Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Re-classification Of Cannabis (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=6835)

Foo Fighter 29-01-2004 21:06

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Getting high is miles better than being ****ed...

no reason why cannibis is illegal imho, people get stoned and chill out... when some people are ****ed they turn aggressive.

free the weed

Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens

Maggy 30-01-2004 00:08

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Getting high is miles better than being ****ed...

no reason why cannibis is illegal imho, people get stoned and chill out... when some people are ****ed they turn aggressive.

free the weed

Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens

Please do us a favour and don't ever drive/ride a bike/horse whilst under the fluence.Thanks. :tu:

Incog. :wavey:

Stuart 30-01-2004 00:25

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas
Please do us a favour and don't ever drive/ride a bike/horse whilst under the fluence.Thanks. :tu:

Incog. :wavey:

Seems that may be more common than you would think

http://www.itv.com/news/429580.html

Xaccers 30-01-2004 00:37

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens

If spotted by the police you should be arrested and your canibis confiscated.
Using it in public place is illegal according to the tax payer funded ad in the newspaper today.

As someone who's never seen the need to smoke cigs let alone do anything stronger (canibis when smoked near me just gives me a stinking headache), could any users who feel able please explain to me why you need to do it?

Ramrod 30-01-2004 00:39

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
.
Using it in public place is illegal according to the tax payer funded ad in the newspaper today.

Thats nice, I'm glad I helped pay for that :rolleyes:

Ramrod 30-01-2004 00:40

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by scastle

Quote:

The study of 100 regular and 90 casual users of cannabis found 74 per cent admitted getting into their cars while under the influence of the drug. This was despite 70 per cent saying they believed that using it had impaired their driving ability
'Cin ******s :afire: :2up:

Xaccers 30-01-2004 00:41

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod
Thats nice, I'm glad I helped pay for that :rolleyes:

Don't forget you helped pay for the study into whether it should be reclacified.
The ads alone cost £1milli on
Take your pick of the other places that money could have been better spent.

Ramrod 30-01-2004 00:43

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Don't forget you helped pay for the study into whether it should be reclacified.
The ads alone cost £1milli on
Take your pic of the other places that money could have been better spent.

Don't get me started :afire:
Labour, you bunch of *user edit* :afire:

Xaccers 30-01-2004 01:00

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod
Don't get me started :afire:
Labour, you bunch of *user edit* :afire:

So, to recap
canibis is now a class C drug
the police themselves are now confused
users are now confused (ok they were probably confused before, but only when smoking it)
over £1milli on has been spent
it's still illegal
the law says you will still get arrested

So what exactly was the point of reclasifying it?

Ramrod 30-01-2004 01:04

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
So, to recap
canibis is now a class C drug
the police themselves are now confused
users are now confused (ok they were probably confused before, but only when smoking it)
over £1milli on has been spent
it's still illegal
the law says you will still get arrested

So what exactly was the point of reclasifying it?

To show that we have a 'right on, groovy' kind of government? :confused:

Xaccers 30-01-2004 01:06

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod
To show that we have a 'right on, groovy' kind of government? :confused:


I've just had a thought.
Perhaps this is to prevent TB embarassment when his son his caught with canibis?

Ramrod 30-01-2004 01:09

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
I've just had a thought.
Perhaps this is to prevent TB embarassment when his son his caught with canibis?

Probably has been already but they are waiting for the right moment to let the news out.... :D

Xaccers 30-01-2004 01:16

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod
Probably has been already but they are waiting for the right moment to let the news out.... :D


Quote:

Originally Posted by TB
Ewan's canibis use is only in the home at number 10, is now legal and above board (big grin, concerned look)


Graham 30-01-2004 03:34

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
They came up with a fantastic idea which on paper looked good, but neglected to take into account what people are like when they've just injected heroine into their viens.

I don't think it was Amsterdam, but one of the other dams,

Well the only reference I can find after a few minutes googling is to an experiment in Switzerland, not The Netherlands, and AFAIK the Swiss don't have the same "tolerance policy" to cannabis that the Dutch do, so I don't see this as a valid comparison.

If you have any cites relating to Holland I'd welcome you posting them.

Xaccers 30-01-2004 04:08

Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham
Well the only reference I can find after a few minutes googling is to an experiment in Switzerland, not The Netherlands, and AFAIK the Swiss don't have the same "tolerance policy" to cannabis that the Dutch do, so I don't see this as a valid comparison.

If you have any cites relating to Holland I'd welcome you posting them.


Can you post the links you've found as I may be wrong, I think it was about 10 years ago. I know it wasn't amsterdam (I remember at the time being suprised Amsterdam wasn't used), but have a sneeking suspicion it was Rotterdam


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum