![]() |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
I've previously explained how I use human and non human disability aids in order to use the Internet. ---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:51 ---------- [/COLOR] Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Two, I believe you live in a fantasy land and most the stuff you come out with is completely untrue. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Spreading Covid-19 disinformation would also be covered under a crime of sending a false communication.
Will Prof Neil Ferguson be affected by this? |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Your issue is that nobody on here really knows you, or I, or anyone. That’s the way it works. On here we can only judge each other on what we post. Over the years, based on how we post we can form opinions on each other, still flawed, yes. My opinion on you based on how you post, is that the disability that you say you have. Doesn’t present itself. I do not, based on what you post, consider you disabled. I see no evidence. On here of your disability. If someone on here had one leg, they would be disabled but that wouldn’t mean that they would be given any slack on what they post. Same applies to you. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
The thing that concerns me is that unless people scream from the rooftops that they have a disability, nobody on a discussion forum will be aware of that disability. Or their race, or even their gender.
As a matter of interest, there are a number of regular posters on this forum that are in protected categories, and I only know that through the odd casual comment about it over a long period of time. If someone is going to complain about a post someone makes, would the complainant not have to prove intent to discriminate? Of course, there will always be complaints from people offended on behalf of others. I do empathise with vulnerable people - their lives can be a misery when people gang up on them because they tease or bully them due to that vulnerability. But any measures introduced need to be proportionate and balanced. I'm not sure that the Online Safety Bill does that. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Even when the subject matter wasn’t about disabilities in the first place. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
I wonder how long it'll be until any new law is tested to see what floats as a defence. Hopefully, saying "I can't help what I say because......." will be as useless a defence as pleading ignorance is in almost any other circumstance. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
When I was a younger my old gran used to say to me a few sage sayings like Ignore them and they will go away and if you cannot say anything good then do not say anything.
Obviously, we all make mistakes and react when we should not but answer me this (to all who have the problem). If you dislike Richard so much why in Gods holy name do so many keep engaging with him? An outsider could some and read a lot of these threads and think a lot of you are nasty peices of work because it does look like you target him and gang up on him. He is one guy saying stuff and acting how a lot of you appear to despise so a group have a go at him. Some call names and some post quite aggressively towards him yet you all slag him off saying you keep doing this and that and acting exactly how you expect yet you engage over and over again. No moral highground here you are as bad as him for rising to it. I got off to a bad start here and after my runs have wound my neck in why don't some of you |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
Today anything can be classed as hurtful to anybody, I wonder what the world will be like 20yrs from now. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
IMO If people are allowed or even expected to praise and/or approve of something or someone, then they should also be allowed to criticise. Otherwise you end up with a very distorted set of viewpoints.
You cannot challenge something, if that something isn't allowed to be presented in the first place. It constantly annoys me when people play the X card, when that has nothing to do with the situation. EG If somebody is arguing with you or possibly attacking you, then all sorts if things are going to be said. As long as X has got anything to do with the original argument/attack, then the argument/attack isn't Xist. |
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum