Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797] (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33628733)

Ravenheart 04-06-2008 20:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Dugg,

I've been in touch with a journalist I know who has done a lot of work for the BBC. unlike some he's not afraid of challenging bosses and head honcho's of corporations and he's very interested in the whole Phorm debate.

I have sent him the link to Alex's latest revelation and am waiting a reply. I'll keep you posted.

mattyh 04-06-2008 20:29

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Nice work!!!

Dugg :)

Wildie 04-06-2008 20:40

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
may explain the stutter of a certain person

Rchivist 04-06-2008 20:48

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567513)
http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

Presumably this has gone out to the usual suspects via a press release?
Chris at Register
Charles Arthur at Guardian
Click, Gadget Show?
etc.?

Do you want me to send a url to Emma and BT CEO elect?

Florence 04-06-2008 21:03

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567585)
Presumably this has gone out to the usual suspects via a press release?
Chris at Register
Charles Arthur at Guardian
Click, Gadget Show?
etc.?

Do you want me to send a url to Emma and BT CEO elect?

Was wondering on that since I am holding 220 shares would be wondering where this leaves us shareholders who knew nothing since Bt didn't do any informed reviews to shareholders over this. Or my mother glazed over at the technical stuff and gave chair control of her proxy vote but BT have shown you need to keep ontop of them as a share holder and this will never happen again..

---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------

Mick this thread needs more stars in the ratings!!!!!

Well done all and dugg Alexander

Wildie 04-06-2008 21:03

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
sell 219 of them before the price drops of the map.

mark777 04-06-2008 21:05

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Is it time to hit the bloggs and forums like we used to do?

I see someone has started a new thread at moneysavingexpert. It probably won't last long, but may get some reads. You may care to contribute during it's short lifetime.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/....html?t=955479

AlexanderHanff 04-06-2008 21:07

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

Alexander Hanff
/me breaths out.

---------- Post added at 20:07 ---------- Previous post was at 20:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567585)
Presumably this has gone out to the usual suspects via a press release?
Chris at Register
Charles Arthur at Guardian
Click, Gadget Show?
etc.?

Do you want me to send a url to Emma and BT CEO elect?

I haven't sent a press release yet I wanted to scan it and get it up on wikileaks first, so I could stop panicking.

Alexander Hanff

serial 04-06-2008 21:09

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Lets see if the ICO and HO stay onside now that they are being made to look like fools by a lieing BT.

Excellent job Alex.

Dephormation 04-06-2008 21:14

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567561)
how the PhormPRteam would spin it...

"Charity donors given more relevant Google ads"
"Charity anti-phishing service launched - 2006"
"Healthy competition in the internet advertising markiet"
"Stressed charity treasurers get a quiet September"
"Ertugrul involved in charity fundraising"

Quote from the 2007 Annual Report (page 11/52)...

"The Group made no charitable or political contributions in the year"

You'll forgive me if I don't comment on these ^h^h^h^h. I can't find polite words.

Sirius 04-06-2008 21:15

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
3 little Words



Smoking Gun Discovered

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf


:clap::clap::clap::clap: Well done Alexander

OldBear 04-06-2008 21:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567604)
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

<snip>

Enjoy??? Are you joking? This is a scandal and a half you've uncovered here; WTG Alex.

Story dugg as requested. :D

btw. First thing I spotted in the report was this:

Quote:

Normally the PageSense system deploys cookies directly to user's machines. BT's broadband terms and conditions prevented this approach. Instead 121Media conducted an initial cookie drop exercise. For two-weeks prior to the trial proper 121Media purchased advertising space on popular third-party websites from which cookies were dropped directly onto users machines.
They did this to get around legal T&Cs?

Is it just me, or does that just stink?

OB

serial 04-06-2008 21:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Page 14: During the trial three users posted their observations of this effect. In each case the reaction was negative, the user suspecting a virus, malware, or spyware of some kind. This artefact is eliminated by the new version of pagesense, "ProxySense".

Disgusted.

AlexanderHanff 04-06-2008 21:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
MORE DIGGS PLEASE!!!

Alexander Hanff

NTLVictim 04-06-2008 21:31

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567626)
MORE DIGGS PLEASE!!!

Alexander Hanff

More bleedin' diggs??what do you think I'm trying to do?? I finally got registered 8th time around and when I tried to digg it, I got;

"
Oops, what you're looking for isn't here!

The page you requested is not here but there are a few things you can try:
  • Try searching for the story you're looking for using the form above.
  • Go to the homepage to see the most recent stories.
Pretty sure it's a website bug? Please let us know and we'll try to get it fixed."

AlexanderHanff 04-06-2008 21:32

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
It's there cos I just added a comment with a link to the full report.

Alexander Hanff

serial 04-06-2008 21:34

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Also Diggers, make sure you digg the comments. With the protest Digg entry we had a number of people digging comments down. I'm guessing the Phorm PR team, so lets beat them at this as well.

homealone 04-06-2008 21:35

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NTLVictim (Post 34567636)
More bleedin' diggs??what do you think I'm trying to do?? I finally got registered 8th time around and when I tried to digg it, I got;

"
Oops, what you're looking for isn't here!

The page you requested is not here but there are a few things you can try:
  • Try searching for the story you're looking for using the form above.
  • Go to the homepage to see the most recent stories.
Pretty sure it's a website bug? Please let us know and we'll try to get it fixed."

I get this if I forget to tell noscript to allow digg.com ..

dugg, btw :)

G UK 04-06-2008 21:39

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567513)
http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

Facebooked

piggy 04-06-2008 21:40

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
digged...or is it dugged??

OldBear 04-06-2008 21:40

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567626)
MORE DIGGS PLEASE!!!

I've posted to Neowin, Alex.

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=641300

Hopefully the Mods and Admins will elevate this to their front page. :shrug:

OB

icsys 04-06-2008 21:41

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Dugg!!!!
...and cross posted on Digital Spy :)

NTLVictim 04-06-2008 21:46

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Pdf downloaded scattering.

BadPhormula 04-06-2008 21:48

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567604)
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

Alexander Hanff
/me breaths out.


Quote:

"121Media will take action (both technical and in public relations) to avoid any
perception that their system is a virus, malware or spyware and to show that in effect it
is a positive web-development"


Too late 121Media(Phorm) your criminal malware credentials are assured!
Even another name change won't shake your malicious malware intentions or actions off.
(can we all say P E R C E P T I O N )

Laughs Out Loud I assume when you write "public relations" you were referring to the disastrous mess your PhormPR monkey team made a right pigs ear of?

Sirius365 04-06-2008 21:50

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Dugg & Posted to delicious

WTG alex !

Florence 04-06-2008 21:51

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Wonder if Sky are still interested in following BT's lead

Rchivist 04-06-2008 21:51

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567604)
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

Alexander Hanff
/me breaths out.

Alexander Hanff

Okay Alex - you win. I'm shocked. And I'm only on page 5.

I've written to the BT Beta forum moderation team to ask them what their attitude will be to people linking directly to the Wikileak page or quoting from the document. I'm on a "final warning" on that site, and I don't want them chucking all the key contributors off the forum or worse. So we will see what they say. But we have ways round that...

I wonder what BT will be looking like in the morning?
I wonder if Emma will ever email me again?
I wonder if they will start treating us customers a bit better now?
I wonder which managers are cheering and which ones are stocking up on Entero VioPhorm?
I wonder how Ian Livingstone will get on at the AGM with that one on the table in front of him?

serial 04-06-2008 21:52

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
This document is priceless, I want to thank the brave employee of BT who sent it to Alex.

JohnnyWashngo 04-06-2008 21:58

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567604)
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

Alexander Hanff
/me breaths out.

Have added more diggs to the comments on the article :)

Also, just a quickie. Can the report be posted somewhere other than the secure section of wikileaks? Firefox 3 is telling me that the certificate for the secure secition of wikileaks expired a few weeks ago and as much as I want to read the document, I don't want to start letting sites off the hook with out of date certificates.

NTLVictim 04-06-2008 22:03

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
digg up my comment or I'll find you.;)

JohnHorb 04-06-2008 22:15

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyWashngo (Post 34567680)
Also, just a quickie. Can the report be posted somewhere other than the secure section of wikileaks? Firefox 3 is telling me that the certificate for the secure secition of wikileaks expired a few weeks ago and as much as I want to read the document, I don't want to start letting sites off the hook with out of date certificates.

Works fine on http://

http://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

JohnnyWashngo 04-06-2008 22:16

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnHorb (Post 34567714)

So it does... cheers for that :)

Florence 04-06-2008 22:17

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Posted on ISPr asking for diggs hope to get more soon...

SMHarman 04-06-2008 22:20

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Florence (Post 34567590)
Was wondering on that since I am holding 220 shares would be wondering where this leaves us shareholders who knew nothing since Bt didn't do any informed reviews to shareholders over this. Or my mother glazed over at the technical stuff and gave chair control of her proxy vote but BT have shown you need to keep ontop of them as a share holder and this will never happen again..

You OWN a share of the company. You have no CONTROL, you have delegated that responsbility to the board of directors. You can take issues about the control of the company you own up with the board of directors either directly, through their audit or ethics committees or by posing questions at the AGM.

NTLVictim 04-06-2008 22:20

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
I take it this has been distributed to all known press everywhere?

I can't wait for the Reg tomorrow..

NTLVictim 04-06-2008 22:22

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34567720)
You OWN a share of the company. You have no CONTROL, you have delegated that responsbility to the board of directors. You can take issues about the control of the company you own up with the board of directors either directly, through their audit or ethics committees or by posing questions at the AGM.


BT have an Ethics Committee? Are you sure?:erm:

SMHarman 04-06-2008 22:23

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by piggy (Post 34567648)
digged...or is it dugged??

like the video game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dig_Dug

davews 04-06-2008 22:26

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Rather a shame you had to put that document on a site with an expired security certificate.... bit of a let down with all our own concerns about privacy...

Won't have a chance to read it till tomorrow now.

wecpc 04-06-2008 22:31

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davews (Post 34567730)
Rather a shame you had to put that document on a site with an expired security certificate.... bit of a let down with all our own concerns about privacy...

Won't have a chance to read it till tomorrow now.

Read post 8041

Colin

Rchivist 04-06-2008 22:32

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567709)
They would have had to declare them as charitable contributions in their annual report, and they have none listed.

Alexander Hanff

I've sent the url of the report and your site to my MP Annette Brooke LD who recently wrote to me with Don Foster's comments following his contacts with with Phorm and BT and Gums (ICO).

I have suggested that they circulate it amongst the 40 MP's who signed the EDM and that Don Foster makes contact with you. Maybe he will turn up at the demo now.

bluecar1 04-06-2008 22:40

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
posted the link to the bt discussion on iii http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/deta...scussion&it=le
*********
internal BT doc of illegal 2006 trials bluecar1
View Author's profile | Add to favourites | Ignore | Author's posts

interesting reading of the ILLEGAL 2006 trials of webwise

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

all the stuff BT claim never to have had

peter
***********

SMHarman 04-06-2008 22:44

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NTLVictim (Post 34567726)
BT have an Ethics Committee? Are you sure?:erm:

No, they have a...
a Operating
b Audit
c Remuneration
d Nominating
e Community Support
f Pension Scheme Performance Review Group
g Equality of Access Board
* Chairs committee
http://www.btplc.com/report/Review07/board.htm

Rchivist 04-06-2008 22:49

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bluecar1 (Post 34567746)
posted the link to the bt discussion on iii http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/deta...scussion&it=le
*********
internal BT doc of illegal 2006 trials bluecar1
View Author's profile | Add to favourites | Ignore | Author's posts

interesting reading of the ILLEGAL 2006 trials of webwise

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

all the stuff BT claim never to have had

peter
***********

I've posted the link over on the ii discussion for Phorm shares too - entitled Anorak's revenge
http://tinyurl.com/4yuaul (ii link to discussion pages)
(you have to read the earlier posts on ii to appreciate that - no offence intended to anyone here)

mark777 04-06-2008 22:56

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567513)
http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

Just posting the link forward as it's a few pages back now. As has been pointed out below, please digg the (positive) comments on the digg site as well.

phormwatch 04-06-2008 23:04

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mark777 (Post 34567762)
Just posting the link forward as it's a few pages back now. As has been pointed out below, please digg the (positive) comments on the digg site as well.

Would anybody who has an account at Slashdot like to submit this as an article?

Having an article on Slashdot would generate huge publicity.

SelfProtection 04-06-2008 23:10

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Originally Posted by bluecar1 [AD]
posted the link to the bt discussion on iii http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/deta...scussion&it=le
*********

You may want to look at the News section on this link BT did some Share Adjustments Today.

phormwatch 04-06-2008 23:12

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Alex-

Please include a link to the full article at Wikileaks on your nodpi article.

I've sent out a few emails to newspapers, and they will want to see the original document.

Thanks.

SelfProtection 04-06-2008 23:12

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SelfProtection (Post 34567776)
Originally Posted by bluecar1 [AD]
posted the link to the bt discussion on iii http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/deta...scussion&it=le

You may want to look at the News section on this link BT did some Share Adjustments Today.


Florence 04-06-2008 23:14

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34567720)
You OWN a share of the company. You have no CONTROL, you have delegated that responsbility to the board of directors. You can take issues about the control of the company you own up with the board of directors either directly, through their audit or ethics committees or by posing questions at the AGM.

NO

I found out my mother still has her 220 shares in BT shse was given when she retired from work. She is 86 she used to go to the AGM's with a friend from work they made a week trip out of an AGM. The last 5 yrs she hasn't been going ill health I didn't know she still had therm until I started talking to her about her shares. seems she has 200 TSB shares which pays her more divi than BT's ever have.
From now I will handle the shares for her no more letting the chairperson handle the proxy vote.

Rchivist 04-06-2008 23:15

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
I wonder what this will do to the contractual relationship between 80/20 Thinking and Phorm? The leaked report contains just a suggestion of dishonest dealing on the part of Phorm doesn't it?..... Hence - immediate termination of contractual relationship. Hope Simon cashed the cheque.

AlexanderHanff 04-06-2008 23:19

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by phormwatch (Post 34567778)
Alex-

Please include a link to the full article at Wikileaks on your nodpi article.

I've sent out a few emails to newspapers, and they will want to see the original document.

Thanks.

Done

Alexander Hanff

---------- Post added at 22:19 ---------- Previous post was at 22:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567785)
I wonder what this will do to the contractual relationship between 80/20 Thinking and Phorm? The leaked report contains just a suggestion of dishonest dealing on the part of Phorm doesn't it?..... Hence - immediate termination of contractual relationship. Hope Simon cashed the cheque.

The article and report is about BT not Phorm, so presumably it would have no effect on their contract with Phorm.

Alexander Hanff

mark777 04-06-2008 23:26

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567788)

The article and report is about BT not Phorm, so presumably it would have no effect on their contract with Phorm.

Alexander Hanff

Even though Phorm are doing business with a disreputable company? ;)

G UK 04-06-2008 23:30

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
If anybody Plays http://www.hattrick.org I have posted a thread on the NonHT-England conference can I ask for posts backing it up please.

Peter N 04-06-2008 23:35

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
I have joined this forum for the single purpose of being able to say a big thank you to Alexander.

That's an amazing piece of work and goes way beyond anything I had hoped for.

You have my thanks and my utmost respect.

Pete

Deko 04-06-2008 23:50

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Wooot yay Hannf,


Anyone want to guess how much phorm shares will drop toms ?

bluecar1 05-06-2008 00:11

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567757)
I've posted the link over on the ii discussion for Phorm shares too - entitled Anorak's revenge
http://tinyurl.com/4yuaul (ii link to discussion pages)
(you have to read the earlier posts on ii to appreciate that - no offence intended to anyone here)


robert, just posted a correction to you post on iii.

as i said over there, it not the anoraks that have been up to anything, it was BT and phorm

peter

tarka 05-06-2008 00:28

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
I just dropped you a pm alex

thebarron 05-06-2008 00:29

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
A big thank you to Alexander for this and an observation from reading the report.
There is absolutely no consideration given to the Webmaster side of this in the trial.
Like where is the evaluation of its ability to avoid webmail sites or password restricted content on http. It seems they just assume it works and that we will believe them because they say so!

Rchivist 05-06-2008 00:35

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bluecar1 (Post 34567849)
robert, just posted a correction to you post on iii.

as i said over there, it not the anoraks that have been up to anything, it was BT and phorm

peter

Yes - typo indeed - it should have said "nerds" not "anoraks", in reply to a post from Gibberish a few posts back on that list "there was a lot of noise from the anti-phormers a few weeks back but recently it has gone very quiet. I guess all the nerds have found something else to worry about."

Looks like we did ;-)

Hank 05-06-2008 00:52

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567738)
I've sent the url of the report and your site to my MP Annette Brooke LD

Same here to our Labour MP who works in the Home Office... :)

Alex: For you... :clap: :clap:

Digg it up all :)

Hank

Tarquin L-Smythe 05-06-2008 00:53

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Fan and Brown Stuff how far will it go and are there enough places to hide.:D

Florence 05-06-2008 00:56

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Looks like we just come back shouting louder though.. This needs to be sorted and if Emma has to answer questions on a lie detector so be it, after all it is only the same amount of invaision on her privacy as she plans on BT customers

Peter N 05-06-2008 01:05

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Hope I'm not jumping too far ahead but a couple of the the stand-out points for me are the clearly stated intentions to prevent the customer from knowing that they were being monitored and the fact that BT were tracking customer service reports and complaints.

That last one suggests that they have been lying to the authorities with regards to the people who have proof of their data being intercepted. BT have claimed that the customer service call centres were not aware of the trials and used that to explain the incorrect information given to callers and yet we now find that those same call centres were collating data regarding calls relating to the trials.

This ought to make a difference in the attitude of the police and other authorities who have so far taken BT's word for everything that's happened.

warescouse 05-06-2008 01:06

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Dugg

mark777 05-06-2008 01:10

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
I've always thought we were being harsh on BT and Phorm.

After all, they have often repeated the fact that they want to be transparent over these issues. I have no doubt that they told the ICO and HO all about their wish to be transparent.

Page 4 of the leaked document confirms this.

Trouble is, I think they have a unique understanding of the word 'transparency'.

"Only 15-20 trialists (0.1% of the trial userbase) identified the presence of the system and had a negative reaction. To ensure 100% transparency, the following work is planned : ... "

transparent = not noticed = under the radar = hidden

Time to review all those Kent/Emma statements in light of this new definition.

vicz 05-06-2008 01:18

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by warescouse (Post 34567929)
Probably the same call centres that caused BT to get a big fine recently when they were caught cheating. They were calling each other and answering quickly to get better response figures for a contract that needed their performance figures to improve. (I think it was with the MOD).

Yes MoD - here http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/a...tre-fraud.html

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 01:21

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
One thing none of you have picked up on yet is the mention of the sample size for the Phase 2 trials (the 2007 trials). 350 000. Now BT have reportedly stated they scaled back on original plans for the 2007 trials but have refused to give a number. So how many do we really think were involved in the 2007 trial?

Alexander Hanff

Rchivist 05-06-2008 01:22

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter N (Post 34567914)
Hope I'm not jumping too far ahead but a couple of the the stand-out points for me are the clearly stated intentions to prevent the customer from knowing that they were being monitored and the fact that BT were tracking customer service reports and complaints.

That last one suggests that they have been lying to the authorities with regards to the people who have proof of their data being intercepted. BT have claimed that the customer service call centres were not aware of the trials and used that to explain the incorrect information given to callers and yet we now find that those same call centres were collating data regarding calls relating to the trials.

This ought to make a difference in the attitude of the police and other authorities who have so far taken BT's word for everything that's happened.


My take on that is that they didn't tell the call centres anything about what they were doing, but clearly gave them some sort of protocol with regard to the type of customer calls they were dealing with - probably just hidden in a statistics report sheet listing various types of customer problem - and for those two weeks the report sheet would list things like
"I'm seeing strange scripts in my forum posts"
"I'm getting funny things happening in my status bar"
"I'm finding odd cookies on my machine"

I doubt the support staff had a clue what it was about, but they would be required to tick boxes so the faults could be statistically logged (but of course the customers would get no help solving the problems).

Remember the BT corporate culture - staff generally aren't told anything. They are always making major changes and telling no one - it's the way they do things.
I'm a regular on the support groups - it's amazing the things they don't tell us about or tell support about.
BT standard policy
1 - plan a change
2 - implement the change
3 - tell the press
4 - watch the customers get problems
5 - don't tell support
6 - watch the customers complain and give them misleading uninformed replies
7 - occasionally discover peer users have diagnosed and provided work-rounds for the problem. Fudge some sort of excuse. Post a url on an obscure part of the help system, which has the wrong advice on it.
8 - eventually (far too late) notice what peer users are saying and alter your advice to fit with theirs.
9 - do it all again a few weeks later.
(this is the story of the latest security "enhancements" to BTYahoo mail by the way but it could be anything, Webwise included)

Wildie 05-06-2008 01:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
hello phormbt team :waving:

warescouse 05-06-2008 01:27

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567944)
cut...
Remember the BT corporate culture - staff generally aren't told anything. They are always making major changes and telling no one - it's the way they do things.
cut...

As an ex BT Engineer I can vouch for that. You get the job done as per the specification.

Rchivist 05-06-2008 01:27

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567943)
One thing none of you have picked up on yet is the mention of the sample size for the Phase 2 trials (the 2007 trials). 350 000. Now BT have reportedly stated they scaled back on original plans for the 2007 trials but have refused to give a number. So how many do we really think were involved in the 2007 trial?

Alexander Hanff

Well - haven't you got the relevant document? ;)

Come on Alex, you're slipping.

I'm off to bed now, there'll be a lot to read tomorrow.

mark777 05-06-2008 01:29

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Page 5

"BT will design and re-engineer the network to enable the integration of such a facility"

They are not going to just walk away from this are they?

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 01:30

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567948)
Well - haven't you got the relevant document? ;)

Come on Alex, you're slipping.

I'm off to bed now, there'll be a lot to read tomorrow.

Well I wanted one of you lot to find it, I didn't want to spoil all the surprises.

Alexander Hanff

Hank 05-06-2008 01:39

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34567928)
I've had a re-read as well. Here's my take.

There were two lots of ad purchasing.

Prior to the trial - to get 121Media cookies on BT customer's machines (covertly) 121Media purchased ads for 2 weeks PRIOR to the trial, on "3rd party popular websites" so they could drop their own cookie secretly on as many computers as possible.

On cookies: Reading 4th section (page 46 of 52 in footer) - I see the 3rd paragraph states cookie dropping could not be done in this trial due to the legal position. So I'm not sure they did do this but if someone has evidence or has read in the hefty document that they did, I'll happily stand corrected.

Hank

labougie 05-06-2008 01:52

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Anyone know what Phorm's fixed assets are? Would it be worth offering Kent a fiver for the lot in the morning?

BadPhormula 05-06-2008 01:53

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Florence (Post 34567900)
Looks like we just come back shouting louder though.. This needs to be sorted and if Emma has to answer questions on a lie detector so be it, after all it is only the same amount of invaision on her privacy as she plans on BT customers

You don't have to worry about that too much.. As long as Emma appears in front of a microphone (Radio, TV or YouTube) her voice can be analysed by a 'voice stress analyser' (the same technology used by Insurance companies to catch claim cheats).

Unfortunately this technology isn't going to work on liars like Kunt Ertugrul because he is a 'pathological liar' and can beat these kind of presentday A.I. primative systems. However make sure everybody saves all his YouTube videos, TV, and Radio stuff because in a few years the voice analysis A.I. technology will be good enough even against a sociopathic *******s like him.

OldBear 05-06-2008 01:54

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank (Post 34567955)
On cookies: Reading 4th section (page 46 of 52 in footer) - I see the 3rd paragraph states cookie dropping could not be done in this trial due to the legal position. So I'm not sure they did do this but if someone has evidence or has read in the hefty document that they did, I'll happily stand corrected.

Hank

Hank, on page 7 in the document, and I mentioned it in this post: http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34...-post8018.html

Quote:

Normally the PageSense system deploys cookies directly to user's machines. BT's broadband terms and conditions prevented this approach. Instead 121Media conducted an initial cookie drop exercise. For two-weeks prior to the trial proper 121Media purchased advertising space on popular third-party websites from which cookies were dropped directly onto users machines.
Phorm dropped 3rd party cookies to users themselves in the 2 weeks ahead of the trial, and then all the way through it.

That's how they got round BT's T&Cs.

I'm surprised that no-one has made more mention of the Javascript injections. Given that Emma S. keeps stuttering out her "it's err... umm... not illegal" carp, I would say that injecting this sort of thing into hundreds of thousands of [intercepted] pages (without permission) before sending them to unsuspecting users is not exactly legal.

I'm also sure that the admission of collecting IP addresses also blows a few holes in the "we don't collect personal information" argument. JHMO

OB

mark777 05-06-2008 02:33

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BadPhormula (Post 34567966)
You don't have to worry about ...
{snip}

You might want to think about using a '*' or an 'e' in the first name of The Prince of Darkness.

Peter N 05-06-2008 02:43

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Having worked in call centres there are a couple of points that make BT's statements regarding the call centre's ignorance dubious.

The software, recording equipment and internal monitoring would all be at the call centre and under the control and supervision of call centre staff - not BT head-office. In order to keep a record of the nature of calls which are likely to relate to the trial, especially given the extremely wide nature of possible queries, there would have to be a change in work routines and the call centre managers would have to be aware of that.

Call contents are not analysed by listen to the call - BT technical support has only one phone number and there are no "press button 3" type options so the only automated record they could have relate to total call volume.

There's also no way that BT's call centre has software with tick-boxes to cover every type of question such that it could be analysed for the "right type" of question as there are so many types of questions that they will receive. BT couldn't look at all if the reports of slow speeds or crashing browsers for example and work out how many relate to the trial.

By far the likeliest scenario - one I seen used dozens of times - is the low-tech one where the staff are told to write down the details of any calls regarding quite specific circumstances such as discovering strange cookies or problems with very specific websits - the ones showing 121Medias adverts.

Either way, the call centre must have known that BT wanted an unusual data analysis and it is ridiculous to suppose that the call agents, supervisors and managers who will have handled the calls.

Do BT really expect us to believe that the call centres knew which calls to report for their stats but didn't query whether or not the calls themselves needed handling differently form usual?

If the call centre believed that these were just regualr problems, how was it possible for that same call centre to provide those figures for BT?

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 04:20

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Nobody else noticed yet that the network latency doubled during peak load from 3s to 6s?

Alexander Hanff

SMHarman 05-06-2008 04:47

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Florence (Post 34567784)
NO

I found out my mother still has her 220 shares in BT shse was given when she retired from work. She is 86 she used to go to the AGM's with a friend from work they made a week trip out of an AGM. The last 5 yrs she hasn't been going ill health I didn't know she still had therm until I started talking to her about her shares. seems she has 200 TSB shares which pays her more divi than BT's ever have.
From now I will handle the shares for her no more letting the chairperson handle the proxy vote.

Sorry, YES. You own a share of the company, you have no participation in the day to day operation and control of the company, you have delegated that to the board of directors. As an owner if you are not happy with that you can change those people that control the company. This is basic company law.

popper 05-06-2008 04:54

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
for Cf you mean?, i always have higher latency on the VM cable this time of night for some strange reason so i didnt notice, and i cant even find the cf latency No on the page right now doh! i know it got one somewere but i forget were LOl.

BTW, still nothing on the wires, i use one of the same one's ELReg uses
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/?JavaScri...=&search=phorm

and still nothing on Google News yet
http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8...nG=Search+News


but at least Technorati has finally started collecting and displaying related links.
http://technorati.com/search/phorm?a...y=n&language=n

and theres no visable mod on the CF site right now to PM so we could'nt get a CF news item up there right now to have the wires find it.

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 05:00

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SMHarman (Post 34568005)
Sorry, YES. You own a share of the company, you have no participation in the day to day operation and control of the company, you have delegated that to the board of directors. As an owner if you are not happy with that you can change those people that control the company. This is basic company law.

Yes but I think what she means is she gets a right to question the board during the AGM.

Alexander Hanff

---------- Post added at 04:00 ---------- Previous post was at 03:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by popper (Post 34568006)
for Cf you mean?, i always have higher latency on the VM cable this time of night for some strange reason so i didnt notice, and i cant even find the cf latency No on the page right now doh! i know it got one somewere but i forget were LOl.

No part of the report measures the latency caused by the PageSense system and during peak load it went up from 3s to 6s also packet loss increased too if I remember correctly. I will have another look at the report tomorrow and cite it.

Alexander Hanff

popper 05-06-2008 05:09

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
LOL, i downloaded the BT PDF, but didnt get around to reading it as im busy trying to get the storie(s) linked far and wide.

i always think wednesday evening stories have a far greater impact on the share prices, as the news hits home, and the shareholders get to hear thursday, and act by friday at the latest...

the usual 3 day turn around on most news stories is a good rule of thumb.

SMHarman 05-06-2008 05:11

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34568007)
Yes but I think what she means is she gets a right to question the board during the AGM.

Alexander Hanff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florence (Post 34567590)
Was wondering on that since I am holding 220 shares would be wondering where this leaves us shareholders who knew nothing since Bt didn't do any informed reviews to shareholders over this. Or my mother glazed over at the technical stuff and gave chair control of her proxy vote but BT have shown you need to keep ontop of them as a share holder and this will never happen again..

I was picking up on the "BT Bt didn't do any informed reviews to shareholders over this." Equally on many other strategic decisions, the spin off of O2 for example did not have shareholder involvement, they are board decisions to be made and questioned after the fact.

popper 05-06-2008 05:25

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
btw ,
BT GROUP PLC

TRANSACTION IN OWN SHARES - VOTING RIGHTS AND CAPITAL
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/L...650&source=RNS

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 06:11

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Wikipedia updated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm

Alexander Hanff

---------- Post added at 05:11 ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 ----------

It is now on WikiLeaks front page with a link to here:

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Britis...idation_report

Alexander Hanff

popper 05-06-2008 07:05

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
http://current.com/items/89001700_th...acts_in_8_days

Rchivist 05-06-2008 07:33

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank (Post 34567955)
On cookies: Reading 4th section (page 46 of 52 in footer) - I see the 3rd paragraph states cookie dropping could not be done in this trial due to the legal position. So I'm not sure they did do this but if someone has evidence or has read in the hefty document that they did, I'll happily stand corrected.

Hank

Exactly - so they did it illegally - that's what the 2weeks pre-trial ads on popular 3rd party sites were for - to get as many 121Media cookies secretly dropped on people's systems as possible in advance - p7 "Normally the PageSense system deploys cookies directly to user's (sic) machines. BT's Broadband terms and conditions prevented this approach. Instead 121Media conducted an initial cookie drop exercise. For two weeks prior to the trial proper 121Media purchased advertising space on popular third-party websites from which cookies were dropped directly onto users machines. This approach in turn constrained the effectiveness of the BTRT trial since not all of the 10,000 triallists were covered by the initial-drop. Estimations were made that approximately 7,000 had received a cookie."

Aren't Terms and Conditions a pain? But never mind we can get round them, although darn it-we do feel our effectiveness has been constrained.

Tharrick 05-06-2008 07:47

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Again, I go on holiday and come back to find 40 pages I need to go through.

This news about the ICO is appalling, and I'll be writing to my MP again and quoting select chunks. While I'm there I'll be mentioning, and probably giving the link to, that leaked document.

I am frankly sickened by that article, Alex. Sickened and terrified. Keep up the good work! I won't be happy until I see the people responsible in jail for this, and massive fines levied against BT and Phorm.

Rchivist 05-06-2008 07:48

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34568012)
Wikipedia updated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm

Alexander Hanff

---------- Post added at 05:11 ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 ----------

It is now on WikiLeaks front page with a link to here:

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Britis...idation_report

Alexander Hanff

Alex - the person at BT who has been handling customer questions (mostly by remaining silent and closing down the BT Beta Q&A thread over a month ago) and making press statements, is Adam Liversage, so do give his name as the BT press contact. I think it's time he answered a few difficult questions.

Hank 05-06-2008 07:52

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34568019)
Exactly - so they did it illegally - that's what the 2weeks pre-trial ads on popular 3rd party sites were for - to get as many 121Media cookies secretly dropped on people's systems as possible in advance - p7 "Normally the PageSense system deploys cookies directly to user's (sic) machines. BT's Broadband terms and conditions prevented this approach. Instead 121Media conducted an initial cookie drop exercise. For two weeks prior to the trial proper 121Media purchased advertising space on popular third-party websites from which cookies were dropped directly onto users machines. This approach in turn constrained the effectiveness of the BTRT trial since not all of the 10,000 triallists were covered by the initial-drop. Estimations were made that approximately 7,000 had received a cookie."

Aren't Terms and Conditions a pain? But never mind we can get round them, although darn it-we do feel our effectiveness has been constrained.

I know it is so wrong. However, even though they did it like this to get around the fact that their Ts & Cs did not allow them to do it "using PageSense in the trial" it does seem to me that you are dead right: They found a way to drop the cookies all over the place so that they could use the fact that they were there later, but without breaking the law (in their opinion). Is that what we are saying here?

Hank

Rchivist 05-06-2008 08:06

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank (Post 34568024)
I know it is so wrong. However, even though they did it like this to get around the fact that their Ts & Cs did not allow them to do it "using PageSense in the trial" it does seem to me that you are dead right: They found a way to drop the cookies all over the place so that they could use the fact that they were there later, but without breaking the law (in their opinion). Is that what we are saying here?

Hank

I can't comment on which bits were more or less illegal than others. IANAL!
That's where this whole scenario is so surreal. If you take the FIPR line, the whole thing is illegal so the details are just details of which bit of illegality was which. all of it was illegal.

I think BT were less interested in legality and more in deniability which is really the name of the game now in our contract ridden, outsourced sub-contracted world. I serously think these executives have got to the point where they regard themselves as either above or immune to the law. They seem to think that it is something that only applies to the little people who pay their salaries.

Having spent a tedious amount of time on BT internal newsgroups being told by other customers that we had no proof, no evidence of wrongdoing, that we were scaremongering, I have to confess a certain amount of satisfaction in posting Alex's no DPI link there last night. And even more satisfaction emailing details to Emma Sanderson, Adam Liversage, Ben Verwaayen (sort of parting gift) and Ian Livingstone. Hope they enjoy their breakfast. It will not the day at the office that they were expecting.

I'm in London for 24 hours so expect I'll miss about 40 pages of this stuff!

Toto 05-06-2008 08:18

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34567604)
FULL REPORT! (minus personally identifiable data)

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:BT_Report.pdf

Enjoy.

Alexander Hanff
/me breaths out.

---------- Post added at 20:07 ---------- Previous post was at 20:05 ----------



I haven't sent a press release yet I wanted to scan it and get it up on wikileaks first, so I could stop panicking.

Alexander Hanff

Alex, somebody seems to have edited that page.

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 08:24

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Toto (Post 34568030)
Alex, somebody seems to have edited that page.

Yeah they changed the file name and added a section to the wiki for it. I have posted the link at the top of this page.

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Britis...idation_report

Also, anyone with a /. account please vote this one up in firehose (already Yellow) by clicking the + button:

http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=705657

Alexander Hanff

Bonglet 05-06-2008 08:38

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Just goes to show how much isp's value the customers now, when i read that couldnt belive what i was reading tbh i bet the second trial lasted much longer involved more people and was still just as bad if not worse.

Sad day when you cant trust your isp especially when there in bed with crooks.

bluecar1 05-06-2008 09:14

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
the debate is warming up over on the bt page at iii

just seen this

take a look at the list of acts possibly broken, seem to be a few i have not seen before

also we need to focus on how do they know the age of the person and do not show unsuitable adverts to a 8 year old if they only know a random number?

do websites come under the jurisdiction of advertising standards? or would BT as they are in effect serving the ads from THEIR servers?

peter

**************
leo said:
"Don't know what all the fuss is about over Phorm. I'd rather see adverts that are tailored to me than adverts for products I have no interest in.

There is a precedent - Google already responds to people's web searches to deliver adverts. "

the information is out there Leo if you want to read it, basicly Phorm/Webwise is using Deep Packet Inspection/Interception Hardwre kit that sits directly on the other side of your ISP payed for Broadband connection.

this special DPI kit has every single bit of your PCs web comunication (if your browser can see it, so can the Phorm interception for profit kit) sent through it, every single web page even password protected HTTP pages you request/click are then fully scaned/collected into their kits ram, processed.

and under UK and EU law, an unlawful derivative work is made without consent of the website content owner, or the ISP end user (should they refuse to take part in any trials, their datastream is still collected.and processed, but dont see the ad's onscreen apparently)for commercial profit.

apparently these are some of the laws broken by not getting Express/Explicit, and informed consent of both partys (end user AND the website content owners)or paying the profits of this unlawful derivative work to the owners.
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003

Computer Misuse Act 1990

Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1998 (see derivative works)

Data Protection Act 1998 (IP addresses are legally defined as personally identifiable data)

this basic laymans copyright might be helpful to outlines the problems BT have placed themselves in during the prior trials without getting consent.


and dont forget may websites already have explicit terms against commercial use of the sites webpage content in their notices (including this very site infact
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/co...opyright_myths

***********

NTLVictim 05-06-2008 09:27

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
We don't have to worry about stress analysis of Emma's voice..most people have a "telltale" when they tell porkies (touching the tip of the nose, etc..), and Emmas is when she lies, she s s s s stammers.

She's being lined up to take the fall on this one, I suspect.

Emma? The phrase you're looking for is "turning Queen's evidence".

AlexanderHanff 05-06-2008 09:32

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Just a quick reminder cos the thread is moving at a bit of a pace at the moment:

Digg - http://digg.com/tech_news/BT_commite...acts_in_8_days

Slashdot (vote up please) http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=705657

Alexander Hanff

bluecar1 05-06-2008 09:41

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34568040)
Just a quick reminder cos the thread is moving at a bit of a pace at the moment:

Digg - http://digg.com/tech_news/BT_commite...acts_in_8_days

Slashdot (vote up please) http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=705657

Alexander Hanff

been posting comments to slashdot as well

peter


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum