Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2016 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702280)

Mick 21-12-2016 17:07

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35876990)
Strange how noone cares that Putin helped to elect Trump as POTUS ...

Strange times indeed

Nothing strange about it. Despite the relaxed gun laws over in the US, I strongly doubt 63 Million people had a gun to their head by the hands of a Russian, forcing them to vote for Trump.

I think people are forgetting Crooked Hillary's audio recording from 10 years ago of her suggesting the US should have done 'something' to rig the Palestine Elections in 2006....

Let me jog your memories....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35866398)
This could also be potentially damaging for her:-

Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election in 2006 - New York Observer.

She's heard saying...

“I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake,” said Sen. Clinton. “And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”

The US wanting to influence foreign Elections, surely not...

Second little chestnut....

The current interfering President, known as Barack Obama, coming over here prior to our own June 23rd referendum and blackmailing us, in to voting Remain, or else we be back at the trading queue. I call this interfering in a foreign referendum/Election, it should never have been allowed.

So while you got some in the US saying the Russians influenced the outcome of the Election...Pot, Kettle, black springs to mind, oh and that word beginning with H for

Hypocrisy !!!

Damien 21-12-2016 17:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35877026)
Second little chestnut....

The current interfering President, known as Barack Obama, coming over here prior to our own June 23rd referendum and blackmailing us, in to voting Remain, or else we be back at the trading queue. I call this interfering in a foreign referendum/Election, it should never have been allowed.

So while you got some in the US saying the Russians influenced the outcome of the Election...Pot, Kettle, black springs to mind, oh and that word beginning with H for

Hypocrisy !!!

That's quite different from if the US hacked one of our parties.

---------- Post added at 16:58 ---------- Previous post was at 16:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35877022)
Propaganda? I think you'll find it was the Hollywood/Media "machine" that did that. All the Russians are even accused of, is EXPOSING the TRUTH. Who was responsible for what was exposed as being the truth? Clue: It wasn't the Russians.

Well Russia selectively revealed the truth didn't they? No RNC e-mails got released (although the FBI do believe they were hacked).

nomadking 21-12-2016 18:02

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877036)
Well Russia selectively revealed the truth didn't they? No RNC e-mails got released (although the FBI do believe they were hacked).

If they were truly being selective then they wouldn't have even bothered trying to get the Republican e-mails.

This all assumes that revealing it had any real effect on the Democrat votes.

Damien 21-12-2016 18:05

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35877045)
If they were truly being selective then they wouldn't have even bothered trying to get the Republican e-mails.

Well they might prove useful now they're in the White House wouldn't it?

ianch99 21-12-2016 18:13

Re: US Election 2016
 
The anti-elite mission is going well:

Trump's Cabinet picks have more wealth than third of American households combined

Mick 21-12-2016 18:46

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35877049)

That's a good thing, means they cannot be bought.

Next weak leftie argument please ? :dozey:

papa smurf 21-12-2016 18:47

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35877049)

i understand mike pence is changing his name to mike Billionbucks so he fits in .

ianch99 21-12-2016 18:55

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35877056)
That's a good thing, means they cannot be bought.

Next weak leftie argument please ? :dozey:

Take your "I love Trump" glasses off for a moment. He is just swapping one elite for another :dunce:

Mick 21-12-2016 19:27

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35877060)
Take your "I love Trump" glasses off for a moment. He is just swapping one elite for another :dunce:

I don't have those glasses sorry, nor do I love Trump so keep your dunce hat to yourself. I am however, glad she, the crooked one, did not win and that's the difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877036)
That's quite different from if the US hacked one of our parties.

I like how you completely ignored the point about Hillary trying to suggest they should have rigged the Palestine Elections back in 2006, so they could determine who was going to win, why is this any different to the so called accusations of foreign nations trying to influence the 2016 US Elections ?

(Clue: it is no different.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien
Well Russia selectively revealed the truth didn't they? No RNC e-mails got released (although the FBI do believe they were hacked).

Did 63 Million Americans get held up a gun point when they were casting their vote for Trump back on November 8th ? Majority of these Americans had made up their mind up, even IF there was an attempt by the Russians or any other foreign entity to influence the Election, which I just don't buy that there was.

Damien 21-12-2016 20:22

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35877068)
I like how you completely ignored the point about Hillary trying to suggest they should have rigged the Palestine Elections back in 2006, so they could determine who was going to win, why is this any different to the so called accusations of foreign nations trying to influence the 2016 US Elections ?

(Clue: it is no different.)

No it isn't too different. I expect America to push for what is in their interests just as I am not surprised Russia are pushing for theirs. My objection is that I consider America and the West in general as the force I would want to be successful. So I think we should be dismayed and push back against Russian involvement and am against people defending Russia or, as is the case in parts of Europe, political parties seeking their help.

richard s 21-12-2016 20:32

Re: US Election 2016
 
Western Countries are all Saints and they do not hack anyone. Laugh.

OhReally 21-12-2016 20:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877003)
Also the FBI and the CIA.

Yes, and we ALL believe everything they say don't we? :dozey:

Damien 21-12-2016 20:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OhReally (Post 35877096)
Yes, and we ALL believe everything they say don't we? :dozey:

I believe them over the Kremlin

OhReally 21-12-2016 20:54

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35877093)
Western Countries are all Saints and they do not hack anyone. Laugh.

Like when they had elections to ensure democracy and Hamas won. All of a sudden we weren't prepared to accept the winner.

Our governments are true hypocrites "let's have an election and if we like the winner it's democracy in action, if not let's have another one"

RizzyKing 22-12-2016 19:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
There is little doubt that both Russia and China are involved in very dubious internet shenanigans but so are we in the west we are not angels and to suggest that because the west is the lesser of two evils doesn't make our activities any less acceptable then Russia and China's. Any outside involvement in trying to influence the US presidential election is a serious escalation of those activities and Russia had a lot more to gain by a trump victory then a clinton one. Personally i also believe a trump victory was preferable to a clinton one but that victory has to be legitimate and pass any and all scrutiny so any chance that Russia played a part must be investigated to a complete conclusion.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum