![]() |
Re: Riots
Quote:
So how have they demonstrated that they are suitable for employment? Never mind for so called 'quality' jobs. How is what I have said, any more rubbish than people who say it is lack of 'quality' jobs? |
Re: Riots
We'll see next week just how hard hitting the riot sentences will end up being.
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
anyone else just see the looters on crimewatch?
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
yeah blad, fresh crepzzz
|
Re: Riots
The Court of Appeal has rejected 7 out of 10 appeals against 'harsh' sentences in the wake of the riots.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15347868 Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
The only appeals they have allowed are for people who handled stolen goods but did not actually participate in the riots and did not attempt to incite riots. Without the 'aggravating' factor of the riot, these sentences were considered too harsh and in each case were halved.
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
Good news, Do the crime Serve the time |
Re: Riots
Quote:
Exactly.:tu: |
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
Re: Riots
It was all the fault of the police for being too heavy handed / not forceful enough :rolleyes:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/de...ed-riots-study http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...n-mobiles.html Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't. :mad: |
Re: Riots
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum