Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

mrmistoffelees 18-01-2022 21:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Bit of a bugger for Carrie mind, all that money she spent on the decorating and now it looks like she’s going to be moving out

daveeb 18-01-2022 21:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110165)
Your dog would also make a better job of running the country too. :D

:D funny you say that, we had that conversation and came to the same conclusion.

Damien 18-01-2022 21:18

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Sky are reporting that some MPs think they've got 54 letters already in. This might be kicking off tonight.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 21:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36110166)
Bit of a bugger for Carrie mind, all that money she spent on the decorating and now it looks like she’s going to be moving out

Can understand now why Johnson said the place was a bit of a dump. After so many house parties, I can appreciate it was not in the same condition that Theresa May left it.

Hugh 18-01-2022 21:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36110166)
Bit of a bugger for Carrie mind, all that money she spent on the decorating and now it looks like she’s going to be moving out

tbf, Brownlow spent it first, then it was Conservative Central Office and the Cabinet Office, then it was Boris Johnson…

Dave42 18-01-2022 21:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Senior Conservative backbencher tells me tonight they are confident of getting to 54 letters tomorrow to try and oust the PM.

“Up the revolution!” they tell me.

No 10 / whips subjecting them to “threats and blackmail” but has only angered MPs further, they say.

https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/sta...50603997597702

be bye bye Johnson soon the worst PM in our country ever

1andrew1 18-01-2022 21:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110158)
He hasn’t said that. What he said about not being told it was against the rules was in answer to the allegation that he was told just that.

You have changed his denial into a separate assertion.

This might help you to understand the situation.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1642541745

Dave42 18-01-2022 21:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110175)
This might help you to understand the situation.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1642541745

OB will still try defend the undefendable Johnson thinking we are all so stupid by saying i dont know rules i made

1andrew1 18-01-2022 22:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110176)
OB will still try defend the undefendable Johnson thinking we are all so stupid by saying i dont know rules i made

Indeed.

Watching the Beth Rigby interview made for uncomfortable viewing. In terms of a bad interview, it was only beaten by Prince Andrew's.

Dave42 18-01-2022 22:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110178)
Indeed.

Watching the Beth Rigby interview made for uncomfortable viewing. In terms of a bad interview, it was only beaten by Prince Andrew's.

exactly Andrew

Mr K 18-01-2022 22:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
My letter has gone in, but don't know if it counts??:confused:

Anyway, whatever your politics the country is better off without Big Dog living it large at our expense. Let him take that wallpaper as a keepsake.

Dave42 18-01-2022 22:18

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

One senior Tory has messaged me to say they are hearing there might be a statement from Sir Graham Brady first thing tomorrow morning and that the PM has been told tonight.
Not confirmed - but there’s a sense of real movement tonight.
#DowningStreetParties

https://twitter.com/STVKathryn/statu...62077478342656
the momentum against Johnson seems to be gathering very quickly

Mod edit (Chris): Please don’t forget to put quote tags around content you’re … welll … quoting. It gets quite confusing otherwise.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 22:22

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110180)
My letter has gone in, but don't know if it counts??:confused:

Anyway, whatever your politics the country is better off without Big Dog living it large at our expense. Let him take that wallpaper as a keepsake.

If K stands for Kawczynski, Knight, Kruger or Kwarteng then it's possibly not wasted.

jfman 18-01-2022 23:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
It’d be a great laugh if Johnson actually won the vote of no confidence (assuming there is one). I genuinely hope he does. The public will see through the charade the process is anyway and there will be no bounce in the polls the issue of “next leader” just trundles along until the next farce.

If we are stuck with the Tories until 2024 then a civil war while led by a buffoon at least provides entertainment value and (assuming Labour can’t win in Scotland) a better chance of a working majority for Starmer.

He’s terminal. The only question is whether to put him out his misery or not.

1andrew1 19-01-2022 08:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
It's embarrassing to be British at the moment. We should be at the heart of the West putting the pressure on Russia over Ukraine. Instead, we're being ridiculed by Ghana who called out the campaign to save Johnson as "Operation Deadmeat".

The sooner the Big Dog is put down the better. I'm certainly looking forward to PMQs.

Chris 19-01-2022 11:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110205)
It's embarrassing to be British at the moment. We should be at the heart of the West putting the pressure on Russia over Ukraine. Instead, we're being ridiculed by Ghana who called out the campaign to save Johnson as "Operation Deadmeat".

The sooner the Big Dog is put down the better. I'm certainly looking forward to PMQs.

Actually we are involved in Ukraine, far more deeply than many realise. It’s not an either/or situation - government goes on even when the prime minister is a numpty.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/brit...ns-to-ukraine/

Dave42 19-01-2022 11:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Bury South MP Christian Wakeford has this morning defected from the Conservatives to Labour.

https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-d...rship-12519919

1andrew1 19-01-2022 11:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Terrible timing for Johnson.
Quote:

Tory MP defects to Labour party

Christian Wakeford, the MP for Bury South, has defected to the Labour Party this afternoon, Sir Keir Starmer has confirmed.

In a statement, the Labour leader said: "I would like to welcome Christian Wakeford to the Labour Party. He has always put the people of Bury South first.

"As Christian said, the policies of the Conservative government are doing nothing to help the people of Bury South and indeed are only making the struggles they face on a daily basis worse.

"People across Britain faces a cost of living crisis but this incompetent Tory government is asleep at the wheel, distracted by a chaos of its own making. Meanwhile families, businesses and pensioners are suffering from the Conservative failure to tackle rising food, fuel and energy prices.

"Labour are the only ones who have put forward a plan to help people through the Tory cost of living crisis.
https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...armer-12514080

papa smurf 19-01-2022 12:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Sir wet flannel is making a right Horlicks of PMQ's.

mrmistoffelees 19-01-2022 12:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110236)
Sir wet flannel is making a right Horlicks of PMQ's.


I think you should consider driving to Barnard Castle.

Hugh 19-01-2022 12:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110236)
Sir wet flannel is making a right Horlicks of PMQ's.

How is PM Waffle De Pfeffel Hindsight responding?

mrmistoffelees 19-01-2022 12:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110238)
How is PM Waffle DePfeffle Hindsight responding?


Booster,waffle,waffle,booster,wait for enquiry,waffle, wait for enquiry.

No random Latin as of yet

Carth 19-01-2022 12:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Christian Wakeford . . . just had a look at his wiki page, seems just as corrupt and useless as most. Probably won't win the next local election anyway if standing for Labour, no harm done.

BenMcr 19-01-2022 12:25

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110240)
Christian Wakeford . . . just had a look at his wiki page, seems just as corrupt and useless as most. Probably won't win the next local election anyway if standing for Labour, no harm done.

He won by 402 votes ahead of Labour, so it'll certainly be an interesting vote next time

papa smurf 19-01-2022 12:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110240)
Christian Wakeford . . . just had a look at his wiki page, seems just as corrupt and useless as most. Probably won't win the next local election anyway if standing for Labour, no harm done.

I think back stabbing traitors are best out of the party so as you say no harm done 1/10 for effort.

mrmistoffelees 19-01-2022 12:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110242)
I think back stabbing traitors are best out of the party so as you say no harm done 1/10 for effort.

Ol Boris hasn't left, yet?

Dave42 19-01-2022 12:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

A big moment in the HoC. David Davis, a former leadership contender, cabinet minister and big beast on the backbenchers tells the PM to go.
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status...81276477923331

Pierre 19-01-2022 12:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110231)
Bury South MP Christian Wakeford has this morning defected from the Conservatives to Labour.

https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-d...rship-12519919

Then he should do the honourable thing and hold a by-election.

---------- Post added at 12:43 ---------- Previous post was at 12:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110236)
Sir wet flannel is making a right Horlicks of PMQ's.

Indeed he hasn't landed anything, Johnson has just batted everything away. Starmer looked quite desperate at the end and had a question struck off .

Hugh 19-01-2022 12:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
From the BBC
Quote:

Veteran Conservative backbencher David Davis dramatically calls for Boris Johnson to resign, telling MPs he expects leaders to take responsibility for their actions.

"In the name of God, go", he adds.

nffc 19-01-2022 12:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110250)
From the BBC

Can't argue with him...

Mick 19-01-2022 13:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36110244)
Ol Boris hasn't left, yet?

Starmer also broke the rules, I think his excuse it was a work meeting, is rather pathetic - they both broke the rules - but what was really striking with PMQs not one question on the impending threat from Russia invading Ukraine.

1andrew1 19-01-2022 13:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36110247)
Indeed he hasn't landed anything, Johnson has just batted everything away. Starmer looked quite desperate at the end and had a question struck off .

I felt it was the right tone but Johnson did better than I expected. The big punches are being landed by Johnson's own side.

Starmer doubtless knew the Royal family question would be struck off. He understood he would achieve his key objective of reminding Johnson's MPs and the public of that terrible image of No. 10 partying with a DJ into the wee hours, whilst the Queen was preparing to bury her husband of 73 years where she sat alone without her family to comfort her.

Damien 19-01-2022 13:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110259)
but what was really striking with PMQs not one question on the impending threat from Russia invading Ukraine.

Largely an issue Labour and the Tories will agree on. If anything develops there will be a statement to the house and the chance for a proper debate focused on it.

Hugh 19-01-2022 13:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110242)
I think back stabbing traitors are best out of the party so as you say no harm done 1/10 for effort.

I remember you being equally outraged when Reckless and Carswell defected from the Tories.

Oh, wait….

Damien 19-01-2022 13:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110240)
Christian Wakeford . . . just had a look at his wiki page, seems just as corrupt and useless as most. Probably won't win the next local election anyway if standing for Labour, no harm done.

Unless Labour does worse than 2019, which is unlikely at the moment, he probably would have lost his seat given the wafer-thin majority.

Not talking about this current surge of polling for Labour, which will drop at some point, either but for a long time now Labour have been outperforming their polling in the seats lost in 2019 so Bury South would have been one of the top targets.

In fact just looked it up. It would be 3rd on their list: http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/bat...targets/labour

So if you take the national swing only then Labour would (in theory) capture Bury South with a 3 seat gain.

Mick 19-01-2022 13:42

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110265)
I remember you being equally outraged when Reckless and Carswell defected from the Tories.

Oh, wait….

Crikey - this was years ago. Chip and shoulder come to mind. :rolleyes:

mrmistoffelees 19-01-2022 13:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110259)
Starmer also broke the rules, I think his excuse it was a work meeting, is rather pathetic - they both broke the rules - but what was really striking with PMQs not one question on the impending threat from Russia invading Ukraine.


Whilst Starmers behaviour if true certainly isn't acceptable. I'm not sure you can make use of it to justify the one incident (so far) against the multiple instances that have occured with and around Boris.

It's akin to saying that one person who is caught driving at 75mph on a deserted motorway in the middle of the night has the same level of culpability as an individual caught ten times speeding at 90mph through a 30mph zone.

Carth 19-01-2022 13:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110267)
Unless Labour does worse than 2019, which is unlikely at the moment, he probably would have lost his seat given the wafer-thin majority.

Not talking about this current surge of polling for Labour, which will drop at some point, either but for a long time now Labour have been outperforming their polling in the seats lost in 2019 so Bury South would have been one of the top targets.

In fact just looked it up. It would be 3rd on their list: http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/bat...targets/labour

So if you take the national swing only then Labour would (in theory) capture Bury South with a 3 seat gain.

Yes I see that, but would people actually vote for someone who, possibly, would turn again if he got upset by something Labour did . . . and Labour doesn't have a clean track record when it comes to infighting does it, so he may well be off again at some time ;)

Julian 19-01-2022 14:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110231)
Bury South MP Christian Wakeford has this morning defected from the Conservatives to Labour.

https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-d...rship-12519919

This is the same MP who co-sponsored a bill to force by-elections to take place after defections. ;)

Also it seems voting him over 400 times in 2 years for policies which fly in the face of labour values has made him extremely unwelcome in some labour quarters......

1andrew1 19-01-2022 14:30

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36110272)
This is the same MP who co-sponsored a bill to force by-elections to take place after defections. ;)

Also it seems voting him over 400 times in 2 years for policies which fly in the face of labour values has made him extremely unwelcome in some labour quarters......

Main thing to watch is its short-term impact in Westminster.

papa smurf 19-01-2022 14:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110268)
Crikey - this was years ago. Chip and shoulder come to mind. :rolleyes:

Not the first two words that come to my mind.

1andrew1 19-01-2022 15:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36110228)
Actually we are involved in Ukraine, far more deeply than many realise. It’s not an either/or situation - government goes on even when the prime minister is a numpty.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/brit...ns-to-ukraine/

Good to hear. Unfortunately, our diplomatic efforts will be constrained at the top level as Johnson fights to remain as Prime Minister.

pip08456 19-01-2022 15:11

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36110272)
This is the same MP who co-sponsored a bill to force by-elections to take place after defections. ;)

Also it seems voting him over 400 times in 2 years for policies which fly in the face of labour values has made him extremely unwelcome in some labour quarters......

Yes, voted on it on 2nd Sept 2020.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1642605027

Pierre 19-01-2022 16:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110267)
Unless Labour does worse than 2019, which is unlikely at the moment, he probably would have lost his seat given the wafer-thin majority.

Indeed, just someone that likes his 80K + expenses salary and wants to keep it. He'd probably swap to the SNP too if they looked like winning the seat.

1andrew1 19-01-2022 16:30

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
From Private Eye. This is what real leadership looks like.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1642609801

Hugh 19-01-2022 18:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110268)
Crikey - this was years ago. Chip and shoulder come to mind. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110275)
Not the first two words that come to my mind.

Apologies, I didn’t realise there was a time limit on relevant facts…

I’ll bear that in mind the next time anyone brings up the last time the Labour Party were in power…

Mr K 19-01-2022 18:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110268)
Crikey - this was years ago. Chip and shoulder come to mind. :rolleyes:

Hugh remembers every post ever made on CF. We've all found that out to our cost ;)

OLD BOY 19-01-2022 20:22

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110160)
Dave42 is right. Check out the Sky News video below. Johnson says "nobody told me" the Number 10 garden party during lockdown was "against the rules".

Whilst ignorance of the law is no defence, they're his rules that he announced the rules to the public!
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1483431855001063429

Yes, he did say that, but he said it because people keep alleging that he was warned it was illegal. Come on, Andrew, join the dots!

---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110174)
Senior Conservative backbencher tells me tonight they are confident of getting to 54 letters tomorrow to try and oust the PM.

“Up the revolution!” they tell me.

That went well… :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 20:15 ---------- Previous post was at 20:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110231)
Bury South MP Christian Wakeford has this morning defected from the Conservatives to Labour.

https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-d...rship-12519919

And you should hear what his constituents say about that.

---------- Post added at 20:22 ---------- Previous post was at 20:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110240)
Christian Wakeford . . . just had a look at his wiki page, seems just as corrupt and useless as most. Probably won't win the next local election anyway if standing for Labour, no harm done.

He’s a one-trick pony. His constituents are furious with him.

jfman 19-01-2022 20:23

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
He’s got a long way to go, OB I’d not count your chickens just yet.

His decision to be Steve Baker’s useful idiot today will likely only buy him time not survival. Especially if the electorate see through it for what it is.

Dude111 19-01-2022 20:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by nashville
Boris is taking his party downhill, He is only giving the SNP a great boost, He must go and give the conservative a chance with a new leader to get rid of the SNP or we will be stuck with Nicola for ever,

I heard some pretty good news from Mr. Boris today

He said almost all restrictions are being lifted,thats quite g00d!!!

pip08456 19-01-2022 21:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36110309)
I heard some pretty good news from Mr. Boris today

He said almost all restrictions are being lifted,thats quite g00d!!!

How about this from Boris today?

Quote:

Confronted by the nation’s biggest challenge since the Second World War and the worst pandemic since 1918, any government would get some things wrong.

But this government got the big things right.
Source

Mick 19-01-2022 21:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110292)
Apologies, I didn’t realise there was a time limit on relevant facts…

I’ll bear that in mind the next time anyone brings up the last time the Labour Party were in power…

You can say what you like when that happens and it will still be highly irrelevant, given the point is, the MP who’s defected today, is a big fat hypocrite having sponsored a Bill to force those who defect to hold a by-election.

Great shame the official young Labour camp does not welcome him.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642627711

pip08456 19-01-2022 21:25

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110320)
You can say what you like when that happens and it will still be highly irrelevant, given the point is, the MP who’s defected today, is a big fat hypocrite having sponsored a Bill to force those who defect to hold a by-election.

Great shame the official young Labour camp does not welcome him.


:clap::clap::clap:

Mr K 19-01-2022 21:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I'd go for the by-election. Labour would win by a landslide atm, given the minute majority last time and the current polls. Same with the other 'red wall' seats. The Tories have been exposed for what they are and Northern voters won't be fooled again.
'Leveling up, my arse ! ' as Jim Royal would say !

nffc 19-01-2022 21:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110320)
You can say what you like when that happens and it will still be highly irrelevant, given the point is, the MP who’s defected today, is a big fat hypocrite having sponsored a Bill to force those who defect to hold a by-election.

Great shame the official young Labour camp does not welcome him.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642627711

Wow, the little snowflakes have found a backbone.

Hugh 19-01-2022 22:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110320)
You can say what you like when that happens and it will still be highly irrelevant, given the point is, the MP who’s defected today, is a big fat hypocrite having sponsored a Bill to force those who defect to hold a by-election.

Great shame the official young Labour camp does not welcome him.

I think any MP (or Local Government representative) who changes Party should have a By-Election in their Constituency, whatever their Party - I was impressed when Carswell did that.

Speaking of hypocrisy, that brings us back to the topic subject - all those in No. 10 (and other departments) making rules and laws for the country, then flaunting those rules and laws themselves, then lying about it and covering it up.

Mick 19-01-2022 22:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110335)
I think any MP (or Local Government representative) who changes Party should have a By-Election in their Constituency, whatever their Party - I was impressed when Carswell did that.

Speaking of hypocrisy, that brings us back to the topic subject - all those in No. 10 (and other departments) making rules and laws for the country, then flaunting those rules and laws themselves, then lying about it and covering it up.

I don’t recall ever disagreeing with the second part of your post.

1andrew1 19-01-2022 23:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110301)
Yes, he did say that, but he said it because people keep alleging that he was warned it was illegal. Come on, Andrew, join the dots!

Enough people are prepared to testify they warned Johnson against the party.

The country has joined the dots and they BoJo spell out. Even David Davis knows this. Supporting Johnson to stay in power is in reality helping Starmer to win the next election.

pip08456 19-01-2022 23:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110326)
I'd go for the by-election. Labour would win by a landslide atm, given the minute majority last time and the current polls. Same with the other 'red wall' seats. The Tories have been exposed for what they are and Northern voters won't be fooled again.
'Leveling up, my arse ! ' as Jim Royal would say !

Who do you think the Labour candidate would be?

Damien 20-01-2022 06:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110320)
Great shame the official young Labour camp does not welcome him.

Agree with the by-election but it's important to remember that Young Labour don't welcome it because they simply don't like Tories and don't want them switching to Labour at all. It's about ideologically purity for them rather than the cold pragmatism of politics.

OLD BOY 20-01-2022 07:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110326)
I'd go for the by-election. Labour would win by a landslide atm, given the minute majority last time and the current polls. Same with the other 'red wall' seats. The Tories have been exposed for what they are and Northern voters won't be fooled again.
'Leveling up, my arse ! ' as Jim Royal would say !

Interesting that you are not taking account of what his constituents are saying!

---------- Post added at 07:56 ---------- Previous post was at 07:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110346)
Enough people are prepared to testify they warned Johnson against the party.

The country has joined the dots and they BoJo spell out. Even David Davis knows this. Supporting Johnson to stay in power is in reality helping Starmer to win the next election.

I await seeing that with interest, Andrew. It’s all talk so far.

Talk of Boris Johnson’s imminent fall from power may be premature. We’ll see.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 08:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110363)
Interestint that you are not taking account of what his constituents are saying!.

What do the polls say for his constituency? I would certainly favour a by-election there on principal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110363)
I await seeing that with interest, Andrew. It’s all talk so far.

Johnson hinted the report is out next week.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 10:51

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Interesting...
Quote:

Growing fears in Downing Street over how damaging the Gray report could be

Sky's deputy political editor Sam Coates has been picking up a sense of nervousness in Number 10 over what could come out when the Sue Gray report is published next week.

According to his sources, some in Downing Street are worried the Sue Gray investigation has come across damaging evidence, and are now doubtful the report will be able to "clear" Boris Johnson.
https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...armer-12514080

Dave42 20-01-2022 11:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Robert Peston
@Peston
· 36m
I understand Sue Gray has found the email from a senior official to PM’s principle private secretary Martin Reynolds warning him the 20 May party should not go ahead, as per Cummings’s revelation and my blog below. So huge…https://itv.com/news/2022-01-17/why-...really-matters
https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1484109819183255552

well well OB know your still gonna defend the undefendable

Damien 20-01-2022 11:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Poor Boris. Imagine being let down by this staff like that! Looks like some more firings amongst his staff!

I think the Tories are spinning the report to be worse than it is as they know they've been referring it so much that everyone and their dog thinks it's rigged to clear him.

Dave42 20-01-2022 11:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Boris Johnson: Tories who want PM to go 'facing intimidation and blackmail' from party and should contact police, MP says

https://news.sky.com/story/tories-wh...warns-12520768

papa smurf 20-01-2022 11:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110392)
Poor Boris. Imagine being let down by this staff like that! Looks like some more firings amongst his staff!

I think the Tories are spinning the report to be worse than it is as they know they've been referring it so much that everyone and their dog thinks it's rigged to clear him.

Clearly the staff are to blame but i think Boris should forgive them, they were working through difficult times with lots of unfathomable rules as has been proven by labours indiscretions which are going unpunished.

OLD BOY 20-01-2022 11:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110395)
Clearly the staff are to blame but i think Boris should forgive them, they were working through difficult times with lots of unfathomable rules as has been proven by labours indiscretions which are going unpunished.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110390)
https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1484109819183255552

well well OB know your still gonna defend the undefendable

I’m not defending anything. I am saying we should read the report first. Not exactly a revolutionary stance for me to take.

Hugh 20-01-2022 12:11

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110397)
I’m not defending anything. I am saying we should read the report first. Not exactly a revolutionary stance for me to take.

But yet you have no issues with the limited scope of the report*, or that Sue Gray cannot make a determination as to whether there is criminal liability, as she is not a court, and she cannot make an independent assessment of the application of non-legal guidance to her colleagues as she is not independent. The only things to be published are the ‘findings’ and not the report itself.

Most importantly, she can’t determine whether the PM or another Minister is in breach of the Ministerial Code, as she is not the PM.

So, the person who will decide if anything is done with the report is the person who would be most affected by the report…

It is an internal investigation by a civil servant, who reports to ministers, of other civil servants and various advisors/3rd parties. It is not a quasi-judicial process, and it has no independent standing. It is almost as if this investigation was structured to enable Ministers/Press Officers to leak to the press that they have been ‘cleared’.

You were in HR - if there were complaints about your HR Director, would it have been accepted practice for him to write the terms of reference for the investigation, and then be the only one who could agree if the complaints had any merit?

You may wish to Google "independent" and "conflict of interest".

*as previously highlighted by Sephiroth

https://assets.publishing.service.go..._2021.docx.pdf

1andrew1 20-01-2022 16:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Desperate and illegal or just sharp politics?
Quote:

Tory defector says whips told him to back PM or lose school funds

The former Conservative MP Christian Wakeford has alleged that party whips told him he would lose funding for a new high school in his constituency if he did not vote with the government.

The claim came as the senior Conservative William Wragg urged MPs to report government ministers, whips and advisers to the Speaker – and even the police – for what he claimed was attempted blackmail of some colleagues suspected of possibly opposing Boris Johnson.

Anger among Johnson critics escalated again on Thursday after sources briefed that rebels were losing their nerve. Another MP opposing Johnson denied that letters of no confidence had been withdrawn after Wakeford defected to Labour.

“These briefings of withdrawals are pure invention from No 10,” one said. “Wakeford may have stayed some people’s hands yesterday but this isn’t going into reverse.”

Speaking at a Labour event on Thursday, Wakeford backed up the claims by Wragg that threats involving public money were made by the whips.

“I was threatened that I would not get a school for Radcliffe if I did not vote in one particular way,” he said. “This is a town that has not had a high school for the best part of 10 years.

“How would you feel when they hold back the regeneration of a town for a vote. It didn’t sit comfortably. That was the start of me questioning my place, where I was and ultimately to where I am now.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...cid=entnewsntp

Pierre 20-01-2022 17:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110427)
Desperate and illegal or just sharp politics?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...cid=entnewsntp

Shows the state of politics and journalism in this country when we're banging on about bloody parties, whilst the fact that a Chinese spy infiltrated parliament and had a Labour MP in their pocket by paying him near half million quid..... is just forgotten.

But let's concentrate on the important stuff.......how much booze did they fit in that suitcase?

Mad Max 20-01-2022 17:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36110432)
Shows the state of politics and journalism in this country when we're banging on about bloody parties, whilst the fact that a Chinese spy infiltrated parliament and had a Labour MP in their pocket by paying him near half million quid..... is just forgotten.

But let's concentrate on the important stuff.......how much booze did they fit in that suitcase?

Exactly.

Dave42 20-01-2022 17:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36110432)
Shows the state of politics and journalism in this country when we're banging on about bloody parties, whilst the fact that a Chinese spy infiltrated parliament and had a Labour MP in their pocket by paying him near half million quid..... is just forgotten.

But let's concentrate on the important stuff.......how much booze did they fit in that suitcase?

it about them thinking there above the law as in one rule for us and no rules for them

cant get how people don't understand they broke the rules they made

Mad Max 20-01-2022 17:18

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110435)
it about them thinking there above the law as in one rule for us and no rules for them

cant get how people don't understand they broke the rules they made

That should also apply to captain hindsight, even though he didn't make the rules.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 17:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I like to hold government of all colours to account for their actions and inactions. :angel:

However, credit where it's due, the current regime could certainly organise a piss up in a brewery! :)

---------- Post added at 17:20 ---------- Previous post was at 17:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36110436)
That should also apply to captain hindsight, even though he didn't make the rules.

Boris made the rules. :confused:

Mad Max 20-01-2022 17:25

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110437)
I like to hold government of all colours to account for their actions and inactions. :angel:

However, credit where it's due, the current regime could certainly organise a piss up in a brewery! :)

---------- Post added at 17:20 ---------- Previous post was at 17:20 ----------


Boris made the rules. :confused:

I was referring to Starmer, I know Boris made the rules, but Starmer shouldn't have broken them either.

Damien 20-01-2022 17:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36110432)
Shows the state of politics and journalism in this country when we're banging on about bloody parties, whilst the fact that a Chinese spy infiltrated parliament and had a Labour MP in their pocket by paying him near half million quid..... is just forgotten.

But let's concentrate on the important stuff.......how much booze did they fit in that suitcase?

But even the Tories aren't saying the Labour MP was in their pocket, they were arguing why he wasn't warned. Partly because they were involved too but also because there isn't any accusation or implication he knew she was a spy from MI5.

The media aren't going to make such an accusation themselves without either the evidence or getting to report on someone else's accusation. Obviously, if that was the story then it would be huge.

Dave42 20-01-2022 17:51

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36110440)
I was referring to Starmer, I know Boris made the rules, but Starmer shouldn't have broken them either.

true but it dont give Johnson a free pass for rule breaking

Hugh 20-01-2022 18:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36110436)
That should also apply to captain hindsight, even though he didn't make the rules.

I thought Johnson had taken over that role?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60014813

Quote:

On Wednesday, Mr Johnson told MPs he had "believed implicitly" it was a work event, but admitted: "With hindsight, I should have sent everyone back inside".
Even Rees-Mogg agrees

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ore-thumb.html

Quote:

I think the Prime Minister has got things right again and again and again," he said.

"But like us all, he accepts that during a two-and-a-half-year period, there will be things that with hindsight would have been done differently."

Mick 20-01-2022 18:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110445)
true but it dont give Johnson a free pass for rule breaking

Neither of them get a free pass - they both broke the rules, doesn't matter how many times one side did over the other, rule breaking is rule breaking.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 18:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110458)
Neither of them get a free pass - they both broke the rules, doesn't matter how many times one side did over the other, rule breaking is rule breaking.

Do we actually know that Starmer has broken the rules? A few people on here have gone on about it quite a lot but it's not being investigated or anything is it? Last April was not like the tough lockdown of 2020.

Mick 20-01-2022 18:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110462)
Do we actually know that Starmer has broken the rules? A few people on here have gone on about it quite a lot but it's not being investigated or anything is it? Last April was not like the tough lockdown of 2020.

Keir Starmer enjoyed a beer with Labour workers, despite lockdown rules banning indoor social gatherings.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 18:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110463)
Keir Starmer enjoyed a beer with Labour workers, despite lockdown rules banning indoor social gatherings.

A tricky one. He said they just stopped working for a bite to eat and carried on working afterwards. That's why I think it's not been taken further.

OLD BOY 20-01-2022 19:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110464)
A tricky one. He said they just stopped working for a bite to eat and carried on working afterwards. That's why I think it's not been taken further.

How is any different, really? If it was a working party, with the same people attending who work together indoors, it sounds like a storm in a teacup.

Hugh 20-01-2022 19:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110466)
How is any different, really? If it was a working party, with the same people attending who work together indoors, it sounds like a storm in a teacup.

Well, there wasn’t an email sent to 100 people, saying "let’s have some socially distanced drinks, and bring your own booze",

Or

It wasn’t two separate parties (one of which was a leaving party) in the same building, who then joined up later in the garden, on the evening before Prince Philip’s funeral

but besides that, no difference…

1andrew1 20-01-2022 20:33

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110466)
How is any different, really? If it was a working party, with the same people attending who work together indoors, it sounds like a storm in a teacup.

My curiosity has been raised as people on the forum have gone on about it. Obviously, having a break for food and drink in 2021 at work is somewhat different than inviting 100 people to an event in 2020.

Sephiroth 20-01-2022 21:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 

The public, as I perceive them, would give Starmer the benefit of the doubt - if only because the Tories, who have been caught bang to rights, are making a big fuss about it.

papa smurf 20-01-2022 21:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110479)

The public, as I perceive them, would give Starmer the benefit of the doubt - if only because the Tories, who have been caught bang to rights, are making a big fuss about it.

As a member of the public, I see starmer as guilty as Boris.

Damien 20-01-2022 21:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110479)

The public, as I perceive them, would give Starmer the benefit of the doubt - if only because the Tories, who have been caught bang to rights, are making a big fuss about it.

I think the fact there is a photo/video helps Starmer because it shows him in an office with a beer, rather mundane.

1andrew1 20-01-2022 22:37

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110482)
I think the fact there is a photo/video helps Starmer because it shows him in an office with a beer, rather mundane.

Yes, that makes sense.

Dave42 20-01-2022 22:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

The Times
@thetimes
·
45m
Up-pointing red triangle UPDATE: Tory MPs who want to oust Johnson are considering publishing a secretly recorded conversation with the chief whip and text messages after they accused the government of blackmail and intimidation
https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1484286584304373774

1andrew1 20-01-2022 23:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Encouraging to see a bit of honesty.
Quote:

Downing Street parties were bad for democracy, admits Sajid Javid

Sajid Javid has admitted parties took place in Downing Street during lockdown and said they had been "damaging" to Britain's democracy.

The Health Secretary appeared to go further than Boris Johnson, who has sought to avoid referring to the events themselves while apologising for the "hurt" they had caused.

On Thursday, Mr Javid urged the public to wait for the findings of an official inquiry by Sue Gray, a senior civil servant, but condemned the parties as "completely wrong".

"We do now know there were some parties. We know that because some of the people that were involved and broke the rules have come forward to say so," he said.

"Of course things like this damage our democracy. From what we already know from the people who have come forward and apologised for the parties that took place, for example the one on the eve of Prince Philip's funeral, that was completely wrong.

“It was wrong in every single way. The way we now get through this is to get the facts out, get them on the table so we can all reach a judgment ourselves."
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...?ocid=msedgntp

Paul 21-01-2022 04:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110435)
cant get how people don't understand they broke the rules they made

'people' understand perfectly, but some of those 'people' just dont really care that much about a few "parties" a year (or more) ago, and are more irritated by the OTT fuss continually being made about it.

Mick 21-01-2022 08:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36110492)
'people' understand perfectly, but some of those 'people' just dont really care that much about a few "parties" a year (or more) ago, and are more irritated by the OTT fuss continually being made about it.

Precisely, Russia is literally on the precipice of invading Ukraine, many pundits and world leaders say it’s gonna happen, this could thrust us all in to World War 3.

But yeah, UK media go on and on about no. 10 parties. defections… :rolleyes:

1andrew1 21-01-2022 08:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
The best way of clearing up this whole matter is for Johnson to step down.

papa smurf 21-01-2022 08:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110482)
I think the fact there is a photo/video helps Starmer because it shows him in an office with a beer, rather mundane.

The best way of clearing up this whole matter is for starmer to step down.

Maggy 21-01-2022 09:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110497)
Precisely, Russia is literally on the precipice of invading Ukraine, many pundits and world leaders say it’s gonna happen, this could thrust us all in to World War 3.

But yeah, UK media go on and on about no. 10 parties. defections… :rolleyes:

No that's just Mr Putin angling for some advantage or other probably of a financial nature.

Damien 21-01-2022 09:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110497)
Precisely, Russia is literally on the precipice of invading Ukraine, many pundits and world leaders say it’s gonna happen, this could thrust us all in to World War 3.

But yeah, UK media go on and on about no. 10 parties. defections… :rolleyes:

That's why it's important a Government doesn't waste its authority. This isn't the media's fault, it's their fault for displaying such disregard for their own rules and the public and their incompetence in handling it when they got caught out.

The media are reporting it because the public care. It's almost always the case that what the public and media care about is, to a neutral observer, objectively out of proportion to what is actually happening in the world.

At any one time there is turmoil on the Indian border with Kashmir, China's treatment of the Uyghurs, there has been a war in Yemen for years now and civil wars in some African states whilst our front pages will focus on the fact that Ant and/or Dec have crashed their car.

Thankfully when it comes to Ukraine the Foreign Office and MOD can just get on with it. They don't need Parliament and even if they did there is a consensus on it.

tweetiepooh 21-01-2022 09:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
My wife said she was listening on radio (Moral Maze?) and it was commented that before the election people knew Mr Boris was an affable chap who liked to please people and was a bit of a clown. That he behaved in that way shouldn't be a surprise. He wants to be liked even if he should really be firmer.


But further to this, it really isn't that much of an issue. It's looking back a fair way about something they shouldn't really have done but really isn't that important. I read that some mother was complaining that a family member died (not HRM) and they held a "work event". Not really related unless someone attending contracted covid, passed it on etc. And I would say the same about Starmer or any others. If there is something that need investigating, investigate and deal with appropriately. This isn't something that really affects the nation or needs immediate action.

Sephiroth 21-01-2022 09:42

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36110507)
My wife said she was listening on radio (Moral Maze?) and it was commented that before the election people knew Mr Boris was an affable chap who liked to please people and was a bit of a clown. That he behaved in that way shouldn't be a surprise. He wants to be liked even if he should really be firmer.


But further to this, it really isn't that much of an issue. It's looking back a fair way about something they shouldn't really have done but really isn't that important. I read that some mother was complaining that a family member died (not HRM) and they held a "work event". Not really related unless someone attending contracted covid, passed it on etc. And I would say the same about Starmer or any others. If there is something that need investigating, investigate and deal with appropriately. This isn't something that really affects the nation or needs immediate action.


There is merit in what Tweetiepooh has said.

Nevertheless, Boris is a dishonest buffoon and needs to be replaced soonest.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum