closed, incentivising viewers to move to Sky Stream for better picture quality Decline in services covered by Sky subscription, without reduction in cost On Sky Stream, traditional channels losses are offset by growth of streaming-only linear channels. |
Re: The future of television
20 different businesses, all delivering the same crap content to your 80 inch TV (with shit sound), all hoping to take your money in whatever way possible whilst reducing their overheads
And they call it entertainment :D |
Re: The future of television
https://www.cordbusters.co.uk/sky-st...an-end-sooner/
[EXTRACT] Freeview and Freesat could be switched off by 2034 – and new research from Sky claims only 330,000 households would be left behind. That’s the headline finding from a major study published this week, and it’s far more optimistic than the government’s previous estimate of 1.8 million households still needing help by 2035. But there’s a big “if” attached: it only works if the government announces a clear timeline around 2027, giving people seven years to prepare, and invests properly in helping vulnerable groups get online The broadcasters are becoming increasingly concerned about the cost of maintaining the existing broadcast system and this I believe will decide the date on which the transmitters are switched off for TV broadcasting. My bets are on 2024 as being the year for the switch-off. Satellite broadcasting will already have been run down or terminated by then. There is still no news on converting channels to streaming on demand at this point, but I think that will happen at the same time. There is not really any point in doing both, but of course there are differing views on that. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Major competitor of Freeview releases sponsored survey which shows Freeview could be switched off early…
|
Re: The future of television
Broadcasters are pushing for an on demand streaming future because scheduled TV is more expensive and difficult to run, and advertisers are preferring a more targeted approach for their advertising, which is more easily achieved via on demand.
Live broadcasts will, of course, continue in the same way that Amazon and TNT broadcast football. While it is still possible that the government will step in, I think the realisation that broadcasters would want compensation for bearing these unnecessary costs will seal the fate of the traditional channels. As the article points out, most of the population is now connected to the internet and if there is a campaign to publicise the forthcoming switch-off, there will be very few people left without it by 2034. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
If our internet went down, her indoors can still watch her crap on freeview through the aerial.
There's far too much now relies on a constant uninterrupted internet connection, and there are no guarantees you'll get one |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
As for speaking for the broadcasters, don’t be daft. I am merely pointing out what has been widely reported. |
Re: The future of television
From that Cordbuster's article, it will be interesting to see what this report says.
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Humax have released their AuraEZ 4K Recorder.
https://humaxdirect.co.uk/products/h...reely-recorder It states it can record Freely Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 04:42 ---------- Previous post was at 04:29 ---------- Ok, so in the FAQ it says ; Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum