Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Riots (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33680220)

Hugh 10-08-2011 07:30

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Which is exactly what the BBC are reporting.

UK Riots: trouble erupts in English cities

Sirius 10-08-2011 07:55

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
I think when all this is over we need to have a hard look at the reason why the police can no longer go in hard with these *******s.

Is it because we have pandered to the wishy washy libs and are only allowed to talk and slap the hands of those involved. Why is it that in a interview last night the **** they were talking to quoted they could no longer do anything to him other than shout at him and he said i could live with that. He also said that i would not be punished because the law is on my side !!!!!.

We need to remove the weak arsed laws that we have been conned into by liberals who say we cannot punish kids and go back to the short sharp shock treatments including the use of borstals for those under 16 and JAIL sentences for the older *******s.

If we need more jails BUILD the buggers it might give the construction industry a much needed boost. Any of those that are not meant to be here and are on immigration requests should be returned from where they came because if they cannot behave then why should we have to deal with them. Anyone else involved should not be fined but jailed and if necessary made to work during the day on the cleanup.

End of rant

Gary L 10-08-2011 08:01

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
I think a lot of it is to do with their ages. they don't want to go in hard because of their ages.
but I think this has left a clear message to 'England' and that is we have enforced your belief that 'England' is a lawless country.

all respect has gone now. these events will flare up anytime they feel like it. and for any reason they choose.

Damien 10-08-2011 08:03

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35285967)
Is it because we have pandered to the wishy washy libs and are only allowed to talk and slap the hands of those involved. Why is it that in a interview last night the **** they were talking to quoted they could no longer do anything to him other than shout at him and he said i could live with that. He also said that i would not be punished because the law is on my side !!!!!.

To be honest I am not going to put much faith in some looting idiot's understanding of the law. Which law is 'on his side'? I am pretty sure that their are any number of laws which are not on his side. Looting is a crime, violent disorder is a crime, what laws exactly are on his side? The police didn't go in because the law prevented them from stopping violence, they didn't go in because that's the tactic they took against the riots - probably because they were outnumbers.

Quote:

We need to remove the weak arsed laws that we have been conned into by liberals who say we cannot punish kids and go back to the short sharp shock treatments including the use of borstals for those under 16 and JAIL sentences for the older *******s.
Which laws?

denphone 10-08-2011 08:12

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35285967)
I think when all this is over we need to have a hard look at the reason why the police can no longer go in hard with these *******s.

Is it because we have pandered to the wishy washy libs and are only allowed to talk and slap the hands of those involved. Why is it that in a interview last night the **** they were talking to quoted they could no longer do anything to him other than shout at him and he said i could live with that. He also said that i would not be punished because the law is on my side !!!!!.

We need to remove the weak arsed laws that we have been conned into by liberals who say we cannot punish kids and go back to the short sharp shock treatments including the use of borstals for those under 16 and JAIL sentences for the older *******s.

If we need more jails BUILD the buggers it might give the construction industry a much needed boost. Any of those that are not meant to be here and are on immigration requests should be returned from where they came because if they cannot behave then why should we have to deal with them. Anyone else involved should not be fined but jailed and if necessary made to work during the day on the cleanup.

End of rant

Its not the laws that are the problem but the wooly Liberal judicial system and the politically correct brigade who pander to the criminal hell bent minority but fail to stand up for the decent law abiding majority.

Gary L 10-08-2011 08:14

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
3 people killed trying to protect their homes.

Quote:

The victims, understood to be two brothers and a friend, were hit by a speeding car in Birmingham in the early hours of this morning, West Midlands Police said.

Officers have arrested one man in connection with the deaths following the incident in the Winson Green area of the city. A car has also been recovered.

Locals indicated that the three men had been praying at their local mosque before taking to the streets to defend properties from a wave of thugs and looters.

One local resident said: “The community people were just protecting the area when the car came and ran them over on the pavement.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-violence.html

denphone 10-08-2011 08:18

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35285977)
3 people killed trying to protect their homes.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-violence.html

Absolutely shocking to hear of 3 people losing their lives just doing what any normal citizen would do in protecting their homes and property.

Damien 10-08-2011 08:20

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35285968)
all respect has gone now. these events will flare up anytime they feel like it. and for any reason they choose.

This is not anything new brought about by a sudden lack of respect, as if there is a bygone era of calm and law abiding society - there wasn't. I don't care if that's people's impressions, it's not backed up by the facts.

That said respect is crucial. Not respect just in 'the law' but a respect of society and the people within it. It's cuts both ways. If these people feel excluded from society, with no hopes of a decent future, then they are going to care a lot less about it.

What we need, in my view, is a combination of policy approaches. We need a harder line on petty crime and disorder but also a more liberal interventionist approach to prevent these people from wanting to cause this kind of violence in the first place. Most would not have been born wanting to do this. We need to do our best to make sure that young people from these communities feel they have a place and a stake in our society rather than feel as if they have no future within it.

RizzyKing 10-08-2011 08:22

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Police need to be going in hard and fat whereever this sort of thing starts and cracking heads and if they are old enough to be out and doing this they are old enough to be on the other end of it. After this initial phase is over we need to see some serious sentences handed down and whatever other penalties that can be enforced to really hammer home to those of this mindset that whatever your problem this is not and never will be the answer or solution.

Sadly i have my doubts there will be any real punishment for this just a lot of talking by lots of people and planning but nothing to really hit the groups that did this and may well do it again when the fancy takes them such is our country today :(.

Osem 10-08-2011 09:23

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35285961)
Which is exactly what the BBC are reporting.

UK Riots: trouble erupts in English cities

Yes, it's confined to certain large towns and cities in England right now and we shouldn't forget that very many areas of England are still untouched by events. Hopefully won't spread further but I still wouldn't bet on that and **** like this won't let a line on a map obstruct their progress if we don't get to grips with this. Anyway let nobody pretend this is in some way solely an 'English' problem as they'll be any number of nationalities involved in the trouble including those who rather like to finger the English for all the world's ills.

Anyway, loads of arrests but how many will actually be charged and punished I wonder? I fear that whilst the arrests importantly remove certain individuals from the scene for a short time, if they subsequently walk away or get a slap on the wrist it'll only serve to prove that the risk/reward ratio is stacked up in favour of the lawbreakers. This will do nothing to disuade these people from taking part in similar acts in the future.

Russ 10-08-2011 09:31

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
I don't think anyone is saying it's just the English that are doing this. But the problems are confined to England.

Osem 10-08-2011 09:34

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35285991)
I don't think anyone is saying it's just the English that are doing this. But the problems are confined to England.

Or more accurately:

Quote:

...it's confined to certain large towns and cities in England right now.
If we're rightly not going to tar the whole UK with this brush let's not tar the whole of England with it. Let's hope these riots don't spread to other parts of the UK but let's not pretend that if we don't get to grips with what's happening in parts of England that it won't eventually do so.

Gary L 10-08-2011 09:39

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35285990)
if they subsequently walk away or get a slap on the wrist it'll only serve to prove that the risk/reward ratio is stacked up in favour of the lawbreakers.
This will do nothing to disuade these people from taking part in similar acts in the future.

True.
it'll work in the way that say one person is charged with smashing a shop window stealing hundreds of pounds worth of stuff and then setting fire to the place resulting in thousands of pounds worth of damage. getting a supervision order.

or at worst. insufficient evidence and no charges at all.

they have nothing to lose. the rewards outweigh the punishment to a lot of these people.

it's the same kind of thing where the more offences you commit in one go. you come better off than just commiting the one offence.

such as driving with no insurance, no MOT, no TAX, no licence. causing thousands of pounds worth of damage. nearly killing innocent people. and failing to stop for police.

in some cases you will get the same punishment as someone who has been stopped for driving with an illegal tyre and an expired tax disc.

MovedGoalPosts 10-08-2011 09:43

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
I haven't been following this thread in detail, but feel it's time to add my bit.

It is one thing people saying the police aren't doing enough, one needs to look a lot deeper at society. The reality is that the **** are running around without fear of anything happening even if they suffer the misfortune of getting caught
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBC Rolling News Feed
A 16-year-old looter from Manchester tells BBC 5 live he will continue participating in the violence and theft until he gets caught, because it is his first offence and nothing will happen.

At some stage society has to stop pandering to human rights namby pamby stuff and be prepared to lock people up for durations that make a real difference, not just offer petty slaps on the wrist community service, or meaningless fines that don't hurt these people in the first place because they haven't got money to pay them, and have so much free time because they don't do school, or are jobless. If that means jails are orvercrowded, tough, it's not supposed to be pleasant in there. So while we have the supposed party of law and order, conservatives, in charge with people like Kenneth Clarke then saying we need to cut sentences, the government in fact is creating the lax atmosphere leading to this situation.

One must also look at society's expectations of the police. On the one hand we want them to be robust. When they are inevitably you get all the complaints of human rights and stuff. One only has to look at the previous student protests when kettling was used. Society cannot have this both ways. If there are people out there intent on running amok then unfortunately all who are in the area will come under suspicion until proven otherwise.

One must also accept there are issues with how the legal system requires any one arrested to be dealt with. If a suspect is arrested then the officers involved will become involved with very time consuming custodial and evidence recording procedures. They won't be available to continue policing for many hours leaving their colleagues more thinly stretched. Is it any wonder therefore that sometimes the police in these situations didn't worry about the minor offences, especially if they are getting evidence they can use later in slow time, to wait for the most serious problems as they try and contain order.

People talk of using the army? I suggest not bringing them onto the streets, leave that to the police, but if there is now a problem with cell capacity, even in police stations or prisons, then use the army to create temporary holding areas, if need be putting the **** in tents. The could even be made to dig their own latrines.

And finally, what is happening now is not about any sort of social statement, it's about opportunism and organised theft. An awful lot of the looting is co-ordinated. The fires and stuff are often a distraction to get the authorities into a different place whilst just down the road the real value target is emptied This was the case in Croydon where the Reeves furniture shop was torched while a nearby Comet was emptied.

Osem 10-08-2011 09:48

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35285998)
True.
it'll work in the way that say one person is charged with smashing a shop window stealing hundreds of pounds worth of stuff and then setting fire to the place resulting in thousands of pounds worth of damage. getting a supervision order.

or at worst. insufficient evidence and no charges at all.

they have nothing to lose. the rewards outweigh the punishment to a lot of these people.

it's the same kind of thing where the more offences you commit in one go. you come better off than just commiting the one offence.

such as driving with no insurance, no MOT, no TAX, no licence. causing thousands of pounds worth of damage. nearly killing innocent people. and failing to stop for police.

in some cases you will get the same punishment as someone who has been stopped for driving with an illegal tyre and an expired tax disc.

The true test of tougher action which we're told is going to be taken is that the punishments truly reflect the crime. For example, IMHO anyone setting fire to property which is likely to be occupied is guilty of attempted murder and should be punished accordingly.

---------- Post added at 10:48 ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35286001)
I haven't been following this thread in detail, but feel it's time to add my bit.

It is one thing people saying the police aren't doing enough, one needs to look a lot deeper at society. The reality is that the **** are running around without fear of anything happening even if they suffer the misfortune of getting caught

At some stage society has to stop pandering to human rights namby pamby stuff and be prepared to lock people up for durations that make a real difference, not just offer petty slaps on the wrist community service, or meaningless fines that don't hurt these people in the first place because they haven't got money to pay them, and have so much free time because they don't do school, or are jobless. If that means jails are orvercrowded, tough, it's not supposed to be pleasant in there. So while we have the supposed party of law and order, conservatives, in charge with people like Kenneth Clarke then saying we need to cut sentences, the government in fact is creating the lax atmosphere leading to this situation.

One must also look at society's expectations of the police. On the one hand we want them to be robust. When they are inevitably you get all the complaints of human rights and stuff. One only has to look at the previous student protests when kettling was used. Society cannot have this both ways. If there are people out there intent on running amok then unfortunately all who are in the area will come under suspicion until proven otherwise.

One must also accept there are issues with how the legal system requires any one arrested to be dealt with. If a suspect is arrested then the officers involved will become involved with very time consuming custodial and evidence recording procedures. They won't be available to continue policing for many hours leaving their colleagues more thinly stretched. Is it any wonder therefore that sometimes the police in these situations didn't worry about the minor offences, especially if they are getting evidence they can use later in slow time, to wait for the most serious problems as they try and contain order.

People talk of using the army? I suggest not bringing them onto the streets, leave that to the police, but if there is now a problem with cell capacity, even in police stations or prisons, then use the army to create temporary holding areas, if need be putting the **** in tents. The could even be made to dig their own latrines.

And finally, what is happening now is not about any sort of social statement, it's about opportunism and organised theft. An awful lot of the looting is co-ordinated. The fires and stuff are often a distraction to get the authorities into a different place whilst just down the road the real value target is emptied This was the case in Croydon where the Reeves furniture shop was torched while a nearby Comet was emptied.

Spot on! The sort of people who'll defend these people are the same who condemn the police whatever they do. As I stated in an earlier post, now that some of these people are seeing close up and personal the results of their efforts they may just think differently.

IMO the Army should be being used as support to allow the police to round up large numbers of troublemakers. Have soldiers transporting and guarding those detained/arrested in secure areas and let the police get on with restoring law and order on the front which is their job.

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 09:57

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Mayor of London Boris Johnson has told the BBC police budgets should not be cut, in the light of looting and disorder over the past few days.

He told BBC Radio 4's Today: "This is not a time to think about making substantial cuts in police numbers."

It puts the Conservative mayor at odds with the government - on Tuesday Theresa May said cuts could be made without affecting frontline services.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14470830

Damien 10-08-2011 09:59

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35286001)
And finally, what is happening now is not about any sort of social statement, it's about opportunism and organised theft. An awful lot of the looting is co-ordinated. The fires and stuff are often a distraction to get the authorities into a different place whilst just down the road the real value target is emptied This was the case in Croydon where the Reeves furniture shop was torched while a nearby Comet was emptied.

There is no social statement to the riots but that doesn't mean they were not born from a social problem. We need to look at why these youths did this, why they wanted to do this. As I mentioned before they clearly have no stake or respect in society. We need to try and instil this into them before they get to this stage, bring them into the fold, make them feel they have a future, and a reason to respect their communities.

denphone 10-08-2011 10:04

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286006)

If we have cuts they have to be well thought out so they do not badly affect important services which are crucial to us all.

---------- Post added at 11:04 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35286001)
I haven't been following this thread in detail, but feel it's time to add my bit.

It is one thing people saying the police aren't doing enough, one needs to look a lot deeper at society. The reality is that the **** are running around without fear of anything happening even if they suffer the misfortune of getting caught


At some stage society has to stop pandering to human rights namby pamby stuff and be prepared to lock people up for durations that make a real difference, not just offer petty slaps on the wrist community service, or meaningless fines that don't hurt these people in the first place because they haven't got money to pay them, and have so much free time because they don't do school, or are jobless. If that means jails are orvercrowded, tough, it's not supposed to be pleasant in there. So while we have the supposed party of law and order, conservatives, in charge with people like Kenneth Clarke then saying we need to cut sentences, the government in fact is creating the lax atmosphere leading to this situation.

One must also look at society's expectations of the police. On the one hand we want them to be robust. When they are inevitably you get all the complaints of human rights and stuff. One only has to look at the previous student protests when kettling was used. Society cannot have this both ways. If there are people out there intent on running amok then unfortunately all who are in the area will come under suspicion until proven otherwise.

One must also accept there are issues with how the legal system requires any one arrested to be dealt with. If a suspect is arrested then the officers involved will become involved with very time consuming custodial and evidence recording procedures. They won't be available to continue policing for many hours leaving their colleagues more thinly stretched. Is it any wonder therefore that sometimes the police in these situations didn't worry about the minor offences, especially if they are getting evidence they can use later in slow time, to wait for the most serious problems as they try and contain order.

People talk of using the army? I suggest not bringing them onto the streets, leave that to the police, but if there is now a problem with cell capacity, even in police stations or prisons, then use the army to create temporary holding areas, if need be putting the **** in tents. The could even be made to dig their own latrines.

And finally, what is happening now is not about any sort of social statement, it's about opportunism and organised theft. An awful lot of the looting is co-ordinated. The fires and stuff are often a distraction to get the authorities into a different place whilst just down the road the real value target is emptied This was the case in Croydon where the Reeves furniture shop was torched while a nearby Comet was emptied.

Excellent well thought out post.

Sirius 10-08-2011 10:18

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35286001)
I haven't been following this thread in detail, but feel it's time to add my bit.

It is one thing people saying the police aren't doing enough, one needs to look a lot deeper at society. The reality is that the **** are running around without fear of anything happening even if they suffer the misfortune of getting caught


At some stage society has to stop pandering to human rights namby pamby stuff and be prepared to lock people up for durations that make a real difference, not just offer petty slaps on the wrist community service, or meaningless fines that don't hurt these people in the first place because they haven't got money to pay them, and have so much free time because they don't do school, or are jobless. If that means jails are orvercrowded, tough, it's not supposed to be pleasant in there. So while we have the supposed party of law and order, conservatives, in charge with people like Kenneth Clarke then saying we need to cut sentences, the government in fact is creating the lax atmosphere leading to this situation.

One must also look at society's expectations of the police. On the one hand we want them to be robust. When they are inevitably you get all the complaints of human rights and stuff. One only has to look at the previous student protests when kettling was used. Society cannot have this both ways. If there are people out there intent on running amok then unfortunately all who are in the area will come under suspicion until proven otherwise.

One must also accept there are issues with how the legal system requires any one arrested to be dealt with. If a suspect is arrested then the officers involved will become involved with very time consuming custodial and evidence recording procedures. They won't be available to continue policing for many hours leaving their colleagues more thinly stretched. Is it any wonder therefore that sometimes the police in these situations didn't worry about the minor offences, especially if they are getting evidence they can use later in slow time, to wait for the most serious problems as they try and contain order.

People talk of using the army? I suggest not bringing them onto the streets, leave that to the police, but if there is now a problem with cell capacity, even in police stations or prisons, then use the army to create temporary holding areas, if need be putting the **** in tents. The could even be made to dig their own latrines.

And finally, what is happening now is not about any sort of social statement, it's about opportunism and organised theft. An awful lot of the looting is co-ordinated. The fires and stuff are often a distraction to get the authorities into a different place whilst just down the road the real value target is emptied This was the case in Croydon where the Reeves furniture shop was torched while a nearby Comet was emptied.

:clap: Excellent

Osem 10-08-2011 10:35

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35286008)
I've just ploughed my way through this thread and someone suggested water cannons with smart water. I'd be more direct: Water cannons loaded with indellible day-glo PINK dye*.

Firstly it'll wreak all their designer stuff and secondly the next day you can arrest anybody who has any trace of pink on them.

Demonstrating is legal, riot and looting are not and the full force of the law MUST be bought to bear on the ****. Riot carries upto a 10 year tarrif so let's see some exemplary scentencing. As for the lack of prison places they had a solution for that in WW2: Make the prisoners build their own prison camp.

*Non poisonous and eco friendly naturally.

Don't know about you but I don't want my high street all pink for weeks/months so why not use Smartwater to mark the villains instead? ;)

Perhaps the makers could rename their product 'idiotwater' just for the purpose... :D

denphone 10-08-2011 10:39

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
PM says water cannon available at 24 hours notice and also say that 'Some parts of society are not just broken, but sick' and on that point l agree with him.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...iots-live.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/20...-day-four-live

Russ 10-08-2011 10:43

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35285992)
Or more accurately:

If we're rightly not going to tar the whole UK with this brush let's not tar the whole of England with it. Let's hope these riots don't spread to other parts of the UK but let's not pretend that if we don't get to grips with what's happening in parts of England that it won't eventually do so.

To call them 'UK riots' is inaccurate - that would imply the trouble is happening in other countries within the UK. It is not. The riots are (so far) happening in England only. To try to go one further and say it should be referred to as "certain parts of England" is nit-picking in the extreme, it would be like objecting to initially calling them the 'London Riots' as they were only occuring in 'parts of London'.

Had these riots been taking place in Swansea, Cardiff and Wrexham only the press would be rightly referring to them as 'Welsh riots' or 'Riots in Wales'. All we ask for is a little consistency.

Derek 10-08-2011 11:26

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha222 (Post 35285529)
A 26-year-old man shot in a car during riots in Croydon has died in hospital

I get the feeling he would have been shot regardless of the recent events.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35285573)
'Mark Duggan did not open fire at Police'

that's the last thing we need to hear at the moment.

He still had a load, illegal firearm. AND he knew the Police were following him. If I knew I was being followed by a firearms unit then I'd make 110% sure I followed every instruction I was given to the letter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuftus (Post 35285853)
It lists the options open to the Police, tells us what a good idea they are and then tells us why we are too much of a pansie country to do it.

Baton rounds. Aiming point is near the belt buckle so a good chance a direct hit will stop the next generation of hooligans from being bred. :D :shocked:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35285955)
There has been no trouble anywhere in Wales, Scotland or N Ireland connected to it. These are indeed England's riots.

So far. A few people up here have been arrested for attempting to incite riots. A few have found out starting Facebook groups under your own name trying to incide violence is a poor idea. :)

Hom3r 10-08-2011 11:38

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286024)
Don't know about you but I don't want my high street all pink for weeks/months so why not use Smartwater to mark the villains instead? ;)

Perhaps the makers could rename their product 'idiotwater' just for the purpose... :D

It can be cleaned with the correct product, which the cops control.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 11:38

Re: Riots
 
My take on this is that this country will never be quite the same.
The hoodlums have discovered they have power in numbers, and they have the confidence to back it up.
Without a standing army policing each city, we're vulnerable - and they know it.

We've been hearing a lot of how bad the recent events are, but I see it from another perspective. I think it's good that the public are now aware of the situation in our society, in a time where we still have a functioning police service and infrastructure.

Could you imagine how bad it would be if the recent events hadn't occurred (and hence changes that inevitably will be made, not made) and we only discover this after a REAL disaster?

Such as, a mass epidemic or national food shortage. We would be queuing up for food/water/medicine alongside these hoodlums, and it wouldn't be the police dealing with them - it would be you and your families.

The recent events have highlighted a serious problem in a fashion that is clear for all to see, and hopefully the underlying causes will be dealt with.
If they aren't, then the problem will remain literally on our doorstep, just waiting.
Just like an opportunistic pathogen, the moment the immune system (security infrastructure) is stretched, the trap will be sprung.

Gary L 10-08-2011 12:03

Re: Riots
 
Well said Sparkle. a lot of sense spoken.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 12:08

Re: Riots
 
Also, what I find particularly worrying about this situation is that it's going to be near impossible to address.
The fundamental reason these people hate the police, is that most if not all have had run-ins with the police because its the job of the police to curb their criminal activities.

I've seen plenty of interviews with locals claiming that it's the police's fault for not listening to the local yoofs. I'd say the majority get "stop and searched" because the police have good reason to.

The only solutions I can see are as follows.
Lock'em all up.
pro- gets them off the street; contains the problem.
con- financially unworkable, and unless they're going to be permanently incarcerated, they'll just come out hardened criminals. Prison (in it's current form) isn't really a deterrent to these thugs.

Make prison a deterrent (or set up work camps)
pro- some reduction in crime
con- current human rights laws might be a problem. These thugs aren't intelligent enough to realise that they will eventually get caught.

Get them into work
pro- gives them something to lose
con- takes jobs away from those more deserving. Unlikely to successful as these people appear quite set in their ways.

I think this problem is a classic example of "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
I think "the ounce of prevention" would have been discipline and education at a young age. As the horse has already bolted so to speak, getting these people to rehabilitate might be an almost superhuman undertaking.

Even if water cannon and rubber bullets are employed, it still doesn't address the underlying core problems - which as mentioned above will remain until the security services are stretched, only to reappear.

---------- Post added at 13:08 ---------- Previous post was at 13:07 ----------

Thanks Gary !

danielf 10-08-2011 12:19

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286066)
My take on this is that this country will never be quite the same.
The hoodlums have discovered they have power in numbers, and they have the confidence to back it up.

Well, it's not as if there isn't a history of rioting in this country is there?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots

I counted about 30 in England in the 20th and 21st Century. That's an average of one nearly every 3 years.

Gary L 10-08-2011 12:30

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35286081)
Well, it's not as if there isn't a history of rioting in this country is there?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots

I counted about 30 in England in the 20th and 21st Century. That's an average of one nearly every 3 years.

It's not really the same though. this has gone on for days now. and it's extending to other parts. simply because they've seen that nothing's being done.

hang on. Dave has said that he's managed to obtain a water cannon!

MK1 10-08-2011 12:43

Re: Riots
 
I don't know if this has been posted. Please do not watch if likely to offend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gex_ya4-Oo

danielf 10-08-2011 12:50

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MK1 (Post 35286098)
I don't know if this has been posted. Please do not watch if likely to offend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gex_ya4-Oo

It's only been posted four times before now. You're the fifth :erm:

MK1 10-08-2011 12:52

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35286100)
It's only been posted four times before now. You're the fifth :erm:

I don't have a spare few hours to look at every post in this thread which is already 49 pages long. I looked at the previous 5 pages but then realised there's another 44 to go.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 12:54

Re: Riots
 
It'll be interesting to see how effective a watercannon will be. In order to be effective, several might be needed.
A watercannon has been shown to be effective where the protest is at a single, fixed location. However, these recent riots seem to be very mobile, and in various locations simultaneously with the rioters playing a cat and mouse game with the police.

With rioters making good use of the terrain (sidestreets to outflank police, etc), it might be difficult to pin them to one location to facilitate use of the watercannon.

Hugh 10-08-2011 13:02

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286086)
It's not really the same though. this has gone on for days now. and it's extending to other parts. simply because they've seen that nothing's being done.

hang on. Dave has said that he's managed to obtain a water cannon!

Nothing except

Metropolitan Police arresting 768 people
Manchester & Salford Police arresting 113 people
Liverpool Police arresting 50 people
Nottinghamshire Police arresting 90 people
West Midlands Police arresting 109 people
and an extra 10,000 Police on the streets of London

Gary L 10-08-2011 13:05

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35286104)
Nothing except

Metropolitan Police arresting 768 people
Manchester & Salford Police arresting 113 people
Liverpool Police arresting 50 people
Nottinghamshire Police arresting 90 people
West Midlands Police arresting 109 people
and an extra 10,000 Police on the streets of London

Yep. and in the meantime houses and shops are still being burned. people are being killed. and shops are being robbed.

Dave actually says in his stern voice "a water cannon at 24 hours notice" :LOL:

I like Dave. he's funny.

I popped into the bank earlier to deposit a cheque. the woman said I bet you're surprised we're empty. I told her has she looked outside lately, it's deserted.
people are too scared to go out. I need to let them know the water cannon is coming.

Hugh 10-08-2011 13:09

Re: Riots
 
I still don't see how you can state "nothing is being done" when there were over 1200 arrests and 10,000 extra police on the streets.

ymmv

Osem 10-08-2011 13:14

Re: England Riots August 2011 (Was London Riots)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35286029)
To call them 'UK riots' is inaccurate - that would imply the trouble is happening in other countries within the UK. It is not. The riots are (so far) happening in England only. To try to go one further and say it should be referred to as "certain parts of England" is nit-picking in the extreme, it would be like objecting to initially calling them the 'London Riots' as they were only occuring in 'parts of London'.

Had these riots been taking place in Swansea, Cardiff and Wrexham only the press would be rightly referring to them as 'Welsh riots' or 'Riots in Wales'. All we ask for is a little consistency.

Sorry, where did I say we, CF or the media should call them or this thread 'UK riots' or 'Parts of the UK riots'? :confused: I merely pointed out that they're so far restricted to parts of England and made the point that we shouldn't tar the whole of England with the same brush as the vast majority of it isn't suffering any riots. I also expressed a hope that they wouldn't affect other parts of the UK but pointed out they very well could do as the same conditions exist across the UK. If we're going to discuss how the media and others refer to these things well I reckon the BBC, as quoted by Hugh, got it spot on but of course different media will have different standards and agendas and use whatever terminology they choose to suit their purpose. I really don't see that as nitpicking or being pedantic.

Gary L 10-08-2011 13:16

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35286106)
I still don't see how you can state "nothing is being done" when there were over 1200 arrests and 10,000 extra police on the streets.

There could be a 1,000,000 police on the streets but.. ok you win. everything possible is being done.

---------- Post added at 14:16 ---------- Previous post was at 14:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286108)
Sorry, where did I say we should call them or this thread 'UK riots' or 'Parts of the UK riots'? I merely pointed out that they're so far restricted to parts of England but we shouldn't tar the whole of England with the same brush. I also expressed a hope that they wouldn't affect other parts of the UK but pointed out they very well could do as the same conditions exist across the UK. I don't see that as nitpicking or being pedantic.

I heard that somewhere in Wales is part of it now, but not confirmed.

Osem 10-08-2011 13:23

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286109)
I heard that somewhere in Wales is part of it now, but not confirmed.

If that's true then that's sad news.

Just found this:

Quote:

Extra police called in to quell disorder in Wales
http://www.newswales.co.uk/?section=...y&F=1&id=22093

Sounds like relatively minor stuff right now thankfully.

danielf 10-08-2011 13:31

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MK1 (Post 35286101)
I don't have a spare few hours to look at every post in this thread which is already 49 pages long. I looked at the previous 5 pages but then realised there's another 44 to go.

I know. It's a long thread. It was last posted on page 45 though (post 675 and onwards) ;)

Hugh 10-08-2011 13:34

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286109)
There could be a 1,000,000 police on the streets but.. ok you win. everything possible is being done.

---------- Post added at 14:16 ---------- Previous post was at 14:15 ----------



I heard that somewhere in Wales is part of it now, but not confirmed.

Once again, you deliberately distort what people state - I didn't say "everything possible was being done", you stated "nothing is being done" - BIG difference.

And once again, when facts are supplied, you immediately bring your old friends hyperbole and talking-bolleaux to the discussion.:dozey:

Sparkle 10-08-2011 13:35

Re: Riots
 
Fast forward to one minute innit.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today...00/9560646.stm

"I'll keep looting until I get caught."

Osem 10-08-2011 13:36

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35286121)
hyperbole and bolleaux

Ahhh.... the ingredients of many an animated after dinner discussion. :D

Gary L 10-08-2011 13:40

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35286121)
Once again, you deliberately distort what people state - I didn't say "everything possible was being done"

I know. it was me that said that.

Quote:

you stated "nothing is being done" - BIG difference.
I know. :confused:

Quote:

And once again, when facts are supplied, you immediately bring your old friends hyperbole and talking-bolleaux to the discussion.:dozey:
Bolleaux. :dozey:

Osem 10-08-2011 13:42

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286126)
Bolleaux. :dozey:

Yes it's French for rubbish (amongst other things).... :D

Mick 10-08-2011 13:50

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MK1 (Post 35286101)
I don't have a spare few hours to look at every post in this thread which is already 49 pages long. I looked at the previous 5 pages but then realised there's another 44 to go.

I don't get why people view threads with so few posts per page. You can set more posts per page via user cp>options. There is only 25 pages for me in this thread and I could set it so that is lower still, makes finding posts far more easier.

denphone 10-08-2011 13:50

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35286106)
I still don't see how you can state "nothing is being done" when there were over 1200 arrests and 10,000 extra police on the streets.

ymmv

Yes l agree with you that since the first 2 days things have been ratcheted up quite considerably by the authorities once they realised the seriousness of the developing situation.

Osem 10-08-2011 13:56

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35286129)
I don't get why people view threads with so few posts per page. You can set more posts per page via user cp>options. There is only 25 pages for me in this thread and I could set it so that is lower still, makes finding posts far more easier.

I'm one of those who obviously haven't exploited the full potential of the CP section so I'm off to do that now. TVM ;)

Gary L 10-08-2011 14:06

Re: Riots
 
Seeing as Dave is waiting till tomorrow when parliament sits around to give Dave some thoughts on what needs to be done. I thought as I've already predicted that someone would get killed through protecting themselves whilst waiting for Dave.

I'm going to predict that tonight maybe. one of these riot kids is going to be killed or seriously injured by a member of the public defending themselves.

thenry 10-08-2011 14:10

Re: Riots
 
Hes going to get grilled. His toyboy, side kick wont offer him too much support neither.

Sirius 10-08-2011 14:12

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286140)

I'm going to predict that tonight maybe. one of these riot kids is going to be killed or seriously injured by a member of the public defending themselves.

It will be entirely there own fault as well and i will not be shedding a tear for them but i will be congratulating the home owner
:tu:

Gary L 10-08-2011 14:15

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35286143)
Hes going to get grilled. His toyboy, side kick wont offer him too much support neither.

I feel sorry for Nick. nobody likes him much. he came to Birmingham the other day and he looked like he was sulking because he got boos.

I don't even know what he was doing whilst Dave was on holiday?

I think Dave will get grilled too. I reckon there's a lot of people wondering if he actually does need this Thursday for him to do his job as Prime Minister.

can he work or think alone?

it makes you wonder if he could actually cope in a real crisis.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 14:27

Re: Riots
 
Manchester police handing out justice to looters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1b74...embedded#at=70

thenry 10-08-2011 14:27

Re: Riots
 
His team will stand tall on dodgy foundation thats for sure, theres steps available for him to take so he isn't completely gagged.... YET!

Little Nikki on the other hand can regain a little respect if he put his foot down.

Russ 10-08-2011 14:35

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286114)
If that's true then that's sad news.

Just found this:



http://www.newswales.co.uk/?section=...y&F=1&id=22093

Sounds like relatively minor stuff right now thankfully.

Isolated disturbances, not believed to be connected to to the England riots.

The thread at one point was named 'UK Riots' - that was inaccurate. A number of the newspapers and at one point Sky News were referring to it at 'Riots in the UK".

When things kick off in Belfast it's "trouble in Northern Ireland". When it happens in England it gets referred to as 'UK Riots'.

Not the most significant factor in all this, just pointing out the usual inconsistencies.

Mick 10-08-2011 14:48

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MK1 (Post 35286098)
I don't know if this has been posted. Please do not watch if likely to offend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gex_ya4-Oo

Reporting on Sky News ticker that they have arrested someone who took part in that mugging. I hope justice is sweet.

Couple of reports suggest that earlier arrests this week, of some the culprits involved in Monday nights riots have been charged and refused bail and referred to the crown courts, sure looks like they are coming down heavy on these rioters. Time will tell.

thenry 10-08-2011 14:56

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35286172)
Reporting on Sky News ticker that they have arrested someone who took part in that mugging. I hope justice is sweet.

Couple of reports suggest that early arrests this week, of some the culprits involved in Monday nights riots have been charged and refused bail and referred to the crowm courts, sure looks like they are coming down heavy on these rioters. Time will tell.

British police at their best. Get in! That mugging is disgraceful.

Funny ain't it, most of us oppose the Governments handling of things as it is pretty drastic but this pretty much sums it all up. These rules have to be in place to go in hard against thieves, ****, fraudsters. We couldn't possibly go against it because this happens, no matter what **** always find a way to **** things up.

Osem 10-08-2011 14:57

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35286165)
Isolated disturbances, not believed to be connected to to the England riots.

The thread at one point was named 'UK Riots' - that was inaccurate. A number of the newspapers and at one point Sky News were referring to it at 'Riots in the UK".

When things kick off in Belfast it's "trouble in Northern Ireland". When it happens in England it gets referred to as 'UK Riots'.Not the most significant factor in all this, just pointing out the usual inconsistencies.

If that bothers you so much then your time might be better spent pointing out these inconsistencies to those actually responsible for them rather than individual posters making a wider point about the rioting.

Is anyone here suggesting we immediately launch an 'Isolated disturbances, not believed to be connected to the England riots' thread to cover what's happend in Wales?

Chris 10-08-2011 14:57

Re: Riots
 
Refusal of bail is a good step - it means the magistrates have guaranteed them time in the slammer, even if they are subsequently handed a slap-on-the-wrist sentence by a liberal-minded judge. Transferring them to the crown court also means the process takes longer, so more time locked up. Can't say I'm shedding too many tears over that right now.

Of course, certain crimes cannot be tried by a panel of magistrates even if they wanted to, so it may be that the charges are of a more serious nature.

Russ 10-08-2011 15:15

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286183)
If that bothers you so much then your time might be better spent pointing out these inconsistencies to those actually responsible for them rather than individual posters making a wider point about the rioting.

Is anyone here suggesting we immediately launch an 'Isolated disturbances, not believed to be connected to the England riots' thread to cover what's happend in Wales?

The problem with being on a discussion board is people *will* post opinions that mean little or nothing to you.

Sirius 10-08-2011 15:15

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286157)
Manchester police handing out justice to looters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1b74...embedded#at=70

Made my day :)

Osem 10-08-2011 15:18

Re: Riots
 
Some even become Moderators.... ;)

Sparkle 10-08-2011 15:22

Re: Riots
 
Just heard a senior policeman on LBC stating that watercannon are only effective against fixed mobs, not running battles....

Still, should be interesting to see how it works.

Gary L 10-08-2011 15:25

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286200)
Still, should be interesting to see how it works.

Well they can always use it to put fires out. just hope they remember to fill it up with water first.

the whole world will be in stitches otherwise :)

Sparkle 10-08-2011 15:27

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35286196)
Made my day :)

Yea, thought you'd enjoy that :)
I like how they didn't indiscriminately hit the bystander on his bike, they let him explain himself first. It looks like his story checked out.

Sirius 10-08-2011 15:29

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286200)
Just heard a senior policeman on LBC stating that watercannon are only effective against fixed mobs, not running battles....

Still, should be interesting to see how it works.

I have watched water cannon hitting a crowd, i have to admit it looks great and cheers you up when you have just been given grief for over an hour by the **** who are now getting a wash in freezing cold water.

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 15:30

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35286205)
I have watched water cannon hitting a crowd and have to admit it looks great and cheers you up when you have just been given grief for over an hour by the **** who are now getting a wash in freezing cold water.

They should put ice-cubes in the water cannon and then fire it as there would be no evidence? So there would be no need for plastic bullets?

Sparkle 10-08-2011 15:31

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286202)
Well they can always use it to put fires out. just hope they remember to fill it up with water first.

the whole world will be in stitches otherwise :)

That's a good point, if violence flares up like this again with so many fires - it's inevitable that will run out, sods law dicates that'll likely occur at the most inopportune moment, right when it's needed.

Osem 10-08-2011 15:33

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286200)
Just heard a senior policeman on LBC stating that watercannon are only effective against fixed mobs, not running battles....

Still, should be interesting to see how it works.

Big fires start out as little ones so if watercannon are in situ at least there's a chance that they can snuff out some of the minor ones before they gather magnitude.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 15:40

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286208)
Big fires start out as little ones so if watercannon are in situ at least there's a chance that they can snuff out some of the minor ones before they gather magnitude.

They should have had watercannon in every city for exactly that purpose, even if not allowed to use it on people. Just think how much property could've been saved with a little forward thinking.
Politicians, forward thinking? Pah.

Osem 10-08-2011 15:45

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286213)
They should have had watercannon in every city for exactly that purpose, even if not allowed to use it on people. Just think how much property could've been saved with a little forward thinking.
Politicians, forward thinking? Pah.

True. Short term budgets don't encourage long term thinking.

denphone 10-08-2011 15:49

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286219)
True. Short term budgets don't encourage long term thinking.

And l agree with that and it would be good if we could take the political short term aspect out of it and plan for things long term.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 15:49

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286206)
They should put ice-cubes in the water cannon and then fire it as there would be no evidence? So there would be no need for plastic bullets?

Or, capsicum oleoresin (cheaper) or capsaicin - essence of red peppers.
Entirely non-lethal, and the main ingredient in pepper spray.
I have a bottle of capsicum oleoresin in my cupboard (circa 5 million scoville heat units). Its the essential oil of peppers (steam distilled oil from dried chillis). A few spoonfulls of that in a spray bottle = instant pepper spray.

A litre bottle per water cannon tank ought to do the trick. :)

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 15:59

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286225)
Or, capsicum oleoresin (cheaper) or capsaicin - essence of red peppers.
Entirely non-lethal, and the main ingredient in pepper spray.
I have a bottle of capsicum oleoresin in my cupboard (circa 5 million scoville heat units). Its the essential oil of peppers (steam distilled oil from dried chillis). A few spoonfulls of that in a spray bottle = instant pepper spray.

A litre bottle per water cannon tank ought to do the trick. :)

A good idea, but I think that the ice-cubes would hurt and do more damage?

Sparkle 10-08-2011 16:05

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286236)
A good idea, but I think that the ice-cubes would hurt and do more damage?

Possibly, but between the ice-cubes jamming up the pump and the bleeding heart liberals, organically grown™ pepper extracted, biodegradable oleoresin might be a good bet too.

---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:03 ----------

Also, a blind mob running into lamp poles and other obstacles would do some extra damage too.
The footage would be priceless.

thenry 10-08-2011 16:10

Re: Riots
 
1 Attachment(s)
Be careful, those below will come after you like the A-Team :Peaceman::hyper:

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 16:10

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286239)
Possibly, but between the ice-cubes jamming up the pump and the bleeding heart liberals, organically grown™ pepper extracted, biodegradable oleoresin might be a good bet too.

---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:03 ----------

Also, a blind mob running into lamp poles and other obstacles would do some extra damage too.
The footage would be priceless.

Yes all very true and well said or you could just add caustic soda to it. The second part to it would be well welcome (you've been framed moments):D:D:D

Sparkle 10-08-2011 16:13

Re: Riots
 
Yes, caustic soda would do the trick too - but it'll cause permanent blindness, same with acid. The effects from pepper spray subside after 20 min or so, so noone gets permanently harmed.

Pierre 10-08-2011 16:14

Re: Riots
 
http://m.mirror.co.uk/article?a=m4:23334652

Teacher charged with looting.........

What else can you say?

denphone 10-08-2011 16:15

Re: Riots
 
Greater Manchester Police has arrested a man on suspicion of arson after a branch of Miss Selfridge was set alight yesterday

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/20...-day-four-live

Sparkle 10-08-2011 16:16

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35286247)
http://m.mirror.co.uk/article?a=m4:23334652

Teacher charged with looting.........

What else can you say?

Was he looting stationary materials? Cuts to the education budget would make for a good legal defense.

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 16:16

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35286247)
http://m.mirror.co.uk/article?a=m4:23334652

Teacher charged with looting.........

What else can you say?

I do not want to see what he is teaching the kids and also glad that my kids do not go to the school where he is/was (as he will not have a job after this)

Gary L 10-08-2011 16:17

Re: Riots
 
From what I'm reading there's going to be a lot of trouble in Bham tonight because of the killing of the 3 Asian guys. there's supposed to be a blackberry message going around about it.

Another **** caught on video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cbVW...layer_embedded

Hugh 10-08-2011 16:18

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35286247)
http://m.mirror.co.uk/article?a=m4:23334652

Teacher charged with looting.........

What else can you say?

Not sure if he's a teacher - it states he works full-time at a primary school......

Maggy 10-08-2011 16:19

Re: Riots
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14476828

Quote:

A Malaysian student who was filmed being mugged after rioters attacked him in London is recovering in hospital.
The attack in Barking on Mohd Asyraf Haziq, 20, on Monday night, made headlines after it was put on YouTube.

Osem 10-08-2011 16:21

Re: Riots
 
I have a much better idea - spray the blighters with Old Spice!

They'll stink for days and it'll destroy any street cred they may think they have... :D

gazzae 10-08-2011 16:21

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286251)
I do not want to see what he is teaching the kids and also glad that my kids do not go to the school where he is/was (as he will not have a job after this)

The word teacher isn't mentioned in that article. He could be a janitor or anything.

thenry 10-08-2011 16:21

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286253)

I shouldn't be laughing but :LOL: :sniper:

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 16:22

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286259)
I have a much better idea - spray the blighters with Old Spice!

They'll stink for days and it'll destroy any street cred they may think they have... :D

Lets hope that they are not old rioters as they may wear it normally:erm:

Taf 10-08-2011 16:22

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35286259)
I have a much better idea - spray the blighters with Old Spice!

They'll stink for days and it'll destroy any street cred they may think they have... :D


And it's flammable.....;)

Gary L 10-08-2011 16:24

Re: Riots
 
Clegg predicted there would be riots.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=YItK1izQIwo

Maggy 10-08-2011 16:27

Re: Riots
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14475741

Quote:

In the wake of the riots in English cities, law-abiding citizens have been picking up brooms and brushes and joining the clean-up. Is the broom the symbol of the resistance to the riots?
After the rioting every night this week, the news headlines told a bleak story of communities under attack. But hours later locals wearing wellies and washing up gloves were reclaiming the streets with brooms, bin bags and dustpans.
The fightback has been co-ordinated by the Twitter campaign #riotcleanup, launched by Dan Thompson and Sophie Collard, two strangers who were united by a shared sense of outrage at the scenes of devastation.
Quote:

When London Mayor Boris Johnson went to inspect the damage in Clapham Junction, the crowd chanted "where's your broom" and one was soon pushed into his hand.
He raised it aloft to cheers that seemed to recognise the new symbol of the fightback.
:)

Gary L 10-08-2011 16:27

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35286262)
I shouldn't be laughing but :LOL: :sniper:

You know when you shout and scream at the kid for hitting your bin with a stick?

well don't. it's so insignificant now :)

TheDaddy 10-08-2011 16:31

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35286253)
From what I'm reading there's going to be a lot of trouble in Bham tonight because of the killing of the 3 Asian guys. there's supposed to be a blackberry message going around about it.

There arranging the riots through blackberry messenger to, if only there was some sort of media outlet who could tap into those phones...

devilincarnate 10-08-2011 16:31

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae (Post 35286261)
The word teacher isn't mentioned in that article. He could be a janitor or anything.

He is a teaching assistant. As it said on the BBC news at 1 but can not find the info about him now.

http://community.tes.co.uk/forums/p/510657/6929259.aspx

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-23334652/

This is funny with him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPdQCuc7CZo

Gary L 10-08-2011 16:34

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286270)

You'd think the courts would sell papers with ready cut slit holes in them, wouldn't you.

Sparkle 10-08-2011 16:34

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by devilincarnate (Post 35286270)

Haha! Maybe he works at the "school of hard knocks"?

thenry 10-08-2011 16:35

Re: Riots
 
Watch this

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424

apologies if its been posted already.

denphone 10-08-2011 16:41

Re: Riots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35286266)

Its great to see the communities rise up and show how together they are.

---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparkle (Post 35286272)
Haha! Maybe he works at the "school of hard knocks"?

He would not know the school of hard knocks.

Hugh 10-08-2011 16:43

Re: Riots
 
Interesting comment from Salford - BBC
Quote:

1733: Officers from Salford City Council and its housing provider, Salix Homes, are reviewing CCTV images to see if they can help identify any of the offenders, with threats to evict tenants if they are found to have been involved. Council leader John Merry says people needed to understand their actions had consequences and "anyone who can do this to their own city is not welcome in Salford".


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum