![]() |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
Given that the electorate voted to leave, why are you seemingly willing us to fail? Whatever happens to the negotiations, we are still leaving, one way or the other. |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
But, as others and I have tried to explain, even if the EU had theoretically wanted to sign some amazing deals with the UK, its previous trade deals with third countries won't allow it to sign a more advantageous deal with a third country. So the UK has to decide upon an existing deal based upon the constraints that the Irish border issue imposes. Quote:
Let's examine the facts. Here's a list of EU trade deals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe...ade_agreements http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/po...de-agreements/ Deals with 35 countries signed and in force. Deals with a further 27 countries provisionally applied Deals with a further 23 countries agreed but not signed Above data excludes Japan recently signed! The US has free trade deals with 20 countries including the countries in NAFTA. Let's hone in on the US: 1. List of free trade deals https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements Two completed negotiations are mentioned at the foot of the list: TPP - the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The US has now left this partnership. https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.5562ef0a4bc0 T-TIP - the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership, mentioned at the foot of the document. Following Trump's election, the US quit this too. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-a7543706.html 2. Despite Canada and the US being in the NAFTA free trade area, Canada has just stopped buying some Boeing planes from the US in a trade dispute. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-c...-idUSKBN1DZ2W2 In conclusion, I'm not asking you to agree with me. My ask is that you do a little research first. |
Re: Brexit discussion
I'm glad the US quit T-TIP . It is a terrible agreement.
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
Not a fan of TM or her divided party but think she's played a blinder, and has started to direct us towards the least damaging 'soft Brexit'. It's not so much done 'one over' on the EU, but totally wrong footed her own swivel eyed loonies that don't represent the majority of leave voters, they just represent their own narrow interests and political ambitions. They initially said what a wonderful deal she'd done, but are now backtracking now they've read the small print ! Too late ;) |
Re: Brexit discussion
A reminder of the first post in this thread.
Guidelines The constant baiting, belittling of either side of the vote needs to end. The new thread must be a reasonable and a frank debate, it's impossible to agree on this topic but none of this "he/she is thick" or "you're a snowflake". Further use of language like ‘traitors’, ‘swivel eyed loonies’, etc, will be rewarded by prompt use of the Sanity Clause. |
Re: Brexit discussion
It's time the Government started to think about jobs and investment and not keeping people like BoJo and Rees-Mogg happy. Here's two industries that think this.
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
If we are and remain in line with the EU's regulatory rules, I see no reason why this can't work. |
Re: Brexit discussion
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
An interesting article in today's FT "The UK has tied its Brexit hands" by Martin Sandbu predicts how things could well end up: Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum