![]() |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
It was the class of Barca that pushed Celtic back - not by adopting Uncle Walter tactics. Celtic began with 2 up front whereas the only offensive thing about Rangers in Europe was the behaviour of their bigotted fans. ---------- Post added at 06:53 ---------- Previous post was at 06:50 ---------- Quote:
You haven't answered yet Deek? How many shares are you in for;) Are you going by official Strathclyde Police figures? Chucky Green's wild estimates from the Bigotdome don't bear up to comparison with those ;) |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway away from the good (Rangers), the bad (celtic) and the ugly (Lennon) it looks like Mad Vlad might have something else to worry about aside from checking down the back of the sofa for change to pay his players with and who is going to buy Tynecastle when Hearts fold. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...redirect=false Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
So Rangers only played with 10 men throughout Uncle Walter's reign. :shocked:
Deluded or what.? Smith only played the one way, home or away. If he had the option to play a bonus player he'd have played 5-5-1. It's beginning to get a bit boring to have to keep pointing out that your stats don't actually bear any resemblence to real facts....it's beginning to feel a bit like the "explaining debt to a hun" video. Celtic did only have 26% possession (official UEFA stat - not the 10% quoted by you and some sections of the Scottish media), but anybody with half a football brain could see that the loss of Samaras contributed greatly to the lack of out ball. So your new fascination with crowds doesn't extend to any actual factual evidence.:erm: Distort and deflect Can you explain to me why the followers of this new club have this fascination for crowd figures? I use the word followers because it's yet to be proven if there are supporters of this zombie club or it's just an excuse for a bigotted gathering on the south side of Glasgow every couple of weeks. Your old club were the 2nd best supported club in Glasgow. Just because there's a bigotfest every couple of weeks and they only charge half a crown to get in doesn't make it a well supported team. The litmus test will be how much of the giro money goes to buying shares or not. How much are you in for Deek? ;) I see you focus on Hearts predicament (do you see any irony?). Does it hurt when you read the positive news from the SPL? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20084786 |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
I agree with Londonroad, trying to compare Ranger's anti-football with Celtic's defensive play is chalk and cheese.
Rangers were happy to keep 10 men behind the ball. Celtic attacked, albeit gave ball away too quickly to capitalise. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ah the usual. Can't win an argument so resort to petty slurs. Quote:
Quote:
Still with hearts circling the drain I hope there is the same witch hunt against them. Living outwith their means? - Check. Using tax avoidance schemes which HMRC say are illegal? - Check. Allegedly having players incorrectly registered? - Check. Seems they should be on their way to SPL3 in the name of sporting integrity. ---------- Post added at 20:23 ---------- Previous post was at 20:21 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Poor poor hurting Derek.
Petty slurs :shocked: The slurs were started by you and you're correct I shouldn't have lowered myself to your level. Have a look through some of your posts when you refer to Celtic and you might realise that you're the champ at petty slurs. You could get another star on your shirt for that ;) It matters not to me what you say about our stadium, our team or whether our manager is ugly or not. :rolleyes: Your club is dead because you allowed it to die. Even when the truth is readily available you have still tried to defend Murray and put all the blame on Whyte. Only Sevco fans can't see that they're still being fleeced.... by the current owners, by the Scottish Media and by the football authorities. If Hearts tick all the boxes you claim then they should face the consequences. There was no witchhunt. Scottish football fans only wanted justice. It's ironic that Sevco fans are paranoid about what happened to their former club. You seem to fail to understand that the consequences should have been that you ceased to exist. That's what liquidation means. There should be no senior football, the new club should be starting at a non-league level and working it's way up. You were given a helping hand. The SPL and The SFA put out every scare story possible to warn the football public about armageddon. There was no demotion of your club to SFL3. The licence ceased to exist. Every rule possible was twisted so that you could apply to join the SFL. They even tried their best to shoehorn you into the top level of the SFL but fan power put paid that too. The message that you fail to comprehend is that armageddon is prefarable to distorting the rules to favour one club. Sporting integrity is paramount to any competition. You should have let your club die with dignity. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Once again concur with Londonroad.
If hearts broke the rules they should get punished. But the bitternness coming from Derek is not about justice, but striven from a feeling of injustice. The "how dare they punish Rangers" syndrome. Lashing out everywhere, because Rangers got their due punishment for cheating, is just sad. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
What I do have an issue with is the vindictiveness shown to them and the intention to hammer them for everything, regardless of its rights and wrongs and the way rules are made up on the fly to suit whatever, or whoevers, agenda. Yes Rangers used EBT's but so did at least one other club. At least Rangers declared their use every year. Surely if there was a problem this should have been spotted after one year and not just waved through until 10 years down the line. What happens? Rangers get a punishment decided upon and then a kangaroo court convened to justify the punishment where the other club get told their use was OK and no investigation is needed. Maybe they were just living up to their charitable history :rofl: by giving a player a big chunk of money not declared after he had stopped playing for them. :rolleyes: Forgive me for laughing when a bunch of other clubs circle the drain despite their protests that "we don't need Rangers" and look forward to them receiving the exact same punishment for Rangers in the name of 'sporting integrity' |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
Rangers, were on the "no no" side, and were stupid at it. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Let’s see if we can remove some of the delusions surrounding this and burst some of the myths. The truth is readily available if you really want to know it.
EBTs are perfectly legal when they are properly used. The way that they were used can be divided 3 ways in terms of how they were utilised by Rangers. 1. The correct way. A discretionary, non contractual payment. This may have been how some of the Rangers EBTs were utilised, e.g. Sir Minty creamed off £6M to himself. 2. The pay off EBT. Used to buy out a players contract. Deemed by HMRC to be liable for tax. There is no side letter or second contract because it’s used to terminate the contract. This is the type of EBT set up for Billy Dodds and Junhino. Celtic, on the advice of HMRC, subsequently paid the tax which is why they don’t have a case to answer. Junhino wasn’t paid any more than was stipulated in the original contract submitted to the authorities. Again, Move along, nothing to see there. 3. The contractual EBT. Players had side letters, aka second contracts, promising them EBT payments as part of their football duties. This misuse of the scheme is not only tax evasion but breaks every football rule on registering players. The consequence of fielding improperly registered players is the automatic awarding of the match 3-0 to the opposition. Note that this is a consequence, not a punishment. In case the use of the names Celtic and Rangers is fogging the issue for you, let’s compare two Scottish teams in a parallel universe: Perth City and Perth United are deadly rivals, both have similar sized crowds and sponsorship deals, etc. Perth United and Perth City are both keen to sign Joe Smith, Perth City offer 10K a week because anything more would break their budget. He signs for Perth United and the player is registered as a United player on a salary of £8K a week. It later transpires that Joe Smith had an EBT that paid him £3K a week. Perth United can only afford this because they don’t have to pay tax, employers NI etc on the additional income. Now, that’s unfair to all the other teams in any competition that Perth Utd are entered into. Not paying tax is also unfair on all the Government departments who have had their budgets cut, and by extension unfair on all the users of those services: NHS patients, Frontline soldiers, social services. I’ve even heard that some police departments have suffered ;) You’re correct that the transfer embargo was invented specifically to deal with you. You do realise that the alternative to that was a total ban. You should be grateful. If Minty and Cardigan had imposed their own transfer ban 5 years ago you could have almost wiped out the tax you owed at that time. You’d still be the same club in the wonderfully atmospheric SPL instead of the zombie tribute band currently trading in the dungeons. It’s really shameful to see a once proud Glasgow Club being stripped to the bones and being passed from one vulture to another. The very people who should be doing something are spending too much energy hoping that other teams fail. The obvious glee at every potential piece of bad news is as undignified as the way you allowed your club to die. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
:D
|
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Quote:
Maybe your just surprised that the best supported team in Glasgow, who have lost most of their team, lost to a team several divisions above them. I'm not, it was never going to be a walkover. ---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 ---------- Quote:
When celtic used them (and quite possibly other clubs as well, despite their assertions otherwise!) there was no enquiry, no sanctions. Everything was brushed under the carpet quietly. All the Rangers fans want it to be treated equally. That hasn't happened so far. Once hearts, motherwell and a few other clubs hit the wall hard we will see if they have the same level of bitterness directed at them. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 ----------
[/COLOR] And yet when Rangers used them a list of punishments was drawn up, circulated and after that they decided to bring together a committee to justify the punishments. When celtic used them (and quite possibly other clubs as well, despite their assertions otherwise!) there was no enquiry, no sanctions. Everything was brushed under the carpet quietly. All the Rangers fans want it to be treated equally. That hasn't happened so far. Once hearts, motherwell and a few other clubs hit the wall hard we will see if they have the same level of bitterness directed at them.[/QUOTE] You are missing the point. rangers were using EBT illegally. They were caught using them, and were blatantly using them illegally. But EBT are ok..just not to supplement wages in a contractual way. At Rangers, it was part of salary, and they stated the expectation of it being used that way. |
Re: The Scottish Football Thread
Rangers fans want to be treated equally? In what way are Rangers fans being treated unfairly?
You stick your heads in the sand and try to blame everybody but the people who brought this shame on the club. Not one person from Rangers has shown the slightest sign of contrition for years of cheating, tax evasion and probably fraud. You'd rather push this paranoid "we are the people" attitude and show real bitterness to anybody who offers unbiased opinion based on the facts that are available for all..... if they want to know. Society as a whole is a loser but I suppose some people gain from this... like police officers who get overtime to protect all these people being threatened by fans of this new club. :( Newco, same colours, more shameful. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum