![]() |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
The Pop Player app and website, which combines content from Pop, Tiny Pop, and Pop Max, will remain available, as will streaming-only versions of the channels. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
They’re ceasing traditional RF broadcast, but they will continue to offer a linear schedule over IP. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
The linear (or not) nature of content delivery is a major aspect of this entire discussion. Have you gone wading in without bothering to understand the context (again)? FAST channels have an EPG. The platform has developed piecemeal so EPGs for linear channels delivered over IP lack a unifying brand name (Freeview and Freesat are, at the end of the day, brand names for an EPG more than anything else, even though the branding encompasses the entire user experience). But nevertheless they all have one. Notwithstanding any of the above, the major bone of contention ever since this thread and its predecessors got going was whether or not the advent of on-demand streaming services meant that linear scheduled broadcast TV was doomed to end. FAST channels are the very reason why on-demand streaming *will not* become the exclusive delivery method for TV. Free, Advert-Supported TV over internet protocol, IP being the delivery technology most of us will be using 10 years from now. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
AIUI, they won't be on the EPG's of the traditional broadcasters as FAST channels or anything else, is this not correct? |
Re: The future of television
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
FAST channels won’t be on the Freesat, Freeview or VM EPG because these EPGs are designed to list channels delivered by satellite, terrestrial, or cable broadcast, as the case may be. FAST channels are delivered over IP and they appear in EPGs dedicated to IP delivery. This is a nascent technology and EPGs for FAST-IP channels are fragmented. But don’t forget there was no coherent EPG for free-to-air satellite TV for many years; your choices were either an un-subbed sky box which listed more locked subscription channels than free ones in its EPG or any number of different implementations from different receiver manufacturers, of varying quality. I have attached a screen shot of the Pluto.tv EPG to this post to illustrated what a FAST service provider EPG presently looks like. I suspect a few years from now, this sort of provision will find its way into Freely, the IP-EPG for public service broadcasters. |
Re: The future of television
But there are FAST channels on the Virgin EPG :confused:
|
Re: The future of television
A commercial decision by Virgin :shrug:
|
Re: The future of television
FAST channels stop the punters fast forwarding through ads. Thats why VM and it advertising paymasters are keen on it, and why they are pushing streaming boxes.
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 ---------- Quote:
As for whether the channels will continue to exist after the changeover, this is the crucial area of debate. It’s interesting to note that even some of our FAST channels besides those on Pluto TV are now being offered on demand. It’ll be interesting to see where the audience goes. https://www.advanced-television.com/...ent-on-demand/ [EXTRACT] Virgin Media O2 is giving Virgin TV customers access to linear FAST channel content via VoD at no extra cost. All Virgin TV customers can now watch episodes from their favourite FAST channel shows whenever suits them outside of the linear TV schedule. Customers can access the catch-up content via Virgin Media’s On Demand streaming app as well as via the Search function on their home screen. |
Re: The future of television
It's almost as if giving viewers a choice was good business...
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
|
Re: The future of television
Why do you believe a switch to 100% IP delivery will mean the end of linear schedules?
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
The FAST channels will continue if the demand is there. They are cheap and easy to assemble, the content is cheap and practically everything is second hand material. Some of our traditional channels may still exist as streaming channels if the government requires it. |
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Once you accept the logic of meeting market demand for a linear scedule, you also accept the same logic that goes with everything else in a competitive marketplace - your offering must be more compelling than your competitor’s. The additional effort required - accurate scheduling of programmes and advertisements, deciding what shows to place where in order to draw in and hold on to an audience - becomes marketing spend that pays a return. Though I also think you’re over-stating how difficult it is for an established professional TV channel with its own play-out suite to actually do all that stuff. Aside from all that, as long as it is necessary to maintain legacy delivery networks, whether cable, terrestrial, satellite or some combination of those, linear schedules will have to continue to exist because that’s the only way to deliver TV over those networks. I still think your imagined timetable for final shut-off of those networks is wildly optimistic. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum