Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Coronavirus (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710629)

RichardCoulter 15-12-2021 22:53

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36105836)
At our booster appointment this evening there was a group of nurses at reception reading over the latest instructions from Sturgeon on who is and is not allowed to have a vaccination over the next 4-5 weeks. Basically in Scotland no 12-15s are now allowed. They have been eligible for a 1st jab for some time but anyone who hasn’t had it already is to be turned away until the booster program is complete.

Now you've had it for a few hours, how are you feeling? Friends of mine have reported things like a large swelling where the injection was administered, feeling extremely weak/tired or just generally dreadful. Most said that this lasts for about 24 hours.

I doubt i'll sleep tonight as I don't know how i'll cope with this on top of the pain etc that I have anyway, but I know I have no alternative.

I'm just hoping that this doesn't happen to everyone that has it, which is why i'm asking how you feel after having had it earlier in the evening.

jfman 15-12-2021 22:58

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105856)
Exactly. There's nothing to worry about at all, unless you're one of the unlucky ones like members of my family, friends and acquaintances. I'm sure many others could say the same.too

That's "living with the virus" Richard. A calculation where there's a number that the Government is willing to put up with if it allows the economy to function.

Even Sunak has highlighted a concern that giving the plebs a Pfizer every six months is billions of pounds despite the vaccine being the key (and sometimes only) defence in the pandemic.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ster-programme

---------- Post added at 22:58 ---------- Previous post was at 22:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105859)
Now you've had it for a few hours, how are you feeling? Friends of mine have reported things like a large swelling where the injection was administered, feeling extremely weak/tired or just generally dreadful. Most said that this lasts for about 24 hours.

I doubt i'll sleep tonight as I don't know how i'll cope with this on top of the pain etc that I have anyway, but I know I have no alternative.

I'm just hoping that this doesn't happen to everyone that has it, which is why i'm asking how you feel after having had it earlier in the evening.

Richard you'll be fine. Both my parents had the flu jab and booster vaccine and had no side effects at all.

Paul 15-12-2021 23:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
I felt no effects at all other than after the first one, my arm was a little sore for a few hours (but only why I was lying on it in bed).

---------- Post added at 23:02 ---------- Previous post was at 22:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36105854)
Except for those 180,000…

Well sad as that may be, people die from illness all the time.
No one cared much about the flu killing 1000's every year (the total since 2000 is well over 100,000, not to mention every other fatal disease and virus).
One of my work colleagues died just two weeks ago from an illness (not covid related in any way).
Illness killed my dad, my grandad, my grandma, both my wifes parents, one of our brother in laws, etc etc.

Chris 15-12-2021 23:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105859)
Now you've had it for a few hours, how are you feeling? Friends of mine have reported things like a large swelling where the injection was administered, feeling extremely weak/tired or just generally dreadful. Most said that this lasts for about 24 hours.

I doubt i'll sleep tonight as I don't know how i'll cope with this on top of the pain etc that I have anyway, but I know I have no alternative.

I'm just hoping that this doesn't happen to everyone that has it, which is why i'm asking how you feel after having had it earlier in the evening.

Upper left arm is tender but that’s all so far. Our eldest had Pfizer earlier this year and was knocked sideways by the first dose - really sleepy. Second wasn’t nearly as bad. I’ll post back tomorrow if I get any side effects from the booster.

Mick 15-12-2021 23:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36105854)
Except for those 180,000…

Who have likely died because of a number of other causes, not just Covid by itself.

Hugh 15-12-2021 23:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36105857)
Yes, totes mosh. You alright hun?

:hugs:

RichardCoulter 16-12-2021 00:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36105866)
Who have likely died because of a number of other causes, not just Covid by itself.

But covid will probably have hastened or caused the deaths from any underlying causes.

---------- Post added at 00:45 ---------- Previous post was at 00:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36105865)
Upper left arm is tender but that’s all so far. Our eldest had Pfizer earlier this year and was knocked sideways by the first dose - really sleepy. Second wasn’t nearly as bad. I’ll post back tomorrow if I get any side effects from the booster.

Thanks, that will make me feel better. I think it's Pfizer that i'm having this time as well (the one that has to be kept very cold).

Paul 16-12-2021 01:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105877)
I think it's Pfizer that i'm having this time as well (the one that has to be kept very cold).

Both the main booster options (Pfizer and Moderna) have to be kept cold.

Mick 16-12-2021 04:57

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105877)
But covid will probably have hastened or caused the deaths from any underlying causes..

Not necessarily, we’ve seen how they record the death, if a person has died within 28 days of a positive Covid-19 result. That person could have had a fatal heart attack, it’s still a Covid death to be tallied.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 08:42

Re: Coronavirus
 
France to ban travel to/from U.K. without a ‘compelling reason’ from Saturday morning

http://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-b...cases-12497105

jonbxx 16-12-2021 08:52

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36105859)
Now you've had it for a few hours, how are you feeling? Friends of mine have reported things like a large swelling where the injection was administered, feeling extremely weak/tired or just generally dreadful. Most said that this lasts for about 24 hours.

I doubt i'll sleep tonight as I don't know how i'll cope with this on top of the pain etc that I have anyway, but I know I have no alternative.

I'm just hoping that this doesn't happen to everyone that has it, which is why i'm asking how you feel after having had it earlier in the evening.

I had my booster pretty much 24 hours ago (Pfizer after AZ doses 1 and 2) My arm aches a bit and I feel a little under the weather to the point where I have just taken a couple of paracetamol but that's purely because I need to do some work. If I wasn't working, a 'take it easy' morning would probably do the job. The side effects are definitely milder than after my first AZ jab :tu:

Interestingly, the vaccination centre I went to (in Watford) had to shut down drop ins due to the size of the queues forming. This is the local presses take on it - https://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/ne...ire-cancelled/

Pierre 16-12-2021 09:04

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105887)
France to ban travel to/from U.K. without a ‘compelling reason’ from Saturday morning

http://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-b...cases-12497105

Stable horse bolted and all that.

Omicron will be in Europe, including France. Stopping travel to and from the UK won't make a blind bit of difference.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 09:06

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36105890)
Stable horse bolted and all that.

Omicron will be in Europe, including France. Stopping travel to and from the UK won't make a blind bit of difference.

Tbf no different to what the U.K. and several other countries have done with South Africa etc.

jfman 16-12-2021 09:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105891)
Tbf no different to what the U.K. and several other countries have done with South Africa etc.

There’s still merit in restricting travel from the highest risk places as a delaying tactic. Further seeding events will only bring forward the collapse of the healthcare system.

Hugh 16-12-2021 09:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36105884)
Not necessarily, we’ve seen how they record the death, if a person has died within 28 days of a positive Covid-19 result. That person could have had a fatal heart attack, it’s still a Covid death to be tallied.

The ONS have two different measures.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...lesmethodology
Quote:

5. Definition of COVID-19 deaths

In England and Wales, the doctor certifying a death can list all causes in the chain of events that led to the death and pre-existing conditions that may have contributed to the death. Using this information, we determine an underlying cause of death. A doctor can certify the involvement of COVID-19 based on symptoms and clinical findings – a positive test result is not required. Definitions of COVID-19 for deaths in Scotland and Northern Ireland are similar to England and Wales.

We use the term "due to COVID-19" when referring only to deaths with an underlying cause of death of COVID-19. When taking into account all of the deaths that had COVID-19 mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, whether as an underlying cause or not, we use the term "involving COVID-19".

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 09:31

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36105892)
There’s still merit in restricting travel from the highest risk places as a delaying tactic. Further seeding events will only bring forward the collapse of the healthcare system.

The French mainlands first detected case of omicron was on 25th November as of December 14th they had 130 known omicron variant cases.

It’s already seeded, they’re just a week or so behind us.

jfman 16-12-2021 09:34

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105895)
The French mainlands first detected case of omicron was on 25th November as of December 14th they had 130 known omicron variant cases.

It’s already seeded, they’re just a week or so behind us.

I accept that, but if you are planning control measures inviting folk in from a country with none isn’t going to assist the situation.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 09:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36105897)
I accept that, but if you are planning control measures inviting folk in from a country with none isn’t going to assist the situation.

I take your point but thats not entirely true though is it? Pre departure tests from the U.K. are required, France could insist on those being PCR

GrimUpNorth 16-12-2021 09:39

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36105884)
Not necessarily, we’ve seen how they record the death, if a person has died within 28 days of a positive Covid-19 result. That person could have had a fatal heart attack, it’s still a Covid death to be tallied.

Attachment 29461

joglynne 16-12-2021 10:23

Re: Coronavirus
 
Today's ZOE video by Professor Tim Spector of King's College London. Worth a watch if you want see, what I consider to be a considered analysis on, what's happening.
Quote:

As fear of Omicron spreads as fast as the virus itself, Professor Tim Spector unpacks ZOE COVID Study data which suggests Omicron hasn't yet exploded in the UK. However, there are clear signs Omicron has overtaken Delta in London where cases are growing fast.

Tim also discusses positive preliminary data on Omicron symptoms, which, at this point in time, seem very similar to those of Delta. The question is, do you really know all the symptoms you should be looking out for?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF79-XprdfU

Hugh 16-12-2021 10:57

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joglynne (Post 36105908)
Today's ZOE video by Professor Tim Spector of King's College London. Worth a watch if you want see, what I consider to be a considered analysis on, what's happening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF79-XprdfU

This is another (similar) take on that - a pre-release paper on Omicron (my brother in law sent it to me, as he subscribes to it (being in the "business")).

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ha...ceptor-binding

I found this bit near the end encouraging

Quote:

We often seem to fall into simple, binary thinking when considering complicated problems. Left or right-wing politics. Vaccinated or unvaccinated selecting for newly evolved viruses. This can limit our ability to make sense out of the world. But what if what is going on with Omicron is not so much driven by antibodies directed against the Spike RBD, but by selection for shifting the region of the respiratory tract that it infects? Or perhaps, this variant has bounced back and forth between humans and other species, and in so doing it has accumulated mutations which have exploited subtle differences in the ACE2 receptor.

One thing that has always fascinated me about viral evolution (or any evolution, for that matter) is the existence of evolutionary islands. Regions of genetic optimization that may not be the best solution, but which might require genetic changes which are less adaptive for a given environment before they are able to reach a new genetic “island” that is more optimal. Once a population (swarm) of viruses are able to bridge the evolutionary barriers to reach a new “island”, then they have a sort of evolutionary burst that can result in many changes within a short period of time as they evolve to adapt to the new optimum of that “island”. Perhaps what we are seeing with Omicron is the genetic consequence of one of these evolutionary bursts.

This is why this new finding from a team at Hong Kong University is so significant. Because it indicates that what may be most important about Omicron may not be the ability to evade vaccine-induced immunity, but that it has shifted its preferred tissue target for infection and replication to the upper airway instead of deep lung. That could explain why it is more infectious, replicates to higher levels, and yet causes less severe disease.

Let’s hope that is our best gift this Christmas.

1andrew1 16-12-2021 11:10

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105915)
Any evidence to support that’s the case in this instance ?

Much as I dislike Macron, the fishing dispute with the UK has ended and this looks a genuine public health move. France is a key stakeholder in Eurostar so will take a hit from this move.

tweetiepooh 16-12-2021 11:13

Re: Coronavirus
 
Like much in politics a lot of it is perception of the public. He's done something, may not work, may get reversed, but he's done something.

1andrew1 16-12-2021 11:16

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36105922)
This is another (similar) take on that - a pre-release paper on Omicron (my brother in law sent it to me, as he subscribes to it (being in the "business")).

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ha...ceptor-binding

I found this bit near the end encouraging

Interesting, thank you.

Hugh 16-12-2021 11:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59683343
Quote:

Queen cancels pre-Christmas family lunch, with sources suggesting it could have put too many people's Christmas arrangements at risk

jfman 16-12-2021 12:54

Re: Coronavirus
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-59673271

There’s the propaganda wing of the British state preparing everyone for an extended school holiday.

joglynne 16-12-2021 13:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh
This is another (similar) take on that - a pre-release paper on Omicron (my brother in law sent it to me, as he subscribes to it (being in the "business")).

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ha...ceptor-binding

I found this bit near the end encouraging
I too found the last bit encouraging giving me some hope especially for Christmas . Hopefully this will make covid easier to treat and will stave off as many people having to be admitted to ICU and ventilated in hospital.

Quote:

...... This is why this new finding from a team at Hong Kong University is so significant. Because it indicates that what may be most important about Omicron may not be the ability to evade vaccine-induced immunity, but that it has shifted its preferred tissue target for infection and replication to the upper airway instead of deep lung. That could explain why it is more infectious, replicates to higher levels, and yet causes less severe disease.

nffc 16-12-2021 13:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
Pop the France travel ban the other way round (and for a second negating the probability they already have an Omicron infection in their country which is just a few days behind ours).

How many people here would be suggesting we ban non-essential travel to and from France when
- there is a high incidence of a new highly infectious strain of the pandemic into which the facts of how it is different is not fully yet known
- the country's CMO and PM were on the TV the night before - and on previous occasions - talking up how serious the situation really is
- the country reached a record number of infections despite a high vaccination level (both 2nd and 3rd doses)
Would we be wanting this in our country? I suspect a fair amount of those who support restrictions would indeed be supporting such travel restrictions.


I don't agree with doing so, because the last month has shown you can't really stop it with travel restrictions, and it doesn't slow it down much either (in fact, it's not exactly clear which restrictions would work any more, you have to look at the countries who have gone further into lockdowns), now we have vaccines that's a game changer anyway - most people with Covid recover, it is mainly those with other issues who are badly affected, a fair amount don't even get symptoms, if that HK study is an indication it absolutely will lead to milder disease. Protect the vulnerable, get vaccinated, it will eventually pass. A high transmissible virus will presumably pass quicker, if it's allowed to. Not saying doing nothing is really viable until we know what that will mean, but, getting otherwise healthy people infected would mean you'd need some serious game changer in a new variant to reverse that immunity.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 16:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
Israel have put the U.K. on their red list for travel.

Sephiroth 16-12-2021 16:18

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105960)
Israel have put the U.K. on their red list for travel.

Damn. That's buggered up Christmas for quite a few.

Paul 16-12-2021 17:33

Re: Coronavirus
 
Enough of this Macron nonsense, multiple posts removed, back to the actual topic.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 18:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
Some information released about the first death with omicron

70 yrs old
No underlying health issues
Non drinker
Non smoker
Not vaccinated

Mad Max 16-12-2021 18:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105982)
Some information released about the first death with omicron

70 yrs old
No underlying health issues
Non drinker
Non smoker
Not vaccinated

Tells you a lot.

Taf 16-12-2021 18:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36105648)
The missus has her second eye op on 5th January next year.

The letter says she has to go for a PCR test on 1st Jan, then the entire household MUST self-isolate at home from that same morning until after she returns home on the 5th Jan. "THE ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD SHOULD NOT GO TO WORK, OR MEET WITH PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE HOME".

It also says that if her PCR is positive, or if anyone in the home tests positive before her op, the entire household must self-isolate for 10 days. The op will then be rescheduled for a later date.

A lady from the hospital called today.

"You were told to isolate as a household from 1st January, after the patient has been to the local testing centre for a PCR test that same day.

This has now been modified under new advice. The entire household must isolate from 8am on 21st December, until 2 days after the patient's hospital appointment on 5th January. Do not go to work, do not leave your home, do not accept visitors into your home".

I explained that she has an urgent cardiac scan on 21st December.

"I shall consult with my seniors, and get back to you tomorrow morning".

18 day's of isolation, I'd better get some shopping done, as there are no home delivery slots anytime before mid January. :(:(:(:(

Itshim 16-12-2021 18:50

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36105987)
A lady from the hospital called today.

"You were told to isolate as a household from 1st January, after the patient has been to the local testing centre for a PCR test that same day.

This has now been modified under new advice. The entire household must isolate from 8am on 21st December, until 2 days after the patient's hospital appointment on 5th January. Do not go to work, do not leave your home, do not accept visitors into your home".

I explained that she has an urgent cardiac scan on 21st December.

"I shall consult with my seniors, and get back to you tomorrow morning".

18 day's of isolation, I'd better get some shopping done, as there are no home delivery slots anytime before mid January. :(:(:(:(

Strange have a op appointment 30th December no such message . Guess you are going to uhw ?

Taf 16-12-2021 19:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36105989)
Strange have a op appointment 30th December no such message . Guess you are going to uhw ?

Yup, her second op for her other eye. Day surgery unit.

---------- Post added at 19:07 ---------- Previous post was at 19:04 ----------

@joglynne. Our local Iceland has recently stopped all home deliveries.

papa smurf 16-12-2021 19:10

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36105985)
Tells you a lot.

Can you share what it tells you.

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106000)
Can you share what it tells you.

Are you deliberately trying to be thick ;)

papa smurf 16-12-2021 19:13

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106001)
Are you deliberately trying to be thick ;)

I'm asking a question in a civil manor could you answer in a similar way.

spiderplant 16-12-2021 19:14

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36105987)
until 2 days after the patient's hospital appointment on 5th January

Huh?

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106002)
I'm asking a question in a civil manor could you answer in a similar way.

I'll ask you this, do you think the lack of vaccinations for this individual has led to his illness?

papa smurf 16-12-2021 19:26

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105982)
Some information released about the first death with omicron

70 yrs old
No underlying health issues
Non drinker
Non smoker
Not vaccinated

A man, giving his name only as John, made the claim after phoning in to Nick Ferrari’s show on LBC.

“I didn’t have a relationship with him, my sister did,” he said.

---------- Post added at 19:26 ---------- Previous post was at 19:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106004)
I'll ask you this, do you think the lack of vaccinations for this individual has led to his illness?

i have no idea, but i imagine being 70 means your nearing the end of your journey.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:28

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106002)
I'm asking a question in a civil manor could you answer in a similar way.

Did you ask that in a Danny Dyer voice ?

---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106005)
A man, giving his name only as John, made the claim after phoning in to Nick Ferrari’s show on LBC.

“I didn’t have a relationship with him, my sister did,” he said.

---------- Post added at 19:26 ---------- Previous post was at 19:23 ----------



i have no idea, but i imagine being 70 means your nearing the end of your journey.

So, he’s making it all up then ?

nomadking 16-12-2021 19:28

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36105985)
Tells you a lot.

The question remains as to what was the status of the infectious person that passed it onto them.
People keep forgetting that for each person that gets infected there was a person who was infected and infectious. It is the infectious people that are the bigger problem, as they are the ones passing it around.

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:29

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106005)
A man, giving his name only as John, made the claim after phoning in to Nick Ferrari’s show on LBC.

“I didn’t have a relationship with him, my sister did,” he said.

---------- Post added at 19:26 ---------- Previous post was at 19:23 ----------



i have no idea, but i imagine being 70 means your nearing the end of your journey.

Really? I don't think that 70 years of age is that old nowadays, my thoughts on the matter were he caught the virus because he didn't have his vaccinations.

pip08456 16-12-2021 19:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36105982)
Some information released about the first death with omicron

70 yrs old
No underlying health issues
Non drinker
Non smoker
Not vaccinated

Source?

Meanwhile this is interesting.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1639682975

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106010)
Really? I don't think that 70 years of age is that old nowadays, my thoughts on the matter were he caught the virus because he didn't have his vaccinations.

Nope……. It became a serious illness due to him not being vaccinated

papa smurf 16-12-2021 19:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106007)
Did you ask that in a Danny Dyer voice ?
no
---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------



So, he’s making it all up then ?

Gosh i never considered that, well spotted you clever boy.

---------- Post added at 19:32 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106012)
Nope……. It became a serious illness due to him not being vaccinated

do have the medical records to hand?

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:33

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106012)
Nope……. It became a serious illness due to him not being vaccinated

Isn't that what I said? I said he caught the virus because he didn't have the vaccinations.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36106011)
Source?

Meanwhile this is interesting.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1639682975

Mainstream media bbc/sky should you wish to check

To your second point. Denmark might disagree

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106015)
Isn't that what I said? I said he caught the virus because he didn't have the vaccinations.

No, you said he caught the virus due to not being vaccinated, the vaccine doesn’t stop you catching it, but provides significant protection against serious illness/death

---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106013)
Gosh i never considered that, well spotted you clever boy.

---------- Post added at 19:32 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------



do have the medical records to hand?

Behave yourself, people need tinfoil at Christmas

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106017)
No, you said he caught the virus due to not being vaccinated, the vaccine doesn’t stop you catching it, but provides significant protection against serious illness/death

---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------



Behave yourself, people need tinfoil at Christmas

Yeah, I know that, and you knew fine well what I meant when I more or less said if he had been vaccinated he would not have been hospitalised and unfortunately died, stop nit-picking ffs.

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:47

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106019)
Yeah, I know that, and you knew fine well what I meant when I more or less said if he had been vaccinated he would not have been hospitalised and unfortunately died, stop nit-picking ffs.

it’s not nit picking. It could be misread or misinterpreted by some.

Stop taking it personally

Mad Max 16-12-2021 19:48

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106020)
it’s not nit picking. It could be misread or misinterpreted by some.

Stop taking it personally

Yes, obviously by you!:rolleyes:

mrmistoffelees 16-12-2021 19:50

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106021)
Yes, obviously by you!:rolleyes:

Yes, obviously…. Enjoy your evening.

jfman 16-12-2021 19:55

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36106007)
So, he’s making it all up then ?

If it’s LBC it’s probably a producer.

nomadking 16-12-2021 20:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106019)
Yeah, I know that, and you knew fine well what I meant when I more or less said if he had been vaccinated he would not have been hospitalised and unfortunately died, stop nit-picking ffs.

Seeing as he apparently had little or no contact with others, lack of vaccination seems irrelevant.
Link
Quote:

John told LBC: "He was a recluse to be honest. He never left the house, had all his food delivered and only left the house to go to the bins and the postbox.
Official stats show that there was a death in Northampton in that time frame.
Link
Quote:

Deaths in Northampton
There were 0 deaths within 28 days of a positive test for coronavirus reported on 16 December 2021.
Between 10 December 2021 and 16 December 2021, there have been 1 deaths within 28 days of a positive coronavirus test. This shows a decrease of -85.7% compared to the previous 7 days.

Taf 16-12-2021 20:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36106003)
Huh?

She will have a PCR test done as she leaves the hospital, so we are to self-isolate together as a household, until she gets a negative test result back.

If it comes back positive, we are to do regular LFT tests and self-isolate a further 10 days. She and our twins are in the "vulnerable" category.

But I have not been able to get hold of any LFT packs. :(:(:(

Mad Max 16-12-2021 20:13

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36106024)
Seeing as he apparently had little or no contact with others, lack of vaccination seems irrelevant.
Link
Official stats show that there was a death in Northampton in that time frame.
Link

Would it not have been better for him to have been vaccinated anyway, after all, whether he was in contact with anyone or not I would have thought that most elderly people would have taken the vaccinations to be on the safe side.

nomadking 16-12-2021 20:22

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106026)
Would it not have been better for him to have been vaccinated anyway, after all, whether he was in contact with anyone or not I would have thought that most elderly people would have taken the vaccinations to be on the safe side.

Compared to completely isolating yourself, going out for a total of 3 jabs is a bigger risk. If he would've had to travel by public transport that would've been an even bigger risk.

Carth 16-12-2021 20:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36106027)
Compared to completely isolating yourself, going out for a total of 3 jabs is a bigger risk.

It seems not.

If everything stated is correct ;)

Paul 16-12-2021 20:41

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106019)
Yeah, I know that, and you knew fine well what I meant when I more or less said if he had been vaccinated he would not have been hospitalised and unfortunately died, stop nit-picking ffs.

Its not nit picking, its been repeated many times now that vaccinations do not stop you catching the virus. Your statement was wrong.

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36106025)
But I have not been able to get hold of any LFT packs. :(:(:(

Order them online ?
I tried to get some locally yesterday, none available, I could order some though.

nomadking 16-12-2021 20:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36106028)
It seems not.

If everything stated is correct ;)

:confused: How is going out for a total of 3 jabs, not more of a risk than isolating yourself?

Paul 16-12-2021 20:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
How is the "risk" measured.

Mad Max 16-12-2021 21:12

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36106033)
Its not nit picking, its been repeated many times now that vaccinations do not stop you catching the virus. Your statement was wrong.

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:38 ----------


Order them online ?
I tried to get some locally yesterday, none available, I could order some though.

Ok, what I should have said was that if he had the vaccinations it would have probably helped him not being hospitalised, that better?

Paul 16-12-2021 21:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36106042)
Ok, what I should have said was that if he had the vaccinations it would have probably helped him not being hospitalised, that better?

Absolutely. They may well have saved his life.

Carth 16-12-2021 21:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36106036)
:confused: How is going out for a total of 3 jabs, not more of a risk than isolating yourself?

The guy who died went nowhere and died.
Maybe 2 quick trips for a jab and things would have ended differently

nffc 16-12-2021 21:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Well he has to have caught covid somehow. Some things aren't adding up.

Pierre 16-12-2021 22:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36106046)
Well he has to have caught covid somehow. Some things aren't adding up.

Amazon prime, Bezos developed the Omicron variant and is now delivering it free to your homes ( as long you subscribe)

jfman 16-12-2021 23:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36106046)
Well he has to have caught covid somehow. Some things aren't adding up.

Lived in a block of flats. There’s evidence from the quarantine hotels of airborne transmission (despite what the WHO say!) between people in adjacent rooms through the flow of air as people open and close doors.

Taf 17-12-2021 10:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36106033)
Order them online ?

None available, despite having checked several times a day so far.

Hugh 17-12-2021 10:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
Must be a local thing - still available online here (in Leeds).

---------- Post added at 10:30 ---------- Previous post was at 10:27 ----------

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/chris-whit...141926249.html

Quote:

Whitty told MPs: “The idea that the lockdowns caused the problems with things like cancer is a complete inversion of reality.

“If we had not had the lockdowns, the whole system would have been in deep, deep trouble and the impact on things like heart attacks and strokes, and all the other things people must still come forward for when they have them, would have been even worse than it was.”

He added: “I think this is sometimes said by people who have no understanding of health at all. But I don’t think it’s said by anyone who’s serious, if I’m honest. And when they say it it’s usually because they want to make a political point.

"The reality is, and if you ask any doctor working in any part of the system, they will say this, that what is threatening our ability to do cancer, what is threatening our ability to do all these things, is the fact that so much of the NHS effort, so many of the beds are having to be put over to COVID and that we’re having to work in a less efficient way because COVID is there.

“Finding a way to manage COVID in a way that minimises the impact on everything else is absolutely central to what we’re trying to do.”

joglynne 17-12-2021 11:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36106079)
None available, despite having checked several times a day so far.

I checked at 10:30 and none were available just went to the site again and this time they were available and I now have a box on order. I hope the site you use has some too. Worth rechecking.
<<hugs>>

Taf 17-12-2021 11:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
A whole new building went up at our local hospital, the largest in Wales. It's 100% for isolating covid patients from the rest of the hospital complex. In theory, that would allow the rest of the hospital to carry-on as usual. But in practice things are still stuttering due to staffing problems.

It's the chunk in the middle covered in coloured panels.

joglynne 17-12-2021 11:18

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36106096)
A whole new building went up at our local hospital, the largest in Wales. It's 100% for isolating covid patients from the rest of the hospital complex. In theory, that would allow the rest of the hospital to carry-on as usual. But in practice things are still stuttering due to staffing problems.

It's the chunk in the middle covered in coloured panels.

WOW that would be a really great help, shame about the lack of staff but maybe there will be ways to use the staff they have more efficiently with the new set up. Fingers crossed.

RichardCoulter 17-12-2021 13:57

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36106025)
She will have a PCR test done as she leaves the hospital, so we are to self-isolate together as a household, until she gets a negative test result back.

If it comes back positive, we are to do regular LFT tests and self-isolate a further 10 days. She and our twins are in the "vulnerable" category.

But I have not been able to get hold of any LFT packs. :(:(:(

If you can't get any, I may be able to spare some.

Well, I had my covid & flu jabs yesterday lunchtime. The nurse said it would be better to have the flu jab in my right arm as i'm right handed as the covid jab sometimes causes stiffness/pain in the arm where it's administered.

After the jabs I felt really tired and had the best sleep that I've had in a very long time (even with sleeping tablets).

I woke up at about 11pm, whilst feeling sleepy and weak, I had no other after effects.

Today, however, my arm is stiff and painful in the top half and my hand. The pain is bearable because i'm on painkillers for other things anyway, which is a good job as I am up to my limit.

I would urge anyone who has yet to have their booster to have it in their less dominant hand and take painkillers if necessary. Booking the following day off work is also advisable due to the fatigue.

Thanks to those who reassured me that it would turn out ok, this was very much appreciated.

mrmistoffelees 17-12-2021 18:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
Obviously, more data required, however concerning if true

https://www.joe.co.uk/coronavirus/uk...HYlCWMjTM9FHtA

Paul 17-12-2021 18:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
I've now seen "studies" that say it is, and others that say it isnt ... so take your pick.

I suppose the best part is none seem to say its worse.

mrmistoffelees 17-12-2021 19:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36106155)
I've now seen "studies" that say it is, and others that say it isnt ... so take your pick.

I suppose the best part is none seem to say its worse.

Oh, that’s probably coming….

Jaymoss 17-12-2021 19:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
I think with how it appears to be spreading the numbers in the New Year could be quite horriffic. Guess all we can do is wait and see

jfman 17-12-2021 19:29

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36106155)
I've now seen "studies" that say it is, and others that say it isnt ... so take your pick.

I suppose the best part is none seem to say its worse.

The difficulties for most studies are that most populations will have different combinations of immunity.

All the different types of vaccines, some boosted, some not. Different variants of infection, infection plus vaccine, etc.

There’s even dispute as to whether the order of infection plus vaccine matters.

nffc 17-12-2021 20:10

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36106159)
The difficulties for most studies are that most populations will have different combinations of immunity.

All the different types of vaccines, some boosted, some not. Different variants of infection, infection plus vaccine, etc.

There’s even dispute as to whether the order of infection plus vaccine matters.

Provided that previous immunity (boosted or not, having covid before) keeps people out of hospital, then it doesn't really matter as much.


They have usually focused on hospital capacity when deciding what to do, don't see why this should be any different.


It still seems to be the case that the unvaccinated are worst off, which is not entirely surprising.

Pierre 17-12-2021 20:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36106158)
I think with how it appears to be spreading the numbers in the New Year could be quite horriffic. Guess all we can do is wait and see

Supposed to double every two days isn’t it, that hasn’t happened.

We’re testing on average 600,000 people a day more than we were a week ago. So numbers are bound to go up even without Omicron.

Deaths are down and been declining since the end of Oct

Hospitalisations have plateaued and not risen above Sep and Oct highs as yet.

It’s 3 weeks since the first reported cases of Omicron in the U.K.

If they’re not clogging up the hospital corridors by Christmas Eve, I think it’s safe to assume they won’t be any other time in the future.

mrmistoffelees 17-12-2021 20:54

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36106165)
Supposed to double every two days isn’t it, that hasn’t happened.

We’re testing on average 600,000 people a day more than we were a week ago. So numbers are bound to go up even without Omicron.

Deaths are down and been declining since the end of Oct

Hospitalisations have plateaued and not risen above Sep and Oct highs as yet.

It’s 3 weeks since the first reported cases of Omicron in the U.K.

If they’re not clogging up the hospital corridors by Christmas Eve, I think it’s safe to assume they won’t be any other time in the future.

So far there’s a 28% increase in hospital admissions in London week on week, I think it’s more likely New Year’s Eve we need to be looking at.

jfman 17-12-2021 21:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
It’ll take longer than Christmas Eve for hospitals to fill there’s very little safe about that assumption. Individual days of admissions will creep up but it’s only when there’s sustained growth over weeks that’ll happen.

3 Cobra meetings this week, Rishi back with the chequebook and a weekend Cobra special. I’d expect more restrictions before hospitals collapse.

Paul 17-12-2021 21:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59696499

Quote:

UK researchers have analysed the likely impact that a Covid booster shot will have on Omicron and say it could provide around 85% protection against severe illness.
Quote:

.....protection against severe disease from Omicron may be around 80 to 85.9%, compared to around 97% for Delta - the other variant that is currently dominant in the UK.
Obviously 86% is not as good as 97%, but its still damn good, and better than 0%.

Quote:

However, there are other parts of the immune system, such as T cells, that can fight Covid too. The modelling could not assess the impact of these.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre
Supposed to double every two days isn’t it, that hasn’t happened.

That was never going to happen for very long.
At that rate it would soon run out of people to infect.

Looking at the governments covid site ;

* Deaths are still falling atm.

* Hospitalisations are starting to rise slightly.
-- They are still lower than Oct & Nov levels, and still nothing like last winter.

* Cases are rising (as also is testing).
-- The peak atm appears to have been Wednesday (incomplete data still atm).

Hugh 17-12-2021 21:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36106165)
Supposed to double every two days isn’t it, that hasn’t happened.

We’re testing on average 600,000 people a day more than we were a week ago. So numbers are bound to go up even without Omicron.

Deaths are down and been declining since the end of Oct

Hospitalisations have plateaued and not risen above Sep and Oct highs as yet.

It’s 3 weeks since the first reported cases of Omicron in the U.K.

If they’re not clogging up the hospital corridors by Christmas Eve, I think it’s safe to assume they won’t be any other time in the future.

Every two to three days, was the original estimate.

In today’s Times - going from around 500 cases per day to over 10,000 cases per seems a fairly rapid growth rate in one week…

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c...read-2w05d0rwl

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1639776359

Jaymoss 17-12-2021 21:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
There is a hell of a lot of people taking tests though so it stands to reason more cases will be found. But it is an horrendous infection rate

my butt will keep twitching till the middle of Jan when we will know the true danger of omicron

jfman 17-12-2021 21:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36106183)
There is a hell of a lot of people taking tests though so it stands to reason more cases will be found. But it is an horrendous infection rate

my butt will keep twitching till the middle of Jan when we will know the true danger of omicron

It's worth noting that testing is demand led. Based on symptoms, being a close contact or some other reason.

If 600,000 people just tested for entertainment value there's no reason to expect to get more positives than the ONS study. Conveniently, that's 1 in 60.

So it would impact the figures would be 10,000. Test positivity would drop.

As we reach testing capacity - people are unable to get tests online, in pharmacies, or book a PCR in a reasonable timeframe the usefulness of the data reduce. The ONS survey on the other hand will continue to reflect increases/decreases in prevalence due to it's model not relying on demand (or supply!).

nffc 17-12-2021 22:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
Aren't people just stockpiling LFTs because
- the new guidance is that close contacts of cases do LFTs
- people are being suggested to do LFTs before going anywhere


As for PCR tests, well, with colds going around as well, and with omicron being milder and more common symptoms with colds, especially in vaccinated people, more people think they have covid (especially with more people getting it) so book a PCR test to be sure knowing LFTs may be incorrect.


It will eventually hit a ceiling as it runs out of people to infect whatever happens. Exponential growth will eventually stop.

jfman 17-12-2021 22:16

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36106189)
Aren't people just stockpiling LFTs because
- the new guidance is that close contacts of cases do LFTs
- people are being suggested to do LFTs before going anywhere

As for PCR tests, well, with colds going around as well, and with omicron being milder and more common symptoms with colds, especially in vaccinated people, more people think they have covid (especially with more people getting it) so book a PCR test to be sure knowing LFTs may be incorrect.

It will eventually hit a ceiling as it runs out of people to infect whatever happens. Exponential growth will eventually stop.

People stockpiling LFTs doesn't affect the reported figure. Whether the tests are in a box or up someone's nose that's capacity gone. New people have difficulty accessing tests - this does result in under-reporting or delayed reporting of cases.

Paul 18-12-2021 03:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36106187)
It's worth noting that testing is demand led.

Demand was suddenly driven up by the new round of fear factor.
Plus the [percieved] requirement to do daily tests if you have "contact" with someone positive.
[its not actually a requirement at all, just a 'strong' recommendation].

Result: The public go into panic mode again, and all the available LFTs vanish almost in a flash.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36106187)
Based on symptoms, being a close contact or some other reason.

So basically that covers any reason at all, even if that 'reason' is just "I felt like it".

Hugh 18-12-2021 08:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36106183)
There is a hell of a lot of people taking tests though so it stands to reason more cases will be found. But it is an horrendous infection rate

my butt will keep twitching till the middle of Jan when we will know the true danger of omicron

Testing has gone up by 50%, Omicron cases by 2,000%.

papa smurf 18-12-2021 08:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36106203)
Testing has gone up by 50%, Omicron cases by 2,000%.

How's the death rate with omicron doing percentage wise?

Chris 18-12-2021 08:58

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36106204)
How's the death rate with omicron doing percentage wise?

Death figures lag the infection figures by about 3 weeks. We won’t know how many people are dying with omicron until the end of the month.

Pierre 18-12-2021 09:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36106182)
Every two to three days, was the original estimate.

In today’s Times - going from around 500 cases per day to over 10,000 cases per seems a fairly rapid growth rate in one week…

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c...read-2w05d0rwl

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1639776359

That chart is an “estimate”. We’ll know for sure in a week or two

---------- Post added at 09:08 ---------- Previous post was at 09:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36106203)
Testing has gone up by 50%, Omicron cases by 2,000%.

Come on Hugh you know the best way to mis-represent numbers is to use %

Testing has increased by 600,000 COVID cases by 40,000. Against last week.

1andrew1 18-12-2021 09:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
Officials drawing up plans for two-week post-Christmas lockdown.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...s-say-12498746

Pierre 18-12-2021 09:47

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36106209)
Officials drawing up plans for two-week post-Christmas lockdown.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...s-say-12498746

It’s just noise now.

jfman 18-12-2021 09:53

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36106209)
Officials drawing up plans for two-week post-Christmas lockdown.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...s-say-12498746

That’ll hurt for the Steve Bakers of this world if it happens. “Freedom” erosion on steroids. Or genetically engineered in a lab if preferable.

papa smurf 18-12-2021 09:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36106209)
Officials drawing up plans for two-week post-Christmas lockdown.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...s-say-12498746

Good luck with that.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum