Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2016 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702280)

OhReally 20-12-2016 23:20

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35876896)
I think the Colleges have made the worst decision possible in American history. It like having UKIP as the new Government.

What, by following their own rules? How very dare they not do what you, the Great Arthur, all-seeing and all-knowing (well apart from climate change which we already proved) demand?

Mick 21-12-2016 02:24

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35876896)

The system is wrong.
Clinton WON the peoples vote. So therefore she should have won the election

No she should not. Go see the MAP of the US on the following page and look at it, how much MORE Red and by that, I mean DEEP Red there is than Deep Blue...

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

As explained, many times in this thread already. The Founding Fathers had it right over 200 hundred years ago. You cannot have heavily populated areas such as California, New York etc, call an Election, it's like California saying to rest of the US, 'We will vote today, everyone else stay at home.'

Bernie Sanders cried the same crap yesterday on Social Media as well and even his own supporters and followers were telling him, that while, yes, they cannot stand the thought of a Trump Presidency, he (Bernie Sanders), needed American History lesson 101. Infact many of them were saying, it was his own stupid DNC Party's fault for backing the wrong Candidate.

Quote:

He will get rid of about 80% of Obamacare. He will NOT allow his countries armed service to fight in other ounctries as part of NATO

And he will carry out his wishes, and to hell with the poor of America.
I assume by this remark, you're not quite up on the facts of Obamacare, again, as explained many times, what it is in this thread, Obamacare is NOT free healthcare.

As for NATO, he is ALL for it, just expects Countries, under the Umbrella of NATO, to pay their fair share, when it comes to Defense spending.

Quote:

It would not surprise me that there will be attempts on his life.
And.... ...it doesn't need to be told every time you reply in this thread. :zzz:

papa smurf 21-12-2016 11:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35876896)
I think the Colleges have made the worst decision possible in American history. It like having UKIP as the new Government.

Trump will cause trouble all over the World with his 'so called decisions that doesn't concern him on a daily basis' like he said the other day regarding. Daily security briefings.

The system is wrong.
Clinton WON the peoples vote. So therefore she should have won the election

His vommenst were 'Idont need to be told the same thing each day.

He will get rid of about 80% of Obamacare. He will NOT allow his countries armed service to fight in other ounctries as part of NATO

And he will carry out his wishes, and to hell with the poor of America.

It would not surprise me that there will be attempts on his life.

well your not alone this nut ,er i mean chap agrees with you

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...Jones-Infowars
SHOCK CLAIM: The CIA 'is trying to ASSASSINATE Donald Trump before he takes office:)

heero_yuy 21-12-2016 12:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
US president assassignation attempts and successes seem to be the norm.

List of attempts and successes

Why should Trump be any different?

There's always rumours about CIA plots as well.

ianch99 21-12-2016 13:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Strange how noone cares that Putin helped to elect Trump as POTUS ...

Strange times indeed

papa smurf 21-12-2016 14:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35876990)
Strange how noone cares that Putin helped to elect Trump as POTUS ...

Strange times indeed

maybe your the only one who believes it :shrug:

Damien 21-12-2016 15:14

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35877001)
maybe your the only one who believes it :shrug:

Also the FBI and the CIA.

nomadking 21-12-2016 15:29

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877003)
Also the FBI and the CIA.

And their evidence is.................nowhere to be found.

papa smurf 21-12-2016 15:32

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35877004)
And their evidence is.................nowhere to be found.

its what ever Obama tells them it is - things will change in late january;)

Damien 21-12-2016 15:48

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35877004)
And their evidence is.................nowhere to be found.

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35877005)
its what ever Obama tells them it is - things will change in late january;)

I believe the 17 intelligence agencies in the US and our own MI5 over the Kremlin's denials.

They are doing a report but I suspect it still won't be believed. During the Cold War Russia always had enough apologists on the left, they now have them on the right. The truth is a lot of people don't care if Putin is calling the shots as long as they benefit. Far-right or left. More than willing to accept Russian meddling if it helps them (and then they accuse others of being traitors!).

papa smurf 21-12-2016 15:59

Re: US Election 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877009)
I believe the 17 intelligence agencies in the US and our own MI5 over the Kremlin's denials.

They are doing a report but I suspect it still won't be believed. During the Cold War Russia always had enough apologists on the left, they now have them on the right. The truth is a lot of people don't care if Putin is calling the shots as long as they benefit. Far-right or left. More than willing to accept Russian meddling if it helps them (and then they accuse others of being traitors!).

scary stuff

papa smurf 21-12-2016 16:03

Re: US Election 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
don't let paranoia win

Damien 21-12-2016 16:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
The 'red menace' was real. The Soviet Union would seek to influence Western states by either having agents here or having people sympathetic to their aims willing to spread their propaganda.

papa smurf 21-12-2016 16:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by damien (Post 35877019)
the 'red menace' was real. The soviet union would seek to influence western states by either having agents here or having people sympathetic to their aims willing to spread their propaganda.

если ты так говоришь, кто я такой, чтобы спорить

nomadking 21-12-2016 16:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35877019)
The 'red menace' was real. The Soviet Union would seek to influence Western states by either having agents here or having people sympathetic to their aims willing to spread their propaganda.

Propaganda? I think you'll find it was the Hollywood/Media "machine" that did that. All the Russians are even accused of, is EXPOSING the TRUTH. Who was responsible for what was exposed as being the truth? Clue: It wasn't the Russians.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum