Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Acceptable levels are related to the skills we need to bring into the country and under our asylum system. You can’t really put a number on it, because this varies over time. As a general rule, if people do not have the skills that employers need, they shouldn’t be accepted into this country. We must also bear in mind that we need labour where there are shortage areas, such as in farming.

I do believe we have many people claiming benefits who could go out to work, with many abusing the system. I’ve seen it first hand, so I know it’s true. Those people should be refused benefit if they are clearly trying to avoid getting a job or getting trained for one. That in itself should help to bring down the numbers.

We should aim to steadily reduce immigration until our population reduces to a level whereby our residents population can get accommodation and our public services are able to function more efficiently.

Illegal immigration must stop and the government must introduce laws that enable us to turn away anyone who enters the country illegally with no right of appeal.

One other exception is students. I do think we should welcome students into this country who are paying for a university course. However, once their studies are complete, they shouldn’t be return to their country. We also need to keep an eye on them to ensure that they do not absent themselves from their studies, which I believe happens a lot.

I just want common sense to prevail and to recognise that we can’t take in everyone who wants to be here. Starmer’s latest plan to pay landlords to take in illegal immigrants will only serve to deprive our own people from getting accommodation. How is that right?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

fyi

https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/internat...plication/faqs

The above is from Sheffield University, but all other Unis have to do the same in order to be able to issue CASs - if the Unis don’t do this, they lose the right to issue CASs, so foreign students couldn’t attend.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Se that asylum seeker's are charge with spying , really need to get more in , after all we haven't spent that much on them have we

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

So what about the jobs that are low level skills that British people don't want to do but foreigners are willing to do?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Don't worry they'll probably get a suspended sentence and of course we can't deport them it's against their human rights

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

So true need to leave ECHR

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Yep and lose the right to a fair trial, the right to free from torture, free from prosecution, the right to life, the right to free expression, right to privacy, right to be free from inhumane treatment etc etc

But a small price to pay to get rid of some brown people eh?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

The right to spout bullshit?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

and pensioners, many of us pay income tax.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Interesting choice of countries given that we would join Russia (and Belarus) as the only European countries outside of the ECHR.

Still, I admire your optimism that no UK government would abuse the new found ‘freedoms’ they’d have if we left the ECHR.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Yea they'll be locking you up for texting next