Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media News Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   ??..New T&Cs..?? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33573)

Nugget 20-09-2005 14:35

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Have you seen the info I posted Nugget?
Carry on guessing, but as I stated earlier, I could see no reason for someone to type up what was posted just because they have an " axe to grind ".
Even if I emailed " legalhook@ntl " they';re not going to say yes or no are they?

I'm not guessing anything. As I'm not an ntl customer (and haven't been for a while), I'm not really bothered either way.

However, you can't expect people to just blindly accept your assertions without giving a proper source.

orangebird 20-09-2005 14:38

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
I'm not guessing anything. As I'm not an ntl customer (and haven't been for a while), I'm not really bothered either way.

However, you can't expect people to just blindly accept your assertions without giving a proper source.

Yeah, but he/she does.... :dozey:

Nemesis 20-09-2005 14:38

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Have you seen the info I posted Nugget?
Carry on guessing, but as I stated earlier, I could see no reason for someone to type up what was posted just because they have an " axe to grind ".
Even if I emailed " legalhook@ntl " they';re not going to say yes or no are they?


No, he probably hasn't, but I have. You posted something that was blatantly an internal document, which YOU had no permission to place in the public Domain.

That document may have been current, or years old, we have no idea, and nor do you. I suggest you back away from this thread.

arcamalpha2004 20-09-2005 14:38

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
I'm not guessing anything. As I'm not an ntl customer (and haven't been for a while), I'm not really bothered either way.

However, you can't expect people to just blindly accept your assertions without giving a proper source.

Well I would have thought if I was going to comment on something I would read up on it first.

To the person who wrote "unless you tell people who the source is, they won't give a flying fig."

I dont give a " flying fig " what you think.

Nemesis 20-09-2005 14:39

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Thin Ice ....

Nugget 20-09-2005 14:41

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
I don't expect anyone to give a 'flying fig' what I think. People can either accept my opinion or not, completely as their choice.

All I'm saying is that people are unlikely to accept someone else's information as being correct if they are unwilling to show their source. No need to get antsy about it.

arcamalpha2004 20-09-2005 14:44

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon M
No, he probably hasn't, but I have. You posted something that was blatantly an internal document, which YOU had no permission to place in the public Domain.

That document may have been current, or years old, we have no idea, and nor do you. I suggest you back away from this thread.


24th june 2004 simon, pretty recent by my calculations.

What are NTL hiding for?They need to be more open with their customers.
Blatantly an internal document? come on simon! people on here would tell you it isnt real, because i dont name a source!
And dont threaten me either.
__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
I don't expect anyone to give a 'flying fig' what I think. People can either accept my opinion or not, completely as their choice.

All I'm saying is that people are unlikely to accept someone else's information as being correct if they are unwilling to show their source. No need to get antsy about it.

Who is getting antsy? not me.
If I name a source that could compromise somebody, no thanks, you dont believe it? thats your shout.

Nugget 20-09-2005 14:45

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
24th june 2004 simon, pretty recent by my calculations.

What are NTL hiding for?They need to be more open with their customers.
Blatantly an internal document? come on simon! people on here would tell you it isnt real, because i dont name a source!
And dont threaten me either.

How can you define something 15 months old as recent? In a business sense, that's practically obsolete.

If you feel that ntl are hiding something, then name your source and we can also decide for ourselves.

Neil 20-09-2005 14:45

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
24th june 2004 simon, pretty recent by my calculations.

What are NTL hiding for?They need to be more open with their customers.
Blatantly an internal document? come on simon! people on here would tell you it isnt real, because i dont name a source!
And dont threaten me either.

Not a threat-----> If you don't start posting with a bit more civility, you won't be posting at all.

We're happy for the discussion to continue, but please don't get drawn into an arguement (that applies to everyone :angel: )

It's obvious that this subject is important to you & we all respect that, but it would appear that this thread will be heading straight into a row if we don;t just step in & say hello. ;)

Hello.... :wavey:

Nugget 20-09-2005 14:46

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Who is getting antsy? not me.
If I name a source that could compromise somebody, no thanks, you dont believe it? thats your shout.

Surely if you're quoting something that could compromise somebody, you shouldn't have quoted it in the first place?

arcamalpha2004 20-09-2005 14:48

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil
Not a threat-----> If you don't start posting with a bit more civility, you won't be posting at all.

We're happy for the discussion to continue, but please don;t get drawn into an arguement.

It's obvious that this subject is important to you & we all respect that, but it would appear that this thread will be heading straight into a row if we don;t just step in & say hello. ;)

Hello.... :wavey:

I suggest that you echo your sentiments about " civility " to other people, namely people who work for NTL.
__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
Surely if you're quoting something that could compromise somebody, you shouldn't have quoted it in the first place?

It only compromises someone if you name them.

Nemesis 20-09-2005 14:50

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Nugget doesn't work for NTL ... nor do I ....

Nugget 20-09-2005 14:50

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
It only compromises someone if you name them.

But you're asking us to accept this without supporting it. For all we know, your 'source' is the binman.

arcamalpha2004 20-09-2005 14:55

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon M
Nugget doesn't work for NTL ... nor do I ....

Simon, if I think that you or nugget have not been civil i will let you know :)
Mention " people who work for NTL " and people jump to conclusions.
__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
But you're asking us to accept this without supporting it. For all we know, your 'source' is the binman.

I am not asking you or anyone to accept it, i put it up to give people something to think about, if they think " well there isnt a named source so it cannot be right" thats fine by me.
On the subject of sources, how many times do you or anyone buy a paper and think " well there is no named source so it cannot be true "
If that was the case, there would be a lot of bankrupted newspapers.

orangebird 20-09-2005 14:56

Re: ??..New T&Cs..??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon M
Nugget doesn't work for NTL ... nor do I ....

He means me :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum